article

Loose Coupling and Healthcare Organizations: Deployment Strategies for Groupware

Authors:

Carl GutwinAuthors Info & Claims

Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Volume 15, Issue 5-6

Pages 537 - 572

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-006-9031-2

Published: 01 December 2006 Publication History

Abstract

Healthcare organizations are often organized in a modular, loosely coupled fashion where separate and semi-autonomous work units specialize in different areas of care delivery. This partitioning allows each unit to adapt to emerging practice standards in its area of expertise and to adjust to its local work environment. However, organizational loose coupling can limit the flow of information within organizations and can make it difficult to coordinate services when patients' care is dependent on professionals from more than one unit. Groupware systems have the potential to improve coordination and information access in healthcare organizations. However, modularity and loose coupling make it difficult to introduce new systems when they span more than one unit, since authority is not always centralized and since perceptions and frames of reference on new deployments differ across units. In this paper, we define a groupware deployment framework for loosely coupled healthcare organizations that has two parts: a set of deployment challenges and a set of deployment strategies. The deployment challenges include: difficulties centralizing deployments, perceptions of inequity, role conflicts, and problems achieving critical mass. The deployment strategies outline a preliminary set of approaches for addressing the difficulties of deploying CSCW systems in loosely coupled healthcare organizations. We illustrate the framework by presenting a case study of a groupware deployment in a home care setting.

References

[1]

Acuff, R.D., L.M. Fagan, T.C. Rindfleisch, B.J. Levitt and P.M. Ford (1997): Lightweight, Mobile e-Mail for Intra-clinic Communication. In Proceedings AMIA Symposium 1997, AMIA, pp. 729-733.

[2]

Aldrich, H. (1979): Organizations and Environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

[3]

Ash, J. (1997): Organizational Factors that Influence Information Technology Diffusion in Academic Health Sciences Centers. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association , vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 102-109.

[4]

Ash, J.S. and D.W. Bates (2005): Factors and Forces Affecting EHR System Adoption: Report of a 2004 ACMI Discussion. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 8-12.

[5]

Bates, D.W., M. Ebell, E. Gotlieb, J. Zapp and H.C. Mullins (2003): A Proposal for Electronic Medical Records in U.S. Primary Care. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1-10.

[6]

Berg, M. (1999): Accumulating and Coordinating: Occasions for Information Technologies in Medical Work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 373-401.

Digital Library

[7]

Berg, M. (2001): Implementing Information Systems in Health Care Organizations: Myths and Challenges. International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 64, no. 2&3, pp. 143-156.

[8]

Bertrand, A.L. (1972): Social Organization: A General Systems and Role Theory Perspective. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis.

[9]

Brusoni, S. and A. Prencipe (2001): Managing Knowledge in Loosely Coupled Networks: Exploring the Links Between Product and Knowledge Dynamics. Journal of Management Studies, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 1019-1035.

[10]

Burns L.R., S.L. Walston, J.A. Alexander, H.S. Zuckerman, R.M. Andersen, P.R. Torrens and D. Hilberman (2001): Just How Integrated are Integrated Delivery Systems? Results from a national survey, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 20-39.

[11]

Davies, H.T.O., S.M. Nutley and R. Mannion (2000): Organisational Culture and Quality of Health Care. Quality in Health Care, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 111-119.

[12]

Dean, M. (1993): News: London Perspective: Unhealthy Computer Systems. The Lancet, vol. 341, 1269-1270.

[13]

Dick, R.S. and E.B. Steen (1991): The Computer-based Patient Record: An Essential Technology for Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

[14]

DiTomaso, N. (2001): The Loose Coupling of Jobs: The Subcontracting of Everyone?. In I. Berg and A.L. Kalleberg (eds.): Sourcebook of Labor Markets: Evolving Structures and Processes. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum, pp. 247-270.

[15]

Fitzpatrick, G. (2000): Understanding the Paper Health Record in Practice: Implications for EHR's. In Proc. Health Informatics Conference (HIC2000), Adelaide, Australia.

[16]

Glassman, R.B. (1973): Persistence and Loose Coupling in Living Systems. Behavioral Science, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 83-98.

[17]

Goldberg, J.L. (1998): CATCH: The Physician's Workstation for Supporting Cooperative Medicine. In Proceedings of IRMA International Conference 1998, pp. 301-312.

[18]

Gomez, E.J., F. Pozodel, E.J. Ortiz, N. Malpica and H. Rahms (1998): A Broadband Multimedia Collaborative System for Advanced Teleradiology and Medical Imaging Diagnosis. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 146-155.

Digital Library

[19]

Gomez, E.J., F. Pozodel, J.A. Quiles, M.T. Arredondo, H. Rahms, M. Sans and P. Cano (1996): A Telemedicine System for Remote Cooperative Medical Imaging Diagnosis. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, vol. 49, 37-48.

[20]

Greenbaum, J. and M. Kyng (1991): Design at work: cooperative design of computer systems. Hilldale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

[21]

Gremy, F., J.M. Fessler and M. Bonnin (1999): Information system evaluation and subjectivity. International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 56, no. 1-3, pp. 13-23.

[22]

Grudin, J. (2003): Leaders Leading? A Shift in Technology Adoption. In Proceedings CHI 2003. New York: ACM Press, pp. 930-931.

[23]

Grudin, J. (1994): Groupware and Social Dynamics: Eight Challenges for Developers. Communications of the ACM, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 92-105.

Digital Library

[24]

Handels, H., Ch. Busch, J. Encarnacao, Ch. Hahn, V. Kuhn, J. Miehe, S.I. Poppl, E. Rinast, Ch. RoBmanith, F. Seibert and A. Will (1997): KAMEDIN: A Telemedicine System for Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Remote Image Analysis in Radiology. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, vol. 52, 175-183.

[25]

Harrison, S. (1992): Just Managing: Power and Culture in the National Health Service. London: Macmillan.

[26]

Hasenfeld, Y. (1983): Human Service Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

[27]

Hodge, M.H. (1990): History of the TDS Medical Information System. In B.I. Blum and K. Duncan (eds.): A History of Medical Informatics. New York: ACM Press, pp. 328-356.

[28]

Horne, S. (1992): Organization and Change Within Educational Systems: Some Implications of a Loose-Coupled Model. Educational Management and Administration, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 88-98.

[29]

Jones, H. and P. Hinds (2002): Extreme Work Teams: Using SWAT Teams as a Model for Coordinating Distributed Robots. In Proceedings CSCW 2002, ACM Press, pp. 372-381.

[30]

Joshi, K. (1991): A Model of Users' Perspective on Change: The Case of Information Technology Implementation. MIS Quarterly, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 229-242.

Digital Library

[31]

Kindberg, T. and N. Bryan-Kinns, R. Makwana (1999): Supporting the Shared Care of Diabetic Patients. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGROUP 1999, ACM Press, pp. 91-100.

[32]

Kitchener, M. and L. Gask (2003): NPM Merger Mania: Lessons from an Early Case. Public Management Review, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 19-44.

[33]

Kouzes, J.M. and P.R. Mico (1979): Domain Theory: An Introduction to Organizational Behaviour in Human Service Organisations. Journal of Applied Behavioural Sciences, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 449-469.

[34]

Kuhn, K.A. and D.A. Giuse (2001): From Hospital Information Systems to Health Information Systems: Problems, Challenges, Perspectives. Methods of Information in Medicine, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 275-287.

[35]

Lauer, T.W., K. Joshi and T. Browdy (2000): Use of the Equity Implementation Model to Review Clinical System Implementation Efforts: A Case Report. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 91-102.

[36]

Lehoux, P., C. Sicotte and J. Denis (1999): Assessment of a Computerized Medical Record System: Disclosing Scripts of Use. Evaluation and Program Planning, vol. 22, 439-453.

[37]

Littlejohns, P., J.C. Wyatt and L. Garvican (2003): Evaluating Computerised Health Information Systems: Hard Lessons Still to be Learnt. British Medical Journal, vol. 326, 860-863.

[38]

Lorsch, J.W. (1973): An Open-System Theory Model for Organizational Research. In A.R. Negandhi (ed.): Modern Organizational Theory: Contextual, Environmental, and Sociocultural Variables. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press, pp. 132-144.

[39]

Makris, L., I. Kamilatos, E.V. Kopsacheilis and M.G. Strintzis (1998): Teleworks: A CSCW Application for Remote Medical Diagnosis Support and Teleconsultation. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 62-73.

Digital Library

[40]

Mark, G. and S. Poltrock (2001): Diffusion of a Collaborative Technology Across Distance. In Proceedings GROUP 2001. New York: ACM Press, pp. 232-241.

[41]

Massaro, T.A. (1993): Introducing Physician Order Entry at a Major Academic Medical Center: Impact on Organizational Culture and Behavior. Academic Medicine, vol. 68, 20-25.

[42]

May, C., R. Harrison, T. Finch, A. MacFarlane, F. Mair and P. Wallace (2003): Understanding the Normalization of Telemedicine Services through Qualitative Evaluation. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 596-604.

[43]

Meyer, J. and B. Rowan (1977): Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 340-363.

[44]

Moore, M.B. (1996): Acceptance of Information Technology by Health Care Professionals. In Proceedings of the symposium on Computers and the quality of life 1996, pp. 56-60.

[45]

Muller, M.J. (1991): PICTIVE - An Exploration in Participatory Design. In Proceedings CHI 1991, ACM Press, pp. 225-231.

[46]

Nielsen, J. (1994): Usability Engineering. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.

[47]

O'Connell, R.T., C. Cho, N. Shah, K. Brown and R.N. Shiffman (2004): Take Note(s): Differential EHR Satisfaction with Two Implementations under One Roof. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 43-49.

[48]

Orton, J.D. and K.E. Weick (1990): Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 203-223.

[49]

Perrow, C. (1999): Normal Accidents: Living with High-risk Technologies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

[50]

Pinelle, D. (2004): Improving groupware design for loosely coupled groups. PhD Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.

[51]

Pinelle, D. and C. Gutwin (2005): A Groupware Design Framework for Loosely Coupled Workgroups. In Proceedings of ECSCW 2005.

[52]

Pinelle, D. and C. Gutwin (2003): Designing for Loose Coupling in Mobile Groups. In Proceedings of GROUP 2003, ACM Press, pp. 75-84.

[53]

Sanchez, R. and J.T. Mahoney (1996): Modularity, Flexibility, and Knowledge Management in Product and Organization Design. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 17, 63-76.

[54]

Scheid-Cook, T.L. (1990): Ritual Conformity and Organizational Control: Loose Coupling or Professionalization?. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 183-199.

[55]

Schneider, K. and I. Wagner (1993): Constructing the 'Dossier Représentatif': Computer-based Information Sharing in French Hospitals. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 1, 229-253.

[56]

Schoop, M. (1999): An empirical study of multidisciplinary communication in healthcare using a language-action perspective. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on the Language Action Perspective on Communication Modelling (LAP 99), pp. 59-72.

[57]

Schoop, M. and D.G. Wastell (1999): Effective Multidisciplinary Communication in Healthcare: Cooperative Documentation Systems. Methods of Information in Medicine, vol. 38, no. 4&5, pp. 265-273.

[58]

Scott, W.R. (1987): Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. 2. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

[59]

Scott, W.R. (1985): Systems within systems: the mental health sector. American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 601-618.

[60]

Southon, F.C.G., C. Sauer and C.N.G. Dampney (1997): Information Technology in Complex Health Services: Organizational Impediments to Successful Technology Transfer and Diffusion. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 112-124.

[61]

Spender, J.C. and P.H. Grinyer (1995): Organizational Renewal: Top Management's Role in a Loosely Coupled System. Human Relations, vol. 48, 909-926.

[62]

Staber, U. and J. Sydow (2002): Organizational Adaptive Capacity - A Structuration Perspective. Journal of Management Inquiry, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 408-424.

[63]

Tamblyn, R., A. Huang, R. Perreault, A. Jacques, D. Roy, J. Hanley, P. McLeod and R. Laprise (2003): The Medical Office of the 21st Century (MOXXI): Effectiveness of Computerized Decision-making Support in Reducing Inappropriate Prescribing in Primary Care. Canadian Medical Association Journal, vol. 169, no. 6.

[64]

van Mulligen, E.M., M. Diwersy, M. Schmidt, H. Burrman and B. Mons (2000): Facilitating Networks of Information. In Proceedings AMIA Symposium 2000, AMIA, pp. 868-872.

[65]

Wagner, M.M., S.A. Eisenstadt, W.R. Hogan and M.C. Pankaskie (1998): Preferences of Interns and Residents for e-Mail, Paging, or Traditional Methods for the Delivery of Different Types of Clinical Information. In Proceedings AMIA Symposium 1998, AMIA, pp. 140-144.

[66]

Weick, K.E. (1976): Educational Organizations as Loosely-coupled Systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 21, 1-21.

[67]

Weick, K.E. (1980): Loosely Coupled Systems: Relaxed Meanings and Thick Interpretations. In Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, 1980.

[68]

Weick, K.E. (1982): Management of Organizational Change Among Loosely Coupled Elements. In P.S. Goodman (ed.): Change in Organizations: New Perspectives on Theory, Research, and Practice, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

[69]

Westbrook, J.I., J. Braithwaite, R. Iedema and E.W. Coiera (2004): Evaluating the Impact of Information Communication Technologies on Complex Organizational Systems: A Multi-Disciplinary, Multi-Method Framework. In Proceedings of MEDINFO 2004, pp. 1323-1327.

[70]

Williams, L.S. (1992): Microchips Versus Stethoscopes: Calgary Hospital MDs Face off Over Controversial Computer System. Canadian Medical Association Journal, vol. 147, 1534- 1547.

[71]

Wilson, T.D. (2001): Information Overload: Implications for Healthcare Services. Health Informatics Journal, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 112-117.

[72]

Wood, J. and D. Silver (1995): Joint Application Development. 2. New York: Wiley.

[73]

Worth, E.R. and T.B. Patrick (1997): Do Electronic Mail Discussion Lists Act as Virtual Colleagues? In Proceedings AMIA Symposium 1997, AMIA, pp. 325-329.

Cited By

Richards OChoi AMarcu G(2021)Shared Understanding in Care Coordination for Children's Behavioral HealthProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34490955:CSCW1(1-25)Online publication date: 22-Apr-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3449095
Boulus-RØdje N(2018)In Search for the Perfect PathwayComputer Supported Cooperative Work10.1007/s10606-018-9318-027:3-6(841-874)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10606-018-9318-0
Amir OGrosz BGajos K(2016)Mutual influence potential networksProceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence10.5555/3060621.3060732(796-803)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3060621.3060732
Show More Cited By

Loose Coupling and Healthcare Organizations: Deployment Strategies for Groupware

Recommendations

Institutional Contradictions and Loose Coupling: Postimplementation of NASA's Enterprise Information System

Through a grounded analysis of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA's) enterprise information system (IS) implementation in the months immediately following the go-live, we show how NASA can be characterized as an institutionally ...
Designing for loose coupling in mobile groups
GROUP '03: Proceedings of the 2003 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work

Loose coupling is a common way of organizing collaboration in work groups, but it has not been studied extensively in CSCW. In this paper, we consider the patterns of work that are seen in mobile groups that adopt a loosely coupled collaboration style. ...
Transforming Healthcare through Entrepreneurial Innovations: An Institutional View

Although digitalization has profoundly changed the business logic in many industries, the healthcare sector still operates in many areas as in the pre-digital era. During recent years, humans have witnessed the rise of new digital health ventures, many ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Computer Supported Cooperative Work

Computer Supported Cooperative Work Volume 15, Issue 5-6

December 2006

157 pages

ISSN:0925-9724

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © Copyright © 2007 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

Publisher

Kluwer Academic Publishers

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 December 2006

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

17
Total Citations
View Citations
0
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 20 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Richards OChoi AMarcu G(2021)Shared Understanding in Care Coordination for Children's Behavioral HealthProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34490955:CSCW1(1-25)Online publication date: 22-Apr-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3449095
Boulus-RØdje N(2018)In Search for the Perfect PathwayComputer Supported Cooperative Work10.1007/s10606-018-9318-027:3-6(841-874)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10606-018-9318-0
Amir OGrosz BGajos K(2016)Mutual influence potential networksProceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence10.5555/3060621.3060732(796-803)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3060621.3060732
Marcu GDey AKiesler SReddy MGergle DMorris MBjørn PKonstan J(2016)Time to reflectProceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing10.1145/2818048.2820079(954-964)Online publication date: 27-Feb-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2818048.2820079
Amir OGrosz BGajos KSwenson SSanders LBegole BKim JInkpen KWoo W(2015)From Care Plans to Care CoordinationProceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/2702123.2702320(1419-1428)Online publication date: 18-Apr-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2702123.2702320
Melotti MGomes RRaft VGerosa MConte TChaves de Castro TPrates RPitangueira Maciel R(2013)CReAMAProceedings of the X Brazilian Symposium in Collaborative Systems10.5555/2542508.2542514(24-31)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2013
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2542508.2542514
Janols R(2012)Time does not heal usability issues!Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference10.1145/2414536.2414582(273-280)Online publication date: 26-Nov-2012
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2414536.2414582
Russo AMecella Mde Leoni M(2012)ROME4EU – A service-oriented process-aware information system for mobile devicesSoftware—Practice & Experience10.1002/spe.113842:10(1275-1314)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2012
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1002/spe.1138
Vega DMedina EMesseguer RRoyo DFreitag F(2011)A node placement heuristic to encourage resource sharing in mobile computingProceedings of the 2011 international conference on Computational science and its applications - Volume Part III10.5555/2029312.2029354(540-555)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2011
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2029312.2029354
Handel MPoltrock SHinds PTang JWang JBardram JDucheneaut N(2011)Working around official applicationsProceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work10.1145/1958824.1958870(309-312)Online publication date: 19-Mar-2011
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1958824.1958870
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents