Teacher development in integrated STEM education: Design of lesson plans through the lens of computational thinking
Pages 3443 - 3474
Abstract
In recent years, the integration of STEM disciplines has been increasingly advocated. It is crucial to prepare and support teachers for integrated STEM education. However, few studies in the literature explore collaborating with teachers from different disciplines. This study investigates the effect of the professional development (PD) program designed for integrated STEM education on teachers' pedagogical design competencies and the contribution of the PD program to teachers' integrated STEM understanding. The pedagogical design competencies of the teachers were examined in terms of the level of conformity of the lesson plans they prepared based on the 5E learning model and how they unified the computational thinking components into STEM education. The program comprised 48 h and five modules. 20 computer science (CS), ten mathematics, and ten science teachers working in middle schools participated in the study. The study shows that the lesson plans developed collaboratively by the teachers were at an acceptable level in terms of integrated STEM education. However, lesson plans need to be improved. Regarding computational thinking, the teachers were more efficient in associating simulation in CS education, data analysis in mathematics education, and data collection in science education compared to other components. They were insufficient in associating components such as parallelization in CS education and automation in science and mathematics education. The teachers stated that PD program strengthens their collaboration with colleagues, contributes to pedagogical design skills in integrated STEM lesson planning and integrating STEM disciplines, and improves their understanding of integrated STEM.
References
[1]
Almeida F Strategies to perform a mixed methods study European Journal of Education Studies 2018 5 1 137-151
[2]
Baker CK and Galanti TM Integrating STEM in elementary classrooms using model-eliciting activities: Responsive professional development for mathematics coaches and teachers International Journal of STEM Education 2017 4 1 1-15
[3]
Balgopal MM STEM teacher agency: A case study of initiating and implementing curricular reform Science Education 2020 104 4 762-785
[4]
Barr V and Stephenson C Bringing computational thinking to K-12: What is Involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? Acm Inroads 2011 2 1 48-54
[5]
Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Dettori, G., Ferrari, A., & Engelhardt, K. (2016). Developing computational thinking in weaselly education-Implications for policy and practice (No. JRC104188). Joint Research Centre.
[6]
Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. A report prepared for the Office of Science Education, National Institutes of Health. BSCS.
[7]
Bybee, R. W. (2009). The BSCS 5E Instructional Model And 21st Century Skills. A Commissioned Paper Prepared For A Workshop On Exploring The Intersection Of Science Education And The Development Of 21st Century Skills. BSCS.
[8]
Cavallo A and Laubach T Students’ science perceptions and enrollment decisions in differing learning cycle classroom Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2001 38 9 1029-1062
[9]
Ceylan, S. & Ozdilek, Z (2015). Improving a sample lesson plan for secondary science courses within the STEM education. Global Conference on Contemporary Issues in Education GLOBE-EDU 2014, 12–14 July 2014, Las Vegas, USA.
[10]
Cheng, L., Antonenko, P. D., Ritzhaupt, A. D., Dawson, K., Miller, D., MacFadden, B. J., ... & Ziegler, M. (2020). Exploring the influence of teachers' beliefs and 3D printing integrated STEM instruction on students’ STEM motivation. Computers & Education, 158, 103983.
[11]
Çiftçi, A., Topçu, M. S., & Foulk, J. A. (2020). Pre-service early childhood teachers’ views on STEM education and their STEM teaching practices. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1-27.
[12]
Creswell JW and Clark VLP Designing and conducting mixed methods research 2011 Sage
[13]
Dare EA, Ellis JA, and Roehrig GH Understanding science teachers’ implementations of integrated STEM curricular units through a phenomenological multiple case study International Journal of STEM Education 2018 5 1 1-19
[14]
Dass P Teaching STEM effectively with the learning cycle approach K-12 STEM Education 2015 1 1 5-12
[15]
English LD STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration International Journal of STEM Education 2016 3 1 1-8
[16]
Estapa AT and Tank KM Supporting integrated STEM in the elementary classroom: A professional development approach centered on an engineering design challenge International Journal of STEM Education 2017 4 1 1-16
[17]
Falloon, G., Hatzigianni, M., Bower, M., Forbes, A., & Stevenson, M. (2020). Understanding K-12 STEM education: a framework for developing STEM literacy. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 1-17.
[18]
Gardner M and Tillotson JW Interpreting integrated STEM: Sustaining pedagogical innovation within a public middle school context International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 2019 17 7 1283-1300
[19]
Guzdial M Software-realized scaffolding to facilitate programming for science learning Interactive Learning Environments 1994 4 1 001-044
[20]
Herro D and Quigley C Exploring teachers’ perceptions of STEAM teaching through professional development: Implications for teacher educators Professional Development in Education 2017 43 3 416-438
[21]
Hudley AHC and Mallinson C “It’s worth our time”: A model of culturally and linguistically supportive professional development for K-12 STEM educators Cultural Studies of Science Education 2017 12 3 637-660
[22]
Israel M and Lash T From classroom lessons to exploratory learning progressions: Mathematics+ computational thinking Interactive Learning Environments 2020 28 3 362-382
[23]
Jaipal-Jamani K and Angeli C Effect of robotics on elementary preservice teachers’ self-efficacy, science learning, and computational thinking Journal of Science Education and Technology 2017 26 2 175-192
[24]
Johnson CC Conceptualizing integrated STEM education School Science and Mathematics 2013 113 8 367-368
[25]
Kalelioğlu F, Gülbahar Y, and Kukul V A framework for computational thinking based on a systematic research review Baltic Journal of Modern Computing 2016 4 3 583-596
[26]
Kalelioğlu, F. (2018). Characteristics of studies conducted on computational thinking: A content analysis. In Computational thinking in the STEM disciplines (pp. 11–29). Springer.
[27]
Kaniawati, D. S., Kaniawati, I., & Suwarma, I. R. (2017). Implementation of STEM education in learning cycle 5E to improve concept understanding on direct current concept. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education.
[28]
Kelley TR, Knowles JG, Holland JD, and Han J Increasing high school teachers self-efficacy for integrated STEM instruction through a collaborative community of practice International Journal of STEM Education 2020 7 1-13
[29]
Ketelhut DJ, Mills K, Hestness E, Cabrera L, Plane J, and McGinnis JR Teacher change following a professional development experience in integrating computational thinking into elementary science Journal of Science Education and Technology 2020 29 1 174-188
[30]
Kong SC, Lai M, and Sun D Teacher development in computational thinking: Design and learning outcomes of programming concepts, practices and pedagogy Computers & Education 2020 151 103872
[31]
Li, Y., Wang, K., Xiao, Y., Froyd, J. E., & Nite, S. B. (2020). Research and trends in STEM education: a systematic analysis of publicly funded projects. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1–17.
[32]
Lorsbach, A. W. (2006). The Learning Cycle as a Tool for Planning Science Instruction. Retrieved October 23, 2018 from https://www.msad54.org/sites/default/files/Learning-Cycle.pdf
[33]
Martín-Páez T, Aguilera D, Perales-Palacios FJ, and Vílchez-González JM What are we talking about when we talk about STEM education? A Review of Literature Science Education 2019 103 4 799-822
[34]
Mathematics and Science for Life [MASCIL]. (2013). Design a parking garage - Working as an architect: Parking in the basement. Retrieved July 11, 2018 from http://www.fisme.science.uu.nl/toepassingen/22015/
[35]
Miles MB and Huberman AM Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook 1994 2 Sage Publications
[36]
Miller J STEM education in the primary years to support mathematical thinking: Using coding to identify mathematical structures and patterns ZDM Mathematics Education 2019 51 6 915-927
[37]
Morrison, J., Frost, J., Gotch, C., McDuffie, A. R., Austin, B., & French, B. (2020). Teachers’ Role in Students’ Learning at a Project-Based STEM High School: Implications for Teacher Education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1-21.
[38]
Nadelson LS and Seifert AL Integrated STEM defined: Contexts, challenges, and the future 2017 Taylor & Francis
[39]
Ortiz-Revilla J, Adúriz-Bravo A, and Greca IM A framework for epistemological discussion on integrated STEM education Science & Education 2020 29 857-880
[40]
Patton MQ Qualitative research and evaluation methods 2002 3 Sage
[41]
Peel A, Sadler TD, and Friedrichsen P Learning natural selection through computational thinking: Unplugged design of algorithmic explanations Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2019 56 7 983-1007
[42]
Ring EA, Dare EA, Crotty EA, and Roehrig GH The evolution of teacher conceptions of STEM education throughout an intensive professional development experience Journal of Science Teacher Education 2017 28 5 444-467
[43]
Ryu M, Mentzer N, and Knobloch NPreservice teachers’ experiences of STEM integration: Challenges and implications for integrated STEM teacher preparationInternational Journal of Technology and Design Education2019293493-512https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10798-018-9440-9
[44]
Sanders M STEM, STEM education, STEMmania Technology Teacher 2009 68 4 20-26
[45]
Schallert, S., Lavicza, Z., & Vandervieren, E. (2020). Merging flipped classroom approaches with the 5E inquiry model: a design heuristic. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1-18.
[46]
Sengupta P, Kinnebrew JS, Basu S, Biswas G, and Clark D Integrating computational thinking with K-12 science education using agent-based computation: A theoretical framework Education and Information Technologies 2013 18 2 351-380
[47]
Shute VJ, Sun C, and Asbell-Clarke J Demystifying computational thinking Educational Research Review 2017 22 142-158
[48]
Song M Integrated STEM teaching competencies and performances as perceived by secondary teachers in South Korea International Journal of Comparative Education and Development 2020 22 2 131-146
[49]
Stohlmann M, Moore TJ, and Roehrig GH Considerations for teaching integrated STEM education Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER) 2012 2 1 4
[50]
Suwito, Budijanto, Handoyo B, and Susilo S The effects of 5E learning cycle assisted with spatial based population geography textbook on students’ achievement International Journal of Instruction 2020 13 1 315-324
[51]
Thibaut L, Knipprath H, Dehaene W, and Depaepe F Teachers’ attitudes toward teaching integrated STEM: The impact of personal background characteristics and school context International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 2019 17 5 987-1007
[52]
Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., De Loof, H., De Meester, J., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A., ... & Depaepe, F. (2018). Integrated STEM education: A systematic review of instructional practices in secondary education. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 2.
[53]
Trowbridge LW, Bybee RW, and Powell JC Teaching secondary school science: Strategies for developing scientific literacy 2004 8 Pearson Prentice Hall
[54]
Wang HH, Moore TJ, Roehrig GH, and Park MS STEM integration: Teacher perceptions and practice Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER) 2011 1 2 2
[55]
Weber RP Basic content analysis 1990 2 Sage
[56]
Wilson, S. M. (2011). Effective STEM teacher, preparation, and professional development. Paper presented at the workshop of the National Research Council’s Committee on Highly Successful Schools or Programs for K-12 STEM Education, Washington, DC.
[57]
Wing JM Computational thinking Communications of the ACM 2006 49 3 33-35
[58]
Yadav A, Hong H, and Stephenson C Computational thinking for all: Pedagogical approaches to embedding 21st century problem solving in K-12 classrooms TechTrends 2016 60 6 565-568
[59]
Yıldız, B. (2013). Etkili matematik öğretimi için BİT entegrasyonu model önerisi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Eğitimi Ana Bilim Dalı Doktora Tezi.
[60]
Zhou, D., Gomez, R., Wright, N., Rittenbruch, M., & Davis, J. (2020). A design-led conceptual framework for developing school integrated STEM programs: the Australian context. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1-29.
Index Terms
- Teacher development in integrated STEM education: Design of lesson plans through the lens of computational thinking
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Scaling up a teacher development programme for sustainable computational thinking education: TPACK surveys, concept tests and primary school visits
AbstractComputational thinking (CT) education in K-12 requires extensive teacher development. This research investigates the effectiveness of a scalable and sustainable teacher development programme in promoting CT in primary education. This ...
Highlights- We evaluate a teacher development programme involving 245 teachers from 47 schools.
Computational Thinking in Teacher Education
SIGCSE '20: Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science EducationTeacher education programs are beginning to acknowledge the important role they play in preparing teachers to support students in the area of STEM, coding, Computational Thinking and robotics. As a result, new courses are being developed that connect ...
Introducing Computational Thinking through Non-Programming Science Activities
SIGCSE '18: Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science EducationMany programs offer informal experiences in programming for select students who may qualify or whose parents pay fees for attending. Integrating computational thinking (CT) in the formal classroom setting provides equal opportunities to develop valuable ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Publisher
Kluwer Academic Publishers
United States
Publication History
Published: 23 September 2022
Accepted: 07 September 2022
Received: 10 September 2021
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Funding Sources
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 0Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 26 Jul 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
View options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in