Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Acceptance of and self-regulatory practices in online learning and their effects on the participation of Hong Kong secondary school students in online learning

Published: 27 December 2022 Publication History

Abstract

This study investigated how the acceptance and use of self-regulatory strategies in online learning affected Hong Kong secondary school students’ participation in online learning. A self-reported questionnaire was distributed to 1381 students from six secondary schools. Findings of the descriptive analysis indicated that students did not frequently use most types of online self-regulatory strategies. Although they agreed that the online learning methods were easy to use and facilitated learning, they did not actively participate in online learning activities and showed a low tendency to continuation. Further, structural equation modeling indicated that the effect of strategy use on actual participation was stronger than that of user acceptance. The former had a significant indirect effect on actual participation through the strong effect it had on user acceptance. Consequently, suggestions have been made for improving the instructional design of online learning and increasing students’ willingness and readiness to participate in online learning.

References

[1]
Aguilera-Hermida AP College students’ use and acceptance of emergency online learning due to COVID-19 International Journal of Educational Research Open 2020 1
[2]
Aguilera-Hermida AP, Quiroga-Garza A, Gómez-Mendoza S, Del Río Villanueva CA, Avolio Alecchi B, and Avci D Comparison of students’ use and acceptance of emergency online learning due to COVID-19 in the USA, Mexico, Peru, and Turkey Education and Information Technologies 2021 26 6 6823-6845
[3]
Akçayır G and Akçayır M The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges Computers & Education 2018 126 334-345
[4]
Anderton B Using the online course to promote self-regulated learning strategies in pre-service teachers Journal of Interactive Online Learning 2006 5 2 156-177
[5]
Azevedo R, Cromley JG, and Seibert D Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students’ ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? Contemporary Educational Psychology 2004 29 3 344-370
[6]
Barnard L, Lan WY, To YM, Paton VO, and Lai SL Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments The Internet and Higher Education 2009 12 1 1-6
[7]
Barnard, L., Paton, V., & Lan, W. (2008). Online self-regulatory learning behaviors as a mediator in the relationship between online course perceptions with achievement. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 9(2).
[8]
Bao W COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies 2020 2 2 113-115
[9]
Beetham H and Sharpe R Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age 2019 Routledge
[10]
Blizak D, Blizak S, Bouchenak O, and Yahiaoui K Students’ perceptions regarding the abrupt transition to online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: Case of faculty of chemistry and hydrocarbons at the University of Boumerdes—Algeria Journal of Chemical Education 2020 97 9 2466-2471
[11]
Blau I and Shamir-Inbal T Re-designed flipped learning model in an academic course: The role of co-creation and co-regulation Computers & Education 2017 115 69-81
[12]
Bol L and Garner JK Challenges in supporting self-regulation in distance education environments Journal of Computing in Higher Education 2011 23 2 104-123
[13]
Bond M Facilitating student engagement through the flipped classroom approach in K-12: A systematic review Computers & Education 2020 151
[14]
Broadbent J and Poon WL Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review The Internet and Higher Education 2015 27 1-13
[15]
Cheng G Exploring factors influencing the acceptance of visual programming environment among boys and girls in primary schools Computers in Human Behavior 2019 92 361-372
[16]
Costa C, Alvelos H, and Teixeira L Students’ acceptance of an educational videos platform: A study in a Portuguese University International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education 2018 14 1 86-102
[17]
Cranfield DJ, Tick A, Venter IM, Blignaut RJ, and Renaud K Higher education students’ perceptions of online learning during COVID-19: A comparative study Education Sciences 2021 11 8 403
[18]
Dignath C and Büttner G Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students: A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level Metacognition and Learning 2008 3 231-264
[19]
Dignath C and Büttner G Teachers’ direct and indirect promotion of self-regulated learning in primary and secondary school mathematics classes – insights from video-based classroom observations and teacher interviews Metacognition and Learning 2018 13 127-157
[20]
Davis FD Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology MIS Quarterly 1989 13 3 319-340
[21]
Edmunds R, Thorpe M, and Conole G Student attitudes towards and use of ICT in course study, work and social activity: A technology acceptance model approach British Journal of Educational Technology 2012 43 1 71-84
[22]
Estriegana R, Medina-Merodio J, and Barchino R Student acceptance of virtual laboratory and practical work: An extension of the technology acceptance model Computers & Education 2019 135 1-14
[23]
Guo J, King RB, Ding Q, and Fan MG Measuring and promoting self-regulation for equity and quality of online learning: New evidence from a multi-institutional survey during COVID-19 Education Sciences 2022 12 7 465
[24]
Ho, D. Y., Peng, S. Q., & Chan, F. S. (2001). An investigative research in teaching and learning in Chinese society. In C. Y. Chiu, F. Salili., & Y. Y. Hong (Eds.), Multiple competencies and self-regulated learning: Implications for multicultural education (Vol. 2, pp. 215–244). Information Age.
[25]
Ho ESC Characteristics of East Asian learners: What we learned from PISA Educational Research Journal 2009 24 2 327-348
[26]
Hong JC, Lee YF, and Ye JH Procrastination predicts online self-regulated learning and online learning ineffectiveness during the coronavirus lockdown Personality and Individual Differences 2021 174
[27]
Hu LT and Bentler PM Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 1999 6 1 1-55
[28]
Hsieh JSC, Huang YM, and Wu WCV Technological acceptance of LINE in flipped EFL oral training Computers in Human Behavior 2017 70 178-190
[29]
Jansen RS, van Leeuwen A, Janssen J, Conijn R, and Kester L Supporting learners' self-regulated learning in Massive Open Online Courses Computers & Education 2020 146
[30]
Johnson G and Davies S Self-regulated learning in digital environments: Theory, research, praxis British Journal of Research 2014 1 2 1-14 20.500.11937/45935
[31]
King WR and He J A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model Information & Management 2006 43 6 740-755
[32]
Kramarski B and Gutman M How can self-regulated learning be supported in mathematical E-learning environments? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 2006 22 1 24-33
[33]
Lai CL and Hwang GJ A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics course Computers & Education 2016 100 126-140
[34]
Lau, K. L. (2020). The effectiveness of self-regulated learning instruction on students’ classical Chinese reading comprehension and motivation. Reading and Writing, 33, 2001–2027.
[35]
Lau, K. L. (2022). Adaptation and validation of a Chinese online self-regulated learning questionnaire. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 40(3), 438–444.
[36]
Lau KL and Ho ESC Reading performance and self-regulated learning of Hong Kong students: What we learnt from PISA 2009 The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 2016 25 1 159-171
[37]
Lau, K. L., & Keung, H. M. (2021). Effectiveness and user acceptance of using out-of-class e-learning activities to support classical Chinese learning. Journal of Chinese Language Teaching, 18(3), 37–72.
[38]
Lee SWY and Tsai CC Students’ perceptions of collaboration, self-regulated learning, and information seeking in the context of internet-based learning and traditional learning Computers in Human Behavior 2011 27 2 905-914
[39]
Li G, Luo H, Lei J, Xu S, and Chen T Effects of first-time experiences and self-regulation on college students’ online learning motivation: Based on a national survey during COVID-19 Education Sciences 2022 12 4 245
[40]
Lin CH, Zhang Y, and Zheng B The roles of learning strategies and motivation in online language learning: A structural equation modeling analysis Computers & Education 2017 113 75-85
[41]
Marković, M., Pavlović, D., & Mamutović, A.(2021). Students’ experiences and acceptance of emergency online learning due to COVID-19. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(5), 1–16.
[42]
Moon J and Kim Y Extending the TAM for a world-wide-web context Information & Management 2001 38 4 217-230
[43]
Moos DC and Azevedo R Learning with computer-based learning environments: A literature review of computer self-efficacy Review of Educational Research 2009 79 2 576-600
[44]
Narciss S, Proske A, and Koerndle H Promoting self-regulated learning in web-based learning environments Computers in Human Behavior 2007 23 3 1126-1144
[45]
Ng EM Integrating self-regulation principles with flipped classroom pedagogy for first year university students Computers & Education 2018 126 65-74
[46]
Padilla-MeléNdez A, Del Aguila-Obra AR, and Garrido-Moreno A Perceived playfulness, gender differences and technology acceptance model in a blended learning scenario Computers & Education 2013 63 306-317
[47]
Park SY An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students' behavioral intention to use e-learning Educational Technology & Society 2009 12 3 150-162
[48]
Rasheed RA, Kamsin A, and Abdullah NA Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review Computers & Education 2020 144
[49]
Scherer R, Siddiq F, and Tondeur J The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education Computers & Education 2019 128 13-35
[50]
Schunk DH and Greene JA Schunk DH and Greene JA Historical, contemporary, and future perspectives on self-regulated learning and performance Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance 2018 2 Routledge 1-15
[51]
Sletten SR Investigating flipped learning: Student self-regulated learning, perceptions, and achievement in an introductory biology course Journal of Science Education and Technology 2017 26 3 347-358
[52]
Steffens K Technology enhanced learning environments for self-regulated learning: A framework for research Technology, Pedagogy and Education 2008 17 3 221-232
[53]
Sun Z, Xie K, and Anderman LH The role of self-regulated learning in students' success in flipped undergraduate math courses The Internet and Higher Education 2018 36 41-53
[54]
Teo T Students and teachers' intention to use technology: Assessing their measurement equivalence and structural invariance Journal of Educational Computing Research 2019 57 1 201-225
[55]
Tweed RG and Kegnab DK Learning considered within a cultural context: Confucian and Socratic approaches American Psychologist 2002 57 89-99
[56]
Venkatesh V and Davis FD A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies Management Science 2000 46 2 186-204
[57]
Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, and Davis FD User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view MIS Quarterly 2003 27 3 425-478
[58]
Wang TH Developing web-based assessment strategies for facilitating junior high school students to perform self-regulated learning in an e-learning environment Computers & Education 2011 57 2 1801-1812
[59]
Winters FI, Greene JA, and Costich CM Self-regulation of learning within computer-based learning environments: A critical analysis Educational Psychology Review 2008 20 4 429-444
[60]
Wong ALS What are the experts' views of barriers to e-learning diffusion in Hong Kong? International Journal of Continuing Education & Lifelong Learning 2015 7 2 25-51
[61]
Zacharis NZ Predicting college students’ acceptance of podcasting as a learning tool Interactive Technology and Smart Education 2012 9 3 171-183
[62]
Zimmerman BJ Boekaerts M, Pintrich P, and Zeidner M Attainment of self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective Handbook of self-regulation 2000 Academic Press 13-39

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Investigating effects of perceived technology-enhanced environment on self-regulated learningEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-023-12270-x29:1(161-183)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Education and Information Technologies
Education and Information Technologies  Volume 28, Issue 7
Jul 2023
1511 pages

Publisher

Kluwer Academic Publishers

United States

Publication History

Published: 27 December 2022
Accepted: 20 December 2022
Received: 01 August 2022

Author Tags

  1. Self-regulation in online learning
  2. Self-regulatory strategies
  3. Technology acceptance
  4. COVID-19 pandemic

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

  • Hong Kong Research Grants Council

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 16 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Investigating effects of perceived technology-enhanced environment on self-regulated learningEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-023-12270-x29:1(161-183)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media