Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Project scheduling in a lean environment to maximize value and minimize overruns

Published: 01 April 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Motivated by the recent trend in delivering projects with value or benefit to stakeholders and seeking to reduce the significant fraction of projects plagued by schedule and budget overruns, researchers are looking at lean project management (LPM) as a possible solution. This paper outlines a new approach to project scheduling in an LPM framework. We develop and solve a math program for balancing project time, cost, value, and risk, seeking to maximize the project value subject to schedule and budget constraints in multimode stochastic projects. Each activity mode contains fixed and resource cost information and duration data, and may be associated with one or more value attributes, thereby integrating project and product scope. By selecting a mode for each activity, the value of the project is determined, and stability is achieved by complying with on-schedule and on-budget probability thresholds. We solve the problem by applying a reinforcement learning-based heuristic, a tool known for obtaining fast solutions in a variety of applications in uncertain environments. We validate the method by comparing the results to two benchmarks—those obtained by solving a mixed-integer program, and the values obtained by adapting a recently published genetic algorithm. Our method generates competitive values faster than the benchmarks, making this approach interesting for the planning stage of a project, when multiple project tradespace alternatives are explored and solved, and runtime is limited. Our approach can be applied by decision-makers to calculate an efficient frontier with the best project plans for given on-schedule and on-budget probabilities.

References

[1]
Badewi A The impact of project management (PM) and benefits management (BM) practices on project success: Towards developing a project benefits governance framework International Journal of Project Management 2016 34 4 761-778
[2]
Balouka N, Cohen I, and Shtub A Extending the multimode resource-constrained project scheduling problem by including value considerations IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 2016 63 1 4-15
[3]
Bianco L, Caramia M, and Giordani S A chance constrained optimization approach for resource unconstrained project scheduling with uncertainty in activity execution intensity Computers and Industrial Engineering 2019 128 831-836
[4]
Briand C, Ngueveu SU, and Šůcha P Finding an optimal Nash equilibrium to the multi-agent project scheduling problem Journal of Scheduling 2017 20 5 475-491
[5]
Browning TR A quantitative framework for managing project value, risk, and opportunity IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 2014 61 4 583-598
[6]
Browning TR Planning, tracking, and reducing a complex project’s value at risk Project Management Journal 2019 50 1 71-85
[7]
Browning TR, Deyst JJ, Eppinger SD, and Whitney DE Adding value in product development by creating information and reducing risk IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 2002 49 4 443-458
[8]
Calafiore G and Campi MC Uncertain convex programs: Randomized solutions and confidence levels Mathematical Programming 2005 102 1 25-46
[9]
Chih YY and Zwikael O Project benefit management: A conceptual framework of target benefit formulation International Journal of Project Management 2015 33 2 352-362
[10]
Cohen I and Iluz M When cost–effective design strategies are not enough: Evidence from an experimental study on the role of redundant goals Omega 2015 56 99-111
[11]
Cohen I, Iluz M, and Shtub A A simulation-based approach in support of project management training for systems engineers Systems Engineering 2014 17 1 26-36
[12]
Cordeiro EC, Barbosa GF, and Trabasso LG A customized QFD (quality function deployment) applied to management of automation projects International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2016 87 5–8 2427-2436
[13]
Dinçer H, Yüksel S, and Martínez L Balanced scorecard-based analysis about European energy investment policies: A hybrid hesitant fuzzy decision-making approach with quality function deployment Expert Systems with Applications 2019 115 152-171
[14]
Holland, J. H. (1975). Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: An introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence. University of Michigan Press. http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=2&tid=8929. Accessed 3 November 2019.
[15]
Iluz M, Moser B, and Shtub A Shared awareness among project team members through role-based simulation during planning—A comparative study Procedia Computer Science 2015 44 295-304
[16]
Iluz, M., & Shtub, A. (2015). Simulation based planning of the fuzzy front end stage of a project. In Procedia CIRP (Vol. 36, pp. 106–110).
[17]
Invernizzi DC, Locatelli G, Grönqvist M, and Brookes NJ Applying value management when it seems that there is no value to be managed: The case of nuclear decommissioning International Journal of Project Management 2019 37 5 668-683
[18]
Kolisch R Project scheduling under resource constraints 1995 Heidelberg Physica-Verlag
[19]
Kolisch R and Sprecher A PSPLIB—A project scheduling problem library European Journal of Operational Research 1997 96 1 205-216
[20]
Laursen M Project networks as constellations for value creation Project Management Journal 2018 49 2 56-70
[21]
Lee J-K and Kim Y-D Search heuristics for resource constrained project scheduling Journal of the Operational Research Society 1996 47 678-689
[22]
Li H and Demeulemeester E A genetic algorithm for the robust resource leveling problem Journal of Scheduling 2016 19 1 43-60
[23]
Liu A, Hu H, Zhang X, and Lei D Novel two-phase approach for process optimization of customer collaborative design based on fuzzy-QFD and DSM IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 2017 64 2 193-207
[24]
Lo SM, Shen H-P, and Chen JC An integrated approach to project management using the Kano model and QFD: An empirical case study Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 2016 28 13–14 1-25
[25]
Ma Z, Demeulemeester E, He Z, and Wang N A computational experiment to explore better robustness measures for project scheduling under two types of uncertain environments Computers and Industrial Engineering 2019 131 382-390
[26]
Masin M, Dubinsky Y, Iluz M, Shindin E, and Shtub A Auvray G, Bocquet J-C, Bonjour E, and Krob D EMI: Engineering and management integrator Complex systems design and management 2016 Springer International Publishing 143-155
[27]
Mishra A, Sinha KK, and Thirumalai S Project quality: The Achilles heel of offshore technology projects? IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 2017 64 3 272-286
[28]
Musawir A, Serra CEM, Zwikael O, and Ali I Project governance, benefit management, and project success: Towards a framework for supporting organizational strategy implementation International Journal of Project Management 2017 35 8 1658-1672
[29]
Oehmen (Ed.), J. (2012). The guide to lean enablers for managing engineering programs. Joint MIT-PMI-INCOSE Community of Practice on Lean in Program Management. https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/70495/oehmenetal2012-theguidetoleanenablersformanagingengineeringprograms.pdf?sequence=4. Accessed 19 June 2019.
[30]
Rezaei F, Najafi AA, and Ramezanian R Mean-conditional value at risk model for the stochastic project scheduling problem Computers and Industrial Engineering 2020
[31]
Sarin RK Gass SI and Fu MC Multi-attribute utility theory Encyclopedia of operations research and management science 2013 Springer 1004-1006
[32]
Serra CEM and Kunc M Benefits realisation management and its influence on project success and on the execution of business strategies International Journal of Project Management 2015 33 1 53-66
[33]
Shtub A, Iluz M, Gersing K, Oehmen J, and Dubinsky Y Implementation of lean engineering practices in projects and programs through simulation based training PM World Journal 2014 3 3 1-13
[34]
Sierksma G and Zwols Y Linear and integer optimization 2015 3 Chapman and Hall/CRC
[35]
Skolnik, M. I. (1970). Radar handbook. McGraw-Hill. https://trid.trb.org/view/49654. Accessed 11 June 2019
[36]
Sutton RS and Barto AG Reinforcement learning: An introduction 2018 2 The MIT Press
[37]
Tantisuvanichkul V Optimizing net present value using priority rule-based scheduling 2014 The University of Manchester
[38]
The Standish Group. (2015). CHAOS report 2015 edition. https://www.standishgroup.com/sample_research_files/CHAOSReport2015-Final.pdf. Accessed 17 April 2019.
[39]
Van De Vonder S, Demeulemeester E, Herroelen W, and Leus R The trade-off between stability and makespan in resource-constrained project scheduling International Journal of Production Research 2006 44 2 215-236
[40]
Van Peteghem V and Vanhoucke M An experimental investigation of metaheuristics for the multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem on new dataset instances European Journal of Operational Research 2014 235 1 62-72
[41]
Vanhoucke M and Coelho J A tool to test and validate algorithms for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem Computers and Industrial Engineering 2018 118 251-265
[42]
Xiong J, Liu J, Chen Y, and Abbass HA A knowledge-based evolutionary multiobjective approach for stochastic extended resource investment project scheduling problems IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 2014 18 5 742-763
[43]
Zwikael O, Chih Y-Y, and Meredith JR Project benefit management: Setting effective target benefits International Journal of Project Management 2018 36 4 650-658

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Journal of Scheduling
Journal of Scheduling  Volume 25, Issue 2
Apr 2022
117 pages

Publisher

Kluwer Academic Publishers

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 April 2022
Accepted: 15 February 2022

Author Tags

  1. Project scheduling
  2. Lean project management
  3. Multimode project scheduling
  4. Stability and robustness in project scheduling
  5. Project value

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

  • EIT Food, the innovation community on Food of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT), a body of the EU under the Horizon 2020, the EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation
  • Bernard M. Gordon Center for Systems Engineering at the Technion

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 0
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 26 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media