article

Network neutrality debate and ISP inter-relations: traffic exchange, revenue sharing, and disconnection threat

Authors:

Pierre Coucheney,

Patrick Maillé,

Bruno TuffinAuthors Info & Claims

Netnomics, Volume 15, Issue 3

Pages 155 - 182

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11066-014-9090-3

Published: 01 November 2014 Publication History

Abstract

The network neutrality debate originally stems from the growing traffic asymmetry between ISPs, questioning the established peering or transit agreements. That tendency is due to popular content providers connected to the network through a single ISP whose traffic is not charged by distant ISPs. We propose in this paper to review the economic transit agreements between ISPs in order to determine their best strategy. We define a model with two ISPs, each providing direct connectivity to a fixed proportion of the content and competing in terms of price for end users, who select their ISP based on the price per unit of available content. We analyze and compare thanks to game-theoretic tools three different situations: the case of peering between the ISPs, the case where ISPs do not share their traffic (exclusivity arrangements), and the case where they fix a transfer price per unit of volume. Our results suggest that a minimal regulation, consisting in letting ISPs choose transit prices but imposing peering in case no agreement is reached, leads to satisfying outcomes in terms of user welfare while still leaving some decision space to ISPs, hence answering a concern they have regarding regulation in the Internet market.

References

[1]

Altman, E., Bernhard, P., Caron, S., Kesidis, G., Rojas-Mora, J., Wong, S. (2010). A study of non-neutral networks with usage-based prices. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ETM Workshop. Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

[2]

Altman, E., Legout, A., Xu, Y. (2011). Network non-neutrality debate: An economic analysis. In: Proceedings of Networking 2011 (Vol. 6641, pp. 68---81). LNCS. Barcelona: Springer Verlag.

[3]

Armstrong, M. (2006). Competition in two-sided markets. Rand Journal of Economics, 37(3), 668---691.

[4]

Ben-Akiva, M., & Lerman, S. (1985). Discrete choice analysis. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

[5]

Berge, C. (1959). Espaces topologiques. Fonctions multivoques, Collection Universitaire de Mathématiques, vol. III. Dunod, Paris.

[6]

Besen, S., Milgrom, P., Mitchell, B.P.S. (2001). Advances in routing technologies and internet peering agreements. American Economic Review, 91(2), 292---296.

[7]

Bourreau, M., Kourandi, F., Valletti, T. (2014). Net neutrality with competing internet platforms. (Vol. 12, No. 307, p. 3). CEIS Research Paper Series.

[8]

Boussion, F., Maillé, P., Tuffin, B. (2012). Net neutrality debate: Impact of competition among ISPs. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on COMmunication Systems and NETworkS (COMSNETS). Bangalore, India.

[9]

Choi, J., Jeon, D.S., Kim, B.C. Net neutrality, business models, and internet interconnection. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics. (Forthcoming).

[10]

Cowley, S. (2005). ISP spat blacks out net connections. InfoWorld, http://www.infoworld.com/t/networking/isp-spat-blacks-out-net-connections-492.

[11]

Economides, N., & Tåg, J. (2012). Net neutrality on the internet: A two-sided market analysis. Information Economics and Policy, 24(2), 91---104.

[12]

Federal Communications Commission (2010). Order in the matter of preserving the open internet, broadband industry practices. Tech. rep., FCC.

[13]

Foros, O., & Hansen, B. (2001). Competition and compatibility among internet service providers. Information Economics and Policy, 13(4), 411---425.

[14]

Kourandi, F., Krämer, J., Valletti, T. (2013). Net neutrality, exclusivity contracts and internet fragmentation. mimeo.

[15]

Krämer, J., Wierwiorra, L., Weinhardt, C. (2013). Net neutrality: a progress report. Telecommunications Policy, 37(9), 794---813.

Digital Library

[16]

Laffont, J.J., Marcus, S., Rey, P., Tirole, J. (2003). Network competition: I. overview and nondiscriminatory pricing. The RAND Journal of Economics, 34(2), 370---390.

[17]

Laffont, J.J., Rey, P., Tirole, J. (1998). Internet interconnection and the off-net-cost pricing principle. The RAND Journal of Economics, 29(1), 1---37.

[18]

Lemley, M., & Lessig, L. (2001). The end of end-to-end: preserving the architecture of the internet in the broadband era. 48 UCLA Law Review, 4.

[19]

Lenard, T., & May, R.E. (2006). Net neutrality or net neutering: should broadband internet services be regulated: Springer Verlag.

[20]

Ma, R., Chiu, D.M., Lui, J., Misra, V., Rubenstein, D. (2008). Interconnecting eyeballs to content: A Shapley value perspective on ISP peering and settlement. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Economics of Networked Systems (NetEcon) (pp. 61---66).

[21]

Ma, R., Chiu, D.M., Lui, J., Misra, V., Rubenstein, D. (2008). On cooperative settlement between content, transit and eyeball internet service providers. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Emerging Networking EXperiments and Technologies (CoNEXT).

[22]

Maillé, P., & Tuffin, B. (2014). Telecommunication network economics: from theory to applications. Cambridge University Press.

[23]

Musacchio, J., Schwartz, G., Walrand, J. (2009). A two-sided market analysis of provider investment incentives with an application to the net-neutrality issue. Review of Network Economics, 8(1), 22---39.

[24]

Nash, J. (1953). Two-person cooperative games. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 128---140.

[25]

Njoroge, P., Ozdaglar, A., Stier-Moses, N., Weintraub, G. (2013). Investment in two sided markets and the net neutrality debate. Review of Network Economics, 12(4), 355---402.

[26]

Osborne, M., & Rubinstein, A. (1994). A course in game theory. MIT Press.

[27]

Reichl, P., Schatz, R., Tuffin, B. (2013). Logarithmic laws in service quality perception : where microeconomics meets psychophysics and quality of experience. Telecommunication Systems, 52(2), 587---600.

Digital Library

[28]

Rochet, J.C., & Tirole, J. (2006). Two-sided markets: a progress report. Rand Journal of Economics, 37(3), 645---667.

[29]

Saavedra, C. (2009). Bargaining power and the net neutrality debate. sites.google.com/site/claudiasaavedra/attachments/bargaining_power.pdf.

[30]

Swanson, B. (2014). How the net works: a brief history of internet interconnection. Entropy Economics.

[31]

Wong, S., J., R.M., Altman, E. (2010). Public consultations on Net Neutrality 2010: USA, EU and France. Tech. rep., SSRN. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1684086.

Cited By

Hanafizadeh PHatami PAnaloui MAlbadvi A(2021)Business model innovation driven by the internet of things technology, in internet service providers’ business contextInformation Systems and e-Business Management10.1007/s10257-021-00537-019:4(1175-1243)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10257-021-00537-0
Muttitanon WSamanchuen T(2020)Internet Cost Reduction Using Internet Exchange Point: A Case Study of Internet Network of ThailandWireless Personal Communications: An International Journal10.1007/s11277-020-07198-1115:4(3177-3198)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s11277-020-07198-1
Kieffer AMaillé PTuffin B(2020)Non-neutrality with Users Deciding Differentiation: A Satisfying Option?Modelling, Analysis, and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems10.1007/978-3-030-68110-4_8(119-128)Online publication date: 17-Nov-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-030-68110-4_8
Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Inefficiency in provisioning interconnected communication networks
EC '05: Proceedings of the 6th ACM conference on Electronic commerce

We model the Internet as a collection of Internet Service Providers (ISPs) that transit and peer to meet an exogenous demand for the transport of IP traffic among an arbitrary set of cities. The prices of bandwidth and of transit are also exogenous. ...
A game-theoretic analysis of the implications of overlay network traffic on ISP peering

Inter-ISP traffic flow determines the settlement between ISPs and affects the perceived performance of ISP services. In today's Internet, the inter-ISP traffic flow patterns are controlled not only by ISPs' policy-based routing configuration and traffic ...
Network non-neutrality debate: an economic analysis
NETWORKING'11: Proceedings of the 10th international IFIP TC 6 conference on Networking - Volume Part II

This paper studies economic utilities and quality of service (QoS) in a two-sided non-neutral market where Internet service providers (ISPs) charge content providers (CPs) for the content delivery. We propose new models that involve a CP, an ISP, end ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Netnomics

Netnomics Volume 15, Issue 3

November 2014

92 pages

ISSN:1385-9587

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © Copyright © 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York.

Publisher

Kluwer Academic Publishers

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 November 2014

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

7
Total Citations
View Citations
0
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 17 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Hanafizadeh PHatami PAnaloui MAlbadvi A(2021)Business model innovation driven by the internet of things technology, in internet service providers’ business contextInformation Systems and e-Business Management10.1007/s10257-021-00537-019:4(1175-1243)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10257-021-00537-0
Muttitanon WSamanchuen T(2020)Internet Cost Reduction Using Internet Exchange Point: A Case Study of Internet Network of ThailandWireless Personal Communications: An International Journal10.1007/s11277-020-07198-1115:4(3177-3198)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s11277-020-07198-1
Kieffer AMaillé PTuffin B(2020)Non-neutrality with Users Deciding Differentiation: A Satisfying Option?Modelling, Analysis, and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems10.1007/978-3-030-68110-4_8(119-128)Online publication date: 17-Nov-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-030-68110-4_8
Hanafizadeh PHatami PBohlin E(2019)Business models of Internet service providersNetnomics10.1007/s11066-019-09130-720:1(55-99)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s11066-019-09130-7
Easley RGuo HKrämer J(2018)Research Commentary-From Net Neutrality to Data NeutralityInformation Systems Research10.1287/isre.2017.074029:2(253-272)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1287/isre.2017.0740
Gourdin EMaille PSimon GTuffin B(2017)The Economics of CDNs and Their Impact on Service FairnessIEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management10.1109/TNSM.2017.264904514:1(22-33)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TNSM.2017.2649045
Maillé PTuffin B(2015)Impact of Content Delivery Networks on Service and Content InnovationACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review10.1145/2847220.284723643:3(49-52)Online publication date: 19-Nov-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2847220.2847236

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents