Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

An efficient 2-tuple linguistic cubic q-rung orthopair fuzzy CILOS-TOPSIS method: evaluating the hydrological geographical regions for watershed management in Pakistan

Published: 30 October 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Watershed factors often have overlapping influences. Group decision-making helps account for these ambiguities for better management strategies. To address this issue, the goal of this study is to provide a creative and unique tool known as a 2-tuple linguistic cubic q-rung orthopair fuzzy set (2TLCuq-ROFS) model. For dealing with uncertain and ambiguous information in multi-attribute group decision-making problems, the 2TLCuq-ROF framework is more efficient and superior to other fuzzy sets. The fundamental concept of 2TLCuq-ROFS is reviewed first, followed by the distance formula and operational rules of 2TLCuq-ROF numbers. We propose four novel weighted aggregation operators utilizing 2TLCuq-ROFNs in order to efficiently aggregate the values to investigate a group decision-making problems. Furthermore, the proposed operators combined with the power averaging (PA) operator to establish an extension of the technique for order of preference by similarity to the ideal solution (TOPSIS) method in the 2TLCuq-ROF environment to show the optimal altenative. After that, a multi-attribute group decision-making approach is proposed to resolve a decision-making problem related to watersheds’ hydrological geographical areas, which is the main contribution of this research. The criterion impact loss (CILOS) method is used to determine the weight information of attributes under the 2TLCuq-ROF environment. In this proposed methodology, we incorporate the independent decisions of all experts on the capabilities of alternatives in accordance with their attributes and then rank the alternatives. In addition, we perform the sensitivity and comparative analyses to explain the efficacy of the proposed methodology and the consistency of the results.

References

[1]
Schellnhuber HJ ‘Earth system’ analysis and the second Copernican revolution Nature 1999 402 6761 C19-C23
[2]
Cheng G and Li X Integrated research methods in watershed science Sci China Earth Sci 2015 58 7 1159-1168
[3]
Cheng G, Li X, Zhao W, Xu Z, Feng Q, Xiao S, and Xiao H Integrated study of the water-ecosystem-economy in the Heihe river basin Natl Sci Rev 2014 1 3 413-428
[4]
Gassman PW, Reyes MR, Green CH, and Arnold JG The soil and water assessment tool: historical development, applications, and future research directions Trans ASABE 2007 50 4 1211-1250
[5]
Markstrom SL, Niswonger RG, Regan RS, Prudic DE, and Barlow PM GSFLOW-coupled ground-water and surface-water flow model based on the integration of the precipitation-runoff modeling system (PRMS) and the modular ground-water flow model (MODFLOW-2005) US Geol Surv Tech Methods 2008 6 240
[6]
Kollet SJ and Maxwell RM Integrated surface-groundwater flow modeling: a free-surface overland flow boundary condition in a parallel groundwater flow model Adv Water Resour 2006 29 7 945-958
[7]
Brunner P and Simmons CT HydroGeoSphere: a fully integrated, physically based hydrological model Ground Water 2012 50 2 170-176
[8]
Yager RR Generalized orthopair fuzzy sets IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 2016 25 5 1222-1230
[9]
Atanassov KT and Atanassov KT Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. In intuitionistic fuzzy sets Stud Fuzziness Soft Comput 1999 35 139-177
[10]
Peng X and Yang Y Fundamental properties of interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators Int J Intell Syst 2016 31 5 444-487
[11]
Garg H A novel accuracy function under interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy environment for solving multi-criteria decision-making problem J Intell Fuzzy Syst 2016 31 1 529-540
[12]
Joshi BP, Singh A, Bhatt PK, and Vaisla KS Interval valued q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets and their properties J Intell Fuzzy Syst 2018 35 5 5225-5230
[13]
Yang Y, Chen ZS, Rodrez RM, Pedrycz W, and Chin KS Novel fusion strategies for continuous interval-valued q-rung orthopair fuzzy information: a case study in quality assessment of smart watch appearance design Int J Mach Learn Cybern 2022 13 3 609-632
[14]
Jun YB, Kim CS, and Yang KO Cubic sets Ann Fuzzy Math Inf 2012 4 1 83-98
[15]
Kaur G and Garg H Multi-attribute decision-making based on Bonferroni mean operators under cubic intuitionistic fuzzy set environment Entropy 2018 20 1 65
[16]
Khan F, Khan MSA, Shahzad M, and Abdullah S Pythagorean cubic fuzzy aggregation operators and their application to multi-criteria decision making problems J Intell Fuzzy Syst 2019 36 1 595-607
[17]
Wang J, Shang X, Bai K, and Xu Y A new approach to cubic q-rung orthopair fuzzy multiple attribute group decision-making based on power Muirhead mean Neural Comput Appl 2020 32 17 14087-14112
[18]
Yu Q, Cao J, Tan L, Liao Y, and Liu J Multiple attribute decision-making based on Maclaurin symmetric mean operators on q-rung orthopair cubic fuzzy sets Soft Comput 2022 26 19 9953-9977
[19]
Garg H, Mahmood T, Ahmmad J, Khan Q, and Ali Z Cubic q-rung orthopair fuzzy linguistic set and their application to multi-attribute decision-making with Muirhead mean operator J Artif Intell Technol 2021 1 1 37-50
[20]
Ying C, Slamu W, and Ying C Cubic q-rung orthopair hesitant exponential similarity measures for the initial diagnosis of depression grades Symmetry 2022 14 4 670
[21]
Zadeh LA The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I Inf Sci 1975 8 3 199-249
[22]
Khan MSA, Jana C, Khan MT, Mahmood W, Pal M, and Mashwani WK Extension of GRA method for multi-attribute group decision-making problem under linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy setting with incomplete weight information Int J Intell Syst 2022 37 11 9726-9749
[23]
Herrera F and Martinez L A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 2000 8 6 746-752
[24]
Herrera F and Martinez L An approach for combining linguistic and numerical information based on the 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model in decision-making Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl Based Syst 2000 8 05 539-562
[25]
Akram M, Naz S, Edalatpanah SA, and Samreen S A hybrid decision-making framework under 2-tuple linguistic complex q-rung orthopair fuzzy Hamy mean aggregation operators Comput Appl Math 2023 42 3 118
[26]
Naz S, Akram M, Shafiq A, and Akhtar K Optimal airport selection utilizing power Muirhead mean based group decision model with 2-tuple linguistic q-rung orthopair fuzzy information Int J Mach Learn Cybern 2024 15 2 303-340
[27]
Naz S, Akram M, Al-Shamiri MMA, Khalaf MM, and Yousaf G A new MAGDM method with 2-tuple linguistic bipolar fuzzy Heronian mean operators Math Biosci Eng 2022 19 3843-3878
[28]
Naz S, Akram M, and Muzammal M Group decision-making based on 2-tuple linguistic T-spherical fuzzy COPRAS method Soft Comput 2023 27 6 2873-2902
[29]
Naz S, Shafiq A, Butt SA, and Ijaz R A new approach to sentiment analysis algorithms: Extended SWARA-MABAC method with 2-tuple linguistic q-rung orthopair fuzzy information Eng Appl Artif Intell 2023 126
[30]
Naz S, Saeed MR, and Butt SA Multi-attribute group decision-making based on 2-tuple linguistic cubic q-rung orthopair fuzzy DEMATEL analysis Granul Comput 2024 9 1 12
[31]
Fu Z A generalized linguistic gained and lost dominance score method for landslide hazard treatment Appl Soft Comput 2023 145 110-567
[32]
Fu Z and Liao H Unbalanced double hierarchy linguistic term set: the TOPSIS method for multi-expert qualitative decision making involving green mine selection Inf Fusion 2019 51 271-286
[33]
Yager RR The power average operator IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 2001 31 6 724-731
[34]
Xu Z and Yager RR Power-geometric operators and their use in group decision making IEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 2010 18 94-105
[35]
Jana C, Garg H, and Pal M Multi-attribute decision making for power Dombi operators under Pythagorean fuzzy information with MABAC method J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 2022 1 18
[36]
Ning B, Wei G, Lin R, and Guo Y A novel MADM technique based on extended power generalized Maclaurin symmetric mean operators under probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy setting and its application to sustainable suppliers selection Expert Syst Appl 2022 204
[37]
Fahmi A, Maqbool Z, Amin F, and Aslam M Web applications for multiuser interaction based on power Heronian aggregation operators Soft Comput 2022 26 10 4553-4573
[38]
Xu Z Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 2007 15 6 1179-1187
[39]
Hussain A, Ullah K, Alshahrani MN, Yang MS, and Pamucar D Novel Aczel-Alsina operators for pythagorean fuzzy sets with application in multi-attribute decision making Symmetry 2022 14 5 940
[40]
Garg H, Ullah K, Mahmood T, Hassan N, and Jan N T-spherical fuzzy power aggregation operators and their applications in multi-attribute decision making J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 2021 12 10 9067-9080
[41]
Liu P, Naz S, Akram M, and Muzammal M Group decision-making analysis based on linguistic q-rung orthopair fuzzy generalized point weighted aggregation operators Int J Mach Learn Cybern 2022 13 4 883-906
[42]
Vaid SK, Vaid G, Kaur S, Kumar R, and Sidhu MS Application of multi-criteria decision-making theory with VIKOR-WASPAS-Entropy methods: a case study of silent Genset Mater Today Proc 2022 50 2416-2423
[43]
Chen CH A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach based on ANP-Entropy TOPSIS for building materials supplier selection Entropy 2021 23 12 1597
[44]
Peng X and Garg H Intuitionistic fuzzy soft decision making method based on CoCoSo and CRITIC for CCN cache placement strategy selection Artif Intell Rev 2022 55 2 1567-1604
[45]
Wang S, Wei G, Lu J, Wu J, Wei C, and Chen X GRP and CRITIC method for probabilistic uncertain linguistic MAGDM and its application to site selection of hospital constructions Soft Comput 2022 26 1 237-251
[46]
Krishnan AR, Kasim MM, Hamid R, and Ghazali MF A modified CRITIC method to estimate the objective weights of decision criteria Symmetry 2021 13 6 973
[47]
Marano S and Sayed AH Decision-making algorithms for learning and adaptation with application to COVID-19 data Signal Process 2022 194
[48]
Dahooie JH, Hajiagha SHR, Farazmehr S, Zavadskas EK, and Antucheviciene J A novel dynamic credit risk evaluation method using data envelopment analysis with common weights and combination of multi-attribute decision-making methods Comput Oper Res 2021 129
[49]
Zavadskas EK and Podvezko V Integrated determination of objective criteria weights in MCDM Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 2016 15 02 267-283
[50]
Hwang CL, Yoon K, Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Methods for multiple attribute decision making. In: Multiple-Attribute Decision-Making: Methods and Applications a State-of-the-Art Survey, vol 186, pp 58–191
[51]
Zhang K and Dai J A novel TOPSIS method with decision-theoretic rough fuzzy sets Inf Sci 2022 608 1221-1244
[52]
Naz S, Akram M, ul Hassan MM, and Fatima A A hybrid DEMATEL-TOPSIS approach using 2-tuple linguistic q-rung orthopair fuzzy information and its application in renewable energy resource selection Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 2024 23 03 1099-1142
[53]
Hamurcu M and Eren T Applications of the MOORA and TOPSIS methods for decision of electric vehicles in public transportation technology Transport 2022 37 4 251-263
[54]
Liu P and Wang P Some q-rung orthopair fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multiple-attribute decision-making Int J Intell Syst 2018 33 2 259-280
[55]
Xu Y, Merigo JM, and Wang H Linguistic power aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making Appl Math Model 2012 36 11 5427-5444
[56]
Xu Y and Wang H Power geometric operators for group decision making under multiplicative linguistic preference relations Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl Based Syst 2012 20 01 139-159
[57]
Xu Y and Wang H Approaches based on 2-tuple linguistic power aggregation operators for multiple attribute group decision making under linguistic environment Appl Soft Comput 2011 11 5 3988-3997
[58]
Naz S, Akram M, Sattar A, and Al-Shamiri MMA 2-Tuple linguistic q-rung orthopair fuzzy CODAS approach and its application in arc welding robot selection AIMS Math 2022 7 9 17529-17569
[59]
Naz S, Shafiq A, Butt SA, and Ijaz R A new approach to sentiment analysis algorithms: Extended SWARA-MABAC method with 2-tuple linguistic q-rung orthopair fuzzy information Eng Appl Artif Intell 2023 126 106-943

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image The Journal of Supercomputing
The Journal of Supercomputing  Volume 81, Issue 1
Jan 2025
4237 pages

Publisher

Kluwer Academic Publishers

United States

Publication History

Published: 30 October 2024
Accepted: 27 September 2024

Author Tags

  1. 2TLCuq-ROFS
  2. CILOS
  3. TOPSIS
  4. Watershed’s hydrological geographical areas

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 0
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 25 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media