article

Package coupling measurement in object-oriented software

Authors:

Jitender Kumar ChhabraAuthors Info & Claims

Journal of Computer Science and Technology, Volume 24, Issue 2

Pages 273 - 283

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-009-9223-6

Published: 01 March 2009 Publication History

Abstract

The grouping of correlated classes into a package helps in better organization of modern object-oriented software. The quality of such packages needs to be measured so as to estimate their utilization. In this paper, new package coupling metrics are proposed, which also take into consideration the hierarchical structure of packages and direction of connections among package elements. The proposed measures have been validated theoretically as well as empirically using 18 packages taken from two open source software systems. The results obtained from this study show strong correlation between package coupling and understandability of the package which suggests that proposed metrics could be further used to represent other external software quality factors.

References

[1]

Booch G. Object Oriented Analysis and Design with Applications. 2nd Ed., Redwood City: Benjamin Cummings Publishing Company Inc., LA, USA, 1994.

[2]

Meyer B. Object Success -- A Manager's Guide to Object Orientation, Its Impact on the Corporation, and Its Use for Reengineering the Software Process. Prentice Hall, 1995.

[3]

Coad P, Yourdon E. Object-Oriented Analysis. Prentice Hall, 1991.

[4]

Page-Jones M. What Every Programmer Should Know about Object-Oriented Design. Dorset House New York, USA, 1995.

[5]

Rumbaugh J, Blaha M, Premerlani W, Eddy F, Lorensen W. Object-Oriented Modeling and Design. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1991.

Digital Library

[6]

Jacobson I, Christerson M, Jonsson P, Övergaard D G. Object-Oriented Software Engineering -- A Use Case Driven Approach. ACM Press, Addison-Wesley, MA, USA, 1992.

[7]

Cantu M. Mastering Delphi 2 for Windows 95/NT. Sybex, 1996.

[8]

Booch G, Jacobson I, Rumbaugh J. UML Semantics. Ratiohal Software Corporation, Version 1.0, 1997.

[9]

Lewis S. The Art and Science of Smalltalk. Prentice-Hall, 1995.

[10]

Stroustrup B. The C++ Programming Language. Third Edition, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Massachusetts, USA, 1997.

[11]

DeMarco T. Controlling Software Projects. Yourdon Press, New York, USA, 1982.

[12]

Briand L, Morasca S, Basili V. Property-based software engineering measurement. IEEE Transactions of Software Engineering , 1996, 22(1): 68-86.

Digital Library

[13]

Chidamber S R, Kemerer C F. Towards a metrics suite for object oriented design. In Proc. the 6th ACM Conf. Object-Oriented Programming: Systems, Languages and Applications (OOPSLA), Phoenix, AZ, Oct. 6-11, 1991, pp.197-211.

[14]

Chidamber S R, Kemerer C F. A metrics suite for object oriented design. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1994, 20(6): 476-493.

Digital Library

[15]

Eder J, Kappel G, Schrefl M. Coupling and cohesion in object-oriented systems. Technical Report, University of Klagenfurt, 1994.

[16]

Churcher N I, Shepperd M J. Comments on 'A metrics suite for object-oriented design'. IEEE Transactions of Software Engineering, 1995, 21(3): 263-265.

Digital Library

[17]

Li W, Henry S. Object-oriented metrics that predict maintainability. Journal of Systems and Software, 1993, 23(2): 111-122.

Digital Library

[18]

Li W, Henry S, Kafura D, Schulman R. Measuring object-oriented design. Journal of Object-Oriented Programming, 1995, 8(4): 48-55.

[19]

Hitz M, Montazeri B. Measuring coupling in object-oriented systems. Object Currents, 1996, 1(4): 124-136.

[20]

Briand L, Devanbu P, Melo W. An investigation into coupling measures for C++. In Proc. 19th Int. Conf. Software Eng., Boston, May 17-23, 1997, pp.412-421.

Digital Library

[21]

Lee Y S, Liang B S, Wu S F, Wang F J. Measuring the coupling and cohesion of an object-oriented program based on information flow. In Proc. International Conference on Software Quality, Maribor, Slovenia, Nov. 6-9, 1995, pp.81-90.

[22]

Martin R. Object oriented design quality metrics: An analysis of dependencies. ROAD, 1995, 2(3).

[23]

Martin R. Agile Software Development, Principles, Patterns, and Practices. Prentice Hall, 2002.

Digital Library

[24]

Tagoug N. Object-oriented system decomposition quality. In Proc. the 7th IEEE International Symposium on High Assurance Systems Engineering, Tokyo, Japan, Oct. 23-25, 2002, pp.230-235.

[25]

Xu B, Chen Z, Zhao J. Measuring cohesion of packages in Ada95. In Proc. Annual ACM SIGAda International Conference on Ada: The Engineering of Correct and Reliable Software for Real-Time & Distributed Systems Using Ada and Related Technologies, San Diego, California, USA, Dec. 7-11, 2003, pp.62-67.

[26]

Gui G, Scott P D. Coupling and cohesion measures for evaluation of component reusability. In Proc. International Workshop on Mining Software Repositories, Shanghai, China, May 22-23, 2006, pp.18-21.

[27]

Yu L G, Ramaswamy S. Component dependency in object-oriented software. Journal of Computer Science and Technology , May 2007, 22(3): 379-386.

[28]

Xu T, Qian K, He X. Service oriented dynamic decoupling metrics. In Proc. the 2006 International Conference on Semantic Web and Web Services (SWWS'06), Las Vegas, USA, June 26-29, 2006, pp.170-176.

[29]

Washizaki H, Yamamoto H, Fukazawa Y. A metrics suite for measuring reusability of software components. In Proc. the Ninth International Software Metrics Symposium (METRICS'03), 2003.

[30]

Narasimhan V L, Hendradjaya B. Some theoretica considerations for a suite of metrics for the integration of software components. Information Sciences, 2007, 177: 844-864.

Digital Library

[31]

Seng O, Bauer M, Biehl M, Pache G. Search-based improvement of subsystem decompositions. In Proc. GECCO'05, Washington, DC, USA, June 25-29, 2005, pp.1045-1051.

[32]

Franch X, Carvallo J P. A quality-model-based approach for describing and evaluating software packages. In Proc. IEEE Joint International Conference on Requirements Engineering (RE'02), Essan, Germany, Sept. 9-13, 2002, pp.1-8.

[33]

Ponisio L, Nierstrasz O. Using contextual information to assess package cohesion. Technical Report No. IAM-06-002, 2006, Institute of Applied Mathematics and Computer Sciences, University of Berne, 2006.

[34]

Lieberherr K J, Lorenz D H, Mezini M. Building modular object-oriented systems with reusable collaborations. In Proc. International Conference on Software Engineering. Limerick Ireland, June 4-11, 2000, pp.821-821.

[35]

Allen E, Khoshgoftaar T. Measuring coupling and cohesion of software modules: An information theory approach. In Proc. the Seventh International Software Metrics Symposium, London, UK, April 4-6, 2001, pp.124-134.

[36]

Mancoridis S, Mitchell B S, Chen Y, Gansner E R. Bunch: A clustering tool for the recovery and maintenance of software system structures. In Proc. International Conference on Software Maintenance, Oxford, England, IEEE Computer Society Press, 1999, pp.50-59.

[37]

Misic V B. Cohesion is structural, coherence is functional Different views, different measures. In Proc. the Seventh International Software Metrics Symposium (METRICS-01), London, UK, April 4-6, 2001, pp.135-144.

[38]

Hautus E. Improving Java software through package structure analysis. In Proc. International Conference on Software Engineering and Applications, Cambridge, USA Nov. 4-6, 2002.

[39]

Lee J K, Seung S J, Kim S D, Hyun W, Han D H. Component identification method with coupling and cohesion. In Proc. the Eighth Asia-Pacific on Software Engineering Conference (APSEC'01), Macao, China, Dec. 4-7, 2001, pp.79-79.

[40]

Abreu F B, Pereira G, Sousa P. A coupling-guided cluster analysis approach to reengineer the modularity of object-oriented systems. In Proc. the 4th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR'2000), Zurich, Switzerland, Feb. 29-March 3, 2000, p.13.

[41]

Abreu F B, Goulão M. A merit factor driven approach to the modularization of object-oriented systems. L'Object, 2001, 7(4): 1-23.

[42]

Szyperski C. Component Software: Beyond Object-Oriented Programming. New York: ACM Press/Addison-Wesley, 1998.

[43]

Yu E, Mylopoulos J. An actor dependency model of organizational work -- With application to business process reengineering. In Proc. Conference on Organizational Computing Systems, Milpitas, Calif., USA, Nov. 1-4, 1993, pp.258-268.

[44]

Yu E. Towards modelling and reasoning support for earlyphase requirements engineering. In Proc. the 3rd IEEE Int. Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE'97), Washington DC, USA, Jan. 6-8, 1997, pp.226-235.

[45]

Northcott M, Vigder M. Managing dependencies between software products. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3412, Franch X, Port D (eds.), ICCBSS 2005, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2005, pp.201-211.

[46]

Grunske L, Kaiser B. An automated dependability analysis method for COTS-based systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3412, Franch X, Port D (eds.), ICCBSS 2005, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2005, pp.178-190.

[47]

Franch X, Maiden N A M. Modeling component dependencies to inform their selection. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2580, Erdogmus H, Weng T (eds.), ICCBSS 2003, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2003, pp.81-91.

[48]

Aggarwal K K, Singh Y, Chhabra J K. Complete dependency matrix for object-oriented software. International Journal of Management and Systems (IJOMAS), 2003, 19(1): 43-54.

[49]

Gosling J, Yellin F. The Java Application Programming Interface. Vol. #1 (Core Packages)/#2 (Window Toolkit and Applets). Reading: Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts, USA, 1996.

[50]

Briand L C, Daly J W, Wüst J K. A unified framework for coupling measurement in object-oriented systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1999, 25(1): 91-121.

Digital Library

[51]

http://sourceforge.net/projects/xgen/.

[52]

http://jakarta.apache.org.

[53]

Kothari C R. Research Methodology: Methods & Techniques. Revised Second Edition, New Age International Publishers, New Delhi, 2007, pp.302-306.

Cited By

Li Xd’Aragona DTaibi D(2023)Evaluating Microservice Organizational Coupling Based on Cross-Service ContributionProduct-Focused Software Process Improvement10.1007/978-3-031-49266-2_30(435-450)Online publication date: 11-Dec-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-031-49266-2_30
Zhou YZhu YChen L(2020)Software Defect-Proneness Prediction with Package Cohesion and Coupling Metrics Based on Complex Network TheoryDependable Software Engineering. Theories, Tools, and Applications10.1007/978-3-030-62822-2_12(186-201)Online publication date: 24-Nov-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-030-62822-2_12
Tiwari SRathore SReddy YVarma VCleland JBellur USengupta SSharma NLoganathan RSharma RSarkar S(2018)Coupling and Cohesion Metrics for Object-Oriented SoftwareProceedings of the 11th Innovations in Software Engineering Conference10.1145/3172871.3172878(1-11)Online publication date: 9-Feb-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3172871.3172878
Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Cohesion and coupling metrics for ontology modules

In recent years, an increasing number of ontologies and semantic web applications have been developed and used. A conscious effort has been made to develop methods to modularize ontologies. These methods contribute to building a new ontology. However, ...
Coupling Metrics for Object-Oriented Design
METRICS '98: Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Software Metrics

In this paper, we describe and evaluate some recently innovated coupling metrics for object-oriented (OO) design. The Coupling Between Objects (CBO) metric of Chidamber and Kemerer are evaluated empirically using five OO systems, and compared with an ...
Validation of dynamic coupling metrics for object-oriented software

Dynamic coupling metrics for object-oriented software provide scope of coupling measurement up to the object level and take into account important and widely used object-oriented features such as inheritance, polymorphism and dynamic binding during ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Journal of Computer Science and Technology

Journal of Computer Science and Technology Volume 24, Issue 2

March 2009

224 pages

ISSN:1000-9000

Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Springer-Verlag

Berlin, Heidelberg

Publication History

Published: 01 March 2009

Revised: 24 November 2008

Received: 16 March 2008

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

15
Total Citations
View Citations
0
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 02 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Li Xd’Aragona DTaibi D(2023)Evaluating Microservice Organizational Coupling Based on Cross-Service ContributionProduct-Focused Software Process Improvement10.1007/978-3-031-49266-2_30(435-450)Online publication date: 11-Dec-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-031-49266-2_30
Zhou YZhu YChen L(2020)Software Defect-Proneness Prediction with Package Cohesion and Coupling Metrics Based on Complex Network TheoryDependable Software Engineering. Theories, Tools, and Applications10.1007/978-3-030-62822-2_12(186-201)Online publication date: 24-Nov-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-030-62822-2_12
Tiwari SRathore SReddy YVarma VCleland JBellur USengupta SSharma NLoganathan RSharma RSarkar S(2018)Coupling and Cohesion Metrics for Object-Oriented SoftwareProceedings of the 11th Innovations in Software Engineering Conference10.1145/3172871.3172878(1-11)Online publication date: 9-Feb-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3172871.3172878
Stevanetic SZdun U(2018)Supporting the analyzability of architectural component models - empirical findings and tool supportEmpirical Software Engineering10.1007/s10664-017-9583-423:6(3578-3625)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10664-017-9583-4
Samosir RHendric HGaol FAbdurachman ESoewito B(2017)Measurement Metric Proposed For Big Data Analytics SystemProceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence10.1145/3168390.3168425(265-269)Online publication date: 5-Dec-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3168390.3168425
(2017)Harmony search based remodularization for object-oriented software systemsComputer Languages, Systems and Structures10.1016/j.cl.2016.09.00347:P2(153-169)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.cl.2016.09.003
Javed MStevanetic SZdun UPreschern CEloranta V(2016)Towards a pattern language for construction and maintenance of software architecture traceability linksProceedings of the 21st European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs10.1145/3011784.3011810(1-20)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3011784.3011810
Stevanetic SZdun ULv JZhang HBabar M(2015)Software metrics for measuring the understandability of architectural structuresProceedings of the 19th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering10.1145/2745802.2745822(1-14)Online publication date: 27-Apr-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2745802.2745822
Jabangwe RBörstler JSmite DWohlin C(2015)Empirical evidence on the link between object-oriented measures and external quality attributesEmpirical Software Engineering10.1007/s10664-013-9291-720:3(640-693)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10664-013-9291-7
Stevanetic SHaitzer TZdun UZdun U(2014)Supporting Software Evolution by Integrating DSL-based Architectural Abstraction and Understandability Related MetricsProceedings of the 2014 European Conference on Software Architecture Workshops10.1145/2642803.2642822(1-8)Online publication date: 25-Aug-2014
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2642803.2642822
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents