Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
article

Teens' concern for privacy when using social networking sites: An analysis of socialization agents and relationships with privacy-protecting behaviors

Published: 01 April 2014 Publication History

Abstract

U.S. teens are spending substantial time on social networking sites (SNSs). Yet, only a few studies have documented teens' privacy-protecting behaviors on SNSs. Using data of Facebook teen users and their parents in the U.S. from the Pew Internet's Teens & Privacy Management Survey (N=622), this study investigated the socialization agents of teens' level of online privacy concern, and the relationship between teens' level of online privacy concern and their privacy-protecting behaviors on SNSs. Based on path analysis results, this study identified parents and SNS use as the two significant socialization agents. In particular, this study revealed the role of parents' privacy concern and the role of SNS use in motivating teens to increase online privacy concern, which, in turn, drives teens to adopt various privacy-setting strategies on SNSs and to set their Facebook profiles to private. Implications for policymakers and educators were discussed.

References

[1]
Aldhafferi, N., Watson, C., & Sajeev, A. S. M. (2013). Personal information privacy settings of online social networks and their suitability for mobile Internet devices. International Journal of Security, 2(2). <http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1305/1305.2770.pdf> Retrieved April 2013.
[2]
A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States. First Monday. v11 i9.
[3]
Advertising versus invertising: The influence of social media B2C efforts on consumer attitudes and brand relationships. In: Close, Angeline.G. (Ed.), Online consumer behavior: Theory and research in social media, advertising, and e-tail, Routledge, New York, NY. pp. 209-236.
[4]
Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. v13. 210-230.
[5]
The role of disclosure of personal information in the evaluation of risk and trust in young peoples' online interactions. Computers in Human Behavior. v30. 299-306.
[6]
Bulgurcu, B., Cavusoglu, H., & Benbasat, I. (2010). Understanding emergence and outcomes of information privacy concerns: A case of Facebook. Proceedings of 31st International Conference on Information Systems. <http://people.commerce.ubc.ca/phd/bulgurcu/docs/2010_ICIS_Bulgurcu.pdf>.
[7]
Privacy setting awareness on Facebook and its effect on user-posted content. Human Communication. v14 i1. 39-55.
[8]
The role of parental socialization: Types of differential family communication patterns regarding consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology. v1 i1. 31-52.
[9]
Consumer socialization. Applied Psychology: An International Review. v48 i3. 297-312.
[10]
Facebook and online privacy: Attitudes, behaviors, and unintended consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. v15 i1. 83-108.
[11]
Sociality through Social Network Sites. In: Dutton, W.H. (Ed.), The oxford handbook of internet studies, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. pp. 151-172.
[12]
Facebook. (2009). Facebook's privacy policy - full version. <https://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=%20322194465300>.
[13]
Felt, A., & Evans, D. (2008). Privacy protection for social networking APIs. Proceedings of Web 2.0 Security and Privacy 2008.
[14]
New Media History. In: Lievrouw, L., Livingstone, S. (Eds.), The handbook of new media: Social shaping and consequences of ICTs, Sage, London. pp. 136-150.
[15]
Database nation. O'Reilly, Sebastopol, CA.
[16]
SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 4th ed. Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA.
[17]
Young people's relationships with online marketing practices: An intrusion too far?. Journal of Marketing Management. v21. 607-623.
[18]
Grant, I. C. (2006). Online privacy--An issue for adolescents? Proceedings of the Child and Teen Consumption 2006. Copenhagen, Denmark.
[19]
Guo, Y. (2010). The privacy issue on social metwork sites: Facebook. 3pm Journal of Digital Research &Publishing. <http://3pmjournal.blogspot.com/2010/10/privacy-issue-on-social-network-sites.html>.
[20]
Gender and perceptions of danger. Sex Roles. v43 i11/12. 843-863.
[21]
Questioning the generational divide: Technological exoticism and adult constructions of online youth identity. In: Buckingham, D. (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media, MIT Press, Cambridge, UK.
[22]
Media, parent, and peer influences in teen food shopping. The Journal of Marketing Management, Fall/Winter. 45-55.
[23]
Do we need to go cellular? Assessing political media consumption using a single-frame landline/cellular survey design. Mass Communication & Society. v15 i2. 284-306.
[24]
Personal information of adolescents on the internet: A quantitative content analysis of MySpace. Journal of Adolescence. v31 i1. 135-146.
[25]
Gender differences in privacy-related measures for young adult Facebook users. Journal of Interactive Advertising. v10 i2. 28-45.
[26]
Privacy and the computer: Why we need privacy in the information society. Metaphilosophy. v28 i3. 259-275.
[27]
Do not track: Revising the EU's data protection framework to require meaningful consent for behavioral advertising. Richmond Journal of Law and Technology, XVIII. v1. 1-50.
[28]
Exploring the influence of family communication patterns, cognitive complexity, and interpersonal competence on adolescent risk behaviors. Journal of Family Communication. v4 i2. 99-121.
[29]
Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2007). Teens, privacy and online social networks. Pew Internet and American life project. <http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2007/Teens-Privacy-and-Online-Social-Networks/1-Summary-of-Findings.aspx>.
[30]
Lenhart, A., Madden, M., Smith, A., Purcell, K., Zickuhr, K., & Rainie, L. (2011). Teens, kindness and cruelty on social network sites. Pew Internet and American life project. <http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Teens-and-social-media/Part-1/Facebook.aspx>.
[31]
Lessing, L. (1998). The architecture of privacy. Retrieved from <http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/works/lessig/architecture_priv.pdf>.
[32]
The taste for privacy: An analysis of college student privacy settings in an online social network. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. v14 i1. 79-100.
[33]
Factors influencing adolescents engagement in risky internet behavior. CyberPsychology & Behavior. v8 i6. 513-520.
[34]
Analyzing facebook privacy settings: User expectations vs. reality. In: Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement conference, IMC '11, ACM, New York, NY, USA. pp. 61-70.
[35]
Young people and new media. Sage, London, UK.
[36]
Lohr, S. (2012). The age of big data. New York Times. <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/12/sunday-review/big-datas-impact-in-the-world.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0> Retrieved 11 February 2012.
[37]
Madden, M., Cortesi, S., Gasser, U., Lenhart, A., & Duggan, M. (2012). Parents, teens, and online privacy. Pew Internet and American life project. <http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Teens-and-Privacy/Methodology/About-this-Study.aspx>.
[38]
Socialization and adolescents' skepticism toward advertising. Journal of Advertising. v27 i3. 11-21.
[39]
Peer, parent, and media influences in teen apparel shopping. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. v21 i1. 53-58.
[40]
Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
[41]
Information privacy concerns, antecedents and privacy measure use in social networking sites: Evidence from Malaysia. Computers in Human Behavior. v28 i6. 2366-2375.
[42]
The role of family communication in consumer learning. Journal of Communication. v31 i4. 42-51.
[43]
Age and consumer socialization agent influences on adolescents' sexual knowledge, attitudes, and behavior: Implications for social marketing initiatives and public policy. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing. v21 i1. 37-52.
[44]
Adolescents' concern for privacy when using the Internet: An empirical analysis predictors and relationships with privacy-protecting behaviors. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal. v35 i3. 232-252.
[45]
Teens surfing the net: How do they learn to protect their privacy?. Journal of Business and Economics. v2 i9. 43-56.
[46]
The role of family communication in consumer socialization of children and adolescents. Journal of Consumer Research. v11 iMarch. 898-913.
[47]
Consumer socialization: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Journal of Marketing Research. v15 i4. 599-609.
[48]
Parent and child perspectives on the presence and meaning of parental television mediation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. v45 i2. 201-220.
[49]
For kids on the Web, it's an ad, ad, ad, ad world. Business Week. 108-109.
[50]
Examining priming and gender as a means to reduce risk in a social networking context: Can stories change disclosure and privacy setting use when personal profiles are constructed?. Computers in Human Behavior. v28. 2067-2074.
[51]
Direct marketing and the use of individual-level consumer information: Determining how and when "privacy" matters. Journal of Direct Marketing. v9 i3. 46-60.
[52]
Ou, M. (2011). Generation gap = Gap in online privacy perceptions? The case for Singaporean youths and their parents. Papers presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Boston, MA.
[53]
Unpacking privacy for a networked world. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM. pp. 129-136.
[54]
Patriot Act. (2006). USA PATRIOT Act. Retrieved from <http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/infocus/patriotact/>.
[55]
Adolescents and social network sites; identity, friendships and privacy. In: Livingstone, S., Haddon, L. (Eds.), Kinds online: Opportunities and risks for children, The Policy Press, Bristol, UK. pp. 83-94.
[56]
The influence of family communication patterns on parental reactions toward advertising: A cross-national examination. Journal of Advertising. v27 i4. 72-85.
[57]
Schonberger, J. (2005). Emerging identity theft market targets teens as newest niche. <http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/extra/features/july-dec05/idtheft_8-29.pdf>.
[58]
Controversies in contemporary advertising. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA.
[59]
Parental mediation of teenagers' video game playing: Antecedents and consequences. New Media & Society. v13 i60. 945-962.
[60]
Tweens' online privacy risks and the role of parental mediation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. v56 i4. 632-649.
[61]
Internet users' information privacy-protective responses: A taxonomy and a nomological model. MIS Quarterly. v32 i3. 503-529.
[62]
Strater, K. & Richter, H. (2007). Examining privacy and disclosure in a social networking community. In Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS), Pittsburgh, PA, USA, July 2007.
[63]
Policies for online privacy in the United States and the European Union. Telematics and Informatics. v19 i173. 173-192.
[64]
Experimental designs using ANOVA. Thomson Higher Education, Belmont, CA.
[65]
Disclosure of personal and contact information by young people in social networking sites: An analysis using Facebook profiles as an example. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics. v6 i1. 81-101.
[66]
Teenage consumer spending statistics. (2012). <http://www.statisticbrain.com/teenage-consumer-spending-statistics/> Retrieved 8 September 2012.
[67]
. In: Trepte, S., Reinecke, L. (Eds.), Privacy online, Springer, Heidelberg and New York.
[68]
Americans reject tailored advertising and three activities that enable it. Technical report, Annenberg School for Communication,University of Pennsylvania.
[69]
The Internet and the family: The view of U.S. parents. In: Feilitzen, C.C. (Ed.), Children in the new media landscape: Games, pornography perceptions, Nordicom, Göteborg, Sweden. pp. 331-348.
[70]
Developing a scale to assess three styles of television mediation: "Instructive mediation". "restrictive mediation", and "social coviewing". Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. v43 i1. 53-66.
[71]
Privacy and freedom. Atheneum, New York.
[72]
A classified bibliography of U.S. privacy surveys. Center for social and legal research, Hackensack, NJ.
[73]
Social and political dimensions of privacy. Journal of Social Issues. v59 i2. 431-453.
[74]
Wildemuth, B. M. (2008). The illusion of online privacy. <http://ils.unc.edu/~wildem/Publications/CHI2006-Privacy.pdf> Retrieved 5 June 2008.
[75]
Cyberbullying and cyberthreats: Responding to the challenge of online social cruelty, threats, and distress. Center for Safe and Responsible Internet Use, Eugene, OR.
[76]
Teenagers' perceptions of online privacy and coping behaviors: A risk-benefit appraisal approach. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. v49 i1. 86-110.
[77]
Parental influence and teens' attitude toward online privacy protection. The Journal of Consumer Affairs. v42 i3. 362-388.
[78]
Information revelation and internet privacy concerns on social network sites: a case study of Facebook. In: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Communities and technologies, ACM. pp. 265-274.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)How Peer Privacy Concerns Affect Active and Passive Uses of Social Networking SitesSocial Science Computer Review10.1177/0894439323122453942:6(1440-1463)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2024
  • (2024)Labeling in the Dark: Exploring Content Creators’ and Consumers’ Experiences with Content Classification for Child Safety on YouTubeProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661565(1518-1532)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Towards Enforcing Good Digital Citizenship: Identifying Opportunities for Adolescent Online Safety NudgesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36374138:CSCW1(1-37)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Teens' concern for privacy when using social networking sites: An analysis of socialization agents and relationships with privacy-protecting behaviors

        Recommendations

        Reviews

        Gopal K. Gupta

        Privacy in social networks is an area of active research. Teenagers are an important group of users since they spend a substantial amount of time using such sites. This paper examines the behavior of teenagers aged 12 to 17 and the role of their parents in helping protect their privacy. The data source used for the analysis was drawn from the recent Teens and Privacy Management Survey conducted by Princeton Research Associates International. The telephone survey was conducted using landline and cell phones. The total sample consisted of 802 parents and their 802 teens aged 12 to 17. The parents (64 percent female) were interviewed first, and then a subsequent interview with a teenager living with the parent was conducted. The teens were filtered out if they were not using a networking site like Facebook. As a result of filtering, 622 teen respondents remained. The authors found that a majority of teens had deleted people from their network of friends list, some had deleted comments others had made on their profiles, and some had also blocked people. It is concluded that voluntary disclosure of personal information by teenagers on sites like Facebook is difficult to curb. The authors investigated the influences of parental mediation and social network usage and found that parents were more concerned about their children's online data. This concern appears to have a strong relationship with the children's privacy concerns. The authors also found that there was a relationship between social network usage and the development of user understanding of consumer aspects of the social networks. The results of the study are interesting, although not very surprising. It should be of interest to people studying the behavior of the younger users of social networks. Online Computing Reviews Service

        Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

        Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image Computers in Human Behavior
        Computers in Human Behavior  Volume 33, Issue
        April, 2014
        382 pages

        Publisher

        Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.

        Netherlands

        Publication History

        Published: 01 April 2014

        Author Tags

        1. Parental influence
        2. Privacy concern
        3. Privacy-protecting behaviors
        4. Social networking site (SNS) use
        5. Teen

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
        Reflects downloads up to 23 Dec 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2024)How Peer Privacy Concerns Affect Active and Passive Uses of Social Networking SitesSocial Science Computer Review10.1177/0894439323122453942:6(1440-1463)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2024
        • (2024)Labeling in the Dark: Exploring Content Creators’ and Consumers’ Experiences with Content Classification for Child Safety on YouTubeProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661565(1518-1532)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
        • (2024)Towards Enforcing Good Digital Citizenship: Identifying Opportunities for Adolescent Online Safety NudgesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36374138:CSCW1(1-37)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
        • (2024)Child online safety educationComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2024.108225156:COnline publication date: 9-Jul-2024
        • (2023)Youth understandings of online privacy and securityProceedings of the Nineteenth USENIX Conference on Usable Privacy and Security10.5555/3632186.3632208(399-416)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2023
        • (2023)Pakistani Teens and Privacy - How Gender Disparities, Religion and Family Values Impact the Privacy Design SpaceProceedings of the 2023 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security10.1145/3576915.3623087(195-209)Online publication date: 15-Nov-2023
        • (2023)The comfort of adolescent patients and their parents with mobile sensing and digital phenotypingComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2022.107603140:COnline publication date: 1-Mar-2023
        • (2022)Understanding Teenage Perceptions and Configurations of Privacy on InstagramProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35556086:CSCW2(1-28)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
        • (2022)Youths' Perceptions of Data Collection in Online Advertising and Social MediaProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35555766:CSCW2(1-27)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
        • (2022)Internet of Things TechnologyTelematics and Informatics10.1016/j.tele.2022.10181670:COnline publication date: 1-May-2022
        • Show More Cited By

        View Options

        View options

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media