article

Toward a formal research framework for ontological analyses

Authors:

Andreas Gehlert,

Werner EssweinAuthors Info & Claims

Advanced Engineering Informatics, Volume 21, Issue 2

Pages 119 - 131

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2006.11.004

Published: 01 April 2007 Publication History

Abstract

Ontological analyses have been used in numerous publications to compare existing modelling grammars with an ontology. However, a sound theoretical research framework is still missing. Consequently, working with the results of such ontological analyses is theoretically questionable. Therefore, the aim of this paper is threefold. Firstly, we want to contribute to such a theoretical research framework by formalising the ontological analyses approach as sets of mathematical functions between ontological and modelling grammar constructs. Secondly, on this basis, we derive four formal requirements each ontological analyses must comply with. Thirdly, we analyse whether current state of the art ontological analyses comply with our findings. While the formalisation demonstrates the strengths of the ontological analysis approach we conclude that current analyses have theoretical deficiencies, which lead to serious limitations in their application. Lastly, we demonstrate the usefulness of our formal framework by describing a new application. This application uses two different ontological analyses as input and produces mappings between the modelling grammars used in these analyses as output.

References

[1]

Y. Wand, R. Weber, Mario Bunge's ontology as a formal foundation for information systems concepts, in: Weingartner and Dorn {48}, pp. 123-150.

[2]

Schütte, R. and Rotthowe, T., The guidelines of modeling - an approach to enhance the quality in information models. In: Ling, T.W., Ram, S., Lee, M.L. (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1507. Springer. pp. 240-254.

[3]

Weber, R., Still desperately seeking the IT artifact. MIS Quarterly. v27 i2. iii-xi.

[4]

Grossmann, R., The existence of the world: An introduction to Ontology. 1992. Routledge, London.

[5]

M. Bunge, Wand, Weber on information systems, in: Weingartner and Dorn {48}, pp. 593-595.

[6]

B. Wyssusek, Ontology and ontologies in information systems analysis and design: A critique, in: Proceedings of the Tenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, 2004, pp. 4303-4308.

[7]

Guarino, N., Understanding, building and using ontologies. International Journal of Human Computer Studies. v46 i2/3. 293-310.

[8]

Shanks, G., Tansley, E. and Weber, R., Using ontology to validate conceptual models. Communications of the ACM. v46 i10. 85-89.

[9]

P. Janich, F. Kambartel, J. Mittelstraí, Wissenschaftstheorie als Wissenschaftskritik, Aspekte, 1974.

[10]

H.H. Do, E. Rahm, Coma - A system for flexible combination of schema matching approaches, in: Proceedings of VLDB, 2002, pp. 610-621.

[11]

Weber, R., Ontological Foundations of Information Systems. 1997. Coopers and Lybrand.

[12]

S. Greiffenberg, Methodenentwicklung in Wirtschaft und Verwaltung, Dr. Kovač, 2004.

[13]

P. Fettke, P. Loos, Ontological evaluation of reference models using the Bunge-Wand-Weber model, in: Proceedings of the Ninth Americas Conference on Information Systems, 2003, pp. 2944-2955.

[14]

Fettke, P. and Loos, P., Ontologische Evaluierung des semantischen Objektmodells. In: Sinz, E.J., Plaha, M., Neckel, P. (Eds.), Modellierung betrieblicher Informationssysteme - MobIS 2003, Köllen. pp. 109-129.

[15]

Opdahl, A.L. and Henderson-Sellers, B., Ontological evaluation of the UML using the Bunge-Wand-Weber model. Software Systems Model. v1 i1. 43-67.

[16]

Green, P. and Rosemann, M., Integrated process modeling: an ontological evaluation. Information Systems. v25 i2. 73-87.

[17]

S. Milton, E. Kazmierczak, C. Keen, An ontological study of data modelling languages using Chisholm's ontology, in: Proceedings of the 11th European-Japanese Conference on Information Modelling and Knowledge Bases, 2001, pp. 21-33.

[18]

Wand, Y. and Weber, R., An ontological model of an information system. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. v16 i11. 1282-1292.

[19]

Wand, Y. and Weber, R., On the deep structure of information systems. Information Systems Journal. v5. 203-223.

[20]

P. Soffer, Y. Wand, Goal-driven analysis of process model validity, in: Persson and Stirna {49}, pp. 521-535.

[21]

W. Degen, H. Herre, What is an upper level ontology? in: Workshop on 'Ontologies', Vienna, 2001.

[22]

W. Degen, B. Heller, H. Herre, B. Smith, GOL: Toward an axiomatized upper-level ontology, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems, 2001, pp. 34-46.

[23]

Guizzardi, G., Herre, H. and Wagner, G., On the general ontological foundations of conceptual modeling. In: Spaccapietra, S., March, S.T., Kambayashi, Y. (Eds.), Lecture Notes of Computer Science, vol. 2503. Springer. pp. 65-78.

[24]

G. Guizzardi, G. Wagner, N. Guarino, M. van Sideren, An ontologically well-founded profile for UML conceptual models, in: Persson and Stirna {49}, pp. 112-126.

[25]

S. Milton, E. Kazmierczak, Enriching the ontological foundations of modelling in information system, in: Proceedings of the Information Systems Foundations Workshop Ontology, Semiotics and Practice, 1999.

[26]

Weber, R. and Zhang, Y., An analytical evaluation of NIAM's grammar for conceptual schema diagrams. Information Systems Journal. v6. 147-170.

[27]

Evermann, J. and Wand, Y., Towards ontologically based semantics for UML constructs. In: Kunii, H.S., Jajodia, S., Sølvberg, A. (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2224. Springer. pp. 354-367.

[28]

Weber, R., Are attributes entities? A study of database designer's memory structures. Information Systems Research. v7 i2. 137-162.

[29]

Rosemann, M. and Green, P., Developing a meta model for the Bunge-Wand-Weber ontological constructs. Information Systems. v27 i2. 75-91.

[30]

M. Rosemann, P. Green, I. Davies, BWW version 4, http://www.uq.edu.au/~uqtchua/ARC/ermetamodel/index.htm, Download: 05.07. 2004 (2004).

[31]

Tversky, A., Features of similarity. Psychological Review. v84. 327-352.

[32]

Bodart, F., Patel, A., Sim, M. and Weber, R., Should optional properties be used in conceptual modelling? A theory and three empirical tests. Information Systems Research. v12 i4. 384-405.

[33]

Patig, S., Evolution of entity-relationship modelling. Data and Knowledge Engineering. v56 i2. 122-138.

[34]

K. Siau, M. Rossi, Evaluation of information modeling methods - a review, in: Proceedings of the Thirty-First Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 5, 1998, pp. 314-322.

Digital Library

[35]

Chen, P.P.-S., The entity relationship model - toward a unified view of data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems. v1 i1. 9-36.

[36]

Lee, G., Eastman, C.M., Sacks, R. and Navathe, S.B., Grammatical rules for specifying information for automated product data modeling. Advanced Engineering Informatics. v20 i2. 155-170.

[37]

ISO TC 184/SC 4, ISO 10303-11:1994. Industrial automation systems and integration: Product data representation and exchange - Part 11. Description methods: The EXPRESS language reference manual. International Organization for Standardization (1994).

[38]

Lankhorst, M.M., van Buuren, R., van Leeuwen, D., Jonkers, H. and ter Doest, H., Enterprise architecture modelling - the issue of integration. Advanced Engineering Informatics. v18 i4. 205-216.

[39]

Object Management Group, Meta object facility (MOF) 2.0 Query/View/Transformation specification: Final adopted specification, OMG document ptc/05-11-01 (2005).

[40]

J.M. Sprinkle, Metamodel driven model migration, Ph.D. thesis, Graduate School of Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee (2003).

[41]

Chandrasekaran, B., Josephson, J.R. and Benjamins, V.R., What are ontologies, and why do we need them?. IEEE Intelligent Systems. v14 i1. 20-26.

[42]

Garcia, A.C.B., Kunz, J., Ekstrom, M. and Kiviniemi, A., Building a project ontology with extreme collaboration and virtual design and construction. Advanced Engineering Informatics. v18 i2. 71-83.

[43]

Dragut, E. and Lawrence, R., Composing mappings between schemas using a reference ontology. In: Meersmann, R., Tari, Z. (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3290. Springer. pp. 783-800.

[44]

A. Behm, A. Geppert, K.R. Dittrich, On the migration of relational schemas and data to object-oriented database systems, in: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Re-Technologies for Information Systems, 1997.

[45]

Rosemann, M., Green, P. and Indulska, M., A reference methodology for conducting ontological analyses. In: Atzeni, P., Chu, W.W., Lu, H., Zhou, S., Ling, T.W. (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3288. Springer. pp. 110-121.

Digital Library

[46]

S. Milton, E. Kazmierczak, L. Thomas, Ontological foundations of data modeling in information systems, in: Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems, 2000, pp. 1537-1543.

[47]

M. Rosemann, P. Green, Integrating multi-perspective views into ontological analysis, in: S. Ang, H. Krcmar, W.J. Orlikowski, P. Weill, J.I. DeGross (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Information Systems, 2000, pp. 618-627.

[48]

P. Weingartner, G. Dorn (Eds.), Studies on Mario Bunge's Treatise, vol. 18 of the Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, Rapodi, 1990.

[49]

In: Persson, A., Stirna, J. (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3084. Springer.

Cited By

Goncharenko BZaytsev VStorm TBalland EVarro D(2016)Language design and implementation for the domain of coding conventionsProceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Software Language Engineering10.1145/2997364.2997386(90-104)Online publication date: 20-Oct-2016
Storm TBalland EVarro D(2016)Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Software Language EngineeringundefinedOnline publication date: 20-Oct-2016
Abbas MBerio G(2013)Creating Ontologies Using Ontology MappingsProceedings of the 2013 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence (WI) and Intelligent Agent Technologies (IAT) - Volume 0310.1109/WI-IAT.2013.169(143-146)Online publication date: 17-Nov-2013
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Toward a formal research framework for ontological analyses

Recommendations

Formal semantics and ontological analysis for understanding subsetting, specialization and redefinition of associations in UML
ER'11: Proceedings of the 30th international conference on Conceptual modeling

The definition of the exact meaning of conceptual modeling constructs is considered a relevant issue since it contributes to their effective and appropriate use by conceptual modelers. This paper studies three related constructs that enhance the ...
DOLCE: A descriptive ontology for linguistic and cognitive engineering¹
Foundational Ontologies in Action

dolce, the first top-level (foundational) ontology to be axiomatized, has remained stable for twenty years and today is broadly used in a variety of domains. dolce is inspired by cognitive and linguistic considerations and aims to model a commonsense view ...
Ontological semantics, formal ontology, and ambiguity
FOIS '01: Proceedings of the international conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems - Volume 2001

Ontological semantics is a theory of meaning in natural language and an approach to natural language processing (NLP) which uses an ontology as the central resource for extracting and representing meaning of natural language texts, reasoning about ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Advanced Engineering Informatics

Advanced Engineering Informatics Volume 21, Issue 2

April, 2007

116 pages

ISSN:1474-0346

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © Elsevier Ltd © 2006.

Publisher

Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.

Netherlands

Publication History

Published: 01 April 2007

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

4
Total Citations
View Citations
0
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 06 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Goncharenko BZaytsev VStorm TBalland EVarro D(2016)Language design and implementation for the domain of coding conventionsProceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Software Language Engineering10.1145/2997364.2997386(90-104)Online publication date: 20-Oct-2016
Storm TBalland EVarro D(2016)Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Software Language EngineeringundefinedOnline publication date: 20-Oct-2016
Abbas MBerio G(2013)Creating Ontologies Using Ontology MappingsProceedings of the 2013 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence (WI) and Intelligent Agent Technologies (IAT) - Volume 0310.1109/WI-IAT.2013.169(143-146)Online publication date: 17-Nov-2013
Moody DHillegersberg J(2009)Evaluating the Visual Syntax of UMLSoftware Language Engineering10.1007/978-3-642-00434-6_3(16-34)Online publication date: 24-Mar-2009

View Options

View options

Figures

Tables

Media

View Issue’s Table of Contents