Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
article

Robust diagnosis of discrete event systems against intermittent loss of observations

Published: 01 September 2012 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    In the usual approaches to fault diagnosis of discrete event systems it is assumed that not only all sensors work properly but also all information reported by sensors always reaches the diagnoser. Any bad sensor operation or communication failure between sensors and the diagnoser can be regarded as loss of observations of events initially assumed as observable. In such situations, it may be possible that either the diagnoser stands still or report some wrong information regarding the fault occurrence. In this paper we assume that intermittent loss of observations may occur and we propose an automaton model based on a new language operation (language dilation) that takes it into account. We refer to this problem as robust diagnosability against intermittent loss of observations (or simply robust diagnosability, where the context allows). We present a necessary and sufficient condition for robust diagnosability in terms of the language generated by the original automaton and propose two tests for robust language diagnosability, one that deploys diagnosers and another one that uses verifiers. We also extend the results to robust codiagnosability against intermittent loss of observations.

    References

    [1]
    Maximum likelihood failure diagnosis in finite state machines under unreliable observations. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. v55 i3. 579-593.
    [2]
    Basilio, J. C., & Lafortune, S. (2009). Robust codiagnosability of discrete event systems. In Proc. of the American control conference (pp. 2202-2209).
    [3]
    Computation of minimal event bases that ensure diagnosability. Discrete Event Dynamic Systems: Theory and Applications.
    [4]
    Carvalho, L. K., Basilio, J. C., & Moreira, M. V. (2010). Robust diagnosability of discrete event systems subject to intermittent sensor failures. In Proc. of the 10th international workshop on discrete event systems (pp. 94-99).
    [5]
    Introduction to discrete event systems. 2nd ed. Springer, New York.
    [6]
    Diagnosability of discrete event systems with modular structure. Discrete Event Dynamic Systems: Theory and Applications. v16 i1. 9-37.
    [7]
    Coordinated decentralized protocols for failure diagnosis of discrete event systems. Discrete Event Dynamic Systems: Theory and Applications. v10. 33-86.
    [8]
    Inference-based ambiguity management in decentralized decision-making: decentralized diagnosis of discrete-event systems. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering. v6 i3. 479-491.
    [9]
    Lima, S. T. S., Basilio, J. C., Lafortune, S., & Moreira, M. V. (2010). Robust diagnosis of discrete-event systems subject to permanent sensor failures. In Proc. of the 10th international workshop on discrete event systems (pp. 100-107).
    [10]
    Diagnosability of discrete event systems and its applications. Discrete Event Dynamic Systems: Theory and Applications. v4 i2. 197-212.
    [11]
    Moreira, M. V., Jesus, T. C., & Basilio, J. C. (2010). Polynomial time verification of decentralized diagnosability of discrete event systems. In Proc. of the American control conference (pp. 3353-3358).
    [12]
    Polynomial time verification of decentralized diagnosability of discrete event systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. v56 i7. 1679-1684.
    [13]
    Decentralized failure diagnosis of discrete event systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans. v36 i2. 384-395.
    [14]
    The control of discrete-event systems. Proceedings of the IEEE. v77. 81-98.
    [15]
    Rohloff, K. R. (2005). Sensor failure tolerant supervisory control. In 44th IEEE conference on decision and control and European control conference (pp. 3493-3498).
    [16]
    Diagnosability of discrete-event systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. v40. 1555-1575.
    [17]
    A polynomial algorithm for testing diagnosability of discrete-event systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. v46 i8. 1318-1321.
    [18]
    Takai, S. (2010). Robust failure diagnosis of partially observed discrete event systems. In Proc. of 10th international workshop on discrete event systems (pp. 215-220).
    [19]
    Diagnosability of stochastic discrete-event systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. v50. 476-492.
    [20]
    Fault diagnosis for timed automata. In: Damm, W., Olderog, E.-R. (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer sciences, Vol. 2469. Springer-Verlag. pp. 205-221.
    [21]
    Diagnosis of discrete event systems using decentralized architectures. Discrete Event Dynamic Systems: Theory and Applications. v17 i2. 233-263.
    [22]
    Polynomial-time verification of diagnosability of partially observed discrete-event systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. v47 i9. 1491-1495.
    [23]
    Fault diagnosis in discrete-event systems: framework and model reduction. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. v48 i7. 1199-1212.

    Cited By

    View all

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Automatica (Journal of IFAC)
    Automatica (Journal of IFAC)  Volume 48, Issue 9
    September, 2012
    448 pages

    Publisher

    Pergamon Press, Inc.

    United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 September 2012

    Author Tags

    1. Automaton
    2. Discrete event systems
    3. Fault diagnosis
    4. Robust diagnosability

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 27 Jul 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Niffler: Real-time Device-level Anomalies Detection in Smart HomeACM Transactions on the Web10.1145/358607317:3(1-27)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2023
    • (2022)Diagnosability verification using LTL model checkingDiscrete Event Dynamic Systems10.1007/s10626-022-00360-w32:3(399-433)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2022
    • (2022)Decentralized diagnosis of discrete event systems subject to permanent sensor failuresDiscrete Event Dynamic Systems10.1007/s10626-021-00353-132:2(159-193)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2022
    • (2021)State Estimation of Discrete-Event Systems Subject to Intermittent and Permanent Loss of Observations2021 60th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC)10.1109/CDC45484.2021.9683601(1048-1053)Online publication date: 14-Dec-2021
    • (2021)Intermittent fault diagnosability of discrete event systems: an overview of automaton-based approachesDiscrete Event Dynamic Systems10.1007/s10626-020-00324-y31:1(59-102)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2021
    • (2019)Discrete event system identification with the aim of fault detectionDiscrete Event Dynamic Systems10.1007/s10626-019-00283-z29:2(191-209)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2019
    • (2018)Formal verification of intermittent fault diagnosability of discrete-event systems using model-checkingInternational Journal of Critical Computer-Based Systems10.5555/3302636.33026408:2(193-213)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2018
    • (2018)Verification of Opacity in Networked Supervisory Control Systems with Insecure Control Channels2018 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC)10.1109/CDC.2018.8619851(4851-4856)Online publication date: 17-Dec-2018
    • (2018)Codiagnosability of networked discrete event systems subject to communication delays and intermittent loss of observationDiscrete Event Dynamic Systems10.1007/s10626-017-0265-628:2(215-246)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2018
    • (2017)A Switched Systems Framework for Guaranteed Convergence of Image-Based Observers With Intermittent MeasurementsIEEE Transactions on Robotics10.1109/TRO.2016.262702433:2(266-280)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2017
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    View options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media