research-article

Freeform digital ink annotations in electronic documents

Computers and Graphics, Volume 55, Issue C

Pages 1 - 20

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2015.10.014

Published: 01 April 2016 Publication History

Abstract

A variety of different approaches have been used to add digital ink annotations to text-based documents. While the majority of research in this field has focused on annotation support for static documents, a small number of studies have investigated support for documents in which the underlying content is changed. Although the approaches used to annotate static documents have been relatively successful, the annotation of dynamic text documents poses significant challenges which remain largely unsolved. However, it is difficult to clearly identify the successful techniques and the remaining challenges since there has not yet been a comprehensive review of digital ink annotation research. This paper reports the results of a systematic mapping study of existing work, and presents a taxonomy categorizing digital ink annotation research. Graphical abstractDisplay Omitted HighlightsAdding annotations to documents is well covered but the order of steps varies by implementation.Automatic adaptation is a gap in the current literature.There is only one study of user expectations on automatic adaptation.The type of input mechanism influences the functionality provided and how it is implemented.There is a wide variety of additional functionality investigated.

References

[1]

Adler A, Gujar A, Harrison BL, O'Hara K, Sellen A. A diary study of work-related reading: design implications for digital reading devices. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI '98, New York, NY, USA: ACM Press, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.; 1998. p. 241-8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/274644.274679.

Digital Library

[2]

Adler MJ, Van Doren C. How to read a book. New York: Simon and Schuster; 1972.

[3]

Agrawala M, Shilman M. DIZI: a digital ink zooming interface for document annotation. In: Costabile MF, Paterno F, editors. Human-computer interaction - INTERACT 2005. Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 3585. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2005. p. 69-79 [chapter 9] http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11555261_9.

[4]

Anderson R, McDowell L, Simon B. Use of classroom presenter in engineering courses. In: Proceedings of the 35th annual conference on frontiers in education, FIE '05, 2005. p. T2G-13, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2005.1611913.

[5]

Anderson RJ, Anderson R, Simon B, Wolfman SA, VanDeGrift T, Yasuhara K. Experiences with a tablet PC based lecture presentation system in computer science courses. SIGCSE Bull 2004; 36(1):56-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1028174.971323.

[6]

Anderson RJ, Hoyer C, Prince C, Su J, Videon F, Wolfman SA. Speech, ink, and slides: the interaction of content channels. In: Proceedings of the 12th annual ACM international conference on multimedia, MULTIMEDIA '04. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2004. p. 796-803, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1027527.1027713.

Digital Library

[7]

Ball E, Franks H, Jenkins J, McGrath M, Leigh J. Annotation is a valuable tool to enhance learning and assessment in student essays. Nurse Educ Today 2009; 29(3):284-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2008.10.005.

[8]

Bargeron D, Moscovich T. Reflowing digital ink annotations. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI '03. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2003. p. 385-93, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/642611.642678.

Digital Library

[9]

Bhardwaj K, Chaudhury S, Roy SD. Augmented paper system: a framework for user's personalized workspace. In: Proceedings of the 4th national conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, image processing and graphics, 2013. p. 1-4, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/NCVPRIPG.2013.6776182.

[10]

Brandl P, Haller M, Oberngruber J, Schafleitner C. Bridging the gap between real printouts and digital whiteboard. In: Proceedings of the work. Conference on advanced visual interfaces, AVI '08. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2008. p. 31-8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1385569.1385577.

Digital Library

[11]

Brush AJ, Bargeron A, Gupta A, Cadiz JJ. Robust annotation positioning in digital documents. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI '01. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2001. p. 285-92, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/365024.365117.

Digital Library

[12]

Cabral D, Correia N. Pen-based video annotations: a proposal and a prototype for tablet PCs. In: Gross T, Gulliksen T, Kotze P, Oestreicher L, Palanque P, Prates RO, et al., editors. Human-computer interaction - INTERACT 2009. Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 5727. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; p. 17-20, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03658-3_5.

[13]

Cadiz JJ, Gupta A, Grudin J. Using web annotations for asynchronous collaboration around documents. In: Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work, CSCW '00. Philadelphia, USA: ACM; 2000. p. 309-18, 359002, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/358916.359002.

Digital Library

[14]

Cattelan RG, Teixeira C, Ribas H, Munson E, Pimentel MGC. Inkteractors: interacting with digital ink. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on applied computing, SAC '08. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2008. p. 1246-51, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1363686.1363973.

Digital Library

[15]

Chandrasekar S, Tront JG, Prey JC. WriteOn1.0: a tablet PC-based tool for effective classroom instruction. SIGCSE Bull 2009; 41(3):323-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1595496.1562975.

[16]

Chang SH, Chen X, Priest RA, Plimmer B. Issues of extending the user interface of integrated development environments. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGCHI New Zealand chapter's international conference on human-computer interactions, CHINZ '08. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2008. p. 23-30, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1496976.1496980.

Digital Library

[17]

Chatti MA, Sodhi T, Specht M, Klamma R, Klemke R. u-Annotate: an application for user-driven freeform digital ink annotation of E-learning content. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on advanced learning technologies, 2006. p. 1039-43, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2006.1652624.

[18]

Chen N, Guimbretière F, Sellen A. Designing a multi-slate reading environment to support active reading activities. ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact 2012; 19 (3):18:1-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2362364.2362366.

[19]

Chen N, Guimbretiere F, Sellen A. Graduate student use of a multislate reading system. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI '13. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2013. p. 1799-808, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466237.

Digital Library

[20]

Chen X, Plimmer B. CodeAnnotator: digital ink annotation within eclipse. In: Proceedings of the 19th Australasian conference on computer-human interactions, OZCHI '07. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2007. p. 211-4, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1324892.1324935.

[21]

Conroy K, Levin D, Guimbretiere F. Proofrite: a paper-augmented word processor. Demo session of UIST. ACM; 2004.

[22]

Dontcheva M, Drucker SM, Cohen MF. V4V: a view for the viewer. In: Proceedings of the 2005 conference on designing for user eXperience, DUX '05, New York, NY, USA: AIGA - American Institute of Graphic Arts; 2005.

[23]

Fowler RL, Barker AS. Effectiveness of highlighting for retention of text material. J Appl Psychol 1974; 59(3):358.

[24]

Golovchinsky G, Denoue L. Moving markup: repositioning freeform annotations. In: Proceedings of the 15th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology, UIST '02. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2002. p. 21-30, http://dx.doi.org/10.145/571985.571989

Digital Library

[25]

Golovchinsky G, Marshall CC. Hypertext interaction revisited. In: Proceedings of the 11th ACM conference on hypertext and hypermedia, HYPERTEXT '00 New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2000. p. 171-9, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/336296.336358.

Digital Library

[26]

Golovchinsky G, Marshall CC. Hypertext interactivity: from choice to participation. New Rev Hypermed Multimed 2000; 6(1):169-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13614560008914722.

[27]

Golovchinsky G, Price MN, Schilit BN. From reading to retrieval: freeform ink annotations as queries. In: Proceedings of the 22Nd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, SIGIR '99. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 1999. p. 19-25, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/312624.312637.

Digital Library

[28]

Gotze M, Schlechtweg S, Strothotte T. The intelligent pen: toward a uniform treatment of electronic documents. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on smart graphics, SMARTGRAPH '02. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2002. p. 129-35, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/569005.569024.

Digital Library

[29]

Guimbretière F. Paper augmented digital documents. In: Proceedings of the 16th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology, UIST '03. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2003. p. 51-60, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/964696.964702.

Digital Library

[30]

Hardock G, Kurtenbach G, Buxton W. A marking based interface for collaborative writing. In: Proceedings of the 6th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology, UIST '93. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 1993. p. 259-66, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/168642.168669.

Digital Library

[31]

Hinckley K, Bi X, Pahud M, Buxton B. Informal information gathering techniques for active reading. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI '12. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2012. p. 1893-6, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208327.

Digital Library

[32]

Johnson G, Gross MD, Hong J, Do EY. Computational support for sketching in design: a review, vol. 2. Hanover, MA, USA: Now Publishers Inc.; http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1100000013.

[33]

Kam M, Wang J, Iles A, Tse E, Chiu J, Glaser D, et al. LiveNotes: a system for cooperative and augmented note-taking in lectures. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI '05. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2005. p. 531-40, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055046.

[34]

Kawase R, Herder E, Nejdl W. A comparison of paper-based and online annotations in the workplace. In: Cress U, Dimitrova V, Specht M, editors. Learning in the synergy of multiple disciplines. Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 5794. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2009. p. 240-53, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04636-0_23.

[35]

Kitchenham B, Charters S. Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews. Technical report, Keele University and Durham University Joint Report; 2007.

[36]

Kitchenham B, Pretorius R, Budgen D, Brereton O, Turner M, Niazi M, et al. Systematic literature reviews in software engineering a tertiary study. Inf Softw Technol 2010; 52(8):792-805. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2010.03.006.

[37]

Levine SR, Ehrlich SF. The freestyle system. In: Klinger A, editor. Human-machine interactive systems, languages and information systems. US: Springer; 1991. p. 3-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5883-1_1.

[38]

Li Y, Hinckley K, Guan Z, Landay JA. Experimental analysis of mode switching techniques in pen-based user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI '05. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2005. p. 461-70, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055036.

[39]

Liao C, Guimbretière F, Anderson R, Linnell N, Prince C, Razmov V. PaperCP: exploring the integration of physical and digital affordances for active learning. In: Baranauskas C, Palanque P, Abascal J, Barbosa SDJ, editors. Human-computer interaction, INTERACT 2007, Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 4663. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2007. p. 15-28, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74800-7_2.

[40]

Liao G, Guimbretiere F, Hinckley K. PapierCraft: a command system for interactive paper. In: Proceedings of the 18th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology, UIST '05. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2005. p. 241-4, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1095034.1095074.

Digital Library

[41]

Liao G, Guimbretière F, Hinckley K, Hollan J. PapierCraft: a gesture-based command system for interactive paper. ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact 2008; 14(4):18:1-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1314683.1314686.

[42]

Lichtschlag L, Borchers J. CodeGraffiti: communication by sketching for pair programmers. In: Adjunct proceedings of the 23nd annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology, UIST '10. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2010. p. 439-40, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1866218.1866260.

Digital Library

[43]

Liu Z. Reading behavior in the digital environment: changes in reading behavior over the past ten years. J Doc 2005; 61(6):700-12.

[44]

Mackay WE, Pothier G, Letondal C, Bøegh K, Sørensen HE. The missing link: augmenting biology laboratory notebooks. In: Proceedings of the 15th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology, UIST '02. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2002. p. 41-50, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/571985.571992.

Digital Library

[45]

Marinai S. Reflowing and annotating scientific papers on eBook readers. In: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM symposium on document engineering, DocEng '13. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2013. p. 241-4, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2494266.2494311.

Digital Library

[46]

Marshall CC. Annotation: from paper books to the digital library. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM international conference on digital libraries, DL '97. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 1997. p. 131-40, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/263690.263806.

Digital Library

[47]

Marshall CC, Brush AJB. From personal to shared annotations. In: CHI '02 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, CHI EA '02. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2002. p. 812-3, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/506443.506610.

Digital Library

[48]

Marshall CC, Price MN, Golovchinsky G, Schilit BN. Collaborating over portable reading appliances. Pers Technol 1999; 3(12):43-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01305319.

[49]

Marshall CC, Price MN, Golovchinsky G, Schilit BN. Designing e-Books for legal research. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on digital libraries, JCDL '01. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2001. p. 41-8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/379437.379445.

Digital Library

[50]

Matulic F, Norrie MC. Supporting active reading on pen and touch-operated tabletops. In: Proceedings of the working conference on advanced visual interfaces, AVI '12. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2012. p. 612-9, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2254556.2254669.

Digital Library

[51]

Mazzei A, Blom J, Gomez L, Dillenbourg P. Shared annotations: the social side of exam preparation. In: Hernandez-Leo D, Ley T, Klamma R, Harrer A, editors. Scaling up learning for sustained impact. Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 8095. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2013. p. 205-18, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40814-4_17.

[52]

Morris MR, Brush AJB, Meyers BR. Reading revisited: evaluating the usability of digital display surfaces for active reading tasks. In: 2nd annual IEEE international workshop on horizontal interactive human-computer systems, 2007. p. 79-86, http://dx.doi.org/

[53]

O'Hara K, Sellen A. A comparison of reading paper and on-line documents. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI '97. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 1997. p. 335-42, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/258549.258787.

Digital Library

[54]

Okoli C, Schabram K. A guide to conducting a systematic literature review of information systems research. Sprouts: Work Pap Inf Syst 2010; 10(26).

[55]

Olsen DR, Taufer T, Fails JA. ScreenCrayons: annotating anything. In: Proceedings of the 17th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology, UIST '04. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2004. p. 165-74, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1029632.1029663.

Digital Library

[56]

Pearson J, Buchanan G. Real-time document collaboration using iPads. In: Proceedings of the 3rd workshop on research advances in large digital book repository and complement. Media, BooksOnline '10. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2010. p. 9-14, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1871854.1871859.

Digital Library

[57]

Plimmer B. A comparative evaluation of annotation software for grading programming assignments. In: Proceedings of the 11th Australasian conference on user interface, AUIC '10. Darlinghurst, Australia: Australian Computer Society, Inc.; 2010. p. 14-22.

[58]

Plimmer B, Apperley M. Making paperless work. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGCHI New Zealand chapter's international conference on computer-human, interaction, CHINZ '07. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2007. p. 1-8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1278960.1278961.

Digital Library

[59]

Plimmer B, Mason P. A pen-based paperless environment for annotating and marking student assignments. In: Proceedings of the 7th Australasian user interface conference, AUIC '06. Darlinghurst, Australia: Australian Computer Society, Inc.; 2006. p. 37-44.

[60]

Plimmer B, Grundy J, Hosking J, Priest R. Inking in the IDE: experiences with pen-based design and annotation. In: IEEE symposium on visual languages and human centric computing, 2006. p. 111-5, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/VLHCC.2006.28.

Digital Library

[61]

Plimmer B, Chang SH, Doshi M, Laycock L, Seneviratne N. iAnnotate: Exploring multi-user ink annotation in web browsers. In: Proceedings of the 11th Australasian conference on user interface, AUIC '10. Darlinghurst, Australia: Australian Computer Society, Inc.; 2010. p. 52-60.

[62]

Price MN, Golovchinsky G, Schilit BN. Linking by inking: trailblazing in a paper-like hypertext. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM conference on hypertext and hypermedia, HYPERTEXT '98. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 1998. p. 30-9, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/276627.276631.

Digital Library

[63]

Price MN, Schilit BN, Golovchinsky G. XLibris: the active reading machine. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI '98. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 1998. p. 22-3, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/286498.286510.

[64]

Priest R, Plimmer B. RCA: experiences with an IDE annotation tool. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCHI New Zealand chapter international conference on computer-human interaction, CHINZ '06. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2006. p. 53-60, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1152760.1152767.

[65]

Ramachandran S, Kashi R. An architecture for ink annotations on web documents. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on document analysis and recognition, vol. 1, 2003. p. 256-60, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICDAR.2003.1227669.

[66]

Sanderson R, Van de Sompel H. Making web annotations persistent over time. In: Proceedings of the 10th annual joint conference on digital libraries, JCDL '10. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2010. p. 1-10, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1816123.1816125.

Digital Library

[67]

Schilit BN, Golovchinsky G, Price MN. Beyond paper: supporting active reading with free form digital ink annotations. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI '98. New York, NY, USA: ACM Press, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.; 1998. p. 249-56, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/274644.274680.

Digital Library

[68]

Schilit BN, Price MN, Golovchinsky G. Digital library information appliances. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM conference on digital libraries, DL '98. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 1998. p. 217-26, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/276675.276700.

Digital Library

[69]

Sellen AJ, Harper R. The myth of the paperless office. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2002.

[70]

Shilman M, Wei Z. Recognizing freeform digital ink annotations. In: Marinai S, Dengel A, editors. Document analysis systems. Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 3163. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2004. p. 322-31, http://dx.doi.rg/10.1007/978-3-540-28640-0_30.

[71]

Shipman F, Price MN, Marshall CC, Golovchinsky G. Identifying useful passages in documents based on annotation patterns. In: Koch T, Sølvberg I, editors. Research and advanced technology for digital libraries. Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 2769. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2003. p. 101-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45175-4_11.

[72]

Signer B, Norrie MC. PaperPoint: a paper-based presentation and interactive paper prototyping tool. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on tangible and embedded interaction, TEI '07. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2007. p. 57-64, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1226969.1226981.

Digital Library

[73]

Simpson ML, Nist SL Textbook annotation: an effective and efficient study strategy for college students. J Read 1990; 34(2):122-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/40032053.

[74]

Steimle J. CoScribe: integrating paper and digital documents for collaborative knowledge work, vol. 2, 2009. p. 174-88, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2009.27.

[75]

Steimle J. Collaborative cross-media annotation of documents. Human-computer interaction series. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2012. p. 103-26. http//dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20276-6_5.

[76]

Steimle J, Brdiczka O, Muhlhauser M. CoScribe: integrating paper and digital documents for collaborative knowledge work. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 2009; 2(3):174-88.

[77]

Sutherland CJ, Plimmer B. vsInk: integrating digital ink with program code in visual studio. In: Proceedings of the fourteenth Australasian user interface conference, vol. 139, AUIC '13. Darlinghurst, Australia: Australian Computer Society, Inc.; 2013. p. 13-22.

[78]

Sutherland CJ, Luxton-Reilly A, Plimmer B. An observational study of how experienced programmers annotate program code. In: Abascal J, Barbosa S, Fetter M, Gross T, Palanque P, Winckler M, editors. Human-computer interaction INTERACT 2007. Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 9297. Bamberg, Germany: Springer International Publishing; 2015. p. 177-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22668-2_15.

[79]

Tront JG, Eligeti V, Prey J. Classroom presentations using tablet PCs and WriteOn. In: Annual frontiers in education, 2006. p. 1-5, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2006.322336.

[80]

Tront JG, Eligeti V, Prey J. WriteOn: a tool to support teaching software engineering. In: 19th Conference on software engineering education and training workshops, 2006. p. 8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CSEETW.2006.25.

Digital Library

[81]

Truong KN, Abowd GD, Brotherton JA. Personalizing the capture of public experiences. In: Proceedings of the 12th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology, UIST '99. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 1999. p. 121-30, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/320719.322593.

Digital Library

[82]

Wang X, Raghupathy S. Ink annotations and their anchoring in heterogeneous digital documents. In: 9th International conference on document analysis and recognition, vol. 1, 2007. p. 163-7, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICDAR.2007.4378696.

[83]

Wang X, Shilman M, Raghupathy S. Parsing ink annotations on heterogeneous documents. In: Eurographics workshop on sketch-based interfaces and modeling. Vienna, Austria: Eurographics Association; 2006. p. 43-50.

[84]

Weibel N, Ispas A, Signer B, Norrie MC. PaperProof: a paper-digital proof-editing system. In: CHI '08 Extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, CHI EA '08. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2008. p. 2349-54, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1358628.1358682.

[85]

Wu H, Yang SJH, Su Y. Free-form annotation tool for collaboration. In: IEEE international conference on sensor networks, ubiquitous and trustworthy Computing, SUTC '08, 2008. p. 555-60, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SUTC.2008.60.

Digital Library

[86]

Yoon D, Chen N, Guimbretière F. TextTearing: opening white space for digital ink annotation. In: Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology, UIST '13. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2013. p. 107-12, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2501988.2502036.

Digital Library

[87]

Zeleznik R, Miller T, Li C, Laviola Jr JJ. MathPaper: mathematical sketching with fluid support for interactive computation. In: Butz A, Fisher B, Krüger A, Olivier P, Christie M, editors. Smart graphics. Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 5166. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2008. p. 20-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85412-8_3.

[88]

Zyto S, Karger DR, Ackerman MS, Mahajan S. Successful classroom deployment of a social document annotation system. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI '12. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2012. p. 1883-92, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208326.

Digital Library

Cited By

Shi LCampbell RChi PCirimele MCleron MClimer KFleming CGanti AGervais PGonnet PKarim TMaksai AMelancon CMickle RMusat CNandy PQu XRobishaw DSingh AVenkatesan M(2024)Inkeraction: An Interaction Modality Powered by Ink Recognition and SynthesisProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642498(1-26)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642498
de Ryckel XSluÿters AVanderdonckt J(2022)SnappView, a Software Development Kit for Supporting End-user Mobile Interface ReviewProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35345276:EICS(1-38)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3534527
Romat HMarquardt NHinckley KHenry Riche N(2022)Style Blink: Exploring Digital Inking of Structured Information via Handcrafted Styling as a First-Class ObjectProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3501988(1-14)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3491102.3501988
Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Reflowing digital ink annotations
CHI '03: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Annotating paper documents with a pen is a familiar and indispensable activity across a wide variety of work and educational settings. Recent developments in pen-based computing promise to bring this experience to digital documents. However, digital ...
Parsing ink annotations on heterogeneous documents
SBM'06: Proceedings of the Third Eurographics conference on Sketch-Based Interfaces and Modeling

Annotation is an integral part of reading, comprehending, commenting, and authoring notes and documents. In this paper we present a system for recognizing annotations in a flexible digital notebook that may contain a variety of content ranging from text,...
Improving annotations in digital documents
ECDL'09: Proceedings of the 13th European conference on Research and advanced technology for digital libraries

Annotation plays a major role in a user's reading of a document: from elementary school students making notes on text books to professors marking up their latest research papers. A common place for annotations to appear is in the margin of a document. ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Computers and Graphics

Computers and Graphics Volume 55, Issue C

April 2016

174 pages

ISSN:0097-8493

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © Elsevier Ltd.

Publisher

Pergamon Press, Inc.

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 April 2016

Qualifiers

Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

9
Total Citations
View Citations
0
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 28 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Shi LCampbell RChi PCirimele MCleron MClimer KFleming CGanti AGervais PGonnet PKarim TMaksai AMelancon CMickle RMusat CNandy PQu XRobishaw DSingh AVenkatesan M(2024)Inkeraction: An Interaction Modality Powered by Ink Recognition and SynthesisProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642498(1-26)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642498
de Ryckel XSluÿters AVanderdonckt J(2022)SnappView, a Software Development Kit for Supporting End-user Mobile Interface ReviewProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35345276:EICS(1-38)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3534527
Romat HMarquardt NHinckley KHenry Riche N(2022)Style Blink: Exploring Digital Inking of Structured Information via Handcrafted Styling as a First-Class ObjectProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3501988(1-14)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3491102.3501988
Cruz SBranco VProvidência F(2021)Contributos para um Sistema de Anotações no Contexto da Comunicação CientíficaProceedings of the 10th International Conference on Digital and Interactive Arts10.1145/3483529.3483703(1-9)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3483529.3483703
Kučera JScott JLindley SOlivier PKitamura YQuigley AIsbister KIgarashi TBjørn PDrucker S(2021)Bedtime WindowProceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3411764.3445121(1-12)Online publication date: 6-May-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3411764.3445121
Sheshadri SZhao SChen YFjeld MBernhaupt RMueller FVerweij DAndres JMcGrenere JCockburn AAvellino IGoguey ABjørn PZhao SSamson BKocielnik R(2020)Learn with Haptics: Improving Vocabulary Recall with Free-form Digital Annotation on Touchscreen MobilesProceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3313831.3376272(1-13)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3313831.3376272
Subramonyam HSeifert CShah PAdar EBernhaupt RMueller FVerweij DAndres JMcGrenere JCockburn AAvellino IGoguey ABjørn PZhao SSamson BKocielnik R(2020)texSketch: Active Diagramming through Pen-and-Ink AnnotationsProceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3313831.3376155(1-13)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3313831.3376155
Aksan EPece FHilliges OMandryk RHancock MPerry MCox A(2018)DeepWritingProceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3173574.3173779(1-14)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3173574.3173779
Riche YHenry Riche NHinckley KPanabaker SFuelling SWilliams SMark GFussell SLampe Cschraefel mHourcade JAppert CWigdor D(2017)As We May Ink?Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3025453.3025716(3241-3253)Online publication date: 2-May-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3025453.3025716

View Options

View options

Figures

Tables

Media

View Issue’s Table of Contents