Cited By
View all- Deng XSong DWei L(2020)A dynamic game model analysis for friendship selectionJournal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology10.3233/JIFS-17938138:1(65-73)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2020
How gender role stereotypes affect attraction in an online dating scenario
Pages 738 - 746
Abstract
Today, it is not uncommon to meet someone and begin a romantic relationship online. Meeting on a dating website differs from meeting in person because a dating profile is created first that allows others to review potential romantic partners. Few studies have examined romantic attraction within an online dating context, and even fewer have examined how gender roles may influence attraction. The current study1 (Nź=ź447, 49.4% female) examined the effects of gender role congruence and physical attractiveness on romantic interest in college students. Participants viewed online dating profiles that varied in their physical attractiveness and adherence to gender role norms. Results indicated that both men and women preferred attractive and gender role incongruent dating partners over average looking and gender role congruent. Contrary to previous research, women differentiated more between profiles based on physical attractiveness than the men, especially for gender role congruent profiles. Men were especially interested in attractive, gender role incongruent profiles. After physical attractiveness, gender role incongruence was the greatest factor that determined interest in a profile. Future research may need to consider how the potential seriousness of a relationship, as defined by the expected length of the relationship, influences how online profile characteristics affect attraction and interest. Participants rated mock dating profiles varying in attractiveness and gender roles.Gender role incongruent were preferred over congruent profiles.Physically attractive profiles were preferred over average appearance profiles.Participant gender and role congruence modified physical attractiveness effects.
References
[1]
J.K. Antill, Sex role complementarity versus similarity in married couples, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45 (1983) 145-155.
[2]
J.J. Arnett, Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties, American Psychologist, 55 (2000) 469-480.
[3]
E. Berscheid, K. Dion, E. Walster, G. Walster, Physical attractiveness and dating choice: A test of the matching hypothesis, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7 (1971) 173-189.
[4]
R.J. Brand, A. Bonatsos, R. D'Orazio, H. DeShong, What is beautiful is good, even online: Correlations between photo attractiveness and text attractiveness in men's online dating profiles, Computers in Human Behavior, 28 (2012) 166-170.
[5]
D.M. Buss, Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12 (1989) 1-49.
[6]
D.M. Buss, M.B. Barnes, Preferences in human mate selection, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50 (1986) 559-570.
[7]
D.M. Buss, T.K. Shackelford, L.A. Kirkpatrick, R.J. Larsen, A¿half century of mate preferences: The cultural evolution of values, Journal of Marriage and Family, 63 (2001) 491-503.
[8]
D. Byrne, The attraction paradigm, Academic Press, New York, 1971.
[9]
J.T. Cacioppo, S. Cacioppo, G.C. Gonzaga, E.L. Ogburn, T.J. VanderWeele, Marital satisfaction and break-ups differ across on-line and off-line meeting venues, PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110 (2013) 10135-10140.
[10]
W. Campbell, Narcissism and romantic attraction, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77 (1999) 1254-1270.
[11]
M.A. Cejka, A.H. Eagly, Gender-stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment, Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 25 (1999) 413.
[12]
J.P. Curran, Correlates of physical attractiveness and interpersonal attraction in the dating situation, Social Behavior and Personality, 1 (1973) 153-157.
[13]
J.V. D'Agostino, S.K. Day, Gender-role orientation and preference for an intimate partner, The Psychological Record, 41 (1991) 321-328.
[14]
A.B. Diekman, E.K. Clark, A.M. Johnston, E.R. Brown, M. Steinberg, Malleability in communal goals and beliefs influences attraction to stem careers: Evidence for a goal congruity perspective, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101 (2011) 902-918.
[15]
A.B. Diekman, A.H. Eagly, Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26 (2000) 1171-1188.
[16]
P. Dijkstra, D.H. Barelds, Do people know what they want: A similar or complementary partner?, Evolutionary Psychology, 6 (2008) 595-602.
[17]
A.H. Eagly, Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1987.
[18]
A.H. Eagly, Sex differences in social behavior: Comparing social role theory and evolutionary psychology, American Psychologist, 52 (1997) 1380-1383.
[19]
A.H. Eagly, R.D. Ashmore, M.G. Makhijan, L.C. Longo, What is beautiful is good, but¿: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype, Psychological Bulletin, 110 (1991) 109-128.
[20]
A.H. Eagly, P.W. Eastwick, M. Johannesen-Schmidt, Possible selves in marital roles: The impact of the anticipated division of labor on the mate preferences of women and men, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35 (2009) 403-414.
[21]
A.H. Eagly, W. Wood, A.B. Diekman, Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal, in: The developmental social psychology of gender, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 2000, pp. 123-174.
[22]
P.W. Eastwick, A.H. Eagly, P. Glick, M.C. Johannesen-Schmidt, S.T. Fiske, A.B. Blum, Is traditional gender ideology associated with sex-typed mate preferences? A test in nine nations, Sex Roles, 54 (2006) 603-614.
[23]
P.W. Eastwick, A.H. Eagly, E.J. Finkel, S.E. Johnson, Implicit and explicit preferences for physical attractiveness in a romantic partner: A double dissociation in predictive validity, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101 (2011) 993-1011.
[24]
F. Faul, E. Erdfelder, A.-G. Lang, A. Buchner, G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences, Behavior Research Methods, 39 (2007) 175-191.
[25]
A. Feingold, Gender differences in effects of physical attractiveness on romantic attraction: A comparison across five research paradigms, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59 (1990) 981-993.
[26]
G.C. Gonzaga, S. Carter, J. Buckwalter, Assortative mating, convergence, and satisfaction in married couples, Personal Relationships, 17 (2010) 634-644.
[27]
M.E. Heilman, M.H. Stopeck, Being attractive, advantage or disadvantage? performance-based evaluations and recommended personnel actions as a function of appearance, sex, and job type, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35 (1985) 202-215.
[28]
J. Henry, H.W. Helm, N. Cruz, Mate Selection: Gender and generational differences, North American Journal of Psychology, 15 (2013) 63-70.
[29]
G. Hitsch, A. Hortaçsu, D. Ariely, What makes you click?-Mate preferences in online dating, Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 8 (2010) 393-427.
[30]
M.C. Johannesen-Schmidt, A.H. Eagly, Another look at sex differences in preferred mate characteristics: The effects of endorsing the traditional female gender role, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26 (2002) 322-328.
[31]
N.P. Li, J.C. Yong, W. Tov, O. Sng, G.O. Fletcher, K.A. Valentine, Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105 (2013) 757-776.
[32]
S. Luo, G. Zhang, What leads to romantic attraction: Similarity, reciprocity, security, or beauty? Evidence from a speed-dating study, Journal of Personality, 77 (2009) 933-964.
[33]
J.E. Lydon, D.W. Jamieson, M.P. Zanna, Interpersonal similarity and the social and intellectual dimensions of first impressions, Social Cognition, 6 (1988) 269-286.
[34]
M. Man, J. Rojahn, L. Chrosniak, J. Sanford, College students' romantic attraction toward peers with physical disabilities, Journal of Developmental & Physical Disabilities, 18 (2006) 35-44.
[35]
K.A. McKenna, A.S. Green, M.J. Gleason, Relationship formation on the Internet: What's the big attraction?, Journal of Social Issues, 58 (2002) 9-31.
[36]
J.H. Moss, The role of similar humor styles in initial romantic attraction, 2010.
[37]
J.S. Nevid, Sex differences in factors of romantic attraction, Sex Roles, 11 (1984) 401-411.
[38]
J.L. Orlofsky, Psychological androgyny, sex-typing, and sex-role ideology as predictors of male-female interpersonal attraction, Sex Roles, 8 (1982) 1057-1073.
[39]
L.E. Park, A.F. Young, J.D. Troisi, R.T. Pinkus, Effects of everyday romantic goal pursuit on women's attitudes toward math and science, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37 (2011) 1259.
[40]
S. Reysen, Construction of a new scale: The Reysen likability scale, Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 33 (2005) 201-208.
[41]
L.D. Rosen, N.A. Cheever, C. Cummings, J. Felt, The impact of emotionality and self-disclosure on online dating versus traditional dating, Computers in Human Behavior, 24 (2008) 2124-2157.
[42]
D.R. Shaffer, R.D. Johnson, Effects of occupational choice and sex-role preferences on the attractiveness of competent men and women, Journal of Personality, 48 (1980) 505-519.
[43]
A. Smith, M. Duggan, Online dating & relationships, Pew Research Centers Internet American Life Project RSS, 2013.
[44]
J.T. Spence, R.L. Helmreich, Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates and antecedents, University of Texas Press, Austin, 1978.
[45]
S. Svrluga, #ilooklikeanengineer wants to challenge your ideas about who can work in tech, The Washington Post, 2015, August 4. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/grade-point/wp/2015/08/04/what-one-engineer-did-when-she-got-tired-of-sexism-at-work-like-having-dollar-bills-thrown-at-her/
[46]
J.A. de Vries, Impact of self-descriptions and photographs on mediated dating interest, Marriage & Family Review, 46 (2010) 538-562.
[47]
E. Walster, V. Aronson, D. Abrahams, L. Rottman, Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4 (1966) 508-516.
[48]
Wang, W, Interracial marriage: Who is 'marrying out'? Pew Research Centers Internet American Life Project RSS, 2015. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/06/12/interracial-marriage-who-is-marrying-out/
- How gender role stereotypes affect attraction in an online dating scenario
Recommendations
The Influence of Gender-Ethnic Intersectionality on Gender Stereotypes about IT Skills and Knowledge
One line of investigation in attempting to better understand the gender imbalance in the information technology (IT) field is to examine gender stereotypes about the skills and knowledge in the IT profession. A survey of 4046 university students in the ...
Children’s Implicit and Explicit Stereotypes on the Gender, Social Skills, and Interests of a Computer Scientist
ICER 2021: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on International Computing Education ResearchMotivation Only 27% of computer and mathematical scientists in the United States and 18% of IT specialists in Europe are women. The under-representation of women in the field of Computer Science is, among other things, influenced by stereotypes of ...
Gender and texting
Femininity predicted emoticon use; was used most frequently.Texting interfered with class preparation/studying for over 70% of students.Gender-linked attitudes predicted school-related texting and relationship conflict.Men were more likely than women to ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Copyright © Elsevier Ltd.
Publisher
Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.
Netherlands
Publication History
Published: 01 October 2016
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- View Citations1Total Citations
- 0Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 13 Nov 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View all- Deng XSong DWei L(2020)A dynamic game model analysis for friendship selectionJournal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology10.3233/JIFS-17938138:1(65-73)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2020
View Options
View options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in