Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Designing intelligent manufacturing systems through Human-Machine Cooperation principles

Published: 01 September 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Models to design and evaluate the performance of Human-Machine Systems are presented.A human-centered approach is proposed to design human-aware Intelligent Manufacturing Systems.The first results of the experiments relating to the usefulness of a human-centered approach are encouraging. Since the start of industrialization, machine capabilities have increased in such a way that human control of processes has evolved from simple (with mechanization) to cognitive (with computerization), and even emotional (with semi/full automation). The processes have also evolved from simple to complicated, and now complex systems, in the emerging context of Industry 4.0. This is notably the case with Intelligent Manufacturing Systems in which processes have become so autonomous that humans are unaware of the processes running, while they may need to intervene to update the manufacturing plan or modify the process configuration if a machine breaks down, or to assist process-intelligent entities when they find themselves in a deadlock. This paper highlights the lack of attention paid to the correct integration of humans in Intelligent Manufacturing Systems and provides solutions based on Human-Machine Cooperation principles to retain humans in the process control loop with different levels of involvement identified by the levels of automation. The aim of these principles is to propose a human-centered approach to design and evaluate systems, processes, and their interactions with humans. Herein, these principles are detailed and applied to Intelligent Manufacturing Systems using Artificial Self-Organizing systems (ASO) as an example. An assistance system was designed to support cooperation between ASO and human operators. Experiments were conducted to evaluate the system and its utility in improving the performance of Human-Machine Systems, as well as its acceptability with regard to human factors. The results presented highlight the advantages of the approach within the context of Industry 4.0.

References

[1]
J. Barbosa, P. Leito, E. Adam, D. Trentesaux, Dynamic self-organization in holonic multi-agent manufacturing systems: The ADACOR evolution, Computers in Industry, 66 (2015) 99-111.
[2]
Blanc, P., Normand, A., Robert, C., Gauthier, A., Michel, J. -F., Pitrat, D., Ellipsis Truchot, M. -J. (2015). Inventaire 2015 des accidents technologiques. Ministre de lcologie, du Dveloppement durable et de lnergie, Direction gnrale de la prvention des risques.
[3]
Cardin, O., Trentesaux, D., Thomas, A., Castagna, P., Berger, T., & Bril El-Haouzi, H. (2015). Coupling predictive scheduling and reactive control in manufacturing hybrid control architectures: State of the art and future challenges. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 115.
[4]
K. Dencker, . Fasth, J. Stahre, L. Mrtensson, T. Lundholm, H. Akillioglu, Proactive assembly systems-realising the potential of human collaboration with automation, Annual Reviews in Control, 33 (2009) 230-237.
[5]
M.R. Endsley, Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems: Situation awareness, Human Factors, 37 (1995) 32-64.
[6]
Erbe, H. -H. (1998). Assistance systems supporting operations in manufacturing. In Proceedings of the BASYS 3rd IEEE/IFIP international conference on information technology for balanced automation systems in manufacturing (pp. 447456).
[7]
F. Flemisch, M. Heesen, T. Hesse, J. Kelsch, A. Schieben, J. Beller, Towards a dynamic balance between humans and automation: Authority, ability, responsibility and control in shared and cooperative control situations, Cognition, Technology and Work, 14 (2012) 3-18.
[8]
J. Frohm, V. Lindstrm, J. Stahre, M. Winroth, Levels of automation in manufacturing, Ergonomia An International Journal of Ergonomics and Human Factors, 30 (2008) 1-28.
[9]
Gaham, M., Bouzouia, B., & Achour, N. (2015). Human-in-the-loop cyber-physical production systems control (HiLCP2sC): A multi-objective interactive framework proposal. In T. Borangiu, A. Thomas, & D. Trentesaux (Eds.), Service orientation in holonic and multi-agent manufacturing (pp. 315325). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
[10]
E.H. Grosse, C.H. Glock, W.P. Neumann, Human factors in order picking: A content analysis of the literature, International Journal of Production Research, 55 (2017) 1260-1276.
[11]
Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. H. and N. M. B. T.-A. in Psychology (Ed.), Human Mental Workload (Vol. 52, pp. 139183). North-Holland.
[12]
J.-M. Hoc, M.-P. Lemoine, Cognitive evaluation of human-human and Human-Machine Cooperation modes in air traffic control, International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 8 (1998) 1-32.
[13]
Inagaki, T. (2003). Adaptive automation: Sharing and trading of control. In E. Hollnagel (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive task design (pp. 147169). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[14]
Kaber, D. B., & Endsley, M. R. (2004). The effects of level of automation and adaptive automation on human performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Theoretical issues in ergonomics science (Vol. 5).
[15]
J. Lee, B. Bagheri, H.A. Kao, A cyber-physical systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems, Manufacturing Letters, 3 (2015) 18-23.
[16]
J. Lee, N. Moray, Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems, Ergonomics, 35 (1992) 1243-1270.
[17]
M.P. Lemoine, S. Debernard, I. Crevits, P. Millot, Cooperation between humans and machines: First results of an experiment with a multi-level cooperative organisation in air traffic control, Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 5 (1996) 299-321.
[18]
M.-P. Lemoine, J.-M. Hoc, Multi-level Human-Machine Cooperation in air traffic control: An experimental evaluation, in: ECCE-8: Proceedings of the eighth European conference on cognitive ergonomics: Granada, Spain, 1013 September 1996, European Association of Cognitive Ergonomics, Granada, Spain, 1996.
[19]
R. Lepratti, Advanced human-machine system for intelligent manufacturing: Some issues in employing ontologies for natural language processing, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 17 (2006) 653-666.
[20]
V. Lindstrm, M. Winroth, Aligning manufacturing strategy and levels of automation: A case study, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management - JET-M, 27 (2010) 148-159.
[21]
MacCarthy, B. (2006). Organizational, systems and human issues in production planning, scheduling and control. In J. W. Herrmann (Ed.), Handbook of production scheduling (pp. 5990). Boston, MA: Springer, US.
[22]
Martnez-Miranda, J., & Pavn, J. (2010). Human attributes in the modelling of work teams BT balanced automation systems for future manufacturing networks: 9th IFIP WG 5.5 international conference, BASYS 2010, Valencia, Spain, July 2123, 2010. Proceedings. In . Ortiz, R. D. Franco, & P. G. Gasquet (Eds.), (pp. 276284). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.
[23]
May, G., Maghazei, O., Taisch, M., Bettoni, A., Cinus, M., & Matarazzo, A. (2014). Toward human-centric factories: Requirements and design aspects of a worker-centric job allocator. In B. Grabot, B. Vallespir, S. Gomes, A. Bouras, & D. Kiritsis (Eds.), Advances in production management systems. Innovative and knowledge-based production management in a global-local world: IFIP WG 5.7 International conference, APMS 2014, Ajaccio, France, September 2024, 2014, Proceedings, Part III (pp. 417424). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
[24]
D. McFarlane, V. Giannikas, A.C.Y. Wong, M. Harrison, Product intelligence in industrial control: Theory and practice, Annual Reviews in Control, 37 (2013) 69-88.
[25]
Millot, P. (Ed.). (2014). Risk management in life-critical systems. Wiley Blackwell.
[26]
Millot, P., & Lemoine, M. -P. (1998). An attempt for generic concepts toward Human-Machine Cooperation. In IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics. San Diego, USA.
[27]
Millot, P., & Mandiau, R. (1995). Men-machine cooperative organizations: Formal and pragmatic implementation methods. In J. -M. Hoc, P. -C. Cacciabue, & E. Hollnagel (Eds.), Expertise and technology: Cognition computer cooperation (pp. 213228, 199). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbraum Associates.
[28]
Millot, P., & Pacaux-Lemoine, M. P. (2013). A common work space for a mutual enrichment of Human-Machine Cooperation and team-situation awareness. IFAC proceedings volumes (IFAC-PapersOnline), 12(PART 1), pp. 387394.
[29]
P. Millot, J.-M. Hoc, Human-Machine Cooperation: Metaphor or possible reality?, in: 2nd European conference on cognitive science ECCS97, 1997, pp. 165-174.
[30]
H. Nishitani, Human-computer interaction in the new process technology, Journal of Process Control, 6 (1996) 111-117.
[31]
P. Oborski, Man-machine interactions in advanced manufacturing systems, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 23 (2004) 227-232.
[32]
Pacaux, M. P., Debernard, S., Godin, A., Rajaonah, B., Anceaux, F., & Vanderhaegen, F. (2011). Levels of automation and Human-Machine Cooperation: Application to human-robot interaction. IFAC proceedings volumes (IFAC-PapersOnline), 18(PART 1), pp. 64846492.
[33]
Pacaux-Lemoine, M. P. (2014). Human-Machine Cooperation principles to support life-critical systems management. In Risk management in life-critical systems (pp. 253277). Wiley Blackwell.
[34]
Pacaux-Lemoine, M. -P., & Itoh, M. (2015). Towards vertical and horizontal extension of shared control concept. In IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics (pp. 30863091). Hong Kong, China.
[35]
M.-P. Pacaux-Lemoine, S. Debernard, Common work space for human machine cooperation in air traffic control, Control Engineering Practice, 10 (2002) 571-576.
[36]
Pacaux-Lemoine, M. -P., Simon, P., & Popieul, J. (2015). Human-Machine Cooperation principles to support driving automation systems design. In 3rd International symposium on future active safety technology toward zero traffic accidents (FAST-zero15). Gothenburg, Sweden.
[37]
M.P. Pacaux-Lemoine, A. Loiselet, A common work space to support the cooperation into the cockpit of a two-seater fighter aircraft, Cooperative Systems Design: A Challenge of Mobility Age (2002) 157-172.
[38]
C. Pach, T. Berger, Y. Sallez, D. Trentesaux, Reactive control of overall power consumption in flexible manufacturing systems scheduling: A potential fields model, Control Engineering Practice, 44 (2015) 193-208.
[39]
R. Parasuraman, T.B. Sheridan, C.D. Wickens, A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation, 30 (2000) 286-297.
[40]
J.N. Pires, Semi-autonomous manufacturing systems: The role of the human-machine interface software and of the manufacturing tracking software, Mechatronics, 15 (2005) 1191-1205.
[41]
B. Rajaonah, N. Tricot, F. Anceaux, P. Millot, The role of intervening variables in driver-ACC cooperation, International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 66 (2008) 185-197.
[42]
J. Rasmussen, Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 13 (1983) 257-266.
[43]
Romero, D., Noran, O., Stahre, J., Bernus, P., & Fast-Berglund, . (2015). Towards a human-centred reference architecture for next generation balanced automation systems: Human-automation symbiosis. In S. Umeda, M. Nakano, H. Mizuyama, H. Hibino, D. Kiritsis, & G. von Cieminski (Eds.), Advances in production management systems: Innovative production management towards sustainable growth: IFIP WG 5.7 international conference, APMS 2015, Tokyo, Japan, September 79, 2015, Proceedings, Part II (pp. 556566). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
[44]
K. Sfsten, M. Winroth, J. Stahre, The content and process of automation strategies, International Journal of Production Economics, 110 (2007) 25-38.
[45]
Schmitt, K. (2012). Automations influence on nuclear power plants: A look at three accidents and how automation played a role. In International ergonomics association world conference. Recife, Brazil.
[46]
T.B. Sheridan, Telerobotics, automation, and human supervisory control, MIT Press, 1992.
[47]
B. Solvang, G. Sziebig, P. Korondi, Shop-floor architecture for effective human-machine and inter-machine interaction, Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 9 (2012) 183-201.
[48]
Trentesaux, D., & Millot, P. (2016). A human-centred design to break the myth of the Magic Human in intelligent manufacturing systems. In T. Borangiu, D. Trentesaux, A. Thomas, & D. McFarlane (Eds.), Service orientation in holonic and multi-agent manufacturing (pp. 103113). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
[49]
D. Trentesaux, R. Dindeleux, C. Tahon, A multicriteria decision support system for dynamic task allocation in a distributed production activity control structure, International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 11 (1998) 3-17.
[50]
D. Trentesaux, N. Moray, C. Tahon, Integration of the human operator into responsive discrete production management systems, European Journal of Operational Research, 109 (1998) 342-361.
[51]
D. Trentesaux, C. Pach, A. Bekrar, Y. Sallez, T. Berger, T. Bonte, J. Barbosa, Benchmarking flexible job-shop scheduling and control systems, Control Engineering Practice, 21 (2013) 1204-1225.
[52]
P. Valckenaers, H. Van Brussel, Design for the unexpected: From holonic manufacturing systems towards a humane mechatronics society (1st ed.), Butterworth-Heinemann, 2016.
[53]
P. Valckenaers, H. Van Brussel, H. Bruyninckx, B. Saint Germain, J. Van Belle, J. Philips, Predicting the unexpected, Computers in Industry, 62 (2011) 623-637.
[54]
H. Van Brussel, J. Wyns, P. Valckenaers, L. Bongaerts, P. Peeters, Reference architecture for holonic manufacturing systems: PROSA, Computers in Industry, 37 (1998) 255-274.
[55]
D.D. Woods, J. Tittle, M. Feil, A. Roesler, Envisioning human robot coordination in future operations, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 34 (2004) 210-218.
[56]
G. Zambrano Rey, M. Carvalho, D. Trentesaux, Cooperation models between humans and artificial self-organizing systems: Motivations, issues and perspectives, Proceedings 2013 6th international symposium on resilient control systems, ISRCS, 2013 (2013) 156-161.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Computers and Industrial Engineering
Computers and Industrial Engineering  Volume 111, Issue C
September 2017
606 pages

Publisher

Pergamon Press, Inc.

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 September 2017

Author Tags

  1. Human-Machine Cooperation
  2. Human-centered design
  3. Industry 4.0
  4. Intelligent manufacturing systems
  5. Levels of automation
  6. Techno-centered design

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 29 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Driving Supply Chain ResilienceProcedia Computer Science10.1016/j.procs.2024.02.065232:C(2458-2467)Online publication date: 2-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Toward human-centered intelligent assistance system in manufacturingProcedia Computer Science10.1016/j.procs.2024.01.156232:C(1584-1596)Online publication date: 2-Jul-2024
  • (2024)The resurrection of digital tripletJournal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences10.1016/j.jksuci.2023.10184635:10Online publication date: 4-Mar-2024
  • (2024)A preliminary step toward intelligent forming of fabric compositesEngineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence10.1016/j.engappai.2024.108262133:PDOnline publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2024)A benchmarking framework for eye-tracking-based vigilance prediction of vessel traffic controllersEngineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107660129:COnline publication date: 16-May-2024
  • (2024)An information-decision framework for the multilevel co-design of products, materials, and manufacturing processesAdvanced Engineering Informatics10.1016/j.aei.2023.10227159:COnline publication date: 1-Jan-2024
  • (2023)A Framework for Constructing a Technology -Enhanced Education Metaverse: Learner Engagement With Human–Machine CollaborationIEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies10.1109/TLT.2023.325751116:6(1179-1189)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2023
  • (2023)A deep learning-enabled human-cyber-physical fusion method towards human-robot collaborative assemblyRobotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing10.1016/j.rcim.2023.10257183:COnline publication date: 5-Jun-2023
  • (2023)Human-centric zero-defect manufacturingComputers in Industry10.1016/j.compind.2022.103792144:COnline publication date: 1-Jan-2023
  • (2022)The Legitimacy of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Decision MakingInternational Journal of Technoethics10.4018/IJT.31103213:2(1-17)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2022
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media