Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Bidirectional projection measure of linguistic neutrosophic numbers and their application to multi-criteria group decision making

Published: 01 February 2019 Publication History

Highlights

Define a new distance measures between two linguistic neutrosophic numbers (LNNs).
Build a model based on the maximum deviation to obtain fuzzy measure.
Obtain the objective weight vector of evaluation criteria.
Put forward to the bidirectional projection measure with LNNs.
Develop a novel MAGDM method based on the bidirectional projection.

Abstract

Linguistic neutrosophic numbers (LNNs) are an effective tool in describing the incomplete and indeterminate evaluation information by using three linguistic variables (LVs) to denote the truth-degree (TD), indeterminacy-degree (ID), and falsity-degree (FD), and the bidirectional projection measure has some advantages in dealing with multi-criteria group decision making (MCGDM) problems because it can consider both the distance and the included angle, but more importantly, it considers the bidirectional projection between each alternative and the ideal solution. In this paper, we define a new distance measure between two linguistic neutrosophic sets (LNSs), and build a model based on the maximum deviation to obtain fuzzy measure, further, we develop the bidirectional projection-based MCGDM method with LNNs in which a weight model based on fuzzy measure is proposed where the weights of evaluation criteria is partial unknown and the interactions among criteria are considered. Finally, we use some examples to verify the effectiveness of the proposed approach and demonstrate its advantages by comparing with some existing methods.

References

[1]
B. Blagojevic, B. Srdjevic, Z. Srdjevic, T. Zoranovic, Heuristic aggregation of individual judgments in AHP group decision making using simulated annealing algorithm, Information Sciences 330 (2016) 260–273.
[2]
Z.S. Chen, K.S. Chin, Y.L. Li, Y. Yang, Proportional hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set for multiple criteria group decision making, Information Sciences 357 (2016) 61–87.
[3]
O. Cordon, F. Herrera, A proposal for improving the accuracy of linguistic modeling, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 8 (3) (2000) 335–344.
[4]
W.H. Cui, J. Ye, L.L. Shi, Linguistic neutrosophic uncertain numbers and their multiple attribute group decision-making method, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems (2018),.
[5]
Y. Dong, C.C. Li, F. Herrera, Connecting the linguistic hierarchy and the numerical scale for the 2-tuple linguistic model and its use to deal with hesitant unbalanced linguistic information, Information Sciences 367–368 (2016) 259–278.
[6]
F.J. Estrella, M. Espinilla, F. Herrera, L. Martínez, Flintstones: A fuzzy linguistic decision tools enhancement suite based on the 2-tuple linguistic model and extensions, Information Sciences 280 (2014) 152–170.
[7]
C.X. Fan, J. Ye, K.L. Hu, E. Fan, Bonferroni mean operators of linguistic neutrosophic numbers and their multiple attribute group decision-making methods, Information 8 (3) (2017) 107.
[8]
Z.B. Fang, J. Ye, Multiple attribute group decision-making method based on linguistic neutrosophic numbers, Symmetry 9 (2017) 111.
[9]
M. Grabisc, H.T. Nguyen, E.A. Walker, Fuzzy measures and integrals, Fundamentals of Uncertainty Calculi with Applications to Fuzzy Inference 30 (1995) 107–171.
[10]
H. Guan, A. Zhao, J. Du, Enterprise green technology innovation behaviour, Economic Science Press, BeiJing, 2017.
[11]
F. Herrera, L. Martinez, A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 8 (6) (2000) 746–752.
[12]
W.Z. Liang, G.Y. Zhao, H. Wu, Evaluating investment risks of metallic mines using an extended TOPSIS method with linguistic neutrosophic numbers, Sysmetry 9 (8) (2017) 149.
[13]
P.D. Liu, Z.L. Guan, Evaluation research on the quality of the railway passenger service based on the linguistic variables and the improved PROMETHEE-II method, Journal of Computers 4 (3) (2009) 265–270.
[14]
P.D. Liu, Y.M. Wang, Multiple attribute decision-making method based on single-valued neutrosophic normalized weighted Bonferroni mean, Neural Computing and Application 25 (7–8) (2014) 2001–2010.
[15]
R. Lourenzutti, R.A. Krohling, A generalized TOPSIS method for group decision making with heterogeneous information in a dynamic environment, Information Sciences 330 (2016) 1–18.
[16]
J.A. Morente-Molinera, G. Kou, R. González-Crespo, J.M. Corchado, E. Herrera-Viedma, Solving multi-criteria group decision making problems under environments with a high number of alternatives using fuzzy ontologies and multi-granular linguistic modelling methods, Knowledge-Based Systems 137 (1) (2017) 54–64.
[17]
H.G. Peng, J.Q. Wang, Hesitant uncertain linguistic Z-numbers and their application in multi-criteria group decision-making problems, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems 19 (5) (2016) 1300–1316.
[18]
J.J. Peng, J.Q. Wang, J. Wang, L.J. Yang, X.H. Chen, An extension of ELECTRE to multi-criteria decision-making problems with multi-hesitant fuzzy sets, Information Sciences 307 (2015) 113–126.
[19]
J.J. Peng, J.Q. Wang, H.Y. Zhang, X.H. Chen, An outranking approach for multi-criteria decision-making problems with simplified neutrosophic sets, Application Soft Computing 25 (2014) 336–346.
[20]
Z.L. Ren, Z.S. Xu, H. Wang, Dual hesitant fuzzy VIKOR method for multi-criteria group decision making based on fuzzy measure and new comparison method, Information Sciences 388–389 (2017) 1–16.
[21]
L.S. Shapley, A value for n-person game, in: H. Kuhn, A. Tucker (Eds.), Contributions to the theory of games, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1953.
[22]
L.L. Shi, J. Ye, Cosine measures of linguistic neutrosophic numbers and their application in multiple attribute group decision-making, Information 8 (4) (2017) 117.
[23]
H.A. Simon, Administrative behavior-a study of decision making processes in administrative organization, Macmillan Publishin Co, Inc., New York, 1971.
[24]
F. Smarandache, A unifying field in logics. Neutrosophic: Neturosophic probability, set, and logic, American Research Press, Rehoboth, 1999.
[25]
Sugeno, M. (1974). Theory of fuzzy integral and its application. Doctorial dissertation, Tokyo Institute of Technology.
[26]
A.Y. Tu, J. Ye, B. Wang, Symmetry measures of simplified neutrosophic sets for multiple attribute decision-making problems, Symmetry 10 (5) (2018) 144.
[27]
H. Wang, F. Smarandache, Y. Zhang, R. Sunderraman, Single valued neutrosophic set, Mulispace Multistruct 4 (2010) 410–413.
[28]
G.W. Wei, Maximizing deviation method for multiple attribute decision making in intuitionistic fuzzy setting, Knowledge-Based Systems 21 (8) (2008) 833–836.
[29]
G.W. Wei, GRA method for multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight information in intuitionistic fuzzy setting, Knowledge-Based Systems 23 (3) (2010) 2443–3247.
[30]
Z.S. Xu, On method for uncertain multiple attribute decision making problems with uncertain multiplicative preference information on alternatives, Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making 4 (2) (2005) 131–139.
[31]
J. Ye, Single valued neutrosophic cross-entropy for multicriteria decision making problems, Applied Mathematical Modelling 38 (3) (2014) 1170–1175.
[32]
J. Ye, An extended TOPSIS method for multiple attribute group decision making based on single valued neutrosophic linguistic numbers, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy System 28 (1) (2015) 247–255.
[33]
J. Ye, Bidirectional projection method for multiple attribute group decision making with neutrosophic numbers, Neural Computing and Applications 28 (5) (2017) 1021–1029.
[34]
J. Ye, Simplified neutrosophic harmonic averaging projection-based method for multiple attribute decision making problems, International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics 8 (3) (2017) 981–987.
[35]
J. Ye, Linguistic neutrosophic cubic numbers and their multiple attribute decision-making method, Information 8 (3) (2017) 110.
[36]
J. Ye, Projection and bidirectional projection measures of single-valued neutrosophic sets and their decision-making method for mechanical design schemes, Journal of Experimental & theoretical artificial intelligence 29 (4) (2017) 731–740.
[37]
J. Ye, Multiple attribute decision-making method based on linguistic cubic variables, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 34 (4) (2018) 2351–2361.
[38]
J. Ye, Multiple attribute decision-making methods based on expected value and similarity measure of hesitant neutrosophic linguistic numbers, Cognitive Computation 10 (2018) 454–463.
[39]
L.A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets, information, Control 8 (3) (1965) 338–353.
[40]
L.A. Zadeh, The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning Part I, Information Sciences 8 (3) (1975) 199–249.
[41]
X. Zhang, Z.S. Xu, The TODIM analysis approach based on novel measured functions under hesitant fuzzy environment, Knowledge-Based Systems 61 (2) (2014) 48–58.
[42]
Y. Zhang, Z.S. Xu, H. Liao, A consensus process for group decision making with probabilistic linguistic preference relations, Information Sciences 414 (2017) 260–275.
[43]
W. Zhou, Z.S. Xu, Group consistency and group decision making under uncertain probabilistic hesitant fuzzy preference environment, Information Sciences 414 (2) (2017) 276–288.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Failure mode and effect analysis using VIKOR method based on interval-valued linguistic Z-numbersJournal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology10.3233/JIFS-23152746:1(1183-1199)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
  • (2024)An Extended EDAS Approach Based on Cumulative Prospect Theory for Multiple Attributes Group Decision Making with Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy InformationInformatica10.15388/24-INFOR54735:2(421-452)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
  • (2024)A software trustworthiness evaluation methodology for cloud services with picture fuzzy informationApplied Soft Computing10.1016/j.asoc.2023.111205152:COnline publication date: 1-Feb-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Bidirectional projection measure of linguistic neutrosophic numbers and their application to multi-criteria group decision making
              Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Information & Contributors

              Information

              Published In

              cover image Computers and Industrial Engineering
              Computers and Industrial Engineering  Volume 128, Issue C
              Feb 2019
              1096 pages

              Publisher

              Pergamon Press, Inc.

              United States

              Publication History

              Published: 01 February 2019

              Author Tags

              1. Linguistic neutrosophic numbers
              2. Bidirectional projection measure
              3. Distance measure
              4. SHAPLEY weight
              5. MCGDM

              Qualifiers

              • Research-article

              Contributors

              Other Metrics

              Bibliometrics & Citations

              Bibliometrics

              Article Metrics

              • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
              • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
              Reflects downloads up to 16 Feb 2025

              Other Metrics

              Citations

              Cited By

              View all
              • (2024)Failure mode and effect analysis using VIKOR method based on interval-valued linguistic Z-numbersJournal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology10.3233/JIFS-23152746:1(1183-1199)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
              • (2024)An Extended EDAS Approach Based on Cumulative Prospect Theory for Multiple Attributes Group Decision Making with Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy InformationInformatica10.15388/24-INFOR54735:2(421-452)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
              • (2024)A software trustworthiness evaluation methodology for cloud services with picture fuzzy informationApplied Soft Computing10.1016/j.asoc.2023.111205152:COnline publication date: 1-Feb-2024
              • (2023)A novel failure mode and effect analysis method with spherical fuzzy entropy and spherical fuzzy weight correlation coefficientEngineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106163122:COnline publication date: 1-Jun-2023
              • (2023)An extended EDAS approach based on cumulative prospect theory for multiple attributes group decision making with probabilistic hesitant fuzzy informationArtificial Intelligence Review10.1007/s10462-022-10244-y56:4(2971-3003)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2023
              • (2023)Mine safety evaluation method using correlation coefficients of consistency linguistic neutrosophic sets in a linguistic neutrosophic multivalued environmentSoft Computing - A Fusion of Foundations, Methodologies and Applications10.1007/s00500-023-08184-y27:13(8599-8609)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2023
              • (2023)Decision-making method based on set pair analysis and VIKOR under heterogeneous information environment and application to typhoon disaster assessmentSoft Computing - A Fusion of Foundations, Methodologies and Applications10.1007/s00500-022-07750-027:12(8289-8314)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2023
              • (2022)A hybrid projection method for resource-constrained project scheduling problem under uncertaintyNeural Computing and Applications10.1007/s00521-022-07321-234:17(14557-14576)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2022
              • (2022)A VIKOR-based group decision-making approach to software reliability evaluationSoft Computing - A Fusion of Foundations, Methodologies and Applications10.1007/s00500-022-07268-526:18(9445-9464)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2022
              • (2021)Bidirectional projection method for multi-attribute group decision making under probabilistic uncertain linguistic environmentJournal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology10.3233/JIFS-21031341:1(1429-1443)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021
              • Show More Cited By

              View Options

              View options

              Figures

              Tables

              Media

              Share

              Share

              Share this Publication link

              Share on social media