Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
article

A survey on statistical bandwidth sharing

Published: 21 June 2004 Publication History

Abstract

The paper provides a survey of recent results on the performance of a network handling elastic data traffic under the assumption that flows are generated as a random process. We notably highlight the insensitivity results allowing a relatively simple expression of performance when bandwidth sharing realizes so-called "balanced fairness". In normal load conditions flow throughput mainly depends on the users' access line rate. There is little scope for optimizing performance, by means of size-dependent scheduling on network links, for instance. In overload, performance deteriorates rapidly. Pro-active admission control is then an arguably necessary traffic control to preserve performance. This paper is written as a tribute to the author's friend Olga Casals.

References

[1]
{1} E. Altman, T. Jimenez, D. Kofman, DPS queues with stationary ergodic service times and the performance of TCP in overload, in: Proceedings of IEEE Infocom 2004.
[2]
{2} F. Baccelli, P. Bremaud, Elements of Queueing Theory, in: Applications of Mathematics, vol. 26, Springer, Berlin, 1994.
[3]
{3} F. Baccelli, D. Hong, Interaction of TCP flows as billiards, in: Proceedings of IEEE Infocom 2003.
[4]
{4} N. Bansal, M. Harchol-Balter, Analysis of SRPT scheduling: investigating unfairness, in: Proceedings of ACM Sigmetrics 2001.
[5]
{5} F. Baskett, K.M. Chandy, R.R. Muntz, F.G. Palacios, Open, closed and mixed networks of queues with different classes of customers, J. ACM 22 (1975) 248-260.
[6]
{6} S. Ben Fredj, T. Bonald, A. Proutière, G. Régnié, J. Roberts. Statiscal bandwidth sharing: a study of congestion at flow level, in: Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM 2001.
[7]
{7} S. Ben Fredj, S. Oueslati-Boulahia, J.W. Roberts, Measurement-based admission control for elastic traffic, in: Teletraffic Engineering in the Internet Era, ITC 17, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2001.
[8]
{8} A. Berger, Y. Kogan, Dimensioning bandwidth for elastic traffic in high-speed data networks, IEEE/ACM Trans. Network, 8 (5) (2000) 643-654.
[9]
{9} T. Bertsekas, R. Gallager, Data Networks, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1987.
[10]
{10} T. Bonald, L. Massoulié, Impact of fairness on Internet performance, in: Proceedings of ACM Sigmetrics 2001.
[11]
{11} T. Bonald, P. Olivier, J. Roberts, Dimensioning high speed IP access networks, in: Proceedings of ITC 18, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2003.
[12]
{12} T. Bonald, A. Proutière, Insensitivity in processor-sharing networks. Perform. Evaluat. 49 (2002) 193-209.
[13]
{13} T. Bonald, A. Proutière, Insensitive bandwidth sharing in data networks, Queue. Syst. 44(1) (2003) 69-100.
[14]
{14} T. Bonald, A. Proutière, On performance bounds for balanced fairness, Perform. Evaluat. 55 (2004) 25-50.
[15]
{15} T. Bonald, A. Proutière, G. Régnié, J.W. Roberts, Insensitivity results in statistical bandwidth sharing, in: ITC 17th 2001.
[16]
{16} T. Bonald, A. Proutiére, J. Roberts, J. Virtamo, Computational aspects of balanced fairness, in: Proceedings of ITC 18, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2003.
[17]
{17} T. Bonald, J. Roberts, Congestion at flow level and the impact of user behaviour, Comput. Networks 42 (2003) 521-536.
[18]
{18} J. Boyer, F. Guillemin, P. Robert, B. Zwart, Heavy tailed M/G/1-PS queues with impatience and admission control in packet networks, in: Proceedings of IEEE Infocom 2003.
[19]
{19} P. Brown, D. Collange, Sharing resources in overload with TCP. France Telecom R&D Technical Report, 2004.
[20]
{20} T. Bu, D. Towsley, Fixed point approximation for TCP behavior in an AQM network, in: Proceedings of ACM Sigmetrics 2001.
[21]
{21} A. Chaintreau, F. Baccelli, D. de Vleeschauwer, D. McDonald, A mean field analysis of interacting HTTP flows, in: Proceedings of ACM Sigmetrics 2004.
[22]
{22} J.W. Cohen, The multiple phase service network with generalized processor sharing. Acta Informat. 12 (1979) 245-284.
[23]
{23} M. Crovella, R. Frangioso, M. Harchol-Balter, Connection scheduling in Web servers, in: Usenix Symposium on Internet Technologies and Systems (USITS'99), Boulder, CO, October 1999, pp. 243-254.
[24]
{24} G. Fayolle, A. de la Fortelle, J.-M. Lasgouttes, L. Massoulié, J.W. Roberts, Best-effort networks: modeling and performance analysis via large networks asymptotics, in: Proceedings of IEEE Infocom 2001.
[25]
{25} G. Fayolle, I. Mitrani, R. Iasnogorodski, Sharing a processor among many job classes, J. ACM 27 (3) (1980) 519-532.
[26]
{26} S. Floyd, V. Paxson, Difficulties in simulating the Internet, IEEE/ACM Trans. Network. 9 (4) (2001) 393-403.
[27]
{27} R. Gibbons, S. Sargood, C. Van Eiji, F. Kelly, H. Azmoodeh, R. Macfadyen, N. Macfadyen, Fixed-point models for the end-to-end performance analysis of IP networks, in: 13th ITC Special Seminar: IP Traffic Management, Modeling and Management, 2000.
[28]
{28} M. Garetto, R. Lo Cigno, M. Meo, M. Ajmone Marsan, Modeling short-lived TCP connections with open multiclass queuing networks, Comput. Networks 44 (2004) 153-176.
[29]
{29} M. Harchol-Balter, B. Schroeder, N. Bansal, M. Agrawal, Size-based scheduling to improve Web performance. ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 21 (2) (2003) 207-233.
[30]
{30} D.P. Heyman, T.V. Lakshman, A.L. Neidhardt, A new method for analyzing feedback based protocols with applications to engineering Web traffic over the Internet, in: Proceedings of IEEE Sigmetrics'97, February 1997, p. 2438.
[31]
{31} A. Jean-Marie, P. Robert, On the transient behaviour of the processor sharing queue, Queue. Syst. Theory Appl. 17 (1994) 129-136.
[32]
{32} F.P. Kelly, Reversibility and Stochastic Networks, Wiley, New York, 1979.
[33]
{33} F.P. Kelly, A. Maulloo, D. Tan, Rate control for communication networks: shadow prices, proportional fairness and stability, J. Operat. Res. Soc. 49 (1998) 237-252.
[34]
{34} F. Kelly, R. Williams, Fluid model for a network operating under a fair bandwidth sharing policy, Ann. Appl. Probab., in press.
[35]
{35} A. Kherani, A. Kumar, Stochastic models for throughput analysis of randomly arriving elastic flows in the Internet, in: Proceedings of IEEE Infocom 2002.
[36]
{36} A. Kumar, M. Hegde, S.V.R. Anand, NETMASTER: experiences in using nonintrusive TCP connection admission control for bandwidth management of an Internet access link. IEEE Communications Magazine 38 (5) (2000) 160-167.
[37]
{37} P. Lassila, H. van den Berg, M. Mandjes, R. Kooij, An integrated packet/flow model for TCP performance analysis, in: Proceedings of ITC 18, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2003.
[38]
{38} R. Litjens, H. van den Berg, R. Boucherie, Throughput measures for processor sharing models, COST 279 document (03)022, 2003, pp. 320-328.
[39]
{39} L. Massoulié, J.W. Roberts, Arguments in favor of admission control for TCP flows, in: Teletraffic Engineering in at Competitive World, ITC 16, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1999, pp. 33-44.
[40]
{40} L. Massoulié, J.W. Roberts, Bandwidth sharing and admission control for elastic traffic, Telecommun. Syst. 15 (2000) 185-201.
[41]
{41} J. Mo, J. Walrand, Fair end-to-end window-based congestion control, IEEE/ACM Trans. Network. 8 (5) (2000) 556-567.
[42]
{42} R. Mortier, I. Pratt, C. Clark, S. Crosby, Implicit admission control, IEEE J. Selected Areas Commun. 18 (12) (2000) 2629-2639.
[43]
{43} M. Nabe, M. Murata, H. Miyahara, Analysis and modeling of World Wide Web traffic for capacity dimensioning of Internet access lines, Perform. Evaluat. 34 (1998) 249-271.
[44]
{44} I.A. Rai, G. Urvoy-Keller, E.W. Biersack, Analysis of LAS scheduling for job size distributions with high variance, in: ACM Sigmetrics 2003, June 2003, pp. 218-228.
[45]
{45} R. Serfozo, Introduction to Stochastic Networks, Springer, Berlin, 1999.
[46]
{46} L. Schrage, L. Miller, The queue M/G/1 with shortest processing time first discipline, Operat. Res. 14 (1966) 670-684.
[47]
{47} G. de Veciana, T.-J. Lee, T. Konstantopoulos, Stability and performance analysis of networks supporting ABR and best effort-like services, IEEE/ACM Trans. Network. 9 (1) (2001) 2-14.
[48]
{48} S. Yang, G. de Veciana, Bandwidth sharing: the role of user impatience, in: Proceedings of Globecom, 2001.
[49]
{49} S. Yang, G. de Veciana, Size-based adaptive bandwidth allocation: optimizing the average QoS for elastic traffic, in: Proceedings of IEEE Infocom 2002.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Strategic Routing in Heterogeneous Discriminatory Processor Sharing QueuesNetwork Games, Artificial Intelligence, Control and Optimization10.1007/978-3-031-78600-6_2(14-23)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024
  • (2023)Strategic Revenue Management for Discriminatory Processor Sharing QueuesComputer Performance Engineering and Stochastic Modelling10.1007/978-3-031-43185-2_1(3-17)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2023
  • (2016)Higher response time moments for M/M/1 discriminatory processor sharing queuesProceedings of the 9th EAI International Conference on Performance Evaluation Methodologies and Tools10.4108/eai.14-12-2015.2262730(145-148)Online publication date: 4-Jan-2016
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Computer Networks: The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking
Computer Networks: The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking  Volume 45, Issue 3
Special issue: In memroy of Olga Casals
21 June 2004
134 pages

Publisher

Elsevier North-Holland, Inc.

United States

Publication History

Published: 21 June 2004

Author Tags

  1. admission control
  2. balanced fairness
  3. elastic traffic
  4. internet traffic theory
  5. processor sharing

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 28 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Strategic Routing in Heterogeneous Discriminatory Processor Sharing QueuesNetwork Games, Artificial Intelligence, Control and Optimization10.1007/978-3-031-78600-6_2(14-23)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024
  • (2023)Strategic Revenue Management for Discriminatory Processor Sharing QueuesComputer Performance Engineering and Stochastic Modelling10.1007/978-3-031-43185-2_1(3-17)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2023
  • (2016)Higher response time moments for M/M/1 discriminatory processor sharing queuesProceedings of the 9th EAI International Conference on Performance Evaluation Methodologies and Tools10.4108/eai.14-12-2015.2262730(145-148)Online publication date: 4-Jan-2016
  • (2016)Performance-Energy Trade-offs in SmartphonesProceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems10.1145/2988287.2989140(127-135)Online publication date: 13-Nov-2016
  • (2016)Sojourn Time Approximations for a Discriminatory Processor Sharing QueueACM Transactions on Modeling and Performance Evaluation of Computing Systems10.1145/28128071:1(1-31)Online publication date: 22-Feb-2016
  • (2014)Fluid Limits for Bandwidth-Sharing Networks with Rate ConstraintsMathematics of Operations Research10.1287/moor.2013.064139:3(746-774)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2014
  • (2013)A series expansion approach for finite-capacity processor sharing queuesProceedings of the 7th International Conference on Performance Evaluation Methodologies and Tools10.4108/icst.valuetools.2013.254394(118-125)Online publication date: 10-Dec-2013
  • (2012)Less is moreProceedings of the 9th USENIX conference on Networked Systems Design and Implementation10.5555/2228298.2228324(19-19)Online publication date: 25-Apr-2012
  • (2011)Simulating flow level bandwidth sharing with pareto distributed file sizesProceedings of the 5th International ICST Conference on Performance Evaluation Methodologies and Tools10.5555/2151688.2151718(265-273)Online publication date: 16-May-2011
  • (2011)Fixed-point approximations of bandwidth sharing networks with rate constraintsACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review10.1145/2034832.203484439:2(47-49)Online publication date: 15-Sep-2011
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media