Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
article

Uncertainty and updating of long-term prediction of prestress forces in PSC box girder bridges

Published: 01 September 2005 Publication History

Abstract

The purpose of the present paper is to propose a method of uncertainty analysis and sensitivity analysis of the effects of creep and shrinkage in prestressed concrete (PSC) box girder bridges. Also, a method to reduce the uncertainty of long-term prediction of time-dependent effects due to creep and shrinkage of concrete is developed. The study deals with the uncertainties in the long-term prediction of creep and shrinkage effects using sampling method. Partial rank correlation coefficient and standardized rank regression coefficient computed on the ranks of the observations are examined to quantify the sensitivity of the outputs to each of the input variables. Updating of long-term prediction is achieved using Bayesian statistical inference. The proposed theory is applied to long-term prediction of prestress force of an actual PSC box girder bridge. The numerical results indicate that the creep model uncertainty factor and relative humidity appear to be the most dominant factors with regard to the model output uncertainty. The present study indicates that the width of mean+/-two standard deviation for updated predictions of prestress forces with nine measurement information is about half of that of mean+/-two standard deviation for prior prediction of prestress forces. Therefore, the adoption of an approach developed in this study would reduce the uncertainties of prediction of time-dependent effects due to creep and shrinkage and improve greatly the long-term serviceability of PSC box girder bridges.

References

[1]
Ba¿ant, Z.P. and Liu, K.L., Random creep and shrinkage in structures: sampling. J Struct Eng ASCE. v111 i5. 1113-1134.
[2]
Madsen, H.O. and Ba¿ant, Z.P., Uncertainty analysis of creep and shrinkage effects in concrete structures. ACI J. v80 i2. 116-127.
[3]
Li, C.Q. and Melchers, R.E., Reliability analysis of creep and shrinkage effects. J Struct Eng ASCE. v118 i9. 2323-2337.
[4]
Tsubaki T. Uncertainty of prediction. In: Proceedings of fifth international RILEM symposium, Barcelona, Spain, 1993. p. 831-47.
[5]
Ba¿ant, Z.P. and Baweja, S., Justification and refinement of model B3 for concrete creep and shrinkage-1. Statistics and sensitivity. Mater Struct. v28 i181. 415-430.
[6]
Teplý, B., Keršner, Z. and Novák, D., Sensitivity study of BP-KX and B3 creep and shrinkage models. Mater Struct. v29 i192. 500-505.
[7]
ACI 209R-92. Prediction of creep, shrinkage and temperature effects in concrete structures. ACI Manual of Concrete Practice, Part 1, American Concrete Institute, Detroit, 1992.
[8]
Comité Euro-International du Béton (CEB). CEB-FIP model code for concrete structures. Lausanne, Switzerland, 1990.
[9]
Smith, M.J. and Goodyear, D.G., A practical look at creep and shrinkage in bridge design. PCI J. v93 i3. 108-121.
[10]
Bjerager, P. and Krenk, S., Parametric sensitivity in first order reliability theory. J Eng Mech ASCE. v115 i7. 1577-1582.
[11]
Ditlevson, O. and Madsen, H.O., Structural reliability methods. 1996. John Wiley, New York.
[12]
Hohenbichler, M. and Rackwitz, R., Sensitivity and importance measures in structural reliability. Civil Eng Syst. v3 i4. 203-209.
[13]
Karamchandani, A. and Cornell, C.A., Sensitivity estimation within first and second order reliability methods. Struct Safety. v11 i2. 95-107.
[14]
Madsen, H.O., Krenk, S. and Lind, N.C., Methods of structural safety. 1986. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
[15]
Novák D, Teplý B, Shiraishi N. Sensitivity analysis of structures: a review. In: Proceedings of CIVIL COMP 93, Edinburgh, Scotland, 1993. p. 201-7.
[16]
Zollman, C.C. and Barbaux, S.H., Rehabilitation of the Boivre Viaduct-a multispan prestressed box girder bridge. PCI J. v30 i3. 22-47.
[17]
Massicotte, B., Picard, A., Gaumond, Y. and Ouellet, C., Strengthening of a long span prestressed segmental box girder bridge. PCI J. v39 i3. 52-65.
[18]
Yoo, S.K., Lee, J.H. and Kim, J.H., Load capability enhancement of Wonhyo Bridge using external PS tendons. KCI J. v7 i6. 30-37.
[19]
Steinberg, E.P., Probabilistic assessment of prestress loss in pretensioned prestressed concrete. PCI J. v40 i6. 76-85.
[20]
Saiidi, M., Shields, J., O'Connor, D. and Hutchens, E., Variation of prestress force in a prestressed concrete bridge during the first 30 months. PCI J. v41 i5. 66-72.
[21]
Saiidi, M., Hutchens, E. and Gardella, D., Bridge prestress losses in dry climate. J Bridge Eng ASCE. v3 i3. 111-116.
[22]
Ang, A.H. and Tang, W.H., . In: Basic Principles, vol. 1. Wiley, New York.
[23]
Reinhardt, H.W., Pat, M.G.M. and Wittmann, F.H., . In: Symposium on fundamental research on creep and shrinkage of concrete, M. Nijhoff, The Hague. pp. 75-94.
[24]
Iman, R.L. and Conover, W.J., Small sample sensitivity analysis techniques for computer models with an application to risk assessment. Commun Stat A. v9 i17. 1749-1842.
[25]
Iman, R.L., Helton, J.C. and Campbell, J.E., An approach to sensitivity analysis of computer models, Part I-Introduction, input variable selection and preliminary variable assessment. J Quality Technol. v13 i3. 174-183.
[26]
Iman, R.L., Helton, J.C. and Campbell, J.E., An approach to sensitivity analysis of computer models, Part II-Ranking of input variables, response surface validation, distribution effect and technique synopsis. J Quality Technol. v13 i4. 232-240.
[27]
Iman RL, Helton JC. A comparison of uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for computer models. Report NUREG/CR-3904, SAND84-1461, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuerque, 1985.
[28]
Helton, J.C., Johnson, J.D., Shiver, A.W. and Sprung, J.L., Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of early exposure results with the MACCS reactor accident consequence model. Reliab Eng Syst Safety. v48 i2. 91-127.
[29]
Ba¿ant, Z.P. and Chern, J.C., Bayesian statistical prediction of concrete creep and shrinkage. ACI J. v81 i4. 319-330.
[30]
Ba¿ant ZP. Probabilistic analysis of creep effects in concrete structures. In: Proceedings of 4th international conference on structural safety and reliability (ICOSSAR 85), Kobe, Japan, 1985. p. I-331-I-334.
[31]
Geyskens, P., Der Kiureghian, A. and Monteiro, P., Bayesian prediction of elastic modulus of concrete. J Struct Eng ASCE. v124 i1. 89-95.
[32]
Box, G.E.P. and Tiao, G.C., Bayesian inference in statistical analysis. 1973. Addison-Wesley.
[33]
Ketchum MA. Redistribution of stress in segmentally erected prestressed concrete bridges. Rep. UCB/SESM 86-07, University of California at Berkely, 1986.
[34]
Kang YJ. SPCFRAME-computer program for nonlinear segmental analysis of planar concrete frames. Rep. UCB/SESM 89/07, University of California at Berkely, 1989.
[35]
Oh, B.H. and Yang, I.H., Effects of material characteristics on the time-dependent behavior of prestressed concrete box girder bridges constructed by free cantilever method. J Korea Concrete Inst. v10 i1. 179-188.
[36]
Lilliefors, H.W., On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality with mean and variance unknown. J Stat Assoc. v62 i318. 399-402.
[37]
Dallal, G.E. and Wilkinson, L., An analytic approximation to the distribution of Lilliefors's test statistic for normality. Am Stat. v40 i4. 294-296.
  1. Uncertainty and updating of long-term prediction of prestress forces in PSC box girder bridges

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image Computers and Structures
      Computers and Structures  Volume 83, Issue 25-26
      September, 2005
      163 pages

      Publisher

      Pergamon Press, Inc.

      United States

      Publication History

      Published: 01 September 2005

      Author Tags

      1. Box girder bridges
      2. Creep
      3. Prestressed concrete
      4. Sensitivity
      5. Shrinkage
      6. Uncertainty
      7. Updating

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 0
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 25 Dec 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      View options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media