Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Envelope modeling of renewable resource variability and capacity

Published: 01 February 2016 Publication History

Abstract

To unify the analysis of both renewable and conventional fossil-fuel generating resources in electricity systems, we develop an envelope-based modeling method. Built on Network Calculus theory (NetCal) for deterministic queuing systems from the field of telecommunications engineering, this method characterizes the variability of electricity supply and demand by upper and lower envelopes and their respective Legendre conjugates. Differing from all other modeling methods, this method not only quantifies variability across different time scales, but also captures the intrinsic tradeoff between capacity and the corresponding Quality-of-Service (QoS) performance. In particular, the QoS measures represent matching/mismatching patterns between power supply and demand and provide an intuitive interpretation of the role of storage resources. The concept of QoS leads to two QoS-based capacity metrics - guaranteed capacity and best-effort capacity - whose conceptual and numerical properties are analyzed and compared against existing capacity metrics for validation purpose. As illustration, the proposed methods are applied to data from the California Independent System Operator (CAISO), which allows us to explicitly quantify the capacity contribution (via the notion of best-effort capacity) of wind during peak hours and its negative system impact at night, and demonstrates the positive capacity contribution of storage resources even though they are net energy consumer. HighlightsDeveloped a worst-case oriented variability modeling called envelope method.Characterized variability of renewables across multiple time scales.Characterized capacity - QoS tradeoffs.Proposed two QoS-based capacity definitions and compared with existing ones.Implemented envelope analysis with 1-min data from CAISO and gained new insights.

References

[1]
B. Ata, Dynamic power control in a wireless static channel subject to a quality-of-service constraint, Oper Res (2005) 842-851.
[2]
A. Bassamboo, R.S. Randhawa, On the accuracy of fluid models for capacity sizing in queueing systems with impatient customers, Oper Res, 58 (2010) 1398-1413.
[3]
A. Bose, X. Jiang, B. Liu, G. Li, Analysis of manufacturing blocking systems with network calculus, Perform Eval, 63 (2006) 1216-1234.
[4]
C.S. Chang, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2000.
[5]
R.L. Cruz, A calculus for network delay. I. Network elements in isolation, IEEE Trans Inf Theory, 37 (1991) 114-131.
[6]
R.L. Cruz, A calculus for network delay. II. Network elements in isolation, IEEE Trans Inf Theory, 37 (1991) 114-131.
[7]
Gross R. UKERC (Organization). The Costs and Impacts of Intermittency: an assessment of the evidence on the costs and impacts of intermittent generation on the British electricity network. UK Energy Research Centre; 2006.
[8]
Holttinen H, Lemström B, Meibom P, Bindner H, Orths A, van Hulle F, et al. Design and operation of power systems with large amounts of wind power. In: State-of-the-art report 2007; 2007.
[9]
X. Jiang, New perspectives on network calculus, ACM SIGMETRICS Perform Eval Rev, 36 (2008) 95-97.
[10]
J.Y. Le Boudec, P. Thiran, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001.
[11]
C. Maglaras, A. Zeevi, Pricing and design of differentiated services: approximate analysis and structural insights, Oper Res (2005) 242-262.
[12]
A. Mandelbaum, S. Zeltyn, Staffing many-server queues with impatient customers: constraint satisfaction in call centers, Oper Res, 57 (2009) 1189.
[13]
M. Milligan, K. Porter, The capacity value of wind in the united states: methods and implementation, Electr J, 19 (2006) 91-99.
[14]
Milligan M, Porter K. Determining the capacity value of wind: an updated survey of methods and implementation. Wind Power 2008, Houston; 2008. Available at (http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy08osti/43433.pdf).
[15]
NERC. Methods to model and calculate capacity contributions of variable generation for resource adequacy planning. North American Electric Reliability Corporation; 2011. Available at {http://www.nerc.com/files/IVGTF1-2.pdf}.
[16]
Rockafellar RT. Convex analysis. In: Princeton mathematics series, vol. 28. Princeton; Princeton University Press; 1970.
  1. Envelope modeling of renewable resource variability and capacity

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Computers and Operations Research
    Computers and Operations Research  Volume 66, Issue C
    February 2016
    445 pages

    Publisher

    Elsevier Science Ltd.

    United Kingdom

    Publication History

    Published: 01 February 2016

    Author Tags

    1. Envelope modeling
    2. Generating capacity
    3. Legendre transform
    4. Network calculus (NetCal)
    5. Renewable intermittency
    6. Smart grids

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 0
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 04 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    View options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media