Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

A lane-changing trajectory re-planning method considering conflicting traffic scenarios

Published: 01 February 2024 Publication History

Abstract

An essential aspect of intelligent driving systems is the automatic lane-changing function. However, in real-world traffic situations, the initially planned lane-changing trajectory can become hazardous due to the intricate and unpredictable nature of human driving behavior. Based on the assumption that vehicles have risks during lane-changing, an integrated methodology is proposed to assess the hazards associated with road conditions in real-time and to quickly adjust the predetermined vehicle trajectory, if deemed necessary, to mitigate the risks of conflicting lane changes. Vehicles are encouraged to adhere to lane changing behavior by adjusting their trajectory, aiming to enhance traffic efficiency. Instead of immediately abandoning lane changing, vehicles should strategically assess the situation before making decisions. Initially, an analysis of variables influencing re-planning is conducted, determining the circumstances conducive to maintaining lane-changing behavior. Subsequently, a trajectory re-planning module is introduced, facilitated by two neural network data-fitting models, allowing real-time performance. Finally, a series of numerical experiments confirm that the devised method effectively guides autonomous driving through quick and secure lane change re-planning in high-risk traffic environments. The proposed novel approach extends the capacity to target traffic flow gaps and dynamically re-plan lane switching motivations, ensuring the vehicle can persist in lane-changing rather than reverting to the original lane.

References

[1]
Ajanović Z., Regolin E., Shyrokau B., Ćatić H., Horn M., Ferrara A., Search-based task and motion planning for hybrid systems: Agile autonomous vehicles, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 121 (2023).
[2]
Bae S., Isele D., Nakhaei A., Xu P., Añon A.M., Choi C., Fujimura K., Moura S., Lane-change in dense traffic with model predictive control and neural networks, IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. (2022).
[3]
Chen T., Cai Y., Chen L., Xu X., Trajectory and velocity planning method of emergency rescue vehicle based on segmented three-dimensional quartic bezier curve, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. (2022).
[4]
Chhabra R., Singh S., Khullar V., Privacy enabled driver behavior analysis in heterogeneous IoV using federated learning, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 120 (2023).
[5]
Ding Y., Zhuang W., Wang L., Liu J., Guvenc L., Li Z., Safe and optimal lane-change path planning for automated driving, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. D 235 (4) (2021) 1070–1083.
[6]
Du H., Pan Y., Kawsar I., Li Z., Hou L., Glowacz A., Enhanced traffic safety and efficiency of an accelerated LC decision via DNN-APF technique, Measurement 217 (2023).
[7]
Fukuyama S., Dynamic game-based approach for optimizing merging vehicle trajectories using time-expanded decision diagram, Transp. Res. C 120 (2020).
[8]
Guanetti J., Kim Y., Borrelli F., Control of connected and automated vehicles: State of the art and future challenges, Annu. Rev. Control 45 (2018) 18–40.
[9]
Hu W., Deng Z., Cao D., Zhang B., Khajepour A., Zeng L., Wu Y., Probabilistic lane-change decision-making and planning for autonomous heavy vehicles, IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sin. 9 (12) (2022) 2161–2173.
[10]
Kim C., Yoon Y., Kim S., Yoo M.J., Yi K., Trajectory planning and control of autonomous vehicles for static vehicle avoidance in dynamic traffic environments, IEEE Access (2023).
[11]
Lee K., Isele D., Theodorou E.A., Bae S., Spatiotemporal costmap inference for mpc via deep inverse reinforcement learning, IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 7 (2) (2022) 3194–3201.
[12]
Li Y., Li L., Ni D., Wang W., Automatic lane-changing trajectory planning: From self-optimum to local-optimum, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 23 (11) (2022) 21004–21014.
[13]
Li T., Wang L., Liu J., Yuan J., Liu P., Sharing the roads: Robot drivers (vs. human drivers) might provoke greater driving anger when they perform identical annoying driving behaviors, Int. J. Hum.–Comput. Interact. 38 (4) (2022) 309–323.
[14]
Li S., Wei C., Wang Y., Combining decision making and trajectory planning for lane changing using deep reinforcement learning, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 23 (9) (2022) 16110–16136.
[15]
Maleki M., Taghavipour A., Azadi S., A real-time optimal cooperative lane change strategy via V2V communication, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. D (2022).
[16]
Nie X., Min C., Pan Y., Li K., Li Z., Deep-neural-network-based modelling of longitudinal-lateral dynamics to predict the vehicle states for autonomous driving, Sensors 22 (2022) 2013.
[17]
Pan Y., He Y., Mikkola A., Accurate real-time truck simulation via semirecursive formulation and Adams–Bashforth–Moulton algorithm, Acta Mech. Sinica 35 (2019) 641–652.
[18]
Pan Y., Nie X., Li Z., Gu S., Data-driven vehicle modeling of longitudinal dynamics based on a multibody model and deep neural networks, Measurement 180 (2021).
[19]
Pan Y., Zhang X., Liu Y., Wang H., Cao Y., Liu X., Liu B., Dynamic behavior prediction of modules in crushing via FEA-DNN technique for durable battery-pack system design, Appl. Energy 322 (2022).
[20]
Rahman M., Chowdhury M., Xie Y., He Y., Review of microscopic lane-changing models and future research opportunities, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 14 (4) (2013) 1942–1956.
[21]
Rhode S., Van Vaerenbergh S., Pfriem M., Power prediction for electric vehicles using online machine learning, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 87 (2020).
[22]
Schwarting W., Alonso-Mora J., Rus D., Planning and decision-making for autonomous vehicles, Annu. Rev. Control, Robot., Auton. Syst. 1 (2018) 187–210.
[23]
Typaldos P., Papageorgiou M., Papamichail I., Optimization-based path-planning for connected and non-connected automated vehicles, Transp. Res. C 134 (2022).
[24]
Wang D., Wang G., Wang H., Optimal lane change path planning based on the NSGA-II and TOPSIS algorithms, Appl. Sci. 13 (2) (2023) 1149.
[25]
Yan Y., Wang J., Zhang K., Liu Y., Liu Y., Yin G., Driver’s individual risk perception-based trajectory planning: A human-like method, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 23 (11) (2022) 20413–20428.
[26]
Yang C., Chen X., Lin X., Li M., Coordinated trajectory planning for lane-changing in the weaving areas of dedicated lanes for connected and automated vehicles, Transp. Res. C 144 (2022).
[27]
Yang W., Li C., Zhou Y., A path planning method for autonomous vehicles based on risk assessment, World Electr. Veh. J. 13 (12) (2022) 234.
[28]
Yu Y., Luo X., Su Q., Peng W., A dynamic lane-changing decision and trajectory planning model of autonomous vehicles under mixed autonomous vehicle and human-driven vehicle environment, Physica A 609 (2023).
[29]
Zhang K., Chang C., Zhong W., Li S., Li Z., Li L., A systematic solution of human driving behavior modeling and simulation for automated vehicle studies, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 23 (11) (2022) 21944–21958.
[30]
Zhang S., Deng G., Yang E., Ou J., Optimal vehicle lane change trajectory planning in multi-vehicle traffic environments, Appl. Sci. 12 (19) (2022) 9662.
[31]
Zhang X., Xiong Y., Pan Y., Du H., Liu B., Crushing stress and vibration fatigue-life optimization of a battery-pack system, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 66 (3) (2023) 1–16.
[32]
Zhang Z., Zhang L., Deng J., Wang M., Wang Z., Cao D., An enabling trajectory planning scheme for lane change collision avoidance on highways, IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh. (2021).

Index Terms

  1. A lane-changing trajectory re-planning method considering conflicting traffic scenarios
              Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Information & Contributors

              Information

              Published In

              cover image Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
              Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence  Volume 127, Issue PA
              Jan 2024
              1599 pages

              Publisher

              Pergamon Press, Inc.

              United States

              Publication History

              Published: 01 February 2024

              Author Tags

              1. Lane change
              2. Collision avoidance
              3. Trajectory re-planning
              4. Neural network

              Qualifiers

              • Research-article

              Contributors

              Other Metrics

              Bibliometrics & Citations

              Bibliometrics

              Article Metrics

              • 0
                Total Citations
              • 0
                Total Downloads
              • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
              • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
              Reflects downloads up to 16 Oct 2024

              Other Metrics

              Citations

              View Options

              View options

              Get Access

              Login options

              Media

              Figures

              Other

              Tables

              Share

              Share

              Share this Publication link

              Share on social media