Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

On the Co-authorship network analysis in the Process Mining research Community: : A social network analysis perspective

Published: 15 November 2022 Publication History

Highlights

We consider the invisible co-authorship network among Process Mining researchers.
The features of the networks are compared in the two first decades of the 21st century.
We examine the scale-free feature and small-world characteristics in this network.
We used TOPSIS in order to integrate measures to identify the most central authors.
Network without central authors and without nodes less than 3 degrees is examined.

Abstract

As a noticeable focal point in the field of analysis tools, Social Network Analysis (SNA) has received much interest to model real-world phenomena in a variety of domains, e.g., research collaboration and have a better perception of social events. Research collaboration refers to the main procedure of integrating disorganized capabilities and knowledge into novel research techniques and ideas. The invaluable analytical indicator of research collaboration is the outcome of analyses of scientific articles developed as its achievements. This article investigates collaboration and co-authorship in the Process Mining field based on the already published dataset consisting of 1278 papers which are selected by their keywords or snowball technique. According to crucial results, the co-authorship network developed among researchers features a number of the properties of the scale-free networks. Additionally, using mathematics, it has been proven that the acquired network is small world network. Besides, most central authors are determined by integrating four centrality measures include closeness, degree, eigenvector, and betweenness via TOPSIS. This network has been compared and reviewed in the absence/presence of such actors. In accordance with the obtained affiliation of the high-ranking authors, TU/e university plays the most pivotal role in Process Mining promotion.

References

[1]
A. Abbasi, J. Altmann, L. Hossain, October). Identifying the effects of co-authorship networks on the performance of scholars: A correlation and regression analysis of performance measures and social network analysis measures, Journal of Informetrics (2011) 594–607,.
[2]
A. Abbasi, K.S.K. Chung, L. Hossain, Egocentric analysis of co-authorship network structure, position and performance, Information Processing & Management 48 (4) (2012) 671–679,.
[3]
Adamic, L. A. (1999). The Small World Web. Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48155-9_27.
[4]
A.M.A. Kermani, A. Aliahmadi, R. Hanneman, Optimizing the choice of influential nodes for diffusion on a social network, International Journal of Communication Systems 29 (7) (2015) 1235–1250,.
[5]
A.M.A. Kermani, A. Badiee, A. Aliahmadi, M. Ghazanfari, H. Kalantari, Introducing a procedure for developing a novel centrality measure (Sociability Centrality) for social networks using TOPSIS method and genetic algorithm, Computers in Human Behavior 56 (2016) 295–305,.
[6]
Aiello, W., Chung, F., & Lu, L. (2000). A random graph model for massive graphs. Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing - STOC ’00. https://doi.org/10.1145/335305.335326.
[7]
H. Al Zaabi, H. Bashir, Modeling and analyzing project interdependencies in project portfolios using an integrated social network analysis-fuzzy TOPSIS MICMAC approach, International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management 11 (6) (2020) 1083–1106,.
[8]
Anggadwita, G., & Martini, E. (Eds.). (2020). Digital Economy for Customer Benefit and Business Fairness. Sustainable Collaboration in Business, Information and Innovation (SCBTII 2019), 184–188. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003036173.
[9]
V. Arnaboldi, R.I.M. Dunbar, A. Passarella, M. Conti, Analysis of Co-authorship Ego networks, Advances in Network Science 82–96 (2016),.
[10]
A.L. Barabási, H. Jeong, Z. Néda, E. Ravasz, A. Schubert, T. Vicsek, Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 311 (3–4) (2002) 590–614,.
[11]
M. Behzadian, S. Khanmohammadi Otaghsara, M. Yazdani, J. Ignatius, A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications, Expert Systems with Applications 39 (17) (2012) 13051–13069,.
[12]
Bloch, F., Jackson, M. O., & Tebaldi, P. (2019). Centrality measures in networks. Available at SSRN 2749124.
[13]
P. Block, M. Hoffman, I.J. Raabe, et al., Social network-based distancing strategies to flatten the COVID-19 curve in a post-lockdown world, Nat Hum Behav 4 (2020) 588–596,.
[14]
K.W. Boyack, R. Klavans, Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: which citation approach represents the research front most accurately?, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61 (12) (2010) 2389–2404,.
[15]
J.C.A.M. Buijs, B.F. van Dongen, W.M.P. van der Aalst, Towards cross-organizational process mining in collections of process models and their executions, Business Process Management Workshops 2–13 (2012),.
[16]
G. Büyüközkan, G. Çifçi, A combined fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS based strategic analysis of electronic service quality in healthcare industry, Expert Systems with Applications 39 (3) (2012) 2341–2354,.
[17]
C.T. Chen, Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 114 (1) (2000) 1–9,.
[18]
Cheong, F., & J. Corbitt, B. (2009). A social network analysis of the co- authorship network of the pacific asia conference on information systems from 1993 to 2008. Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, PACIS, Hyderabad, India. https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2009/23.
[19]
Cook, J. E., & Wolf, A. L. (1995). Automating process discovery through event-data analysis. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Software Engineering - ICSE ’95, 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1145/225014.225021.
[20]
L.F. Costa, O.N. Oliveira, G. Travieso, F.A. Rodrigues, P.R. Villas Boas, L. Antiqueira, et al., Analyzing and modeling real-world phenomena with complex networks: A survey of applications, Advances in Physics 60 (3) (2011) 329–412,.
[21]
H. Dino, S. Yu, L. Wan, M. Wang, K. Zhang, H. Guo, et al., Detecting leaders and key members of scientific teams in co-authorship networks, Computers & Electrical Engineering 85 (2020),.
[22]
Y. Du, C. Gao, Y. Hu, S. Mahadevan, Y. Deng, A new method of identifying influential nodes in complex networks based on TOPSIS, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 399 (2014) 57–69,.
[23]
B.P.F. Fonseca, R.B. Sampaio, M.V.A. Fonseca, F. Zicker, Co-authorship network analysis in health research: Method and potential use, Health Research Policy and Systems 14 (1) (2016) 14–34,.
[24]
N.E. Friedkin, The development of structure in random networks: An analysis of the effects of increasing network density on five measures of structure, Social Networks 3 (1) (1981) 41–52,.
[25]
C.S. Garcia, A. Meincheim, E.R. Faria Junior, M.R. Dallagassa, D.M.V. Sato, D.R. Carvalho, et al., Process mining techniques and applications – A systematic mapping study, Expert Systems with Applications 133 (2019) 260–295,.
[26]
Gaurav, M., Srivastava, A., Kumar, A., & Miller, S. (2013). Leveraging candidate popularity on Twitter to predict election outcome. Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Social Network Mining and Analysis - SNAKDD ’13, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/2501025.2501038.
[27]
L.O. Gavião, A.P. Sant’Anna, G.B.A. Lima, P.A. de Almada Garcia, A.M. de Sousa, Selecting distribution centers in disaster management by network analysis and composition of probabilistic preferences, Industrial Engineering and Operations Management 1–11 (2020),.
[28]
T. Heinze, S. Kuhlmann, Across institutional boundaries?, Research Policy 37 (5) (2008) 888–899,.
[29]
X. Hu, O.Z. Li, S. Pei, Of stars and galaxies – Co-authorship network and research, China Journal of Accounting Research 13 (1) (2020) 1–30,.
[30]
C.-L. Hwang, K. Yoon, Methods for multiple attribute decision making, Multiple Attribute Decision Making 58–191 (1981),.
[31]
S. Inoue, N. Ito, Y. Uchiyama, R. Kohsaka, Sustainable development utilizing local agricultural resources: A network analysis of interorganizational collaborations in Tsuruoka, Noto, and Aso in Japan, Japanese Journal of Agricultural Economics 22 (2020) 95–100. https://doi.org/10.18480/jjae.22.0_95.
[32]
M. Jalayer, M. Azheian, A.M.A. Kermani, A hybrid algorithm based on community detection and multi attribute decision making for influence maximization, Computers & Industrial Engineering 120 (2018) 234–250,.
[33]
T. Kaya, C. Kahraman, Multicriteria decision making in energy planning using a modified fuzzy TOPSIS methodology, Expert Systems with Applications 38 (6) (2011) 6577–6585,.
[34]
M.A.M.A. Kermani, H. Navidi, F. Alborzi, A novel method for supplier selection by two competitors, including multiple criteria, International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 25 (6) (2012) 527–535,.
[35]
M.A.M.A. Kermani, S.A. Sani, H. Zand, Resident’s Alzheimer disease and social networks within a nursing home, Complex Networks & Their Applications IX 335–345 (2021),.
[36]
A. Kelemenis, D. Askounis, A new TOPSIS-based multi-criteria approach to personnel selection, Expert Systems with Applications 37 (7) (2010) 4999–5008,.
[37]
S. Kumar, Efficacy of a giant component in co-authorship networks, Aslib Journal of Information Management 68 (1) (2016) 19–32,.
[38]
J. Leskovec, L. Backstrom, R. Kumar, A. Tomkins, Microscopic evolution of social networks, in: Proceeding of the 14th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining -, 2008,.
[39]
X. Liu, J. Bollen, M.L. Nelson, H. van de Sompel, Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community, Information Processing & Management 41 (6) (2005) 1462–1480,.
[40]
A. Mardani, A. Jusoh, K. Nor, Z. Khalifah, N. Zakwan, A. Valipour, Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications – a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 28 (1) (2015) 516–571,.
[41]
G. Melin, O. Persson, Studying research collaboration using co-authorships, Scientometrics 36 (1996) 363–377,.
[42]
J.P. Mena-Chalco, L.A. Digiampietri, F.M. Lopes, R.M. Cesar, Brazilian bibliometric coauthorship networks, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 65 (7) (2014) 1424–1445,.
[43]
I. Mesgari, M.A.M.A. Kermani, R. Hanneman, A. Aliahmadi, Identifying key nodes in social networks using multi-criteria decision-making tools, Mathematical Technology of Networks 137–150 (2015),.
[44]
S. Milgram, THE SMALL WORLD PROBLEM, PSYCHOLOGY TODAY 2 (1) (1967) 60–67. https://b2n.ir/106419.
[45]
R. Molontay, M. Nagy, Two decades of network science, in: Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, 2019, pp. 578–583,.
[46]
Momeni, F., & Mayr, P. (2016). Using Co-authorship Networks for Author Name Disambiguation. Proceedings of the 16th ACM/IEEE-CS on Joint Conference on Digital Libraries - JCDL ’16, 261–262. https://doi.org/10.1145/2910896.2925461.
[47]
C.M. Morel, S.J. Serruya, G.O. Penna, R. Guimarães, Co-authorship network analysis: A powerful tool for strategic planning of research, development and capacity building programs on neglected diseases, PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 3 (8) (2009) e501.
[48]
M.E.J. Newman, Clustering and preferential attachment in growing networks, Physical Review E 64 (2) (2001) 1–13,.
[49]
M.E.J. Newman, The structure of scientific collaboration networks, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98 (2) (2001) 404–409,.
[50]
M.E.J. Newman, Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101 (Supplement 1) (2004) 5200–5205,.
[51]
E. Otte, R. Rousseau, Social network analysis: A powerful strategy, also for the information sciences, Journal of Information Science 28 (6) (2002) 441–453,.
[52]
Y.-J. Pan, Y.-C. Chen, S.-R. Lu, K.-D. Juang, S.-P. Chen, Y.-F. Wang, et al., The influence of friendship on migraine in young adolescents: A social network analysis, Cephalalgia 40 (12) (2020) 1321–1330,.
[53]
Reinhardt W., Meier C., Drachsler H., Sloep P. (2011) Analyzing 5 Years of EC-TEL Proceedings. In: Kloos C.D., Gillet D., Crespo García R.M., Wild F., Wolpers M. (eds) Towards Ubiquitous Learning. EC-TEL 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6964. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23985-4_51.
[54]
J.S. Rha, Trends of research on supply chain resilience: A systematic review using network analysis, Sustainability 12 (11) (2020) 4343,.
[55]
R.B. Roy, U.K. Sarkar, Identifying influential stock indices from global stock markets: A social network analysis approach, Procedia Computer Science 5 (2011) 442–449,.
[56]
A. Said, R.A. Abbasi, O. Maqbool, A. Daud, N.R. Aljohani, CC-GA: A clustering coefficient based genetic algorithm for detecting communities in social networks, Applied Soft Computing 63 (2018) 59–70,.
[57]
P. Salamati, F. Soheili, Social network analysis of Iranian researchers in the field of violence, Chinese Journal of Traumatology 19 (5) (2016) 264–270,.
[58]
Savić, M. š., Ivanović, M., & Jain, L. C. (2018). Co-authorship Networks: An Introduction. Intelligent Systems Reference Library, 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91196-0_5.
[59]
Schoenebeck, G. (2013). Potential networks, contagious communities, and understanding social network structure. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web - WWW ’13, 1123–1132. https://doi.org/10.1145/2488388.2488486.
[60]
D. Schuster, S.J. van Zelst, W.M.P. van der Aalst, Incremental discovery of hierarchical process models, Research Challenges in Information Science 417–433 (2020),.
[61]
M. Shekofteh, M. Kazerani, M. Karimi, F. Zayeri, F. Rahimi, Co-Authorship Patterns and Networks in Pharmacology and Pharmacy in Iran, International Journal of Information Science & Management 15 (2) (2017) 1–13. https://ijism.ricest.ac.ir/index.php/ijism/article/view/1050.
[62]
H.S. Shih, Incremental analysis for MCDM with an application to group TOPSIS, European Journal of Operational Research 186 (2) (2008) 720–734,.
[63]
E. Stattner, N. Vidot, Social network analysis in epidemiology: Current trends and perspectives, FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH CHALLENGES IN INFORMATION SCIENCE 2011 (2011) 1–11,.
[64]
A. Strotmann, D. Zhao, T. Bubela, Author name disambiguation for collaboration network analysis and visualization, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 46 (1) (2009) 1–20,.
[65]
Sun, Y. F., Liang, Z. S., Shan, C. J., Viernstein, H., & Unger, F. (2011). Comprehensive evaluation of natural antioxidants and antioxidant potentials in Ziziphus jujuba Mill. var. spinosa (Bunge) Hu ex H. F. Chou fruits based on geographical origin by TOPSIS method. Food Chemistry, 124(4), 1612–1619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.08.026.
[66]
F.W. Takes, W.A. Kosters, Determining the diameter of small world networks, in: Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 2011, pp. 1191–1196,.
[67]
Van Der Aalst, W. (2012). Process mining. Communications of the ACM, 55(8), 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1145/2240236.2240257.
[68]
W. van der Aalst, A. Adriansyah, A.K.A. de Medeiros, F. Arcieri, T. Baier, T. Blickle, et al., Process Mining Manifesto, Business Process Management Workshops 169–194 (2012),.
[69]
W.M.P. van der Aalst, B.F. van Dongen, J. Herbst, L. Maruster, G. Schimm, A.J.M.M. Weijters, Workflow mining: A survey of issues and approaches, Data & Knowledge Engineering 47 (2) (2003) 237–267,.
[70]
D. Watts, S. Strogatz, Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks, Nature 393 (1998) 440–442,.
[71]
Xygalatas, D. (2010). Nickolas A. Christakis and James H. Fowler (2009), Connected: The Surprising Power of our Social Networks and How they Shape our Lives, Little, Brown, New York, NY. 353 pages. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 10(3–4), 401–403. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853710x531267.
[72]
P. Yang, X. Liu, G. Xu, A dynamic weighted TOPSIS method for identifying influential nodes in complex networks, Modern Physics Letters B 32 (19) (2018) 1850216,.
[73]
J.-K. Yu, J.-Q. Ma, Social network analysis as a tool for the analysis of the international trade network of aquatic products, Aquaculture International 28 (3) (2020) 1195–1211,.
[74]
F. Zandi, M. Tavana, A fuzzy group quality function deployment model for e-CRM framework assessment in agile manufacturing, Computers & Industrial Engineering 61 (1) (2011) 1–19,.
[75]
A. Zareie, A. Sheikhahmadi, K. Khamforoosh, Influence maximization in social networks based on TOPSIS, Expert Systems with Applications 108 (2018) 96–107,.
[76]
E.K. Zavadskas, Z. Turskis, S. Kildienė, STATE OF ART SURVEYS OF OVERVIEWS ON MCDM/MADM METHODS, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 20 (1) (2014) 165–179,.
[77]
K. Zhang, H. Du, M.W. Feldman, Maximizing influence in a social network: Improved results using a genetic algorithm, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 478 (2017) 20–30,.
[78]
Z. Zhou, J. Irizarry, Q. Li, Using network theory to explore the complexity of subway construction accident network (SCAN) for promoting safety management, Safety Science 64 (2014) 127–136,.
[79]
M. Zitt, E. Bassecoulard, Development of a method for detection and trend analysis of research fronts built by lexical or cocitation analysis, Scientometrics 30 (1) (1994) 333–351,.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Celebrating two decades of SBSI (2004 to 2023): A Comprehensive Descriptive and Meta-Scientific AnalysisProceedings of the 20th Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems10.1145/3658271.3658300(1-10)Online publication date: 20-May-2024
  • (2024)Graph-based algorithm for exploring collaboration mechanisms and hidden patterns among top scholarsExpert Systems with Applications: An International Journal10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123810249:PCOnline publication date: 17-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Leveraging machine learning for automatic topic discovery and forecasting of process mining researchExpert Systems with Applications: An International Journal10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122435239:COnline publication date: 1-Apr-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. On the Co-authorship network analysis in the Process Mining research Community: A social network analysis perspective
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal
        Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal  Volume 206, Issue C
        Nov 2022
        1603 pages

        Publisher

        Pergamon Press, Inc.

        United States

        Publication History

        Published: 15 November 2022

        Author Tags

        1. Process mining
        2. Co-authorship network
        3. Social network analysis
        4. Centrality measures
        5. TOPSIS

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
        Reflects downloads up to 14 Oct 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2024)Celebrating two decades of SBSI (2004 to 2023): A Comprehensive Descriptive and Meta-Scientific AnalysisProceedings of the 20th Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems10.1145/3658271.3658300(1-10)Online publication date: 20-May-2024
        • (2024)Graph-based algorithm for exploring collaboration mechanisms and hidden patterns among top scholarsExpert Systems with Applications: An International Journal10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123810249:PCOnline publication date: 17-Jul-2024
        • (2024)Leveraging machine learning for automatic topic discovery and forecasting of process mining researchExpert Systems with Applications: An International Journal10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122435239:COnline publication date: 1-Apr-2024
        • (2024)Uncovering the skillsets required in computer science jobs using social network analysisEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-023-12304-429:10(12759-12780)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
        • (2023)Twenty one years of SBQS (2002 to 2022): A Comprehensive Descriptive and Meta-Scientific AnalysisProceedings of the XXII Brazilian Symposium on Software Quality10.1145/3629479.3629493(138-147)Online publication date: 7-Nov-2023
        • (2023)Thirteen Years of WebMedia (2010 to 2022) - A Comprehensive Descriptive and Meta-Scientific AnalysisProceedings of the 29th Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web10.1145/3617023.3617048(184-192)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2023
        • (2023)Detection of unknown bearing faults using re-weighted symplectic geometric node network characteristics and structure analysisExpert Systems with Applications: An International Journal10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119304215:COnline publication date: 15-Feb-2023

        View Options

        View options

        Get Access

        Login options

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media