Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
article

Multiparty communication complexity and very hard functions

Published: 01 July 2004 Publication History

Abstract

A boolean function f(x1,...,xn) with xi ∈ {0,1}m for each i is hard if its nondeterministic multiparty communication complexity (introduced in [in: Proceedings of the 30th IEEE FOCS, 1989, p. 428-433]), C(f), is at least nm. Note that C(f) ≤ nm for each f(x1,...,xn) with xi ∈ {0, 1}m for each i. A boolean function is very hard if it is hard and its complementary function is also hard. In this paper, we show that randomly chosen boolean function f(x1,...,xn) with xi ∈ {0,1}m for each i is very hard with very high probability (for n ≥ 3 and m large enough). In [in: Proceedings of the 12th Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, LNCS 900, 1995, p. 350-360], it has been shown that if f(x1,...,xk,...,xn) = f1(x1,..., xk) ċ f2(xk+1,...,xn), where C(f1) > 0 and C(f2) > 0, then C(f) = C(f1) + C(f2). We prove here an analogical result: If f(x1,..., xk,..., xn) = f1(x1,...,xk) ⊕ f2(xk+1,..., xn) then DC(f) = DC(f1) + DC(f2), where DC(g) denotes the deterministic multiparty communication complexity of the function g and "⊕" denotes the parity function.

References

[1]
{1} A.V. Aho, J.D. Ullman, M.Y. Yanakakis, On notion of information transfer in VLSI, in: Proceedings of the 15th ACM STOC, 1983, pp. 133-139.
[2]
{2} L. Babai, N. Nisan, M. Szegedy, Multiparty protocols and log-space hard pseudorandom sequences, in: Proceedings of the 21st ACM STOC, 1989, pp. 1-11.
[3]
{3} A.K. Chandra, M.L. Furst, R.J. Lipton, Multi-party protocols, in: Proceedings of the 15th ACM STOC, 1983, pp. 94-99.
[4]
{4} D. Dolev, T. Feder, Multiparty communication complexity, in: Proceedings of the 30th IEEE FOCS, 1989, pp. 428-433.
[5]
{5} P. Ďuriš, Z. Galil, G. Schnitger, Lower bounds on communication complexity, Information and Computation 73 (1987) 1-22.
[6]
{6} P. Ďuriš, J.D.P. Rolim, Optimal lower bounds on the multiparty communication complexity, in: Proceedings of the 12th Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, LNCS 900, 1995, pp. 350-360.
[7]
{7} M. Fürer, The power of randomness in communication complexity, in: Proceedings of the 19th ACM STOC, 1987, pp. 178-181.
[8]
{8} E. Kushilevitz, N. Nisan, Communication Complexity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997.
[9]
{9} J. Maňuch, Construction of very hard functions for multiparty communication complexity. Theoretical Informatics and Applications 34 (2000) 61-76.
[10]
{10} K. Melhorn, E.M. Schmidt, Las Vegas is better in VLSI and distributed computing, in: Proceedings of the 14th ACM STOC, 1982, pp. 330-337.
[11]
{11} C.H. Papadimitriou, M. Sipser, Communication complexity, in: Proceedings of the 14th ACM STOC, 1982, pp. 196-200.
[12]
{12} A. Yao, Some complexity questions related to distributive computing, in: Proceedings of the 11th ACM STOC, 1979, pp. 209-213.

Cited By

View all
  • (2011)Partition arguments in multiparty communication complexityTheoretical Computer Science10.1016/j.tcs.2010.01.018412:24(2611-2622)Online publication date: 1-May-2011

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Information and Computation
Information and Computation  Volume 192, Issue 1
1 July 2004
121 pages

Publisher

Academic Press, Inc.

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 July 2004

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 10 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2011)Partition arguments in multiparty communication complexityTheoretical Computer Science10.1016/j.tcs.2010.01.018412:24(2611-2622)Online publication date: 1-May-2011

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media