Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Interactive technology and human-animal encounters at the zoo

Published: 01 February 2017 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper we investigate social dimensions of technology use in human-animal interactions, through a study of interactive systems at the zoo.Zoos are a familiar place for encounters between humans and non-domesticated animals. Accordingly, we examine zoos as a significant site to extend research into animal-computer interaction (ACI). We present a case study that examines the deployment and use of new digital technologies that intervene in, and influence, human-animal relationships.The paper reports on interactive systems in use at Melbourne Zoo. The study investigates the use and impact of technology in the course of human-animal encounters, including how human use of technology in this setting shapes encounters in subtle ways. We examine five interactive systems used by visitors (Digital Signs and the Zoopermarket), by zoo personnel with visitors (Educator Screens and Volunteer iPads), and by zoo personnel with animals (Apps for Apes).Our work draws broad insights for the design and understanding of animal-human-computer interaction at the zoo, as a catalyst for further research into this site of considerable significance to animal-computer interaction. We identified four key themes in the ways that interactive systems are intervening in human-animal encounters at the zoo. Firstly, interactive technology at the zoo risks distracting from visitors' encounters with animals. Secondly, the appearance and use of technology moreover runs counter to expectations of naturalistic zoo landscapes. Thirdly, interactive systems however offer opportunities to enhance important aspects of visitors' experience of animal encounters, and to widen the temporal and spatial dimensions of the encounter. Finally, we interpret these insights by examining how technology is used in the context of interactions between numerous human and animal actors, and in a setting impacted by complex social and organisational forces. From this, we identify the need for ACI to consider technology use by diverse people and animals; that multiple interactions may occur at once; the diverse social activities that may surround human-animal interactions; the distributed form of interactions between multiple participants; and the performative nature of some human-animal encounters. Zoos offer a site to study technology as part of complex human-animal interactions.Technology shapes human-animal encounters in subtle ways.Design needs to accommodate diverse human and animal participants.Human-animal interactions may be distributed or entail multiple interactions.Interactions occur as part of social activities and can involve performance.

References

[1]
L.L. Andersen, Zoo interpretation and exhibit design: two sides of the same coin, J. Mus. Educ., 16 (1991) 4-6.
[2]
U.S. Anderson, A.S. Kelling, R. Pressley-Keough, M.A. Bloomsmith, T.L. Maple, Enhancing the zoo visitor's experience by public animal training and oral interpretation at an otter exhibit, Environ. Behav., 35 (2003) 826-841.
[3]
F. Aspling, O. Juhlin, E. Chiodo, Smelling, Pulling, and Looking: Unpacking Similarities and Differences in Dog and Human City Life, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2015.
[4]
R. Ballantyne, J. Packer, L.A. Sutherland, Visitors' memories of wildlife tourism: Implications for the design of powerful interpretive experiences, Tour. Manag., 32 (2011) 770-779.
[5]
R. Ballantyne, J. Packer, K. Hughes, L. Dierking, Conservation learning in wildlife tourism settings¿: lessons from research in zoos and aquariums, Environ. Educ. Res., 13 (2007) 367-383.
[6]
Bastian, M., 2013. Why More-than-Human Participatory Research? WWW Document. (URL) {{http://www.morethanhumanresearch.com/1/previous/2.html}} (accessed 27.05.15.).
[7]
H. Boostrom, Problem-solving with orangutans (Pongo Pygmaeus and Pongo Abeli)i) (and chimpanzees (Pan Troglodyte)s): Using the iPad to provide novel enrichment opportunities (Masters Thesis), Texas A&M University, 2013.
[8]
L. Brent, J.W. Eichberg, Primate puzzleboard: a simple environmental enrichment device for captive chimpanzees, Zoo Biol., 10 (1991) 353-360.
[9]
M. Carter, S. Webber, S. Sherwen, Naturalism and ACI: Augmenting Zoo Enclosures with Digital Technology, in:, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2015.
[10]
D.A.D. Cheok, Metazoa Ludens: mixed reality interaction and play between humans and animals, in: Art and Technology of Entertainment Computing and Communication, Springer, London, 2010, pp. 83-110.
[11]
A.W. Clay, B.M. Perdue, D.E. Gaalema, F.L. Dolins, M.A. Bloomsmith, The use of technology to enhance zoological parks, Zoo Biol., 30 (2011) 487-497.
[12]
S. Clayton, J. Fraser, C.D. Saunders, Zoo experiences: conversations, connections, and concern for animals, Zoo Biol., 28 (2009) 377-397.
[13]
J.C. Coe, Design and perception: making the zoo experience real, Zoo Biol., 4 (1985) 197-208.
[14]
S. Coleman, Can iPads enhance environmental education?, IZE J., 48 (2012) 7-9.
[15]
S. Cook, G.R. Hosey, Interaction sequences between chimpanzees and human visitors at the Zoo, Zoo Biol., 14 (1995) 431-440.
[16]
J.H. Falk, An identity-centered approach to understanding museum learning, Curator Mus. J., 49 (2006) 151-166.
[17]
Falk, J.H., Reinhard, E.M., Vernon, C.L., Bronnenkant, K., Deans, N.L., 2007. Why Zoos & Aquariums Matter: Assessing the Impact of a Visit to a Zoo or Aquarium. Association of Zoos and Aquariums
[18]
E.J. Fernandez, M.A. Tamborski, S.R. Pickens, W. Timberlake, Animal-visitor interactions in the modern zoo: conflicts and interventions, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 120 (2009) 1-8.
[19]
T. Finlay, L.R. James, T.L. Maple, People's perceptions of animals the influence of zoo environment, Environ. Behav., 20 (1988) 508-528.
[20]
Frawley, J.K., Dyson, L.E., 2014. Animal Personas: Acknowledging Non-human Stakeholders in Designing for Sustainable Food Systems. OzCHI'14. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 21-30. {
[21]
F. French, C. Mancini, Designing Smart Toys for the Cognitive Enrichment of Elephants, in:, ISAWEL, London, 2014.
[22]
B.C. Hallman, S.M.P. Benbow, Family leisure, family photography and zoos: exploring the emotional geographies of families, Soc. Cult. Geogr., 8 (2007) 871-888.
[23]
Hauser, S., Wakkary, R., Neustaedter, C., 2014. Improving guide dog team play with accessible dog toys. In: CHI'14 EA. ACM, New York, NY, USA. pp. 1537-1542
[24]
E.S. Herrelko, An assessment of the Development of a Cognitive Research programme and Introductions in Zoo-housed Chimpanzees (Doctoral Thesis), University of Stirling, 2011.
[25]
G. Hosey, A preliminary model of human-animal relationships in the zoo, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 109 (2008) 105-127.
[26]
G.R. Hosey, Zoo animals and their human audiences: what is the visitor effect?, Anim. Welf., 9 (2000) 343-357.
[27]
J.M. Hoy, P.J. Murray, A. Tribe, Thirty years later: enrichment practices for captive mammals, Zoo Biol., 29 (2010) 303-316.
[28]
J. Perry E. Klopfer M. Norton D. Sutch R. Sandford K. Facer AR gone wild: two approaches to using augmented reality learning games in Zoos ICLS'08 2008 International Society of the Learning Sciences 322 329.
[29]
I.K.H. Jørgensen, H. Wirman, Multispecies methods, technologies for play, Digit. Creat., 0 (2016) 1-15.
[30]
Jimenez Pazmino, P.F., Lopez Silva B. Slattery, B., Lyons, L., 2013. Teachable MoBilMent: Capitalizing on Teachable Moments with Mobile Technology in Zoos. In: CHI'13 EA. ACM, New York, NY, USA. pp. 643-648.
[31]
Karlsson, J., ur Réhman, S., Li, H., 2010. Augmented reality to enhance visitors experience in a digital zoo. In: MUM'10. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 7:1-7:4.
[32]
Kelling, N., Kelling, A., 2014. Zooar: Zoo Based Augmented Reality Signage. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. pp. 1099-1103.
[33]
M.L. Kirchgessner, B.J. Sewall, The impact of environmental, social, and animal factors on visitor stay times at big cat exhibits, Visit. Stud., 18 (2015) 150-167.
[34]
Kobayashi, H., Hirose, M., Fujiwara, A., Nakamura, K., Sezaki, K., Saito, K., 2013. Tele Echo Tube: Beyond Cultural and Imaginable Boundaries. In: MM'13. ACM, New York, NY, USA. pp. 173-182.
[35]
P. Lee, D. Cheok, S. James, L. Debra, W. Jie, W. Chuang, F. Farbiz, A mobile pet wearable computer and mixed reality system for human-poultry interaction through the internet, Pers. Ubiquitous Comput., 10 (2006) 301-317.
[36]
Ludvigsen, M., Veerasawmy, R., 2010. Designing Technology for Active Spectator Experiences at Sporting Events. In: OzCHI. ACM, New York, NY, USA. pp. 96-103.
[37]
J.F. Luebke, J. Matiasek, An exploratory study of zoo visitors' exhibit experiences and reactions, Zoo Biol., 32 (2013) 407-416.
[38]
C. Mancini, Animal-computer interaction: a manifesto, Interactions, 18 (2011) 69-73.
[39]
Mancini, C., 2013. Animal-Computer Interaction (ACI): Changing Perspective on HCI, Participation and Sustainability. In: CHI'13 EA. pp. 2227-2236.
[40]
Mancini, C., Harris, R., Aengenheister, B., Guest, C., 2015. Re-centering multispecies practices: a canine interface for cancer detection dogs. In: CHI'15. ACM, New York, NY, USA. pp. 2673-2682.
[41]
Mancini, C., van der Linden, J., Bryan, J., Stuart, A., 2012. Exploring interspecies sensemaking: dog tracking semiotics and multispecies ethnography. In: UBICOMP. ACM, New York, NY, USA. pp. 143-152.
[42]
D. Mankoff, A. Dey, J. Mankoff, K. Mankoff, Supporting Interspecies Social Awareness: Using Peripheral Displays for Distributed Pack Awareness, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2005.
[43]
L. Marino, S.O. Lilienfeld, R. Malamud, N. Nobis, R. Broglio, Do zoos and aquariums promote attitude change in visitors? A critical evaluation of the American zoo and aquarium study, Soc. Amp. Anim., 18 (2010) 126-138.
[44]
R.E. McGrath, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2009.
[45]
J. Mellen, M. Sevenich MacPhee, Philosophy of environmental enrichment: Past, present, And Future, Zoo Biol., 20 (2001) 211-226.
[46]
Moscardo, G., Woods, B., Saltzer, R., 2004. The role of interpretation in wildlife tourism. In: Wildlife Tourism Impacts. Planning and Management. Common Ground Publishing Altona, Australia. pp. 231-252
[47]
W.L. Neuman, Pearson, Boston, MA, USA, 2006.
[48]
Noz, F., An, J., 2011. Cat cat revolution: an interspecies gaming experience. In: CHI'11. ACM, New York, NY, USA. pp. 2661-2664
[49]
K. O'Hara, T. Kindberg, M. Glancy, L. Baptista, B. Sukumaran, G. Kahana, J. Rowbotham, Collecting and sharing location-based content on mobile phones in a zoo visitor experience, Comput. Support. Coop. Work, 16 (2007) 11-44.
[50]
B.J. Oates, Researching Information Systems and Computing, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2006.
[51]
Ohashi, Y., Ogawa, H., Arisawa, M., 2008. Making new learning environment in zoo by adopting mobile devices. In: MobileHCI'08. ACM, New York, NY, USA. pp. 489-490.
[52]
W.J. Orlikowski, J.J. Baroudi, Studying information technology in organizations: research approaches and assumptions, Inf. Syst. Res., 2 (1991) 1-28.
[53]
Paldanius, M., Kärkkäinen, T., Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K., Juhlin, O., Häkkilä, J., 2011. Communication technology for human-dog interaction: exploration of dog owners' experiences and expectations. In: CHI'11. ACM, New York, NY, USA. pp. 2641-2650.
[54]
E.L. Pearson, R. Lowry, J. Dorrian, C.A. Litchfield, Evaluating the conservation impact of an innovative zoo-based educational campaign: "Don"t Palm Us Off' for orang-utan conservation, Zoo Biol., 33 (2014) 184-196.
[55]
B.M. Perdue, A.W. Clay, D.E. Gaalema, T.L. Maple, T.S. Stoinski, Technology at the zoo: the influence of a touchscreen computer on orangutans and zoo visitors, Zoo Biol., 31 (2012) 27-39.
[56]
B.M. Perdue, T.S. Stoinski, T.L. Maple, Using technology to educate zoo visitors about conservation, Visit. Stud., 15 (2012) 16-27.
[57]
J.-L. Rault, S. Webber, M. Carter, Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on Animal Welfare Science and Animal-Computer Interaction, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2015.
[58]
L.S. Reade, N.K. Waran, The modern zoo: how do people perceive zoo animals?, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 47 (1996) 109-118.
[59]
B.I. Resner, Rover@Home¿: Computer Mediated Remote Interaction between Humans and Dogs (Thesis), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2001.
[60]
P.C. Reynolds, D. Braithwaite, Towards a conceptual framework for wildlife tourism, Tour. Manag., 22 (2001) 31-42.
[61]
D.L. Rhoads, R.J. Goldsworthy, The effects of zoo environments on public attitudes toward endangered wildlife, Int. J. Environ. Stud., 13 (1979) 283-287.
[62]
Robinson, C., Mancini, C., van der Linden, J., Guest, C., Harris, R., 2014a. Canine-centered interface design: supporting the work of diabetes alert dogs. In: CHI'14. ACM, New York, NY, USA. pp. 3757-3766.
[63]
Robinson, C., Mancini, C.,¿van der Linden, J., Guest, C., Harris, R., 2014b. Empowering assistance dogs: an alarm interface for canine use. In: ISAWEL'14 Intelligent Systems for Animal Welfare London
[64]
S.L. Sherwen, T.J. Harvey, M.J.L. Magrath, K.L. Butler, K.V. Fanson, P.H. Hemsworth, Effects of visual contact with zoo visitors on black-capped capuchin welfare, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 167 (2015) 65-73.
[65]
J. Sickler, J. Fraser, Enjoyment in Zoos, Leis. Stud., 28 (2009) 313-331.
[66]
J. Smith, Apps for apes: Orang-utans want iPads for Christmas, New Sci., 212 (2011) 69-71.
[67]
W. Smith, H. Lewi, K. Darian-Smith, J. Pearce, Re-Connecting Visual Content to Place in a Mobile Guide for the Shrine of Remembrance, British Computer Society, Swinton, UK, 2010.
[68]
Suzuki, M., Hatono, I., Ogino, T., Kusunoki, F., Sakamoto, H., Sawada, K., Hoki, Y., Ifuku, K., 2009. LEGS System in a zoo: use of mobile phones to enhance observation of animals. In: IDC'09. ACM. pp. 222-225.
[69]
S. Tofield, R.K. Coll, B. Vyle, R. Bolstad, Zoos as a source of free choice learning, Res. Sci. Technol. Educ., 21 (2003) 67-99.
[70]
Trindade, R., Sousa, M., Hart, C., Vieira, N., Rodrigues, R., França, J., 2015. Purrfect crime: exploring animal computer interaction through a digital game for humans and cats. In: CHI EA'15. ACM, New York, NY, USA. pp. 93-96.
[71]
Weilenmann, A., Juhlin, O., 2011. Understanding people and animals: the use of a positioning system in ordinary human-canine Interaction. In: CHI'11. ACM, New York, NY, USA. pp. 2631-2640.
[72]
B. Weiler, L. Smith, Does more interpretation lead to greater outcomes? An assessment of the impacts of multiple layers of interpretation in a zoo context, J. Sustain. Tour., 17 (2009) 91-105.
[73]
B. Weiler, S.H. Ham, The impacts of profound wildlife experiences, Anthrozoos, 24 (2011) 51-64.
[74]
Westerlaken, M., 2014. Felino: The Philosophical Practice of Making an Interspecies Videogame. In: International 8th Philosophy of Computer Games Conference. pp. 1-12.
[75]
Westerlaken, M., Gualeni, S., 2013. Digitally Complemented Zoomorphism¿: A Theoretical Foundation for Human-Animal Interaction Design. In: DPPI'13. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA.
[76]
H. Wirman, Orangutan Play on and Beyond a Touchscreen, ISEA, Sydney, 2013.
[77]
H. Wirman, The Playing Other and What We cannot Help Learning from the Study of Animal Play, DIGRA, Atlanta, GA, 2013.
[78]
World Association of Zoos and Aquariums), 2015. Committing to Conservation:The World Zoo and Aquarium Conservation Strategy WWW Document. (URL) {{http://www.waza.org/files/webcontent/1.public_site/5.conservation/conservation_strategies/committing_to_conservation/WAZA%20Conservation%20Strategy%202015_}}Landscape.PDF (accessed 7.1.15.).
[79]
R.K. Yin, Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage, 2009.
[80]
V. Yocco, E.H. Danter, J.E. Heimlich, B.A. Dunckel, C. Myers, Exploring use of new media in environmental education contexts: introducing visitors' technology use in zoos model, Environ. Educ. Res., 17 (2011) 801-814.
[81]
Young, J., Young, N., Greenberg, S., Sharlin, E., 2007. Feline Fun Park: A Distributed Tangible Interface for Pets and Owners. In: Adjunct Proceedings of Pervasive. Toronto, Canada.
[82]
C. Zeagler, S. Gilliland, L. Freil, T. Starner, M. Jackson, Going to the Dogs: Towards an Interactive Touchscreen I(nterface for Wor)king Dogs, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2014.
[83]
Zoos Victoria, 2009. Zoos Victoria Strategic Plan 2009-29 WWW Document. (URL) {{http://www.zoo.org.au/sites/default/files/ZV-strategic-plan-2009-29.pdf}} (accessed 1.7.15.).
[84]
Zoos Victoria, 2014a. Zoos Victoria Corporate Plan 2014-19 WWW Document. (URL) {{http://www.zoo.org.au/sites/default/files/ZVCorpPlan14_FA_1.pdf}}
[85]
Zoos Victoria, 2014b. Zoos Victoria Annual Report 2013-14 WWW Document. (URL) {{http://www.zoo.org.au/sites/default/files/Zoos%20Victoria%20Annual%20Report%202013-14.pdf}} (accessed 1.7.15.).

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Digital design considerations in urban natureProceedings of the 27th International Academic Mindtrek Conference10.1145/3681716.3689441(235-243)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Investigating Lemurs Sensory Modality in Technologies: How do Lemurs Engage with Single and Multimodal Stimuli in Zoos?Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3651056(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Augmented Reality at Zoo Exhibits: A Design Framework for Enhancing the Zoo ExperienceProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642015(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • Show More Cited By
  1. Interactive technology and human-animal encounters at the zoo

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
    International Journal of Human-Computer Studies  Volume 98, Issue C
    February 2017
    234 pages

    Publisher

    Academic Press, Inc.

    United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 February 2017

    Author Tags

    1. Animal-computer interaction
    2. Human-animal interaction
    3. Interactive zoo interpretations

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 12 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Digital design considerations in urban natureProceedings of the 27th International Academic Mindtrek Conference10.1145/3681716.3689441(235-243)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024
    • (2024)Investigating Lemurs Sensory Modality in Technologies: How do Lemurs Engage with Single and Multimodal Stimuli in Zoos?Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3651056(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Augmented Reality at Zoo Exhibits: A Design Framework for Enhancing the Zoo ExperienceProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642015(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2023)How computers can shape the relationship between non-human primates and humans through multi-sensory experiences: Developing multi-modal devices for LemursProceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction10.1145/3637882.3637902(1-4)Online publication date: 4-Dec-2023
    • (2022)Politicising Animal-Computer Interaction: an Approach to Political Engagement with Animal-Centred DesignProceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction10.1145/3565995.3566034(1-11)Online publication date: 5-Dec-2022
    • (2022)Do Monkeys Want Audio or Visual Stimuli? Interactive Computers for Choice with White-Faced Sakis in ZoosProceedings of the 2022 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3532106.3533577(1497-1511)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2022
    • (2021)Supporting Animal-Mediated Interventions at Home: The Role of Animals and Technology to Facilitate Daily ActivitiesProceedings of the Eight International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction10.1145/3493842.3493887(1-7)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2021
    • (2021)Digital Technologies in NatureProceedings of the Eight International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction10.1145/3493842.3493885(1-7)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2021
    • (2021)Ethics and Power Dynamics in Playful Technology for AnimalsProceedings of the 24th International Academic Mindtrek Conference10.1145/3464327.3464366(91-101)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2021
    • (2021)ZooDesign: Methods for Understanding and Facilitating Children’s Education at ZoosProceedings of the 20th Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3459990.3460697(204-215)Online publication date: 24-Jun-2021
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    View options

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media