Digital transparency and the usefulness for open government
References
[1]
A.M. Aladwani, Y.K. Dwivedi, Towards a theory of SocioCitizenry: Quality anticipation, trust configuration, and approved adaptation of governmental social media, International Journal of Information Management 43 (2018) 261–272.
[2]
C. Alexopoulos, E. Loukis, Y. Charalabidis, A platform for closing the open data feedback loop based on Web2. 0 functionality, JeDEM-eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government 6 (1) (2014) 62–68.
[3]
Attard, J., Orlandi, F., Scerri, S., & Auer, S.J. G. i q (2015). A systematic review of open government data initiatives. 32(4), 399–418.
[4]
F. Bannister, R. Connolly, The trouble with transparency: a critical review of openness in e‐government, Policy & Internet 3 (1) (2011) 1–30.
[5]
J.C. Bertot, P.T. Jaeger, J.M. Grimes, Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies, Government Information Quarterly 27 (2010) 264–271.
[6]
J.C. Bertot, P.T. Jaeger, J.M. Grimes, Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies, Government Information Quarterly 27 (3) (2010) 264–271.
[7]
Bessa-Vilela, N., Caramelo-Gomes, J., & Morais, P. (2017). Government transparency: reality or mirage?
[8]
T. Cahlikova, V. Mabillard, Open data and transparency: Opportunities and challenges in the swiss context, Public Performance & Management Review (2019) 1–25.
[9]
W.W. Chin, The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling, Modern methods for business research 295 (2) (1998) 295–336.
[10]
F. Corradini, A. Polini, A. Polzonetti, B. Re, Business processes verification for e-government service delivery, Information Systems Management 27 (4) (2010) 293–308.
[11]
A. Cukierman, The limits of transparency, Economic Notes 38 (1–2) (2009) 1–37.
[12]
W.H. Delone, E.R. McLean, The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update, Journal of Management Information Systems 19 (4) (2003) 9–30.
[13]
T.W. Dillon, D. McDowell, F. Salimian, D. Conklin, Perceived ease of use and usefulness of bedside-computer systems, Computers in Nursing 16 (3) (1998) 151–156.
[14]
C. Fornell, D.F. Larcker, Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1) (1981) 39–50.
[15]
A. Fung, M. Graham, D. Weil, Full disclosure: The perils and promise of transparency, Cambridge University Press, 2007.
[16]
S. Grimmelikhuijsen, Linking transparency, knowledge and citizen trust in government: An experiment, International Review of Administrative Sciences 78 (1) (2012) 50–73.
[17]
J.F. Hair, W.C. Black, B.J. Babin, R.E. Anderson, R.L. Tatham, Multivariate data analysis, fifth ed., Prentice Hall, 1988.
[18]
H.H. Harman, Modern factor analysis, University of Chicago Press, 1976.
[19]
Helbig, N., Styrin, E., Canestraro, D., & Pardo, T. (2010, May). Information and transparency: learning from recovery act reporting experiences. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference on Public Administration Online: Challenges and Opportunities (pp. 59-65).
[20]
J. Henseler, G. Hubona, P.A. Ray, Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines, Industrial Management data Systems 116 (1) (2016) 2–20.
[21]
M.A. Hossain, Y.K. Dwivedi, N. Rana, State-of-the-art in open data research: Insights from existing literature and a research agenda, Journal of Organizational Computing Electronic Commerce 26 (1–2) (2016) 14–40.
[22]
K. Janssen, The influence of the PSI directive on open government data: An overview of recent developments, Government Information Quarterly 28 (4) (2011) 446–456.
[23]
M. Janssen, Y. Charalabidis, A. Zuiderwijk, Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government, Information Systems Management 29 (4) (2012) 258–268.
[24]
M. Janssen, R. Matheus, J. Longo, V. Weerakkody, Transparency-by-design as a foundation for open government, Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 11 (1) (2017).
[25]
J. Jeng, Usability assessment of academic digital libraries: effectiveness, efficiency, satisfaction, and learnability, Libri 55 (2–3) (2005) 96–121.
[26]
Jetzek, T., Avital, M., & Bjørn-Andersen, N. (2013). The generative mechanisms of open government data.
[27]
M. Kassen, A promising phenomenon of open data: A case study of the Chicago open data project, Government Information Quarterly 30 (4) (2013) 508–513,.
[28]
N. Kock, Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach, International Journal of e-Collaboration 11 (4) (2015) 1–10.
[29]
O.K. Lean, S. Zailani, T. Ramayah, Y. Fernando, Factors influencing intention to use e-government services among citizens in Malaysia, International Journal of Information Management 29 (6) (2009) 458–475.
[30]
R.P. Lourenço, An analysis of open government portals: A perspective of transparency for accountability, Government Information Quarterly (2015).
[31]
R.P. Lourenço, Evidence of an open government data portal impact on the public sphere, International Journal of Electronic Government Research 12 (3) (2016) 21–36.
[32]
R.P. Lourenço, Government transparency: Monitoring public policy accumulation and administrative overload, Government Information Quarterly 40 (1) (2023).
[33]
L.F. Luna-Reyes, J.C. Bertot, S. Mellouli, Open government, open data and digital government, Government Information Quarterly 31 (1) (2014) 4–5.
[34]
R. Máchová, M. Lněnička, Evaluating the quality of open data portals on the national level, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 12 (1) (2017) 21–41.
[35]
Matheus, R. (2017). Designing and Evaluation Transparency in Open Government. Paper presented at the Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government.
[36]
Matheus, R., & Janssen, M. (2013). Transparency of civil society websites: towards a model for evaluation websites transparency. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance.
[37]
R. Matheus, M. Janssen, Transparency dimensions of big and open linked data, M. Janssen, M. Mäntymäki, J. Hidders, B. Klievink, W. Lamersdorf, B. van Loenen, A. Zuiderwijk (Eds.), Open and big data management and innovation, Vol. 9373, Springer International Publishing, 2015, pp. 236–246.
[38]
R. Matheus, M. Janssen, A systematic literature study to unravel transparency enabled by open government data: The window theory, Public Performance & Management Review 43 (3) (2020) 503–534.
[39]
R. Matheus, M. Janssen, D. Maheshwari, Data science empowering the public: Data-driven dashboards for transparent and accountable decision-making in smart cities, Government Information Quarterly 37 (3) (2018).
[40]
R.P. McDonald, M.-H.R. Ho, Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses, Psychological Methods 7 (1) (2002) 64.
[41]
P. Morgan, D. Cleave‐Hogg, S. DeSousa, J. Tarshis, High‐fidelity patient simulation: validation of performance checklists, British Journal of Anaesthesia 92 (3) (2004) 388–392.
[42]
M. Nilashi, D. Jannach, O. bin Ibrahim, M.D. Esfahani, H. Ahmadi, Recommendation quality, transparency, and website quality for trust-building in recommendation agents, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 19 (2016) 70–84.
[43]
F.L. Ohemeng, K. Ofosu-Adarkwa, Promoting transparency and strengthening public trust in government through information communication technologies?: A study of Ghana's E-governance initiative, International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age 1 (2) (2014) 25–42.
[44]
P.A. Pavlou, D. Gefen, Psychological contract violation in online marketplaces: Antecedents, consequences, and moderating role, Information Systems Research 16 (4) (2005) 372–399.
[45]
S. Petter, D. Straub, A. Rai, Specifying formative constructs in information systems research, MIS Quarterly 31 (4) (2007) 623–656.
[46]
P.M. Podsakoff, S.B. MacKenzie, J.Y. Lee, N.P. Podsakoff, Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies, Journal of applied psychology 88 (5) (2003) 879.
[47]
I.M. Romi, Testing delone and mclean's model in financial institutions, American Academic & Scholarly Research Journal 5 (3 special issue) (2013) 121.
[48]
J. Rowley, e-Government stakeholders—Who are they and what do they want?, International Journal of Information Management 31 (1) (2011) 53–62.
[49]
Scholl, H.J., & Luna-Reyes, L.F. (2011). Transparency and openness in government: a system dynamics perspective. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance.
[50]
A. Shaharudin, B. van Loenen, M. Janssen, Towards a common definition of open data intermediaries, Digital Government: Research Practice 4 (2) (2023) 1–21.
[51]
A. Shirish, S. Chandra, S.C. Srivastava, Switching to online learning during COVID-19: Theorizing the role of IT mindfulness and techno eustress for facilitating productivity and creativity in student learning, International Journal of Information Management 61 (2021).
[52]
D. Straub, M.C. Boudreau, D. Gefen, Validation guidelines for IS positivist research, Communications of the Association for Information Systems 13 (1) (2004) 24.
[53]
K.-T. Tai, Open government research over a decade: A systematic review, Government Information Quarterly 38 (2) (2021).
[54]
S.F. Wamba, Impact of artificial intelligence assimilation on firm performance: The mediating effects of organizational agility and customer agility, International Journal of Information Management 67 (2022).
[55]
S.J. Ward, The magical concept of transparency, Ethics for Digital Journalists: Emerging Best Practices (2014) 45–58.
[56]
V. Weerakkody, K. Kapoor, M.E. Balta, Z. Irani, Y.K. Dwivedi, Factors influencing user acceptance of public sector big open data, Production Planning & Control 28 (11–12) (2017) 891–905.
[57]
Welch, E.W., & Hinnant, C.C. (2003). Internet use, transparency, and interactivity effects on trust in government. Paper presented at the System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on.
[58]
F.A. Zeleti, A. Ojo, E. Curry, Exploring the economic value of open government data, Government Information Quarterly 33 (3) (2016) 535–551.
[59]
A. Zuiderwijk, M. Janssen, C. Davis, Innovation with open data: Essential elements of open data ecosystems, Information Polity 19 (1, 2) (2014) 17–33.
[60]
Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., & Parnia, A. (2013). The complementarity of open data infrastructures: An analysis of functionalities. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research.
Index Terms
- Digital transparency and the usefulness for open government
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Contrasting perceptions about transparency, citizen participation, and open government between civil society organization and government
The concepts of Transparency, Citizen Participation and Open Government is increasingly being used by politicians, public officials and civil society. Open Government strategies are being assumed by public administration at different levels of ...
From Open Government to Open City: Lessons Learnt from Institutionalizing Open Government Practices in Bahía Blanca, Argentina
ICEGOV '17: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic GovernanceBahía Blanca is an Argentinean medium-sized city located in the south of Buenos Aires Province, pioneering the implementation and institutionalizing the practice of Open Government (OG). Through dedicated efforts, the local Government has been ...
Open government and data intermediaries: the case of AidData
dg.o '14: Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Digital Government ResearchOpen Government initiatives can improve transparency, participation, and collaboration between citizens and government agencies. Increasingly a data intermediary is an important actor in this relationship. Helping state agencies as open data producers, ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
The Authors.
Publisher
Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.
Netherlands
Publication History
Published: 01 December 2023
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 0Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 20 Jan 2025