Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

How to measure information similarity in online social networks

Published: 01 December 2017 Publication History

Abstract

In our current knowledge-driven society, many information systems encourage users to utilize their online social connections information collections actively as useful sources. The abundant information-sharing activities among online social connections could be valuable in enhancing and developing a sophisticated user information model. In order to leverage the shared information as a user information model, our preliminary job is to determine how to measure effectively the resulting patterns. However, this task is not easy, due to multiple aspects of information and the diversity of information preferences among social connections. Which similarity measure is the most representable for the common interests of multifaceted information among online social connections? This is the main question we will explore in this paper. In order to answer this question, we considered users self-defined online social connections, specifically in Citeulike, which were built around an object-centered sociality as the gold standard of shared interests among online social connections. Then, we computed the effectiveness of various similarity measures in their capabilities to estimate shared interests. The results demonstrate that, instead of focusing on monotonous bookmark-based similarities, it is significantly better to zero in on more cognitively expressible metadata-based similarities in accounting for shared interests.

References

[1]
C.G. Akcora, B. Carminati, E. Ferrari, Network and profile based measures for user similarities on social networks, in: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration (IRI), 2011.
[2]
A. Anderson, Effects of user similarity in social media, in: Proceedings of the fifth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, ACM, Seattle, Washington, USA, 2012, pp. 703-712.
[3]
D. Antoniades, C. Dovrolis, Co-evolutionary dynamics in social networks: a case study of Twitter, Comput. Social Netw., 2 (2015) 1.
[4]
E.-A. Baatarjav, S. Phithakkitnukoon, R. Dantu, Group recommendation system for Facebook, in: Proceedings of the OTM Confederated International Workshops and Posters on On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: 2008 Workshops: ADI, AWeSoMe, COMBEK, EI2N, IWSSA, MONET, OnToContent+QSI, ORM, PerSys, RDDS, SEMELS, and SWWS, Springer-Verlag, Monterrey, Mexico, 2008, pp. 211-219.
[5]
E. Bakshy, The role of social networks in information diffusion, in: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web, ACM, Lyon, France, 2012, pp. 519-528.
[6]
P. Bhattacharyya, A. Garg, S. Wu, Analysis of user keyword similarity in online social networks, Social Netw. Anal. Mining, 1 (2011) 143-158.
[7]
K. Bischoff, We love rock n roll: analyzing and predicting friendship links in Last.fm, in: Proceedings of the 3rd Annual ACM Web Science Conference, ACM, Evanston, Illinois, 2012, pp. 47-56.
[8]
J. Bobadilla, Recommender systems survey, Knowl.-Based Syst., 46 (2013) 109-132.
[9]
U. Boj, Interlinking the social web with semantics, IEEE Intell. Syst., 23 (2008) 29-40.
[10]
M.J. Brzozowski, T. Hogg, G. Szabo, Friends and foes: ideological social networking, in: Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, Florence, Italy, 2008, pp. 817-820.
[11]
F. Buccafurri, Discovering missing me edges across social networks, Inf. Sci., 319 (2015) 18-37.
[12]
D.-B. Chen, Identifying influential nodes in large-scale directed networks: the role of clustering, PloS One, 8 (2013) e77455.
[13]
L. Colucci, Evaluating item-item similarity algorithms for movies, in: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 2016.
[14]
M. Elahi, F. Ricci, N. Rubens, A survey of active learning in collaborative filtering recommender systems, Comput. Sci. Rev., 20 (2016) 29-50.
[15]
B. Hajian, T. White, Modelling influence in a social network: metrics and evaluation, in: Proceedings of IEEE third international conference on Privacy, security, risk and trust (passat) and 2011 ieee third international conference on social computing (socialcom), 2011.
[16]
C.-L. Huang, Utilizing user tag-based interests in recommender systems for social resource sharing websites, Knowl.-Based Syst., 56 (2014) 86-96.
[17]
V.-J. Ilmarinen, J.-E. Lnnqvist, S. Paunonen, Similarity-attraction effects in friendship formation: honest platoon-mates prefer each other but dishonest do not, Personal. Individ. Differ., 92 (2016) 153-158.
[18]
James, K., et al., Multiple gold standards address bias in functional network integration, in Newcastle University, Computing Science Technical Reports Series. 2011, Newcastle University.
[19]
N. Jonnalagedda, Incorporating popularity in a personalized news recommender system, PeerJ Comput. Sci., 2 (2016) e63.
[20]
W.B.A. Karaa, N. Griba, Information retrieval with porter stemmer: a new version for English, Springer, 2013.
[21]
L.J. Knoll, Social influence on risk perception during adolescence, Psychol. Sci., 26 (2015) 583-592.
[22]
Lee, D.H., Personalized recommendations based on users' information centered social networks, in Information Science. 2013, University of Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
[23]
D.H. Lee, T. Schleyer, Social tagging is no substitute for controlled indexing: a comparison of medical subject headings and CiteULike tags assigned to 231,388 papers, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 63 (2012) 1747-1757.
[24]
M. Levy, M. Sandler, Music information retrieval using social tags and audio, IEEE Trans. Multimed., 11 (2009) 383-395.
[25]
H. Liu, A new user similarity model to improve the accuracy of collaborative filtering, Knowl.-Based Syst., 56 (2014) 156-166.
[26]
J.-E. Lnnqvist, J.V.A. Itkonen, Homogeneity of personal values and personality traits in Facebook social networks, J. Res. Personal., 60 (2016) 24-35.
[27]
H. Ma, On measuring social friend interest similarities in recommender systems, in: Proceedings of the 37th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research & development in information retrieval, ACM, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia, 2014, pp. 465-474.
[28]
M. Manca, L. Boratto, S. Carta, Mining user behavior in a social bookmarking system-a delicious friend recommender system, in: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Data Management Technologies and Applications, 2014.
[29]
M. McPherson, S. Lovin, J. Cook, Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks, Ann. Rev. Sociol., 27 (2001) 415-445.
[30]
N. Modani, Like-minded communities: bringing the familiarity and similarity together, in: Proceedings of Web Information Systems Engineering, 2012, pp. 382-395.
[31]
J. Mori, Extracting relations in social networks from the web using similarity between collective contexts, in: Proceedings of 5th International Semantic Web Conference on the Semantic Web - ISWC 2006, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2006, pp. 487-500.
[32]
B. Nansen, An internet of social things, in: Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures: the Future of Design, ACM, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2014, pp. 87-96.
[33]
D. Nicolini, J. Mengis, J. Swan, Understanding the role of objects in cross-disciplinary collaboration, Organ. Sci., 23 (2012) 612-629.
[34]
S. Oh, S.Y. Syn, Motivations for sharing information and social support in social media: a comparative analysis of Facebook, Twitter, Delicious, YouTube, and Flickr, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. (2015).
[35]
N. Onodera, F. Yoshikane, Factors affecting citation rates of research articles, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 66 (2015) 739-764.
[36]
J.H. Park, An investigation of information sharing and seeking behaviors in online investment communities, Comput. Human Behav., 31 (2014) 1-12.
[37]
R. Patel, P. Bhatt, A survey on semantic focused web crawler for information discovery using data mining technique, Int. J. Innovat. Res. Sci. Technol., 1 (2015) 168-170.
[38]
P. Saari, T. Eerola, Semantic computing of moods based on tags in social media of music, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 26 (2014) 2548-2560.
[39]
J.B. Schafer, Collaborative filtering recommender systems, in: The Adaptive Web: Methods and Strategies of Web Personalization, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007, pp. 291-324.
[40]
P. Singla, M. Richardson, Yes, there is a correlation: - from social networks to personal behavior on the web, in: Proceeding of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web, ACM, Beijing, China, 2008, pp. 655-664.
[41]
H. Steck, Item popularity and recommendation accuracy, in: Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems, ACM, Chicago, Illinois, USA, 2011, pp. 125-132.
[42]
V. Subramaniyaswamy, V. Vijayakumar, V. Indragandhi, A review of ontologybased tag recommendation approaches, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 28 (2013) 1054-1071.
[43]
A. Tapia-Rosero, A. Bronselaer, G. De Tr, A method based on shape-similarity for detecting similar opinions in group decision-making, Inf. Sci., 258 (2014) 291-311.
[44]
L. Weng, The role of information diffusion in the evolution of social networks, in: Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, ACM, Chicago, Illinois, USA, 2013, pp. 356-364.
[45]
J. Wilson, S. Chaudhury, B. Lall, Improving collaborative filtering based recommenders using topic modelling, in: Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence (WI) and Intelligent Agent Technologies (IAT)-Volume 01, IEEE Computer Society, 2014.
[46]
H. Xie, Incorporating sentiment into tag-based user profiles and resource profiles for personalized search in folksonomy, Inf. Process. Manag., 52 (2016) 61-72.
[47]
M. Yava, G. Ycel, Impact of homophily on diffusion dynamics over social networks., Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev., 32 (2014) 354-372.
[48]
Y. Yu, L. Mo, J. Zhou, Social friend interest similarity in microblog and its implication, Int. J. Control Autom., 8 (2015) 21-32.
[49]
D. Zhao, A. Strotmann, The knowledge base and research front of information science 20062010: an author cocitation and bibliographic coupling analysis, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 65 (2014) 995-1006.
[50]
X. Zuo, A. Iamnitchi, A Survey of socially aware peer-to-peer systems, ACM Comput. Surv., 49 (2016) 1-28.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)A proposal for the EI index for fuzzy groupsSoft Computing - A Fusion of Foundations, Methodologies and Applications10.1007/s00500-022-07545-327:4(2125-2137)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2023
  • (2022)Deep learning based feature extraction and a bidirectional hybrid optimized model for location based advertisingMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-022-12457-381:11(16067-16095)Online publication date: 1-May-2022
  • (2019)Evaluating Visual Explanations for Similarity-Based RecommendationsProceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization10.1145/3320435.3320465(22-30)Online publication date: 7-Jun-2019

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Information Sciences: an International Journal
Information Sciences: an International Journal  Volume 418, Issue C
December 2017
671 pages

Publisher

Elsevier Science Inc.

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 December 2017

Author Tags

  1. Citeulike
  2. Group membership
  3. Information similarity
  4. Online social networks
  5. Social tags
  6. Watching relations

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 16 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)A proposal for the EI index for fuzzy groupsSoft Computing - A Fusion of Foundations, Methodologies and Applications10.1007/s00500-022-07545-327:4(2125-2137)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2023
  • (2022)Deep learning based feature extraction and a bidirectional hybrid optimized model for location based advertisingMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-022-12457-381:11(16067-16095)Online publication date: 1-May-2022
  • (2019)Evaluating Visual Explanations for Similarity-Based RecommendationsProceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization10.1145/3320435.3320465(22-30)Online publication date: 7-Jun-2019

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media