Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
article

Journal self-citation study for semiconductor literature: synchronous and diachronous approach

Published: 01 December 2006 Publication History

Abstract

The present study investigates the self-citations of the most productive semiconductor journals by synchronous (self-citing rate) and diachronous (self-cited rate) approaches. Journal's productivity of 100 most productive semiconductor journals was gathered from INSPEC database, 1978-1997 through OVID. Data of citation frequency were obtained from the Science Citation Index (SCI), Journal Citation Reports (JCR) 2001 CDROM edition by the title-by-title search. The self-citing and self-cited data were drawn from the Citing Journal Listing and the Cited Journal Listing of the JCR CDROM version 1990-2001. Self-citing and self-cited rates were determined by the method suggested by the JCR. Eighty-seven journals common to INSPEC and JCR in semiconductor were selected as the object of this study and were listed for statistical tests. The results of the present study demonstrate that high self-citing journals are usually older than low self-citing journals. In contrast to the self-citing data, the journal self-cited rate is not closely related to the publication year but reflects the characteristics of various journals. Journals with a short time interval of publication are more possible with high self-citing and self-cited rates. Journals with higher self-citing rate tend to be more productive and receive more citation than journals with lower self-citing rate. The journal self-cited rate has no association with the number of articles that a journal published and the citation it received. A journal with a higher self-citing rate tends to be cited more by itself. The mean self-citing rate is 9.59% and the mean self-cited rate is 15.03%. There is a significant difference between self-citing and self-cited rates within the same set of journals.

References

[1]
Aksnes, D. W. (2003). A macro study of self-citation. Scientometrics, 56(2), 235-246.
[2]
Fassoulaki, A., Paraskeva, K. P., & Garabinis, G. (2000). Self-citations in six anaesthesia journals and their significance in determining the impact factor. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 84(2), 266-269.
[3]
Garfield, E. (1974). Journal citation studies XVII. Journal self-citation rates--there's a difference. Essays of an Information Scientist, 52, 192-194.
[4]
ISI Science Citation Index, 2001. Journal Citation Reports, CDROM.
[5]
ISI Web of Knowledge, Journal Citation Reports, Online Help "How to analyze self-citation", 2004 version.
[6]
Lawani, S. M. (1977). Citation analysis and the quality of scientific productivity. BioScience, 27(1), 26-31.
[7]
Lawani, S. M. (1982). On the heterogeneity and classification of author self-citations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 33(5), 281-284.
[8]
Lipetz, B. A. (1999). Aspect of JASIS authorship through five decades. Journal of American Society for Information Science, 50(11), 994-1003.
[9]
MacRoberts, M. H., & MacRoberts, B. R. (1989). Problems of citation analysis: a critical review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40(5), 342-349.
[10]
Maczelka, H., & Zsindely, S. (1992). All well if starts well? Citation infancy of recently launched chemistry journals. Scientometrics, 25(2), 367-372.
[11]
Minium, E. W., & Clarke, R. B. (1982). Elements of Statistical Reasoning. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
[12]
Nisonger, T. E. (2000). Use of the Journal Citation Reports for serials management in research libraries: an investigation of the effect of self-citation on journal rankings in library and information science and genetics. College and Research Libraries, 61, 263-275.
[13]
Peritz, B. C., & Bar-Ilan, J. (2002). The sources used by bibliometrics-scientometrics as reflected in references. Scientometrics, 54(2), 269-284.
[14]
Pichappan, P. (1995). A dual refinement of journal self-citation measures. Scientometrics, 33(1), 13-21.
[15]
Rousseau, R. (1999). Temporal differences in self-citation rates of scientific journals. Scientometrics, 44(3), 521-531.
[16]
So, C. Y. K. (1990). Openness index and affinity index: two new citation indicators. Scientometrics, 19(1-2), 25-34.
[17]
Tsay, M. Y., Jou, S. J., & Ma, S. S. (2000). A bibliometric study of semiconductor literature, 1978-1997. Scientometrics, 49(3), 491-509.
[18]
Tsay, M. Y., & Ma, S. S. (2003). The nature and relationship between the productivity of journals and their citations in semiconductor literature. Scientometrics, 56(2), 201-222.
[19]
White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1989). Bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 24, 119-185.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)The classification of citing motivations: a meta-synthesisScientometrics10.1007/s11192-021-03908-z126:4(3243-3264)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2021
  • (2015)Topic-based heterogeneous rankScientometrics10.1007/s11192-015-1601-y104:1(313-334)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2015
  • (2011)P-Rank: An indicator measuring prestige in heterogeneous scholarly networksJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology10.1002/asi.2146162:3(467-477)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2011

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Information Processing and Management: an International Journal
Information Processing and Management: an International Journal  Volume 42, Issue 6
Special issue: Informetrics
December 2006
252 pages

Publisher

Pergamon Press, Inc.

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 December 2006

Author Tags

  1. analysis
  2. citation analysis
  3. journal self-cited
  4. journal self-citing
  5. self-citation
  6. semiconductor journals
  7. synchronous vs. diachronous

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 26 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)The classification of citing motivations: a meta-synthesisScientometrics10.1007/s11192-021-03908-z126:4(3243-3264)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2021
  • (2015)Topic-based heterogeneous rankScientometrics10.1007/s11192-015-1601-y104:1(313-334)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2015
  • (2011)P-Rank: An indicator measuring prestige in heterogeneous scholarly networksJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology10.1002/asi.2146162:3(467-477)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2011

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media