Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
article

Optimised boundary compact finite difference schemes for computational aeroacoustics

Published: 01 July 2007 Publication History

Abstract

A set of optimised boundary closure schemes is presented for use with compact central finite difference schemes in computational aeroacoustics (CAA) involving non-trivial boundaries. The boundary schemes are given in a form of non-central compact finite differences. They maintain fourth-order accuracy, a pentadiagonal matrix system and seven-point stencil which the main interior scheme employs. This paper introduces a new strategy to optimise the boundary schemes in the spectral domain and achieve the best resolution characteristics given a strict tolerance for the dispersion and dissipation errors. The boundary schemes are derived from sophisticated extrapolation of solutions outside the domain. The extrapolation functions are devised by combining polynomials and trigonometric series which contain extra control variables used to optimise the resolution characteristics. The differencing coefficients of the boundary schemes are determined in association with the existing coefficients of the interior scheme which is also optimised through an improved procedure in this paper. The accuracy of the proposed schemes is demonstrated by their application to CAA benchmark problems.

References

[1]
Lele, S.K., Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution. J. Comput. Phys. v103. 16
[2]
Tolstykh, M.A., Application of fifth-order compact upwind differencing to moisture transport equation in atmosphere. J. Comput. Phys. v112. 394
[3]
Ekaterinaris, J.A., Implicit, high-resolution, compact schemes for gas dynamics and aeroacoustics. J. Comput. Phys. v156. 272
[4]
Hixon, R., Prefactored small-stencil compact schemes. J. Comput. Phys. v165. 522
[5]
Freund, J.B., Lele, S.K. and Moin, P., Numerical simulation of a Mach 1.92 turbulent jet and its sound field. AIAA J. v38 i11. 2023
[6]
Kim, J.W. and Morris, P.J., Computation of subsonic inviscid flow past a cone using high-order finite difference schemes. AIAA J. v40 i10. 1961
[7]
Nagarajan, S., Lele, S.K. and Ferziger, J.H., A robust high-order compact method for large eddy simulation. J. Comput. Phys. v191. 392
[8]
Kim, J.W. and Lee, D.J., Optimized compact finite difference schemes with maximum resolution. AIAA J. v34 i5. 887
[9]
Adams, N.A. and Shariff, K., A high-resolution hybrid compact-ENO scheme for shock-turbulence interaction problems. J. Comput. Phys. v127. 27
[10]
Gaitonde, D. and Shang, J.S., Optimized compact-difference-based finite-volume schemes for linear wave phenomena. J. Comput. Phys. v138. 617
[11]
Lee, C. and Seo, Y., A new compact spectral scheme for turbulence simulations. J. Comput. Phys. v183. 438
[12]
Ashcroft, G. and Zhang, X., Optimized prefactored compact schemes. J. Comput. Phys. v190. 459
[13]
Kim, J.W. and Lee, D.J., Implementation of boundary conditions for optimized high-order compact scheme. J. Comput. Acoust. v5 i2. 177
[14]
Carpenter, M.H., Gottlieb, D. and Abarbanel, S., The stability of numerical boundary treatments for compact high-order finite-difference schemes. J. Comput. Phys. v108. 272
[15]
C.K.W. Tam, Aliasing problem: category 1, problem 1, analytic solution, in: Proc. Fourth Computational Aeroacoustics Workshop on Benchmark Problems, Cleveland, USA, October 2003, NASA Glenn Research Centre (NASA/CP-2004-212954, 2004), p. 31.
[16]
Yee, H.C., Sandham, N.D. and Djomehri, M.J., Low-dissipative high-order shock-capturing methods using characteristic-based filters. J. Comput. Phys. v150. 199
[17]
Kim, J.W. and Lee, D.J., Generalized characteristic boundary conditions for computational aeroacoustics. AIAA J. v38 i11. 2040
[18]
S.E. Sherer, Acoustic scattering from multiple circular cylinders: category 2, problems 1 and 2, analytic solution, in: Proc. Fourth Computational Aeroacoustics Workshop on Benchmark Problems, Cleveland, USA, October 2003, NASA Glenn Research Centre (NASA/CP-2004-212954, 2004), p. 39.
[19]
Kim, J.W. and Lee, D.J., Characteristic interface conditions for multiblock high-order computation on singular structured grid. AIAA J. v41 i12. 2341
[20]
Sandberg, R.D. and Sandham, N.D., Nonreflecting zonal characteristic boundary condition for direct numerical simulation of aerodynamic sound. AIAA J. v44 i2. 402
[21]
Kim, J.W. and Lee, D.J., Generalized characteristic boundary conditions for computational aeroacoustics, part 2. AIAA J. v42 i1. 47

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Towards a genuinely stable boundary closure for pentadiagonal compact finite difference schemesJournal of Computational Physics10.1016/j.jcp.2024.112887504:COnline publication date: 1-May-2024
  • (2023)Non-overlapping High-accuracy Parallel Closure for Compact Schemes: Application in Multiphysics and Complex GeometryACM Transactions on Parallel Computing10.1145/358000510:1(1-28)Online publication date: 29-Mar-2023
  • (2022)A non-overlapping high accuracy parallel subdomain closure for compact schemeJournal of Computational Physics10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111593470:COnline publication date: 1-Dec-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Journal of Computational Physics
Journal of Computational Physics  Volume 225, Issue 1
July, 2007
1202 pages

Publisher

Academic Press Professional, Inc.

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 July 2007

Author Tags

  1. Boundary closure
  2. Compact schemes
  3. Computational aeroacoustics
  4. Optimisation

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Towards a genuinely stable boundary closure for pentadiagonal compact finite difference schemesJournal of Computational Physics10.1016/j.jcp.2024.112887504:COnline publication date: 1-May-2024
  • (2023)Non-overlapping High-accuracy Parallel Closure for Compact Schemes: Application in Multiphysics and Complex GeometryACM Transactions on Parallel Computing10.1145/358000510:1(1-28)Online publication date: 29-Mar-2023
  • (2022)A non-overlapping high accuracy parallel subdomain closure for compact schemeJournal of Computational Physics10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111593470:COnline publication date: 1-Dec-2022
  • (2020)A High Accuracy Preserving Parallel Algorithm for Compact Schemes for DNSACM Transactions on Parallel Computing10.1145/34180737:4(1-32)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2020
  • (2020)Compact Schemes for Multiscale Flows with Cell-Centered Finite Difference MethodJournal of Scientific Computing10.1007/s10915-020-01314-w85:1Online publication date: 8-Oct-2020
  • (2016)A priori grid quality estimation for high-order finite differencingJournal of Computational Physics10.1016/j.jcp.2016.03.063315:C(629-643)Online publication date: 15-Jun-2016
  • (2015)An advanced synthetic eddy method for the computation of aerofoil-turbulence interaction noiseJournal of Computational Physics10.1016/j.jcp.2015.01.039287:C(1-17)Online publication date: 15-Apr-2015
  • (2013)Quasi-disjoint pentadiagonal matrix systems for the parallelization of compact finite-difference schemes and filtersJournal of Computational Physics10.1016/j.jcp.2013.01.046241(168-194)Online publication date: 1-May-2013

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media