Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
article

Unsupervised profiling of OCRed historical documents

Published: 01 May 2013 Publication History

Abstract

In search engines and digital libraries, more and more OCRed historical documents become available. Still, access to these texts is often not satisfactory due to two problems: first, the quality of optical character recognition (OCR) on historical texts is often surprisingly low; second, historical spelling variation represents a barrier for search even if texts are properly reconstructed. As one step towards a solution we introduce a method that automatically computes a two-channel profile from an OCRed historical text. The profile includes (1) ''global'' information on typical recognition errors found in the OCR output, typical patterns for historical spelling variation, vocabulary and word frequencies in the underlying text, and (2) ''local'' hypotheses on OCR-errors and historical orthography of particular tokens of the OCR output. We argue that availability of this kind of knowledge represents a key step for improving OCR and Information Retrieval (IR) on historical texts: profiles can be used, e.g., to automatically finetune postcorrection systems or adapt OCR engines to the given input document, and to define refined models for approximate search that are aware of the kind of language variation found in a specific document. Our evaluation results show a strong correlation between the true distribution of spelling variation patterns and recognition errors in the OCRed text and estimated ranks and scores automatically computed in profiles. As a specific application we show how to improve the output of a commercial OCR engine using profiles in a postcorrection system.

References

[1]
G. Inc., Google books, {http://books.google.com/}.
[2]
R. Holley, How good can it get?, D-Lib Magazine 15(3/4).
[3]
T.L. Packer, Performing information extraction to improve OCR error detection in semi-structured historical documents, in: Proceedings of the 2011 Workshop on Historical Document Imaging and Processing (HIP '11), Beijing, China, 2011, pp. 67-74.
[4]
A. Fischer, V. Frinken, A. Fornes, H. Bunke, Transcription alignment of Latin manuscripts using hidden Markov models, in: Proceedings of the 2011 Workshop on Historical Document Imaging and Processing (HIP '11), Beijing, China, 2011, pp. 29-36.
[5]
H. Balk, A. Conteh, IMPACT: centre of competence in text digitisation, in: Proceedings of the 2011 Workshop on Historical Document Imaging and Processing (HIP '11), Beijing, China, 2011, pp. 155-160.
[6]
A. Gotscharek, U. Reffle, C. Ringlstetter, K. U. Schulz, On lexical resources for digitization of historical documents, in: DocEng '09: Proceedings of the Ninth ACM symposium on Document engineering, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2009, pp. 193-200.
[7]
R. Smith, Limits on the application of frequency-based language models to ocr, in: ICDAR, IEEE, 2011, pp. 538-542.
[8]
P. Yang, A. Antonacopoulos, C. Clausner, S. Pletschacher, Grid-based modelling and correction of arbitrarily warped historical document images for large-scale digitisation, in: Proceedings of the 2011 Workshop on Historical Document Imaging and Processing, HIP '11, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2011, pp. 106-111.
[9]
Gotscharek, A., Reffle, U., Ringlstetter, C., Schulz, K. and Neumann, A., Towards information retrieval on historical document collections: the role of matching procedures and special lexica. . International Journal of Document Analysis and Recognition. 1-13.
[10]
K. Taghva, T. Nartker, J. Borsack, Information access in the presence of ocr errors, in: Proceedings of the First ACM Workshop on Hardcopy Document Processing, HDP '04, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2004, pp. 1-8.
[11]
A.C. Popat, A panlingual anomalous text detector, in: Proceedings of the Ninth ACM Symposium on Document Engineering, DocEng '09, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2009, pp. 201-204.
[12]
Reffle, U., Efficiently generating correction suggestions for garbled tokens of historical language. Natural Language Engineering. v17. 265-282.
[13]
Shannon, C.E., A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal. v27. 379-423.
[14]
R. Wagner, M. Fisher, The string-to-string correction problem, Journal of the ACM 21 (1) (1974) 168-173
[15]
F. Weigel, S. Baumann, J. Rohrschneider, Lexical postprocessing by heuristic search and automatic determination of the edit costs, in: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR 95), 1995, pp. 857-860.
[16]
E.S. Ristad, P.N. Yianilos, Learning string edit distance, in: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Machine Learning, Morgan Kaufmann, 1997, pp. 287-295.
[17]
E. Brill, R.C. Moore, An improved error model for noisy channel spelling correction, in: ACL '00: Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, Association for Computational Linguistics, Morristown, NJ, USA, 2000, pp. 286-293.
[18]
O. Kolak, W. Byrne, P. Resnik, A generative probabilistic ocr model for nlp applications, in: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology, vol. 1, NAACL '03, Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2003, pp. 55-62.
[19]
Probability scoring for spelling correction. Statistics and Computing. v1. 93-103.
[20]
L.-M. Liu, Y.M. Babad, W. Sun, K.-K. Chan, Adaptive post-processing of ocr text via knowledge acquisition, in: Proceedings of the 19th annual conference on Computer Science, CSC '91, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1991, pp. 558-569.
[21]
Rice, S.V., Nagy, G. and Nartker, T.A., Optical Character Recognition: An Illustrated Guide to the Frontier. . 1999. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
[22]
X. Tong, D.A. Evans, A statistical approach to automatic OCR error correction in context, in: Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Very Large Corpora, Copenhagen, Denmark, 1996, pp. 88-100.
[23]
C. Ringlstetter, U. Reffle, A. Gotscharek, K.U. Schulz, Deriving symbol dependent edit weights for text correction-the use of error dictionaries, in: ICDAR, 2007, pp. 639-643.
[24]
R. Jin, C. Zhai, A.G. Hauptmann, Information retrieval for ocr documents: a content-based probabilistic correction model, in: Document Recognition and Retrieval X Santa Clara, CA, USA, Proceedings, 2003, pp. 128-135.
[25]
A. Ernst-Gerlach, N. Fuhr, Generating search term variants for text collections with historic spellings, in: Proceedings of the 28th European Conference on Information Retrieval Research (ECIR 2006), Springer, 2006, pp. 1-8.
[26]
Jurish, B., More than words: Using token context to improve canonicalization of historical German. . JLCL. v25 i1. 23-39.
[27]
Schulz, K.U. and Mihov, S., Fast string correction with Levenshtein automata. International Journal of Document Analysis and Recognition. v5 i1. 67-85.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)A survey of OCR evaluation tools and metricsProceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Historical Document Imaging and Processing10.1145/3476887.3476888(13-18)Online publication date: 5-Sep-2021
  • (2021)Survey of Post-OCR Processing ApproachesACM Computing Surveys10.1145/345347654:6(1-37)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2021
  • (2019)OCR-DProceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Digital Access to Textual Cultural Heritage10.1145/3322905.3322917(53-58)Online publication date: 8-May-2019
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Unsupervised profiling of OCRed historical documents
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Publisher

    Elsevier Science Inc.

    United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 May 2013

    Author Tags

    1. Error detection and error correction
    2. OCR postprocessing
    3. Processing of historical documents
    4. Statistical learning

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 16 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2021)A survey of OCR evaluation tools and metricsProceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Historical Document Imaging and Processing10.1145/3476887.3476888(13-18)Online publication date: 5-Sep-2021
    • (2021)Survey of Post-OCR Processing ApproachesACM Computing Surveys10.1145/345347654:6(1-37)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2021
    • (2019)OCR-DProceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Digital Access to Textual Cultural Heritage10.1145/3322905.3322917(53-58)Online publication date: 8-May-2019
    • (2019)A-I-PoCoToProceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Digital Access to Textual Cultural Heritage10.1145/3322905.3322908(19-24)Online publication date: 8-May-2019
    • (2019)Recognizing the orthography changes for identifying the temporal origin on the example of the Balkan historical documentsNeural Computing and Applications10.1007/s00521-017-3292-131:8(3493-3513)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2019
    • (2017)Profiling of OCR'ed Historical Texts RevisitedProceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Digital Access to Textual Cultural Heritage10.1145/3078081.3078096(61-66)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2017
    • (2017)Mass Digitization of Early Modern Texts With Optical Character RecognitionJournal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 10.1145/307564511:1(1-25)Online publication date: 7-Dec-2017
    • (2017)Learning string distance with smoothing for OCR spelling correctionMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-016-4185-576:22(24549-24567)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2017
    • (2016)An evidence-based model of saliency feature extraction for scene text analysisInternational Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition10.1007/s10032-016-0270-619:3(269-287)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2016
    • (2014)OCR of historical printings of Latin textsProceedings of the First International Conference on Digital Access to Textual Cultural Heritage10.1145/2595188.2595205(71-75)Online publication date: 19-May-2014
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    View options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media