Bubbles bursting: : Investigating and measuring the personalisation of social media searches
Authors: 
Can Yang, Xinyuan Xu, Bernardo Pereira Nunes, 
Sean Wolfgand Matsui SiqueiraAuthors Info & Claims
Can Yang, Xinyuan Xu, Bernardo Pereira Nunes, Sean Wolfgand Matsui SiqueiraAuthors Info & ClaimsReferences
[1]
U. Reviglio, C. Agosti, Thinking outside the black-box: The case for “algorithmic sovereignty in social media, 6, Social Media+ Society, 2020, pp. 1–12.
[2]
E. Bozdag, Bias in algorithmic filtering and personalization, Ethics Inform. Technol. 15 (3) (2013) 209–227.
[3]
N. Bartley, A. Abeliuk, E. Ferrara, K. Lerman, Auditing algorithmic bias on twitter, in: 13th ACM Web Science Conference 2021, 2021, pp. 65–73.
[4]
K. Ansgar, V.E. Perez, W. Helena, P. Menisha, C. Sofia, J. Marina, M. Derek, Editorial responsibilities arising from personalization algorithms, ORBIT J. 1 (1) (2017) 1–12.
[5]
N. Perra, L.E. Rocha, Modelling opinion dynamics in the age of algorithmic personalisation, Sci. Rep. 9 (1) (2019) 1–11.
[6]
F. Zuiderveen Borgesius, D. Trilling, J. Möller, B. Bodó, C.H. De Vreese, N. Helberger, Should we worry about filter bubbles?, Internet Policy Review, J. Internet Regul. 5 (1) (2016) 1–16.
[7]
A. Bruns, Are filter bubbles real?, Polity Press, Cambridge, 2019.
[8]
G. Figà Talamanca, S. Arfini, Through the newsfeed glass: Rethinking filter bubbles and echo chambers, Philos. Technol. 35(1) (2022) 1–34.
[9]
E. Pariser, The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you, Penguin Press, 2011.
[10]
S.S. Rehani, Social media personalization algorithms and the emergence of filter bubbles, iSChannel 15 (1) (2020) 20–24.
[11]
D.J. Ali, E. Eriyanto, Political polarization and selective exposure of social media users in indonesia, Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik 24 (3) (2021) 268–283.
[12]
S. Miller, P. Menard, D. Bourrie, S. Sittig, Integrating truth bias and elaboration likelihood to understand how political polarisation impacts disinformation engagement on social media, Inform. Syst. J. (2022) 1–38.
[13]
H. Holone, The filter bubble and its effect on online personal health information, Croat. Med. J. 57 (3) (2016) 298–301.
[14]
S.C. Rhodes, Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and fake news: how social media conditions individuals to be less critical of political misinformation, Polit. Commun. 39 (1) (2022) 1–22.
[15]
P. Garg, S.N. Singh, Multilayer perceptron optimization approaches for detecting spam on social media based on recursive feature elimination, in: B. Unhelker, H.M. Pandey, G. Raj (Eds.), Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, 2022, pp. 501–510.
[16]
J. Sun, J. Song, Y. Jiang, Y. Liu, J. Li, Prick the filter bubble: A novel cross domain recommendation model with adaptive diversity regularization, Electronic Markets 32 (1) (2022) 101–121.
[17]
N. Thurman, S. Schifferes, The future of personalization at news websites, Journal. Stud. 13 (5–6) (2012) 775–790.
[18]
A. Hannak, P. Sapiezynski, A. Molavi Kakhki, B. Krishnamurthy, D. Lazer, A. Mislove, C. Wilson, Measuring Personalization of Web Search, in: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW ’13, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2013, pp. 527–538. URL:
[19]
C. Kliman-Silver, A. Hannak, D. Lazer, C. Wilson, A. Mislove, Location, Location, Location: The Impact of Geolocation on Web Search Personalization, in: Proceedings of the 2015 Internet Measurement Conference, IMC ’15, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2015, pp. 121–127.
[20]
V. Cozza, V.T. Hoang, M. Petrocchi, A. Spognardi, Experimental measures of news personalization in Google News, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (2016) 93–104
[21]
E. Bakshy, S. Messing, L.A. Adamic, Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on facebook, Science 348 (6239) (2015) 1130–1132.
[22]
C. Yang, B.P. Nunes, J.C. d. Santos, S.W.M. Siqueira, X. Xu, The biaschecker: How biased are social media searches?, in: Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, ASONAM ’21, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2022, p. 305–308. URL:
[23]
J.C. dos Santos, S.W.M. Siqueira, B. Pereira Nunes, P.P. Balestrassi, F.R.S. Pereira, Is there personalization in twitter search? a study on polarized opinions about the brazilian welfare reform, in: 12th ACM Conference on Web Science, WebSci ’20, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2020, pp. 267–276,.
[24]
S. Nagulendra, J. Vassileva, Understanding and controlling the filter bubble through interactive visualization: a user study, in: Proceedings of the 25th ACM conference on Hypertext and social media, HT ’14, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2014, pp. 107–115. URL:
[25]
O. Shcherbakova, S. Nikiforchuk, Social media and filter bubbles, Sci. J. Polonia Univ. 54 (5) (2022) 81–88,.
[26]
R. Levy, Social media, news consumption, and polarization: Evidence from a field experiment, Am. Econ. Rev. 111 (3) (2021) 831–870.
[27]
J.J. Van Bavel, S. Rathje, E. Harris, C. Robertson, A. Sternisko, How social media shapes polarization, Trends Cognit. Sci. 25 (11) (2021) 913–916.
[28]
R. Gramigna, Inside facebook’s semiosphere. how social media influence digital hate and fuel cyber-polarization, Soc. Semiot. 32 (5) (2022) 606–633,.
[29]
J.P. Baptista, A. Gradim, “brave new world of fake news: How it works, Javnost-the public 28 (4) (2021) 426–443.
[30]
N.K. Agarwal, F. Alsaeedi, Creation, dissemination and mitigation: toward a disinformation behavior framework and model, Aslib J. Inform. Manage. 73 (5) (2021) 639–658.
[31]
C.H. Au, K.K. Ho, D.K. Chiu, The role of online misinformation and fake news in ideological polarization: barriers, catalysts, and implications, Inform. Syst. Front. (2021) 1–24.
[32]
J.A. Piazza, Fake news: The effects of social media disinformation on domestic terrorism, Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict 15 (1) (2022) 55–77.
[33]
T. Lee, The global rise of “fake news and the threat to democratic elections in the usa, Public Administration and Policy 22 (1) (2019) 15–24.
[34]
D. Acemoglu, A. Ozdaglar, J. Siderius, A model of online misinformation, NBER Working Paper (2022) 1–42
[35]
A.K. Kar, S.N. Tripathi, N. Malik, S. Gupta, U. Sivarajah, How does misinformation and capricious opinions impact the supply chain-a study on the impacts during the pandemic, Ann. Oper. Res. (2022) 1–22.
[36]
E.J. Rader, Awareness of behavioral tracking and information privacy concern in facebook and google., in: SOUPS, Vol. 14, 2014, pp. 51–67.
[37]
A. Koene, E. Perez, C.J. Carter, R. Statache, S. Adolphs, C. O’Malley, T. Rodden, D. McAuley, Privacy concerns arising from internet service personalization filters, Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 45 (3) (2016) 167–171.
[38]
J. Golbeck, User privacy concerns with common data used in recommender systems, in: Social Informatics: 8th International Conference, SocInfo 2016, Bellevue, WA, USA, November 11–14, 2016, Proceedings, Part I 8, Springer, 2016, pp. 468–480.
[39]
A.-R. Jung, The influence of perceived ad relevance on social media advertising: An empirical examination of a mediating role of privacy concern, Comput. Human Behav. 70 (2017) 303–309.
[40]
S. Gambs, Privacy and ethical challenges in big data, in: Foundations and Practice of Security: 11th International Symposium, FPS 2018, Montreal, QC, Canada, November 13–15, 2018, Revised Selected Papers 11, Springer, 2019, pp. 17–26.
[41]
A. Kozyreva, P. Lorenz-Spreen, R. Hertwig, S. Lewandowsky, S.M. Herzog, Public attitudes towards algorithmic personalization and use of personal data online: Evidence from germany, great britain, and the united states, Human. Soc. Sci. Commun. 8 (1) (2021) 1–11.
[42]
E. Perez Vallejos, L. Dowthwaite, H. Creswich, V. Portillo, A. Koene, M. Jirotka, A. McCarthy, D. McAuley, The impact of algorithmic decision-making processes on young people’s well-being, Health Inform. J. 27 (1) (2021) 1–21.
[43]
D. Nikolov, D.F. Oliveira, A. Flammini, F. Menczer, Measuring online social bubbles, PeerJ Comput. Sci. 1 (2015) 1–14.
[44]
E. Hargreaves, C. Agosti, D. Menasché, G. Neglia, A. Reiffers-Masson, E. Altman, Biases in the Facebook News Feed: A Case Study on the Italian Elections, IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) 2018 (2018) 806–812,.
[45]
F. Huszár, S.I. Ktena, C. O’Brien, L. Belli, A. Schlaikjer, M. Hardt, Algorithmic amplification of politics on twitter, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119 (1) (2022) e2025334119.
[46]
J. Kulshrestha, M. Eslami, J. Messias, M.B. Zafar, S. Ghosh, K.P. Gummadi, K. Karahalios, Search bias quantification: investigating political bias in social media and web search, Inform. Retrieval J.1–2, SI 22 (2019) 188–227,.
[47]
R.E. Robertson, D. Lazer, C. Wilson, Auditing the personalization and composition of politically-related search engine results pages, in: Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference, 2018, pp. 955–965.
[48]
C. Sandvig, K. Hamilton, K. Karahalios, C. Langbort, Auditing algorithms: Research methods for detecting discrimination on internet platforms, Data and discrimination: converting critical concerns into productive inquiry 22 (2014) (2014) 4349–4357.
[49]
J. Bandy, Problematic machine behavior: A systematic literature review of algorithm audits, Proceedings of the acm on human-computer interaction 5 (CSCW1) (2021) 1–34.
[50]
J. Bandy, N. Diakopoulos, More accounts, fewer links: How algorithmic curation impacts media exposure in twitter timelines, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5 (CSCW1) (2021) 1–28.
[51]
R. Kohavi, R. Longbotham, D. Sommerfield, R.M. Henne, Controlled experiments on the web: survey and practical guide, Data Mining Knowl. Discovery 18 (2009) 140–181.
[52]
R. Kohavi, A. Deng, B. Frasca, R. Longbotham, T. Walker, Y. Xu, Trustworthy online controlled experiments: Five puzzling outcomes explained, in: Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, 2012, pp. 786–794.
[53]
R. Kohavi, D. Tang, Y. Xu, Trustworthy Online Controlled Experiments: A Practical Guide to A/B Testing, Cambridge University Press, 2020, pp. 200–208. 10.1017/9781108653985.025 Ch. The A/A Test,.
[54]
E.T. Peterson, Web analytics demystified: a marketer’s guide to understanding how your web site affects your business, Bookrenter, 2004.
[55]
S. Salehi, J.T. Du, H. Ashman, Examining Personalization in Academic Web Search, in: Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Hypertext & Social Media, HT ’15, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2015, pp. 103–111. URL:
[56]
H. Le, R. Maragh, B. Ekdale, A. High, T. Havens, Z. Shafiq, Measuring Political Personalization of Google News Search, in: The World Wide Web Conference, WWW ’19, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2019, pp. 2957–2963. doi: 10.1145/3308558.3313682.
[57]
B. Pan, H. Hembrooke, T. Joachims, L. Lorigo, G. Gay, L. Granka, In google we trust: Users’ decisions on rank, position, and relevance, J. Comput.-Mediated Commun. 12 (3) (2007) 801–823.
[58]
P. Jaccard, Distribution de la flore alpine dans le bassin des dranses et dans quelques régions voisines, Bulletin de la Societe Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles 37 (1901) 241–272,.
[59]
V.I. Levenshtein, Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions and reversals, Soviet Physics Doklady 10 (1966) 707–710.
[60]
M.G. Kendall, A new measure of rank correlation, Biometrika 30 (1–2) (1938) 81–93,. arXiv:https://academic.oup.com/biomet/article-pdf/30/1-2/81/423380/30-1-2-81.pdf.
[61]
K. Wang, Y. Zeng, F. Meng, L. Yang Feiyu, Comparison between calculation methods for semantic text similarity based on siamese networks, in: 2021 4th International Conference on Data Science and Information Technology, DSIT 2021, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2021, pp. 389–395. doi: 10.1145/3478905.3478981.
[62]
Y. Yang, D. Cer, A. Ahmad, M. Guo, J. Law, N. Constant, G.H. Abrego, S. Yuan, C. Tar, Y.-H. Sung, B. Strope, R. Kurzweil, Multilingual universal sentence encoder for semantic retrieval (2019). arXiv:1907.04307.
[63]
F. Feng, Y. Yang, D. Cer, N. Arivazhagan, W. Wang, Language-agnostic bert sentence embedding (2020). arXiv:2007.01852.
[64]
J. Devlin, M.-W. Chang, K. Lee, K. Toutanova, Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding (2019). arXiv:1810.04805.
[65]
F. Rahutomo, T. Kitasuka, M. Aritsugi, Semantic cosine similarity, in: The 7th international student conference on advanced science and technology ICAST, Vol. 4, 2012, pp. 1–2.
[66]
S.M. Kosslyn, Graph Design for the Eye and Mind, Oxford University Press, 2006, Ch. Choosing a Graph Format, pp. 29–74.
[67]
M. Mani, S. Fei, Effective big data visualization, in: Proceedings of the 21st International Database Engineering & Applications Symposium, 2017, pp. 298–303.
[68]
J. In, S. Lee, Statistical data presentation, Korean J. Anesthesiol. 70 (3) (2017) 267–276.
[69]
J.M. Chambers, W.S. Cleveland, B. Kleiner, P.A. Tukey, Graphical Methods for Data Analysis, 1st Edition, Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2017, Ch. Portraying the Distribution of a Set of Data, pp. 9–46.
[70]
S.E. Asch, Forming impressions of personality., The, J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 41 (3) (1946) 258–290.
[71]
R.M. Hogarth, H.J. Einhorn, Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model, Cognit. Psychol. 24 (1) (1992) 1–55.
[72]
J. Marquardson, M. Grimes, Supporting better decisions: How order effects influence decision support system alignment, Interact. Comput. 30 (6) (2018) 469–479.
[73]
R. Epstein, R.E. Robertson, The search engine manipulation effect (seme) and its possible impact on the outcomes of elections, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112 (33) (2015) E4512–E4521.
[74]
A. Novin, E. Meyers, Making sense of conflicting science information: Exploring bias in the search engine result page, in: Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Conference Human Information Interaction and Retrieval, CHIIR ’17, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2017, p. 175–184. URL:
[75]
E. Ulusoy, D. Carnahan, D.E. Bergan, R.C. Barry, S. Ma, S. Ahn, J. McGraw, Flooding the zone: How exposure to implausible statements shapes subsequent belief judgments, Int. J. Public Opin. Res. 33 (4) (2021) 856–872,.
[76]
E. Bozdag, J. Van Den Hoven, Breaking the filter bubble: democracy and design, Ethics Inform. Technol. 17 (4) (2015) 249–265.
[77]
J. Swart, Experiencing algorithms: How young people understand, feel about, and engage with algorithmic news selection on social media, Social Media+ Society 7 (2) (2021) 1–11.
[78]
European Parliament and Council of the European Union, EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), Official Journal of the European Union, L 119/1 (2016). URL: https://commission.europa.eu/law/law-topic/data-protection_en.
[79]
Presidency of the Republic, Brazilian General Data Protection Law (LGPD), Law n 13.709, Secretaria-Geral (2018). URL: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2018/lei/L13709compilado.htm.
[80]
Parliament of United Kingdom, Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA), Government UK (2018). URL: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/data-protection-act-2018.
[81]
Office of the Privacy Commissioner, The Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA), S.C. 2000, c. 5 (2000). URL: https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/privacy-topics/privacy-laws-in-canada/the-personal-information-protection-and-electronic-documents-act-pipeda/.
[82]
Office of the Australian Information Commissioner, Australian Privacy Principles (APPs), Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (2014). URL: https://www.oaic.gov.au/privacy/australian-privacy-principles.
[83]
R. Buyle, R. Taelman, K. Mostaert, G. Joris, E. Mannens, R. Verborgh, T. Berners-Lee, Streamlining governmental processes by putting citizens in control of their personal data, in: Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia: 6th International Conference, EGOSE 2019, St. Petersburg, Russia, November 13–14, 2019, Proceedings 6, Springer, 2020, pp. 346–359.
[84]
C. Aguilera-Carnerero, A.H. Azeez, ‘islamonausea, not islamophobia’: The many faces of cyber hate speech, J. Arab & Muslim Media Res. 9 (1) (2016) 21–40.
[85]
M. Li, Z. Luo, The ‘bad women drivers’ myth: The overrepresentation of female drivers and gender bias in china’s media, Inform., Commun. Soc. 23 (5) (2020) 776–793.
[86]
T.T. Nguyen, D. Huang, E.K. Michaels, M.M. Glymour, A.M. Allen, Q.C. Nguyen, Evaluating associations between area-level twitter-expressed negative racial sentiment, hate crimes, and residents’ racial prejudice in the united states, SSM-population Health 13 (2021),.
[87]
H. Cho, W. Li, J. Cannon, R. Lopez, C. Song, Testing three explanations for stigmatization of people of asian descent during covid-19: maladaptive coping, biased media use, or racial prejudice?, Ethnicity Health 26 (1) (2021) 94–109.
[88]
M.I. Rashid, M.M. Iqbal, M. Tanvir, Islamophobia: Causes and countermeasures, Asian J. Comparat. Politics (2023) 20578911231156277.
[89]
A.K. Kar, Y.K. Dwivedi, Theory building with big data-driven research–moving away from the “what towards the “why, Int. J. Inf. Manage. 54 (2020),.
[90]
R. Aswani, A.K. Kar, P.V. Ilavarasan, Experience: managing misinformation in social media–insights for policymakers from twitter analytics, J. Data Inform. Qual. (JDIQ) 12 (1) (2019) 1–18,.
[91]
F. Sharevski, A. Huff, P. Jachim, E. Pieroni, (mis) perceptions and engagement on twitter: Covid-19 vaccine rumors on efficacy and mass immunization effort, Int. J. Inform. Manage. Data Insights 2 (1) (2022).
[92]
W. Ansar, S. Goswami, Combating the menace: A survey on characterization and detection of fake news from a data science perspective, Int. J. Inform. Manage. Data Insights 1 (2) (2021).
[93]
A.K. Kar, R. Aswani, How to differentiate propagators of information and misinformation–insights from social media analytics based on bio-inspired computing, J. Inform. Optimiz. Sci. 42 (6) (2021) 1307–1335,.
[94]
L. Schelenz, A. Segal, K. Gal, Best practices for transparency in machinegenerated personalization, in: Adjunct Publication of the 28th ACMConference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, UMAP’20 Adjunct, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY,USA, 2020, p. 23–28.
Recommendations
The BiasChecker: how biased are social media searches?
ASONAM '21: Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and MiningSocial media searches are frequently employed by users to keep them up to date about ongoing events and learn broadly about public opinion on topics that are unfamiliar to them. Nevertheless, there are rising concerns about the results returned that can ...
Socializing the political: rethinking filter bubbles and social media with Hannah Arendt
AbstractIt is often claimed that social media accelerate political extremism by employing personalization algorithms that filter users into groups with homogenous beliefs. While an intuitive position, recent research has shown that social media users ...
Uses and gratifications of social networking sites for bridging and bonding social capital
Applying uses and gratifications theory (UGT) and social capital theory, our study examined users of four social networking sites (SNSs) (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat), and their influence on online bridging and bonding social capital. ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Elsevier Ltd.
Publisher
Pergamon Press, Inc.
United States
Publication History
Published: 01 August 2023
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 0Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 02 Sep 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
View options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in