Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
article

A survey of statistical user simulation techniques for reinforcement-learning of dialogue management strategies

Published: 01 June 2006 Publication History

Abstract

Within the broad field of spoken dialogue systems, the application of machine-learning approaches to dialogue management strategy design is a rapidly growing research area. The main motivation is the hope of building systems that learn through trial-and-error interaction what constitutes a good dialogue strategy. Training of such systems could in theory be done using human users or using corpora of human–computer dialogue, but in practice the typically vast space of possible dialogue states and strategies cannot be explored without the use of automatic user simulation tools.This requirement for training statistical dialogue models has created an interesting new application area for predictive statistical user modelling and a variety of different techniques for simulating user behaviour have been presented in the literature ranging from simple Markov models to Bayesian networks. The development of reliable user simulation tools is critical to further progress on automatic dialogue management design but it holds many challenges, some of which have been encountered in other areas of current research on statistical user modelling, such as the problem of ‘concept drift’, the problem of combining content-based and collaboration-based modelling techniques, and user model evaluation. The latter topic is of particular interest, because simulation-based learning is currently one of the few applications of statistical user modelling that employs both direct ‘accuracy-based’ and indirect ‘utility-based’ evaluation techniques.In this paper, we briefly summarize the role of the dialogue manager in a spoken dialogue system, give a short introduction to reinforcement-learning of dialogue management strategies and review the literature on user modelling for simulation-based strategy learning. We further describe recent work on user model evaluation and discuss some of the current research issues in simulation-based learning from a user modelling perspective.

References

[1]
Alspector, J., Koicz, A. & Karunanithi, N. 1997 Feature based and clique based user models for movie selection: a comparative study. User Modelling and User Adapted Interaction 7(4), 279-304.
[2]
Araki, M., Watanabe, T. & Doshita, S. 1997 Evaluating dialogue strategies for recovering from misunderstandings. In Proceedings of the IJCAI Workshop on Collaboration Cooperation and Conflict in Dialogue Systems, pp. 13-18.
[3]
Aust, H, Oerder, M., Seide, F. & Steinbiss, V. 1995 The Philips automatic train timetable information system. Speech Communication 17, 249-262.
[4]
Bernsen, N. O., Dybkjar, H. & Dybkjar, L. 1996 Principles for the design of cooperative spoken human-machine dialogue. In Proceedings of the ICSLP, pp. 729-732.
[5]
Bernsen, N. O., Dybkjar, H. & Dybkjar, L. 1998 Designing Interactive Speech Systems: From First Ideas to User Testing. Berlin: Springer.
[6]
Berthold, A. & Jameson, A. 1999 Interpreting symptoms of cognitive load in speech input. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on User Modeling, pp. 235-244.
[7]
Bestavros, A. 1996 Speculative data dissemination and service to reduce server load, network traffic and service time for distributed information systems. In Proceedings of the 1996 International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE-96), New Orleans, LA.
[8]
Biermann, W. & Long, P. M. 1996 The composition of messages in speech-graphics interactive systems. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Spoken Dialogue, pp. 97-100.
[9]
Billsus, D. & Pazzani, M. 1995 A hybrid user model for news story classification. In User Modeling, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference, Banff, Canada, pp. 99-108.
[10]
Binsted, K., Cawsey, A. & Jones, R. 1995 Generating personalised patient information using the medical record. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on AI in Medicine, pp. 29-41.
[11]
Bohus, D. 2004 Error awareness and recovery in task-oriented spoken dialogue systems. Technical Report, PhD Thesis proposal CMU.
[12]
Bohus, D. & Rudnicky, A. 2005a Constructing accurate beliefs in spoken dialog systems. In Proceedings of ASRU, San Juan, Perto Rico.
[13]
Bohus, D. & Rudnicky, A. 2005b Sorry, I didn't catch that! -- an investigation of non-understanding errors and recovery strategies. In Proceedings of SIGdial, Lisbon, Portugal.
[14]
Bontcheva, K. 2005 Tailoring the content of dynamically generated explanations. In Bauer, M., Gmytrasiewicz, P. J. & Vassileva, J. (eds.), User Modelling 2001: 8th International Conference, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 2109. Berlin: Springer.
[15]
Bos, J., Klein, E., Lemon, O. & Oka, T. 2003 Dipper: description and formalisation of an information-state update dialogue system architecture. In 4th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, Sapporo, Japan.
[16]
Bretier, P. & Sadek, M. D. 1996 A rational agent as the kernel of a cooperative spoken dialogue system: implementing a logical theory of interaction. In Proceedings of ATAL, Sapporo, Japan, pp. 189-203.
[17]
Bunt, H. C. 1981 Rules for the interpretation, evaluation and generation of dialogue acts. IPO Annual Progress Report 16, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, pp. 99-107.
[18]
Burke, R. 2002 Hybrid recommender systems: survey and experiments. User Modeling and User Adapted Interaction 12(4), 331-370.
[19]
Carberry, S. 2001 Techniques for plan recognition. Journal of User-Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 11(1-2), 31-48.
[20]
Carberry, S. & Lambert, L. 1999 A process model for recognizing communicatove acts and modelling negotiation subdialogues. Computational Linguistics 25(1), 1-53.
[21]
Chiu, P. & Webb, G. 1998 Using decision trees for agent modeling: improving prediction performance. User Modelling and User Adapted Interaction 8, 131-152.
[22]
Cuayahuitl, H., Renals, S., Lemon, O. & Shimodaira, H. 2005 Human-computer dialogue simulation using hidden markov models. In Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding.
[23]
Denecke, M., Dohsaka, K. & Nakano, M. 2004 Learning dialogue policies using state aggregation in reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of INTERSPEECH 2004, pp. 325-328.
[24]
Devillers, L. & Bonneau-Maynard, H. 1998 Evaluation of dialog strategies for a tourist information retrieval system. In Proceedings of ICSLP 98, Sydney, Australia, pp. 1187-1190.
[25]
Dols, F. J. & van der Sloot, K. 1992 Modelling mutual effects in belief-based interactive systems. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on User Modeling, Dagstuhl, Germany, pp. 3-19.
[26]
Eckert, W., Levin, E. & Pieraccini, R. 1997 User modelling for spoken dialogue system evaluation. In Proceedings of ASRU, pp. 80-87.
[27]
Eckert, W., Levin, E. & Pieraccini, R. 1998 Automatic evaluation of spoken dialogue systems. Technical Report TR98.9.1, ATT Labs Research.
[28]
Elzer, S., Chu-Carroll, J. & Carberry, S. 1994 Recognizing and utilizing user preferences in collaborative consultation dialogues. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on User Modeling, Hyannis, MA, pp. 19-24.
[29]
Filisko, E. & Seneff, S. 2005 Developing city name acquisition strategies in spoken dialogue systems via user simulation. In Proceedings of the 6th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, Lisbon, Portugal.
[30]
Fleming, M. & Cohen, R. 2001 A user modeling approach to determining system initiative in mixed-initiative artificial intelligence systems. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on User Modeling (UM2001).
[31]
Georgila, K., Henderson, J. & Lemon, O. 2005a Learning user simulations for information state update dialogue systems. In Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (Eurospeech), Lisbon, Portugal.
[32]
Georgila, K., Lemon, O. & Henderson, J. 2005b Automatic annotation of COMMUNICATOR dialogue data for learning dialogue strategies and user simulations. In Proceedings of DIALOR.
[33]
Gervasio, M. T., Iba, W. & Langley, P. 1998 Learning to predict user operations for adaptive scheduling. In Proceedings of the 15th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Madison, WI, pp. 721-726.
[34]
Ghahramani, Z. 2004 Unsupervised learning. In Bousquet, O., Raetsch, G., & von Luxburg, U. (eds.), Advanced Lectures on Machine Learning. Berlin: Springer.
[35]
Glass, J. 1999 Challenges for spoken dialogue systems. In Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE ASRU Workshop.
[36]
Goddeau, D. & Pineau, J. 2000 Fast reinforcement learning of dialog strategies. In IEEE Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Istanbul, Turkey.
[37]
Gorin, A., Riccardi, G. & Wright, J. 1997 How may I help you? Speech Communication 23, 113-127.
[38]
Gorin, A. L., Parker, B. A., Sachs, R. M. & Wilpon, J. G. 1996 How may I help you. In Proceedings of International Symposium on Spoken Dialogue, pp. 57-60.
[39]
Guinn, C. I. 1998 An analysis of initiative selection in collaborative task-oriented discourse. User Modeling and User-adapted Interaction 8(3-4), 255-314.
[40]
Gurston, P. J., Farrell, M., Attwater, D., Allen, J., Kuo, H., Afify, M., Fosler-Lussier, E. & Lee, C. 2001 Oasis natural language call steering trial. In Proceedings of Eurospeech.
[41]
Harvey, T., Carberry, S. & Decker, K. 2005 Tailored responses for decision support. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on User Modeling (UM-05).
[42]
Henderson, J., Lemon, O. & Georgila, K. 2005 Hybrid reinforcement/supervised learning for dialogue policies from communicator data. In Proceedings of the IJCAI Workshop on KRPDS, Edinburgh, UK.
[43]
Horvitz, E., Breese, J., Heckerman, D., Hovel, D. & Rommelse, K. 1998 The Lumiere project: Bayesian user modeling for inferring the goals and needs of software users. In Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 256-265.
[44]
Hustadt, U. 1994 A multi-model logic for stereotyping. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on User Modeling, Hyannis, MA, pp. 87-92.
[45]
Ishizaki, M., Crocker, M. & Mellish, C. 1999 Exploring mixed-initiative dialogue using computer dialogue simulation. Journal of User-Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 9(1-2), 79-91.
[46]
Jelinek, F. 1976 Continuous speech recognition by statistical methods. In Proceedings of the IEEE 64, 532-556.
[47]
Jones, K. S. & Galliers, J. 1996 Evaluating Natural Language Processing Systems: An Analysis and Review. Berlin: Springer.
[48]
Jurafsky, D., Wooters, C., Tajchman, G., Segal, J., Stolcke, A., Fosler, E. & Morgan, N. 1994 The Berkeley restaurant project. In Proceedings of the ICSLP, pp. 2139-2142.
[49]
Kaelbling, L. P., Littman, M. L. & Moore, A. 1996 Reinforcement learning: a survey. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 4, 237-285.
[50]
Kamm, C. 1995 User interfaces for voice applications. In Roe, D. & Wilpon, J. (eds.), Voice Communication between Humans and Machines. National Academy Press.
[51]
Keeney, R. & Raiffa, H. 1976 Decisions with Multiple Objectives. New York: Wiley.
[52]
Klinkenberg, R. & Renz, I. 1998 Adaptive information filtering: Learning in the presence of concept drift. In AAAI/ICML-98 Workshop on Learning for Text Categorization, Technical Report WS-98-05, Madison, WI.
[53]
Komatani, K., Ueno, S., Kawahara, T. & Okuno, H. G. 2003 Flexible guidance generation using user model in spoken dialogue systems. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the ACL, Sapporo, Japan.
[54]
Levin, E. & Pieraccini, R. 1997 A stochastic model of computer-human interaction for learning dialogue strategies. In Proceedings of Eurospeech 97, Rhodes, Greece, pp. 1883-1886.
[55]
Levin, E., Pieraccini, R. & Eckert, W. 2000 A stochastic model of human-machine interaction for learning dialog strategies. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing 8(1), 11-23.
[56]
Lieberman, H. 1995 Letizia: an agent that assists web browsing. In IJCAI 95, Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Montreal, Canada, pp. 924-929.
[57]
Lin, B.-S. & Lee, L.-S. 2001 Computer-aided analysis and design for spoken dialogue systems based on quantitative simulations. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing 9(5), 534-548.
[58]
Litman, D. J., Kearns, M. S., Singh, S. & Walker, M. A. 2000 Automatic optimization of dialogue management. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING- 2000), Saarbrucken, Germany.
[59]
Litman, D. J. & Pan, S. 1999 Empirically evaluating an adaptable spoken dialogue system. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on User Modeling.
[60]
Lopez-Cozar, R., de la Torre, A., Segura, J. & Rubio, A. 2003 Assessment of dialogue systems by means of a new simulation technique. Speech Communication 40, 387-407.
[61]
Moore, R. C. 1977 Reasoning about knowledge and action. In IJCAI-77, pp. 223-227.
[62]
Niimi, Y. & Nishimoto, T. 1999 Mathematical analysis of dialogue control strategies. In Proceedings of Eurospeech 99, pp. 1535-1538.
[63]
Pieraccini, R., Dayandhi, K., Bloom, J., Dahan, J., Phillips, M., Goodman, B. R. & Prasad, K. V. 2004 Multimodal conversational systems for automobiles. Communications of the ACM 47(1), 47-49.
[64]
Pietquin, O. 2004 A framework for unsupervised learning of dialogue strategies. PhD thesis, Faculte Polytechnique de Mons.
[65]
Pietquin, O. 2005 A probabilistic description of man-machine spoken communication. In Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME 2005), July 2005, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
[66]
Pietquin, O. & Beaufort, R. 2005 Comparing ASR modeling methods for spoken dialogue simulation and optimal strategy learning. In Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (Interspeech/Eurospeech 2005), Lisbon, Portugal.
[67]
Pietquin, O. & Dutoit, T. 2005 A probabilistic framework for dialog simulation and optimal strategy learning. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, Special Issue on Data Mining of Speech, Audio and Dialog (to appear).
[68]
Polifroni, J., Hirschmann, L. & Seneff, S. 1992 Experiments in evaluating interactive spoken language systems. In Proceedings of the DARPA Speech and Natural Language Workshop, Harriman, New York, pp. 28-33.
[69]
Potjer, J., Russel, A. & Boves, L. 1996 Subjective and objective evaluation of two types of dialogues in a call assistance service. In IEEE Third Workshop on Interactive Voice Technology for Telecommunications Applications, IVTTA, pp. 89-92.
[70]
Rabiner, L. & Juang, B. 1993 Fundamentals of Speech Recognition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
[71]
Raskutti, B., Neitz, A. & Ward, B. 1997 A feature-based approach to recommending selections based on past preferences. User Modelling and User Adapted Interaction 7(3), 179-218.
[72]
Resnick, P. & Varian, H. 1997 Recommender systems. Communications of the ACM 40(3), 56-58.
[73]
Rosset, S., Bennacef, S. & Lamel, L. 1999 Design strategies for spoken language dialogue systems. In Proceedings Eurospeech 99, pp. 1535-1538.
[74]
Rudnicky, A., Thayer, E. & Constantinides, P. 1999 Creating natural dialogs in the carnegie mellon communicator system. In Proceedings Eurospeech, pp. 1531-1534.
[75]
Russell, S. & Norvig, P. 1995 Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
[76]
Schatzmann, J., Georgila, K. & Young, S. 2005a Quantitative evaluation of user simulation techniques for spoken dialogue systems. In Proceedings of the 6th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, Lisbon, Portugal.
[77]
Schatzmann, J., Stuttle, M., Weilhammer, K. & Young, S. 2005b Effects of the user model on simulation-based learning of dialogue strategies. In Proceedings of the ASRU 2005, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
[78]
Scheffler, K. 2002 Automatic design of spoken dialogue systems. PhD thesis, Cambridge University.
[79]
Scheffler, K. & Young, S. J. 1999 Simulation of human-machine dialogues. Technical Report CUED/F-INFENG/TR 355, Cambridge University Engineering Department.
[80]
Scheffler, K. & Young, S. J. 2000 Probabilistic simulation of human-machine dialogues. In Proceedings of ICASSP, Istanbul, pp. 1217-1220.
[81]
Scheffler, K. & Young, S. J. 2001 Corpus-based dialogue simulation for automatic strategy learning and evaluation. In Proceedings of NAACL Workshop on Adaptation in Dialogue Systems, pp. 64-70.
[82]
Scheffler, K. & Young, S. J. 2002 Automatic learning of dialogue strategy using dialogue simulation and reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of Human Language Technology, San Diego, pp. 12-18.
[83]
Searle, J. R. 1969 Speech Acts. An Essay on the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[84]
Seneff, S., Hurley, E., Lau, R., Pao, C., Schmid, P. & Zue, V. 1998 Galaxy ii: a reference architecture for conversational system development. In Proceedings of the ICSLP, pp. 931-934.
[85]
Shin, J., Narayanan, S., Gerber, L., Kazemzadeh, A. & Byrd, D. 2002 Analysis of user behaviour under error conditions in spoken dialogue. In Proceedings of ICSLP.
[86]
Simpson, A. & Fraser, N. A. 1993 Black box and glass box evaluation of the Sundial system. In Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, pp. 1423-1426.
[87]
Singh, S., Kearns, M. S., Litman, D. J. & Walker, M. A. 1999 Reinforcement learning for spoken dialogue systems. In Proceedings of NIPS, Denver, CO.
[88]
Singh, S., Kearns, M. S., Litman, D. J. & Walker, M. A. 2000 Empirical evaluation of a reinforcement learning spoken dialogue system. In Proceedings of the 7th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI- 2000), Austin, TX, pp. 645-651.
[89]
Singh, S., Litman, D., Kearns, M. & Walker, M. 2002 Optimizing dialogue management with reinforcement learning: experiments with the njfun system. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 16, 105-133.
[90]
Smith, R. W. 1998 An evaluation of strategies for selectively verifying utterance meanings in spoken natural language dialog. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 48, 627-647.
[91]
Smith, R. W. & Hipp, D. R. 1994 Spoken Natural Language Dialog Systems: A Practical Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[92]
Stock, O. 1993 Alfresco: enjoying the combination of natural language processing and hypermedia for information exploration. In Maybury, M. T. (ed.), Intelligent Multimedia Interfaces. AAAI Press / MIT Press.
[93]
Sutton, R. S. & Barto, A. G. 1998 Reinforcement Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[94]
Traum, D. 1999 Speech acts for dialogue agents. In Wooldridge, M. & Rao, A. (eds.), Foundations of Rational Agency. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 169-201.
[95]
van Rijsbergen, C. J. 1979 Information Retrieval, 2nd edn. London: Butterworths.
[96]
Walker, M. 1993 Informational redundancy and resource bounds in dialogue. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
[97]
Walker, M. 2000 An application of reinforcement learning to dialogue strategy selection in a spoken dialogue system for email. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 12, 387-416.
[98]
Walker, M., Fromer, J. C. & Narayanan, S. 1998 Learning optimal dialogue strategies: a case study of a spoke dialogue agent for email. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguists, pp. 1345-1352.
[99]
Walker, M., Hindle, D. & Fromer, J. 1997 Evaluating competing agent strategies for a voice email agent. In Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, Rhodes, Greece.
[100]
Wallis, J. W. & Shortliffe, E. H. 1985 Customized explanations using causal knowledge. In Buchanan, B. C. & Shoortliffe, E. H. (eds.), Rule-based Expert Systems: The MYCIN Experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project. Addison Wesley.
[101]
Watanabe, T., Araki, M. & Doshita, S. 1998 Evaluating dialogue strategies under communication errors using computer-to-computer simulation. Transactions of IEICE, Information System E81-D(9), 1025-1033.
[102]
Watkins, C. & Dayan, P. 1992a Q-learning. Machine Learning 8(3), 279-292.
[103]
Watkins, C. & Dayan, P. 1992b Technical note: Q-learning. Machine Learning 8, 279-292.
[104]
Webb, G., Pazzani, M. & Billsus, D. 2001 Machine learning for user modeling. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 11, 19-29.
[105]
Webb, G. I. & Kuzmycz, M. 1996 Feature based modelling: a methodology for producing coherent, consistent, dynamically changing model of agent's competencies. User Modelling and User Adapted Interaction 5(2), 117-150.
[106]
Webber, B. & Joshi, A. 1982 Taking the initiative in natural language database interaction: justifying why. In Proceedings of COLING 82, pp. 413-419.
[107]
Widmer, G. & Kubat, M. 1996 Learning in the presence of concept drift and hidden contexts. Machine Learning 23, 69-101.
[108]
Williams, J., Poupart, P. & Young, S. 2005a Partially observable Markov decision processes with continuous observations for dialogue management. In Proceedings of the 6th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, Lisbon, Portugal.
[109]
Williams, J. D. 2003 A probabilistic model of human/computer dialogue with application to a partially observable markov decision process. PhD 1st year Report, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge.
[110]
Williams, J. D., Poupart, P. & Young, S. 2005b Factored partially observable Markov decision processes for dialogue management. In Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Knowledge and Reasoning in Practical Dialog Systems, International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), Edinburgh, UK.
[111]
Young, S. 2002a The statistical approach to the design of spoken dialogue systems. Technical Report CUED/F-INFENG/TR.433, Cambridge University Engineering Department.
[112]
Young, S. 2002b Talking to machines (statistically speaking). In Proceedings of the ICSLP, Denver, CO.
[113]
Young, S. J., Evermann, G., Kershaw, D., Moore, G., Odell, J., Ollason, D., Povey, D., Valtchev, V. & Woodland, P. 2002 The HTK Book (for HTK Version 3.2). University of Cambridge.
[114]
Zue, V. 1997 Conversational interfaces: advances and challenges. In Proceedings of Eurospeech.
[115]
Zukerman, I. & Albrecht, D. 2001 Predictive statistical models for user modeling. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 11, 5-18.
[116]
Zukerman, I. & Litman, D. 2001 Natural language processing and user modeling: synergies and limitations. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 11, 129-158.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Towards a Formal Characterization of User Simulation Objectives in Conversational Information AccessProceedings of the 2024 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval10.1145/3664190.3672529(185-193)Online publication date: 2-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Identifying Breakdowns in Conversational Recommender Systems using User SimulationProceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Conversational User Interfaces10.1145/3640794.3665539(1-10)Online publication date: 8-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Leveraging User Simulation to Develop and Evaluate Conversational Information Access AgentsProceedings of the 17th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining10.1145/3616855.3635730(1136-1138)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image The Knowledge Engineering Review
The Knowledge Engineering Review  Volume 21, Issue 2
June 2006
91 pages

Publisher

Cambridge University Press

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 June 2006

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 01 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Towards a Formal Characterization of User Simulation Objectives in Conversational Information AccessProceedings of the 2024 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval10.1145/3664190.3672529(185-193)Online publication date: 2-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Identifying Breakdowns in Conversational Recommender Systems using User SimulationProceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Conversational User Interfaces10.1145/3640794.3665539(1-10)Online publication date: 8-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Leveraging User Simulation to Develop and Evaluate Conversational Information Access AgentsProceedings of the 17th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining10.1145/3616855.3635730(1136-1138)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Tutorial on User Simulation for Evaluating Information Access Systems on the WebCompanion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 202410.1145/3589335.3641243(1254-1257)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
  • (2024)Emotion-and-knowledge grounded response generation in an open-domain dialogue settingKnowledge-Based Systems10.1016/j.knosys.2023.111173284:COnline publication date: 25-Jan-2024
  • (2023)Understanding or Manipulation: Rethinking Online Performance Gains of Modern Recommender SystemsACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/363786942:4(1-32)Online publication date: 15-Dec-2023
  • (2023)User Simulation for Evaluating Information Access SystemsProceedings of the Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval in the Asia Pacific Region10.1145/3624918.3629549(302-305)Online publication date: 26-Nov-2023
  • (2023)Tutorial on User Simulation for Evaluating Information Access SystemsProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management10.1145/3583780.3615296(5200-5203)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Modeling, Replicating, and Predicting Human Behavior: A SurveyACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems10.1145/358049218:2(1-47)Online publication date: 28-May-2023
  • (2023)UserSimCRS: A User Simulation Toolkit for Evaluating Conversational Recommender SystemsProceedings of the Sixteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining10.1145/3539597.3573029(1160-1163)Online publication date: 27-Feb-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media