article

Using Students as Subjects—A Comparative Study ofStudents and Professionals in Lead-Time Impact Assessment

Authors:

Martin Höst,

Björn Regnell, and

Claes WohlinAuthors Info & Claims

Empirical Software Engineering, Volume 5, Issue 3

Pages 201 - 214

https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026586415054

Published: 01 November 2000 Publication History

Publisher Site

Abstract

In many studies in software engineering students are used instead of professional software developers, although the objective is to draw conclusions valid for professional software developers. This paper presents a study where the difference between the two groups is evaluated. People from the two groups have individually carried out a non-trivial software engineering judgement task involving the assessment of how ten different factors affect the lead-time of software development projects. It is found that the differences are only minor, and it is concluded that software engineering students may be used instead of professional software developers under certain conditions. These conditions are identified and described based on generally accepted criteria for validity evaluation of empirical studies.

References

[1]

Cook, T. D., and Campbell, D. T. 1979. Quasi-Experimentation--Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Houghton Miffilin Company.

Google Scholar

[2]

Fenton, N., and Pfleeger, S. L. 1996. Software Metrics--A Rigorous & Practical Approach, Second Edition. London, UK: International Thomson Computer Press.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[3]

Karlsson, J., and Ryan, K. 1997. A cost-value approach for prioritizing requirements. IEEE Software, September/October: 67-74.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[4]

Moynihan, T. 1997. How experienced project managers assess risk. IEEE Software, May/June: 35-41.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[5]

Pickard, L. M., Kitchenham, B. A., and Jones, P. W. 1998. Combining empirical results in software engineering. Information and Software Technology. 40(11): 811-821.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[6]

Porter, A., Votta, L., and Basili, V. R. 1995. Comparing detection methods for software requirements inspection: A replicated experiment. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 216: 563-575.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[7]

Porter, A., Votta, L. 1998. Comparing detection methods for software requirements inspection: A replication using professional subjects. Empirical Software Engineering, 3(4): 355-380.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[8]

Reel, J. S. 1999. Critical success factors in software projects. IEEE Software, May/June: 18-23.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[9]

Robson, C. 1993. Real World Research. UK: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

Google Scholar

[10]

Saaty, T. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill.

Google Scholar

[11]

Siegel, S., and Castellan, N. J. 1988. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill.

Google Scholar

[12]

Wohlin, C., and Ahlgren, M. 1995. Soft factors and their impact on time to market. Software Quality Journal, 4: 189-205.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[13]

Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Höst, M., Ohlsson, M. C., Regnell, B., and Wesslén, A. 2000. Experimentation in Software Engineering: An Introduction. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Alhirabi NBeaumont SRana OPerera C(2024)Designing Privacy-Aware IoT Applications for Unregulated DomainsACM Transactions on Internet of Things10.1145/36484805:2(1-32)Online publication date: 15-Feb-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3648480
Idowu SOsman OStrüber DBerger T(2024)Machine learning experiment management tools: a mixed-methods empirical studyEmpirical Software Engineering10.1007/s10664-024-10444-w29:4Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10664-024-10444-w
Di Martino SFasolino AStarace LTramontana P(2024)GUI testing of Android applicationsJournal of Software: Evolution and Process10.1002/smr.264036:7Online publication date: 14-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1002/smr.2640
Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Career Goals of Software Development Professionals and Software Development Students
CSERC '16: Proceedings of the Computer Science Education Research Conference 2016

The demand for software professionals remains a concern. The main aim of this study is to gain a deeper understanding of the career goals of people in the software development pipeline. In this quantitative study in South Africa we investigated the ...
Read More
Toward enhancing the training of software engineering students and professionals using active video watching
ICSE-SEET '18: Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training

Soft skills (e.g., the ability to communicate, negotiate, collaborate) are essential for software engineers. However, teaching soft skills in a conventional classroom setting is time-consuming and resource-intensive. In this paper, we present and ...
Read More
IT Professionals: An Iberian Snapshot

Nowadays, Universities and other Training Institutions need to clearly identify the Information Technology IT skills that companies demand from IT practitioners. This is essential not only for offering appropriate and reliable university degrees, but ...
Read More

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Empirical Software Engineering

Empirical Software Engineering Volume 5, Issue 3

November 2000

126 pages

ISSN:1382-3256

Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Kluwer Academic Publishers

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 November 2000

Qualifiers

Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

194
Total Citations
View Citations
0
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Alhirabi NBeaumont SRana OPerera C(2024)Designing Privacy-Aware IoT Applications for Unregulated DomainsACM Transactions on Internet of Things10.1145/36484805:2(1-32)Online publication date: 15-Feb-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3648480
Idowu SOsman OStrüber DBerger T(2024)Machine learning experiment management tools: a mixed-methods empirical studyEmpirical Software Engineering10.1007/s10664-024-10444-w29:4Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10664-024-10444-w
Di Martino SFasolino AStarace LTramontana P(2024)GUI testing of Android applicationsJournal of Software: Evolution and Process10.1002/smr.264036:7Online publication date: 14-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1002/smr.2640
Daun MBrings J(2023)Aggregating N-fold Requirements Inspection ResultsProceedings of the 27th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering10.1145/3593434.3593465(339-347)Online publication date: 14-Jun-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3593434.3593465
Davis MAghayi ELatoza TWang XMyers BSunshine J(2023)What’s (Not) Working in Programmer User Studies?ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology10.1145/358715732:5(1-32)Online publication date: 24-Jul-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3587157
Alhirabi NBeaumont SLlanos JMeedeniya DRana OPerera C(2023)PARROTProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/35808807:1(1-37)Online publication date: 28-Mar-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3580880
Basin DGuarnizo JKrstic SNguyen HOchoa MMeng WJensen CCremers CKirda E(2023)Is Modeling Access Control Worth It?Proceedings of the 2023 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security10.1145/3576915.3623196(2830-2844)Online publication date: 15-Nov-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3576915.3623196
Alfayez RWinn RAlwehaibi WVenson EBoehm B(2023)How SonarQube-identified technical debt is prioritizedInformation and Software Technology10.1016/j.infsof.2023.107147156:COnline publication date: 1-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.infsof.2023.107147
Lima PMelegati JGomes EPereira NGuerra EMeirelles P(2023)CADVInformation and Software Technology10.1016/j.infsof.2022.107089154:COnline publication date: 20-Jan-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.infsof.2022.107089
Cadette WFelizardo FZavadski ALeal GBalancieri RColanzi T(2022)The Impact of the Group Maturity on the Software Development Team Effectiveness: an Experience ReportProceedings of the XXXVI Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering10.1145/3555228.3555258(78-87)Online publication date: 5-Oct-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3555228.3555258
Show More Cited By

Abstract

References

Cited By

Recommendations

Career Goals of Software Development Professionals and Software Development Students

Toward enhancing the training of software engineering students and professionals using active video watching

IT Professionals: An Iberian Snapshot

Comments

Information

Published In

Publisher

Publication History

Qualifiers

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View options

Figures

Other

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media

Affiliations