Effects of satellite image spatial aggregation and resolution on estimates of forest land area
Pages 1913 - 1940
Abstract
Satellite imagery is being used increasingly in association with national forest inventories (NFIs) to produce maps and enhance estimates of forest attributes. We simulated several image spatial resolutions within sparsely and heavily forested study areas to assess resolution effects on estimates of forest land area, independent of other sensor characteristics. We spatially aggregated 30 m datasets to coarser spatial resolutions (90, 150, 210, 270, 510 and 990 m) and produced estimates of forest proportion for each spatial resolution using both model-and design-based approaches. Average-based aggregation had no effect on per-image estimates of forest proportion; image variability decreased with increasing spatial resolution and local variability peaked between 210 and 270 m. Majority-based aggregation resulted in overestimation of forest land in a heavily forested landscape and underestimation of forest land in a sparsely forested landscape, with both trends following a natural log distribution. Of the spatial resolutions tested, 30 m was superior for obtaining estimates using model-based approaches. However, standard errors of design-based inventory estimates of forest proportion were smallest when accompanying stratification maps which were aggregated to between 90 and 150 m spatial resolutions and strata thresholds were optimized by study area. These results suggest that spatially aggregating existing 30 m land cover datasets can provide NFIs with gains in precision of their estimates of forest land area, while reducing image storage size and processing times; land cover datasets derived from coarser spatial resolution sensors may provide similar benefits.
References
[1]
Atkinson, P. M. and Curran, P. J. (1995) Defining an optimal size of support for remote sensing investigations. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 33, pp. 768-776.
[2]
Bian, L. (1997) Multiscale nature of spatial data in scaling up environmental models. Scale in Remote Sensing and GIS, pp. 13-26. CRC Lewis, Boca Raton, FL
[3]
Breidt, F. J. and Opsomer, J. D. (2002) Endogenous Post-Stratification in Surveys: Classifying with a Sample Fitted Model, Department of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, IO
[4]
Cochran, W. (1977) Sampling Techniques, John Wiley & Sons, New York
[5]
Cohen, W. B., Maiersperger, T. K., Yang, Z., Gower, S. T., Turner, D. P., Ritts, W. D., Berterretche, M. and Running, S. W. (2003) Comparisons of land cover and LAI estimates derived from ETM+ and MODIS for four sites in North America: a quality assessment of 2000/2001 provisional MODIS products. Remote Sensing of Environment, 88, pp. 233-255.
[6]
Colombo, S., Chica-Olmo, M., Abarca, F. and Eva, H. (2004) Variographic analysis of tropical forest cover from multi-scale remotely sensed imagery. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 58, pp. 330-341.
[7]
Deutsch, C. V. and Journel, A. G. (1997) GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide, Oxford University Press, New York
[8]
Ferro, C. J. S. (1998) Scale and texture in digital image classification.
[9]
Forshaw, M. R. B., Haskell, A., Miller, P. F., Stanley, D. J. and Townshend, J. R. G. (1983) Spatial resolution of remotely sensed imagery: a review paper. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 4, pp. 497-520.
[10]
Garcia-Gigorro, S. and Saura, S. (2005) Forest fragmentation estimated from remotely sensed data: is comparison across scales possible?. Forest Science, 51, pp. 51-63.
[11]
Goodchild, M. F. and Quattrochi, D. A. (1997) Scale, multiscaling, remote sensing, and GIS. Scale in Remote Sensing and GIS, pp. 1-11. CRC Lewis, Boca Raton, FL
[12]
Hansen, M. H. and Wendt, D. G. (2000) Using classified Landsat Thematic Mapper data for stratification in a statewide forest inventory. Proceedings of the First Annual Forest Inventory and Analysis Symposium, pp. 20-27. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St Paul, MN
[13]
Hay, G. J., Niemann, K. O. and Goodenough, D. G. (1997) Spatial thresholds, image-objects, and upscaling: a multiscale evaluation. Remote Sensing of Environment, 62, pp. 1-19.
[14]
Henderson-Sellers, A. and Pitman, A. J. (1992) Land-surface schemes for future climate models: specification, aggregation and heterogeneity. Journal of Geophysical Research, 97, pp. 2687-2696.
[15]
Hlavka, C. A. and Dungan, J. L. (2002) Areal estimates of fragmented land cover: effects of pixel size and model-based corrections. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23, pp. 711-724.
[16]
Hlavka, C. A. and Livingston, G. P. (1997) Statistical models of fragmented land cover and the effects of coarse spatial resolution on the estimation of area with satellite sensor imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 18, pp. 2253-2259.
[17]
Homer, C., Huang, C., Yang, L., Wylie, B. and Coan, M. (2004) Development of a 2001 national land-cover database for the United States. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 70, pp. 829-840.
[18]
Isaaks, E. H. and Srivastava, R. M. (1989) Applied Geostatistics, Oxford University Press, New York
[19]
Jarnagin, S. T., Jennings, D. B. and Ebert, D. W. (2004) A technique for assessing the accuracy of sub-pixel impervious surface estimates derived from Landsat TM imagery. Remote Sensing and GIS Accuracy Assessment, pp. 269-280. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
[20]
Jensen, J. R. (1996) Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
[21]
Joseph, G. (2000) How well do we understand Earth observation electro-optical sensor parameters?. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 55, pp. 9-12.
[22]
Ju, J., Gopal, S. and Kolaczyk, E. D. (2005) On the choice of spatial and categorical scale in remote sensing land cover classification. Remote Sensing of Environment, 96, pp. 62-77.
[23]
Justice, C. O., Markham, B. L., Townshend, J. R. G. and Kennard, R. L. (1989) Spatial degradation of satellite data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 10, pp. 1539-1561.
[24]
Kuusela, K. and Paivinen, R. (1995) On the classification of ecosystems in boreal and temperate forests. Proceedings of an International Workshop Designing a System of Nomenclature for European Forest Mapping, pp. 387-393. Institute for Remote Sensing Applications, Joint Research Centre, European Commission and the European Forest Institute, Ispra, Varese, Italy
[25]
Latty, R. S. and Hoffer, R. M. (1981) Computer-based classification accuracy due to the spatial resolution using per-point versus per-field classification techniques. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Machine Processing of Remotely Sensed Data, pp. 384-393. LARS/Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
[26]
Lefsky, M. A. and Cohen, W. B. (2003) Selection of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Forest Environments: Concepts and Case Studies, pp. 13-46. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston
[27]
Lessard, V. C., Hansen, M. H. and Nelson, M. D. (2003) Comparing Minnesota land cover/use area estimates using NRI and FIA data. Third Annual Forest Inventory and Analysis Symposium, pp. 36-43. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station, St Paul, MN
[28]
Liknes, G. C., Nelson, M. D. and McRoberts, R. E. (2004) Evaluating classified MODIS satellite imagery as a stratification tool. In ACCURACY 2004: The Joint Meeting of the Sixth International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences and the Fifteenth Annual Conference of TIES, International Environmetrics Society, pp. 1-8. St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
[29]
Marceau, D. J. and Hay, G. J. (1999) Remote sensing contributions to the scale issue. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 25, pp. 357-366.
[30]
Marceau, D. J., Howarth, P. J. and Gratton, D. J. (1994) Remote sensing and the measurement of geographical entities in a forest environment. 1: The scale and spatial aggregation problem. Remote Sensing of Environment, 49, pp. 93-104.
[31]
Marceau, D. J., Howarth, P. J. and Gratton, D. J. (1994) Remote sensing and the measurement of geographical entities in a forest environment. 2: The optimal spatial resolution. Remote Sensing of Environment, 49, pp. 105-117.
[32]
Markham, B. L. and Townshend, J. R. G. (1981) Land cover classification accuracy as a function of sensor spatial resolution. Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment, pp. 1075-1090. Environmental Research Institute of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
[33]
Mayaux, P. and Lambin, E. F. (1995) Estimation of tropical forest area from coarse spatial resolution data: a two-step correction function for proportional errors due to spatial aggregation. Remote Sensing of Environment, 53, pp. 1-15.
[34]
McRoberts, R. E. (2002) Using maps to increase the precision of forest inventory estimates. Accuracy 2002: Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, pp. 456-463. Department of Geomatics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne
[35]
McRoberts, R. E. (2006) A model-based approach to estimating forest area. Remote Sensing of Environment, 103, pp. 56-66.
[36]
McRoberts, R. E., Holden, G. R., Nelson, M. D., Liknes, G. C. and Gormanson, D. D. (2006) Using satellite imagery as ancillary data for increasing the precision of estimates for the Forest Inventory and Analysis program of the USDA Forest Service. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36, pp. 2968-2980.
[37]
McRoberts, R. E., Wendt, D. G., Nelson, M. D. and Hansen, M. H. (2002) Using a land cover classification based on satellite imagery to improve the precision of forest inventory area estimates. Remote Sensing of Environment, 81, pp. 36-44.
[38]
Millington, A. C., Velez-Liendo, X. M. and Bradley, A. V. (2003) Scale dependence in multitemporal mapping of forest fragmentation in Bolivia: implications for explaining temporal trends in landscape ecology and applications to biodiversity conservation. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 57, pp. 289-299.
[39]
Moody, A. and Woodcock, C. E. (1994) Scale-dependent errors in the estimation of land-cover proportions: implications for global land-cover datasets. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 60, pp. 585-594.
[40]
Moran, M. S., Humes, K. S. and Pinter Jr., P. J. (1997) The scaling characteristics of remotely-sensed variables for sparsely-vegetated heterogeneous landscapes. Journal of Hydrology, 190, pp. 337-362.
[41]
Morisette, J. T., Nickeson, J. E., Davis, P., Wang, Y., Tian, Y., Woodcock, C. E., Shabanov, N., Hansen, M. C., Cohen, W. B., Oetter, D. R. and Kennedy, R. E. (2003) High spatial resolution satellite observations for validation of MODIS land products: IKONOS observations acquired under the NASA Scientific Data Purchase. Remote Sensing of Environment, 88, pp. 100-110.
[42]
Nelson, M. D., McRoberts, R. E. and Hansen, M. C. (2004) Forest land area estimates from Vegetation Continuous Fields. In Remote Sensing for Field Users: Proceedings of the Tenth Biennial Forest Service Remote Sensing Applications Conference, American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, pp. 1-6. Bethesda, MD
[43]
Nelson, M. D., McRoberts, R. E. and Lessard, V. C. (2005) Comparison of U.S. forest land area estimates from Forest Inventory and Analysis, National Resources Inventory, and four satellite image-derived land cover datasets. Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Forest Inventory and Analysis Symposium, pp. 129-137. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DC
[44]
Nelson, R. (1989) Regression and ratio estimators to integrate AVHRR and MSS data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 30, pp. 201-216.
[45]
Pax-Lenny, M. and Woodcock, C. E. (1997) The effects of spatial resolution on the ability to monitor the status of agricultural lands. Remote Sensing of Environment, 61, pp. 210-220.
[46]
Pebesma, E. J. (2004) Multivariable geostatistics in S: the gstat package. Computers and Geosciences, 30, pp. 683-691.
[47]
R Development Core Team (2004) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
[48]
Reese, H., Nilsson, M., Sandstrom, P. and Olsson, H. (2002) Applications using estimates of forest parameters derived from satellite and forest inventory data. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 37, pp. 37-55.
[49]
Sadowski, F. G., Mailila, J. E., Sarno, J. E. and Nalepka, R. F. (1977) The influence of multispectral scanner spatial resolution on forest feature classification. Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment, pp. 1279-1288. Environmental Research Institute of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
[50]
Saura, S. (2004) Effects of remote sensor spatial resolution and data aggregation on selected fragmentation indices. Landscape Ecology, 19, pp. 197-209.
[51]
Strahler, A. H., Woodcock, C. E. and Smith, J. A. (1986) On the nature of models in remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 20, pp. 121-139.
[52]
Su, Z., Pelgrum, H. and Menenti, M. (1999) Aggregation rules for surface parameters in global models. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 3, pp. 549-563.
[53]
Thomas, G., Hobbs, S. E. and Dufour, M. (1996) Woodland area estimation by spectral mixing: applying a goodness-of-fit solution method. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17, pp. 291-301.
[54]
Tian, Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Knyazikhin, Y., Bogaert, J. and Myneni, R. B. (2002) Radiative transfer based scaling of LAI retrievals from reflectance data of different resolutions. Remote Sensing of Environment, 84, pp. 143-159.
[55]
Townshend, J. R. G. and Justice, C. O. (1988) Selecting the spatial resolution of satellite sensors required for global monitoring of land transformations. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 9, pp. 187-236.
[56]
Turner, M. G., O'Neill, R. V., Gardner, R. H. and Milne, B. T. (1989) Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology, 3, pp. 153-162.
[57]
USDA Forest Service (2003) Forest Inventory and Analysis National Core Field Guide, Volume 1: Field Data Collection Procedures for Phase 2 Plots, Version 2.0, US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Forest Inventory and Analysis, Washington, DC
[58]
Woodcock, C. E. and Strahler, A. H. (1987) The factor of scale in remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 21, pp. 311-332.
[59]
Wu, J. (2004) Effects of changing scale on landscape pattern analysis: scaling relations. Landscape Ecology, 19, pp. 125-138.
[60]
Zhu, Z. and Evans, D. L. (1994) U.S. forest types and predicted percent forest cover from AVHRR data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 60, pp. 525-531.
Recommendations
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Publisher
Taylor & Francis, Inc.
United States
Publication History
Published: 01 April 2009
Qualifiers
- Article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 0Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 06 Feb 2025