Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
article

Persuasion and Value in Legal Argument

Published: 01 December 2005 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper we consider legal reasoning as a species of practical reasoning. As such it is important both that arguments are considered in the context of competing, attacking and supporting arguments, and that the possibility of rational disagreement is accommodated. We present two formal frameworks for considering systems of arguments: the standard framework of Dung, and an extension which relates arguments to values allowing for rational disagreement. We apply these frameworks to modelling a body of case law, explain how the frameworks can be generated to reconstruct legal reasoning in particular cases, and describe some tools to support the extraction of the value related knowledge required from a set of precedent cases.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Preferences and constraints in abstract argumentationProceedings of the Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence10.24963/ijcai.2023/345(3095-3103)Online publication date: 19-Aug-2023
  • (2023)A claim-centric perspective on abstract argumentation semanticsArtificial Intelligence10.1016/j.artint.2023.104011324:COnline publication date: 1-Nov-2023
  • (2020)Implementations in Machine EthicsACM Computing Surveys10.1145/341963353:6(1-38)Online publication date: 30-Dec-2020
  • Show More Cited By

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Journal of Logic and Computation
Journal of Logic and Computation  Volume 15, Issue 6
December 2005
283 pages
ISSN:0955-792X
EISSN:1465-363X
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Oxford University Press, Inc.

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 December 2005

Author Tags

  1. Argumentation
  2. argumentation frameworks
  3. argumentation schemes
  4. critical questions
  5. legal reasoning
  6. legal theory construction
  7. practical reasoning

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 25 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Preferences and constraints in abstract argumentationProceedings of the Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence10.24963/ijcai.2023/345(3095-3103)Online publication date: 19-Aug-2023
  • (2023)A claim-centric perspective on abstract argumentation semanticsArtificial Intelligence10.1016/j.artint.2023.104011324:COnline publication date: 1-Nov-2023
  • (2020)Implementations in Machine EthicsACM Computing Surveys10.1145/341963353:6(1-38)Online publication date: 30-Dec-2020
  • (2019)Building Jiminy CricketProceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society10.1145/3306618.3314257(147-153)Online publication date: 27-Jan-2019
  • (2018)Taking account of the actions of others in value-based reasoningArtificial Intelligence10.1016/j.artint.2017.09.002254:C(1-20)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2018
  • (2018)Eveline T. FeterisArtificial Intelligence and Law10.1007/s10506-018-9226-026:3(307-314)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2018
  • (2017)Norms and value based reasoningArtificial Intelligence and Law10.1007/s10506-017-9194-925:1(29-64)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2017
  • (2016)Value based reasoning and the actions of othersProceedings of the Twenty-second European Conference on Artificial Intelligence10.3233/978-1-61499-672-9-680(680-688)Online publication date: 29-Aug-2016
  • (2016)Formalizing value-guided argumentation for ethical systems designArtificial Intelligence and Law10.1007/s10506-016-9189-y24:4(387-407)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2016
  • (2016)Cognitive computing and proposed approaches to conceptual organization of case law knowledge basesArtificial Intelligence and Law10.1007/s10506-016-9188-z24:4(347-370)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2016
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media