Robust Data-Driven Neuro-Adaptive Observers With Lipschitz Activation Functions
Pages 2862 - 2867
Abstract
While the use of neural networks for learning has gained traction in control and system identification problems, their use in data-driven estimator design is not as prevalent. Prior art on neuro-adaptive observers limit the type of activation functions to radial basis function networks and provide conservative bounds on the resulting observer estimation error because they leverage boundedness of the activation functions rather than exploiting their underlying structure. This paper proposes the use of Lipschitz activation functions in the neuroadaptive observer: utilizing the Lipschitz constants of these activations simplifies the data-driven observer design procedure via recently discovered LMI conditions. Furthermore, in spite of measurement noise and approximation error, pre-computable robust stability guarantees are provided on the resulting state estimation error.
References
[1]
K. S. Narendra and K. Parthasarathy, “Identification and control of dynamical systems using neural networks,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 4–27, 1990.
[2]
E. B. Kosmatopoulos, M. M. Polycarpou, M. A. Christodoulou, and P. A. Ioannou, “High-order neural network structures for identification of dynamical systems,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 422–431, 1995.
[3]
B. Kiumarsi, K. G. Vamvoudakis, H. Modares, and F. L. Lewis, “Optimal and autonomous control using reinforcement learning: A survey,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 2042–2062, 2018.
[4]
Y. Huang and D. Liu, “Neural-network-based optimal tracking control scheme for a class of unknown discrete-time nonlinear systems using iterative adp algorithm,” Neurocomputing, vol. 125, pp. 46–56, 2014.
[5]
A. Chakrabarty, D. K. Jha, G. T. Buzzard, Y. Wang, and K. Vamvoudakis, “Safe Approximate Dynamic Programming Via Kernelized Lipschitz Estimation,” pp. 1–13, Jul 2019. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.02151
[6]
A. Chakrabarty, R. Quirynen, C. Danielson, and W. Gao, “Approximate dynamic programming for linear systems with state and input constraints,” in 2019 18th European Control Conference (ECC), June 2019, pp. 524–529.
[7]
J. Theocharis and V. Petridis, “Neural network observer for induction motor control,” IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 26–37, 1994.
[8]
Y. H. Kim, F. L. Lewis, and C. T. Abdallah, “A dynamic recurrent neural-network-based adaptive observer for a class of nonlinear systems,” Automatica, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 1539–1543, 1997.
[9]
F. Abdollahi, H. Talebi, and R. Patel, “A Stable Neural Network-Based Observer With Application to Flexible-Joint Manipulators,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 118–129, jan 2006.
[10]
X. Liu, C. Yang, Z. Chen, M. Wang, and C. Y. Su, “Neuro-adaptive observer based control of flexible joint robot,” Neurocomputing, vol. 275, pp. 73–82, 2018.
[11]
B. Pratap and S. Purwar, “Neural Network Observer for Twin Rotor MIMO System: An LMI Based Approach,” in International Conference on Modeling, Identification and Control. Okayama, Japan: IEEE, 2010, pp. 539–544.
[12]
R. Rahimilarki, Z. Gao, A. Zhang, and R. J. Binns, “Robust neural network fault estimation approach for nonlinear dynamic systems with applications to wind turbine systems,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 3203, no. c, pp. 1–1, 2019.
[13]
A. Zemouche, R. Rajamani, H. Trinh, and M. Zasadzinski, “A new LMI based ℋ∞ observer design method for Lipschitz nonlinear systems,” in Proc. European Control Conference (ECC), Jun 2016, pp. 2011–2016.
[14]
A. Chakrabarty, M. J. Corless, G. T. Buzzard, S. H. Żak, and A. E. Rundell, “State and unknown input observers for nonlinear systems with bounded exogenous inputs,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 5497–5510, 2017.
[15]
A. Zemouche and M. Boutayeb, “On LMI conditions to design observers for Lipschitz nonlinear systems,” Automatica, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 585–591, 2013.
[16]
A. Chakrabarty, E. Fridman, S. H. Żak, and G. T. Buzzard, “State and unknown input observers for nonlinear systems with delayed measurements,” Automatica, vol. 95, pp. 246–253, sep 2018.
[17]
A. Zemouche and M. Boutayeb, “A unified ℋ∞ adaptive observer synthesis method for a class of systems with both lipschitz and monotone nonlinearities,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 282–288, 2009.
[18]
K. Hornik, “Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks,” Neural Networks, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 251–257, 1991.
[19]
A. Hannun, C. Case et al., “Deep speech: Scaling up end-to-end speech recognition,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.5567, 2014.
Recommendations
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
7716 pages
Copyright © 2019.
Publisher
IEEE Press
Publication History
Published: 01 December 2019
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 0Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 09 Aug 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
View options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in