Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1109/ESEM.2017.33acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesesemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Analysis of the understanding of the concepts of task and skill variety by software engineering professionals

Published: 09 November 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Context: In organizational psychology literature, Task Variety and Skill Variety are considered different aspects of work design. Albeit related to different aspects of the work, it is common to find strong correlations between these constructs. After applying the Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ) on a sample of 102 software professional, we found the similar correlations and conjectured that they were partly due to a misunderstanding about what a task is, what a skill is, and what could be considered a variety of those concepts in the practice of software development. Goal: Our goal in this study was to investigate the actual existence and the possible sources of such misunderstanding. Method: We performed semi-structured interviews with software professionals that had previously participated in the application of the WDQ and analyzed the results using qualitative research techniques. We selected four software professionals among those with higher experience in software development. Results: Qualitative data revealed insights regarding the reasons why the correlation identified in the quantitative results could have arisen in our sample. Conclusions: Our findings pointed out that the misunderstanding of such concepts might affect the results of the application of quantitative questionnaires that measure these constructs.

References

[1]
F. P. Morgeson and S. E. Humphrey, "The work design questionnaire (wdq): developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work." Journal of applied psychology, vol. 91, no. 6, p. 1321, 2006.
[2]
F. Q. da Silva, C. França, C. V. de Magalhães, and R. E. Santos, "Preliminary findings about the nature of work in software engineering: An exploratory survey," in Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement. ACM, 2016, p. 10.
[3]
C. França, H. Sharp, and F. Q. Da Silva, "Motivated software engineers are engaged and focused, while satisfied ones are happy," in Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement. ACM, 2014, p. 32.
[4]
J. R. Hackman and G. R. Oldham, "Development of the job diagnostic survey." Journal of Applied psychology, vol. 60, no. 2, p. 159, 1975.
[5]
J. R. Hackman and G. R. Oldham, "Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory," Organizational behavior and human performance, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 250--279, 1976.
[6]
S. Zaniboni, D. M. Truxillo, and F. Fraccaroli, "Differential effects of task variety and skill variety on burnout and turnover intentions for older and younger workers," European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 306--317, 2013.
[7]
M. N. Kiggundu, "Task interdependence and the theory of job design," Academy of management Review, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 499--508, 1981.
[8]
M. N. Kiggundu, "Task interdependence and job design: Test of a theory," Organizational behavior and human performance, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 145--172, 1983.
[9]
G. Van Der Vegt, B. Emans, and E. Van De Vliert, "Motivating effects of task and outcome interdependence in work teams," Group & organization management, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 124--143, 1998.

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)Measuring human values in software engineeringProceedings of the 12th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement10.1145/3239235.3267427(1-4)Online publication date: 11-Oct-2018

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ESEM '17: Proceedings of the 11th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement
November 2017
481 pages
ISBN:9781509040391

Sponsors

Publisher

IEEE Press

Publication History

Published: 09 November 2017

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. job characteristics
  2. skill variety
  3. software engineering
  4. survey research
  5. task variety
  6. work design

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

ESEM '17
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 130 of 594 submissions, 22%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 27 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)Measuring human values in software engineeringProceedings of the 12th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement10.1145/3239235.3267427(1-4)Online publication date: 11-Oct-2018

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media