Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1109/ETFA.2017.8247641guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
research-article

Adaptive self-organizing map applied to lathe tool condition monitoring

Published: 12 September 2017 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Condition monitoring is a fundamental part of machining as well as other manufacturing processes where generally there are parts that wear out and have to be replaced. In turning or milling tool wear level is fundamental for proper machine operation and is often accessed through the use of multiple sensors combined with a reasoning method. The unique modeling capabilities of artificial neural networks in the presence of noisy information make them best candidates for condition monitoring. This paper presents enhancements to the selforganizing map neural network where a modified learning algorithm is used to control the effectiveness of memory usage through the reduction of the learning rate in raw memory areas. Further modeling ability tests of the neural network were produced to test the influence of time as a feature in classification performance. Results show significant improvements in tool wear classification through the use of time as a feature as well as gained performance with memory learning rate control. The modified learning algorithm suggest that online continuous learning is possible by avoiding over fitting from previously seen data suggesting therefore the accommodation of new data patterns without forgetting previous ones.

    References

    [1]
    N. Ambhore, D. Kamble, S. Chinchanikar, and V. Wayal, “Tool condition monitoring system: A review,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 2, no. 4-5, pp. 3419–3428, 2015.
    [2]
    A. Siddhpura and R. Paurobally, “A review of flank wear prediction methods for tool condition monitoring in a turning process,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf Technol., vol. 65, no. 1-4, pp. 371–393, 2013.
    [3]
    D. Dimla and P. Lister, “On-line metal cutting tool condition monitoring,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 769–781, 2000.
    [4]
    R. G. Silva, R. L. Reuben, K. J. Baker, and S. J. Wilcox, “Tool wear monitoring of turning operations by neural network and expert system classification of a feature set generated from multiple sensors,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 319–332, 1998.
    [5]
    M. Compare, F. Martini, and E. Zio, “Genetic algorithms for condition-based maintenance optimization under uncertainty,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 244, no. 2, pp. 611–623, 2015.
    [6]
    M. Yuwono, Y. Guo, J. Wall, J. Li, S. West, G. Platt, and S. W. Su, “Unsupervised feature selection using swarm intelligence and consensus clustering for automatic fault detection and diagnosis in Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning systems,” Appl. Soft Comput. J., vol. 34, pp. 402–425, 2015.
    [7]
    T. Segreto, A. Simeone, and R. Teti, “Multiple sensor monitoring in nickel alloy turning for tool wear assessment via sensor fusion,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 12, no. Fig 2, pp. 85–90, 2013.
    [8]
    C. Shao, K. Paynabar, T. H. Kim, J. Jin, S. J. Hu, J. P. Spicer, H. Wang, and J. A. Abell, “Feature selection for manufacturing process monitoring using cross-validation,” J. Manuf Syst., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 550–555, 2013.
    [9]
    M. S. H. Bhuiyan, I. A. Choudhury, and M. Dahari, “Monitoring the tool wear, surface roughness and chip formation occurrences using multiple sensors in turning,” J. Manuf Syst., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 476–487, 2014.
    [10]
    B. S. Prasad, K. A. Prabha, and P. V. S. G. Kumar, “Condition monitoring of turning process using infrared thermography technique-An experimental approach,” Infrared Phys. Technol., vol. 81, pp. 137–147, 2017.
    [11]
    G. Wang, Z. Guo, and Y. Yang, “Force sensor based online tool wear monitoring using distributed Gaussian ARTMAP network,” Sensors Actuators, A Phys., vol. 192, pp. 111–118, 2013.
    [12]
    J. a. Duro, J. a. Padget, C. R. Bowen, H. A. Kim, and A. Nassehi, “Multi-sensor data fusion framework for CNC machining monitoring,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., vol. 66-67, pp. 505–520, 2016.
    [13]
    M. a. Shahin, “State-of-the-art review of some artificial intelligence applications in pile foundations,” Geosci. Front., pp. 1–12, 2014.
    [14]
    D. Pérez-Canales, J. Álvarez-Ramírez, J. C. Jáuregui-Correa, L. Vela-Martinez, and G. Herrera-Ruiz, “Identification of dynamic instabilities in machining process using the approximate entropy method,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 556–564, 2011.
    [15]
    T. Kohonen, “The self organizing map,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 78, pp. 1464–1480, 1990.
    [16]
    T. Kohonen, “Essentials of the self-organizing map,” Neural Networks, vol. 37, pp. 52–65, 2013.
    [17]
    P. Sarlin, “Self-organizing time map: An abstraction of temporal multivariate patterns,” Neurocomputing, vol. 99, pp. 496–508, 2013.
    [18]
    R. G. Silva, “Condition monitoring of the cutting process using a self-organizing spiking neural network map,” J. Intell. Manuf., vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 823–829, 2009.
    [19]
    D. Olszewski, “Fraud detection using self-organizing map visualizing the user profiles,” Knowledge-Based Syst., vol. 70, pp. 324–334, 2014.
    [20]
    P. Potočnik and E. Govekar, “Semi-supervised vibration-based classification and condition monitoring of compressors,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., vol. 93, pp. 51–65, 2017.
    [21]
    D. E. Dimla Snr. D. E., “Sensor signals for tool-wear monitoring in metal cutting operations-a review of methods,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 1073–1098, 2000.
    [22]
    F. Girardin, D. Rémond, and J. F. Rigal, “Tool wear detection in milling-An original approach with a non-dedicated sensor,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1907–1920, 2010.
    [23]
    C. L. Yen, M. C. Lu, and J. L. Chen, “Applying the self-organization feature map (SOM) algorithm to AE-based tool wear monitoring in micro-cutting,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., vol. 34, no. 1-2, pp. 353–366, 2013.
    [24]
    R. Silva, R., Wilcox, S. and Reuben, “Development of a system for monitoring tool wear using artificial intelligence techniques,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf., vol. 220, no. B8, p. 1333–1346., 2006.
    [25]
    R. J. Kuo, “Multi-sensor integration for on-line tool wear estimation through artificial neural networks and fuzzy neural network,” Eng. Appl. Artif Intell., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 249–261, 2000.
    [26]
    ISO 3685. International Organization for Standardization, 1993.
    [27]
    R. G. Silva, K. J. Baker, S. J. Wilcox, and R. L. Reuben, “the Adaptability of a Tool Wear Monitoring System Under Changing Cutting Conditions,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 287–298, 2000.
    [28]
    X. Jing, “Robust adaptive learning of feedforward neural networks via LMI optimizations,” Neural Networks, vol. 31, pp. 33–45, 2012.
    [29]
    D. Meng and Z. Pei, “Dynamic adaptive learning algorithm based on two-fuzzy neural-networks,” Neurocomputing, vol. 125, pp. 88–94, 2014.
    [30]
    A. F. R. Araujo and R. L. M. E. Rego, “Self-organizing Maps with a Time-varying Structure,” ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 46, no. 1, p. 7: 1–7: 38, 2013.
    [31]
    Y. Xing, X. Shi, F. Shen, K. Zhou, and J. Zhao, “A Self-Organizing Incremental Neural Network based on local distribution learning,” Neural Networks, vol. 84, pp. 143–160, 2016.
    [32]
    H. Shah-Hosseini and R. Safabakhsh, “TASOM: A new time adaptive self-organizing map,” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man, Cybern. Part B Cybern., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 271–282, 2003.
    [33]
    M. Piastra, “Self-organizing adaptive map: Autonomous learning of curves and surfaces from point samples,” Neural Networks, vol. 41, pp. 96–112, 2013.

    Index Terms

    1. Adaptive self-organizing map applied to lathe tool condition monitoring
              Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Information & Contributors

              Information

              Published In

              cover image Guide Proceedings
              2017 22nd IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA)
              Sep 2017
              1377 pages

              Publisher

              IEEE Press

              Publication History

              Published: 12 September 2017

              Qualifiers

              • Research-article

              Contributors

              Other Metrics

              Bibliometrics & Citations

              Bibliometrics

              Article Metrics

              • 0
                Total Citations
              • 0
                Total Downloads
              • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
              • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
              Reflects downloads up to 27 Jul 2024

              Other Metrics

              Citations

              View Options

              View options

              Get Access

              Login options

              Media

              Figures

              Other

              Tables

              Share

              Share

              Share this Publication link

              Share on social media