Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1109/FIE.2016.7757474guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
research-article

Academics' experience of teaching Open Ended Group Projects: A phenomenographic study

Published: 01 October 2016 Publication History

Abstract

An Open Ended Group Project (OEGP) is a distinguishable pedagogical tool, used by teachers in computing, engineering, and information technology courses. The tool contributes to the development of ‘soft’ skills essential for students' future career needs. This paper reports on a phenomenographic study that investigates the research question: What are the ways in which academics teaching Open Ended Group Projects experience teaching the course? Previous studies, using the phenomenographic research approach, have offered insights into academics' conceptions of science learning and teaching. However, there are no studies that investigate the experiences of teachers who use OEGP in their classes. This is the first study, that asks academics using an OEGP how they experience teaching these courses. Students enrolled in a course on computing education research conducted the small-scale study at Uppsala University, Sweden. In order to answer the research question, a theoretical sample was selected with a wide range of relevant population characteristics (e.g. background, prior experience, gender, and age). The semi-structured interview questions focused on understanding of OEGP, the learning objectives of OEGP, strategies for teaching these learning objectives, and the teacher's experience in teaching through OEGP. The results indicate that teachers see their role within OEGP as a coach and that the variation between experiences lies in what is intended to be coached. This variation is presented in a hierarchy (the outcome space). Categories focus on: the team, discipline, problem solving skills, learning and motivation. We also look at the first-hand experience of a student in an OEGP course and discuss the teachers' perceptions of students' experiences of OEGP. The implication for teaching is that a teacher needs to reconsider the way he or she teaches more often in OEGP than in regular courses. There are two reasons for this. First, teaching OEGP is based less on teaching content knowledge and more on teaching skills. Secondly, OEGP deals with a ‘real problem’, and aspects of the problem continuously change. Teachers are recommended to aim for reaching a higher category, indicating a deeper level of experience, and to use the experience of coaching OEGP in other courses as well. The importance of metacognition (reflection on action) and discussion with other teachers who have experience in teaching OEGP is highlighted.

References

[1]
P. S. Westwood, What Teachers Need to Know About Teaching Methods: Aust Council for Ed Research, 2008.
[2]
I. Newman, M. Daniels, and X. Faulkner, “Open ended group projects a ‘tool’ for more effective teaching,” in Fifth Australasian Conference on Computing Education, Adelaide, Australia, 2003, pp. 95–103.
[3]
F. Marton and S. Booth, Learning and Awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates, 1997.
[4]
M. Daniels, Å. Cajander, A. Pears, and T. Clear, “Engineering education research in practice: Evolving use of open ended group projects as a pedagogical strategy for developing skills in global collaboration,” International journal of engineering education, vol. 26, pp. 795–806, 2010.
[5]
C. Laxer, M. Daniels, Å. Cajander, and M. Wollowski, “Evolution of an international collaborative student project,” in 11th Australasian Conference on Computing Education (ACE '09). vol. 95, M. Hamilton and T. Clear, Eds., ed Darlinghurst, Australia, Australia: Australian Computer Society, Inc., 2009, pp. 111–118.
[6]
M. Daniels, L. Barker, Å. Cajander, C. Laxer, and D. Moore, “Managing cross-cultural differences in an open ended group project course,” in 35th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Indianapolis, IN, USA, 2005, pp. T4D22–23.
[7]
ITS Education Asia. (2015). Defining problems — “closed and open ended problems. Available: http://www.itseducation.asia/define-problems.htm
[8]
A. Hauer and M. Daniels, “A learning theory perspective on running open ended group projects (OEGPs),” in Tenth Australasian Conference on Computing Education (ACE '08), 2008, pp. 85–91.
[9]
D. H. Jonassen, “Designing constructivist learning environments,” Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory, vol. 2, pp. 215–239, 1999.
[10]
D. Kolb, Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1984.
[11]
C. E. Hmelo-Silver, “Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn?,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 16, pp. 235–266.
[12]
H. Barrows and A. Kelson, “Problem-based learning in secondary education and the problem-based learning institute,” Springfield, IL: Problem-Based Learning Institute, 1995.
[13]
A. Kolmos and H. Algreen-Ussing, “Implementing PBL and project organized curriculum,” in Das Hochschulwesen. Forum Für Hochschulforschung,-praxis Und-politik, 2001.
[14]
J. Copley, “The integration of teacher education and technology: a constructivist model,” Technology and Teacher Education, Charlottesville. VA: AACE. vol. 681. 1992.
[15]
C. Anil, M. Lofvars, L. Ames, E. Björling, A. Moregard, E. Campbell et al., (2013). Project Earth. Extending access to medical records and test results in health care [Online]. Available: http://docplayer.se/12075761-Rose-hulmaninstitute-of-technology-uppsala-university.html
[16]
F. Marton, “Phenomenography —Describing conceptions of the world around us,” Instructional Science, vol. 10, pp. 177–200, 1981.
[17]
G. S. Akerlind, “Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods,” Higher Education Research & Development, vol. 31, pp. 115–127, 2012/02/01 2012.
[18]
M. Prosser, K. Trigwell, and P. Taylor, “A phenomenographic study of academics' conceptions of science learning and teaching,” Learning and instruction, vol. 4, pp. 217–231, 1994.
[19]
A. Carbone, L. Mannila, and S. Fitzgerald, “Computer science and IT teachers' conceptions of successful and unsuccessful teaching: A phenomenographic study,” Computer Science Education, vol. 17, pp. 275–299, 2007.
[20]
R. Lister, A. Berglund, I. Box, C. Cope, A. Pears, C. Avram et al., “Differing ways that computing academics understand teaching,” in Ninth Australasian Conference on Computing Education (ACE), Ballarat, Victoria, Australia, 2007, pp. 97–106.
[21]
A. Pears, A. Berglund, A. Eckerdal, P. East, P. Kinnunen, L. Malmi et al., “What's the problem? Teachers' experience of student learning successes and failures,” in Seventh Baltic Sea Conference on Computing Education Research (Koli Calling 2007), Koli National Park, Finland, 2007, pp. 207–211.
[22]
P. Kinnunen, R. McCartney, L. Murphy, and L. Thomas, “Through the eyes of instructors: A phenomenographic investigation of student success,” in Third International Workshop on Computing Education Research (ICER), Atlanta, GA, USA, 2007, pp. 61–72.
[23]
C. Cope, “Ensuring validity and reliability in phenomenographic research using the analytical framework of a structure of awareness,” Qualitative Research Journal, vol. 4, pp. 5–18, 2004.
[24]
D. A. Schon, “Educating the reflective practitioner,” San Francisco: lossey-Bass, 1987.

Index Terms

  1. Academics' experience of teaching Open Ended Group Projects: A phenomenographic study
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image Guide Proceedings
      2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)
      2378 pages

      Publisher

      IEEE Press

      Publication History

      Published: 01 October 2016

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 0
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 09 Nov 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      View options

      Get Access

      Login options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media