Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1109/FIE.2016.7757524guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
research-article

Representations of underrepresented characters in engineering children books

Published: 01 October 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Women, people with disabilities, Blacks, Latinas and American Indians are considered underrepresented in engineering fields because they constitute a small portion of engineering students and the population of professional engineers in the United States. In order to increase underrepresented engineering degree recipients, it is necessary to provide opportunities for underrepresented students to develop their self-concept and experience positive and effective pre-college engineering experiences. Children's experiences are potentially influenced by picture books. Previous studies reveal that children compare themselves with the characters in their books who share the same backgrounds and consider the characters as role models (e.g. [1] & [2]). The picture books characters can affect children's perceptions of their backgrounds and influence their self-concepts. To address this possibility our research team examined children's books about engineering. We looked into the portrayal of underrepresented characters in 14 engineering picture books for children ages 4–8. To examine the characters' genders, ages, ethnicities, and abilities, we conducted a quantitative content analysis of these picture books based on Krippendorff's method [3]. The result of the study indicates that, though still being underrepresented, different groups of underrepresented populations are depicted more frequently in engineering picture books than the engineering field itself.

References

[1]
Anderson, David A., and Mykol Hamilton. “Gender role stereotyping of parents in children's picture books: The invisible father.” Sex Roles 52, no. 3–4 (2005): 145–151.
[2]
Kama, Amit. “Supercrips versus the pitiful handicapped: Reception of disabling images by disabled audience members.” Communications 29, no. 4 (2004): 447–466.
[3]
Krippendorff, Klaus. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage Publication, 2012.
[4]
National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. 2015. Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2015. Special Report NSF 15-311. Arlington, VA. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/.
[5]
Davis, Lance A., and Robin D. Gibbin, eds. Raising public awareness of engineering. National Academies Press, 2002.
[6]
Taylor, Frank. “Content analysis and gender stereotypes in children's books.” Teaching Sociology (2003): 300–311.
[7]
Mills, C. Wright. The sociological imagination. Oxford University Press, 2000.
[8]
Jablin, Fredric M., and Linda L. Putnam, eds. The new handbook of organizational communication: advances in theory, research, and methodos. Sage Publications, 2001.
[9]
Golos, Debbie B., and Annie M. Moses. “Representations of deaf characters in children's picture books.” American Annals of the Deaf 156, no. 3 (2011): 270–282.
[10]
Crabb, Peter B., and Deb L. Marciano. “Representations of material culture and gender in award-winning children's books: a 20-year followup.” Journal of Researchin Childhood Education 25, no. 4 (2011): 390–398.
[11]
Rajput, Toby. “Questioning your collection.” Knowledge Quest 38, no. 1 (2009): 62.
[12]
Judge, Timothy A., and Joyce E. Bono. “Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis.” Journal of applied Psychology 86, no. 1 (2001): 80.
[13]
Lent, Robert W., Steven D. Brown, and Kevin C. Larkin. “Self-efficacy in the prediction of academic performance and perceived career options.” Journal of counseling psychology 33, no. 3 (1986): 265.
[14]
Weber, Robert P. 2004. “Content Analysis.” Pp 117–124 in Social Research Methods: A Reader edited by Clive Seale. New York, NY: Routledge
[15]
Boettger, Ryan K., and Laura A. Palmer. “Quantitative content analysis: Its use in technical communication.” Professional Communication, IEEE Transactions on 53, no. 4 (2010): 346–357.

Index Terms

  1. Representations of underrepresented characters in engineering children books
            Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Information & Contributors

            Information

            Published In

            cover image Guide Proceedings
            2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)
            2378 pages

            Publisher

            IEEE Press

            Publication History

            Published: 01 October 2016

            Qualifiers

            • Research-article

            Contributors

            Other Metrics

            Bibliometrics & Citations

            Bibliometrics

            Article Metrics

            • 0
              Total Citations
            • 0
              Total Downloads
            • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
            Reflects downloads up to 15 Oct 2024

            Other Metrics

            Citations

            View Options

            View options

            Get Access

            Login options

            Media

            Figures

            Other

            Tables

            Share

            Share

            Share this Publication link

            Share on social media