Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637276guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
research-article

Highlighting the Barren Landscape of Postdoctoral Resources: A Content Analysis of University Websites

Published: 13 October 2021 Publication History

Abstract

This research paper serves as a benchmarking study to investigate the types and availability of resources available to postdoctoral scholars on university websites. Postdoctoral education in engineering and computer science disciplines is a forgotten stage of the academic pipeline, with very few scholars investigating the learning and development that occurs through the transient postdoctoral years. The few studies that have been done report postdocs feeling “forgotten” and on a “postdoctoral treadmill,” often without formal mentorship or guidance in developing the skills required to land academic careers. While most postdoctoral scholars do have supervisors to whom they report, most literature indicates that postdocs in engineering and computer science are still lacking mentorship in the peripheral skillsets essential for career success, and these effects are amplified for women and postdocs of color. Given a lack of interpersonal mentorship, it is plausible that postdocs turn to institutional resources for guidance and directions for professional development. To date, literature has not benchmarked the type or extent of resources available that are aimed at postdoctoral scholars. To this end, the purpose of this paper is to characterize university webpages using content analysis methods in order to understand the presence or absence of various types of support for postdocs at universities.

References

[1]
National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, “Survey of Graduate Students and Postdoctorates in Science and Engineering,” Washington D.C., 2018. [Online]. Available: https://ncsesdata.nsf.gov/gradpostdoc/2018/html/gss18-dt-tah002-2.html.
[2]
M. B. Omary, Y. M. Shah, S. Schnell, S. Subramanian, M. S. Swanson, and M. X. O'Riordan, “Enhancing career development of postdoctoral trainees: act locally and beyond,” J. Physiol., vol. 597, no. 9, pp. 2317–2322, 2019.
[3]
S. L. Mendez, K. E. Starkey, S. E. Cooksey, and V. M. Conley, “Environmental Influences on the STEM Identity and Career Intentions of Latinx STEM Postdoctoral Scholars,” J. Hispanic High. Educ., 2021.
[4]
S. Blake-Beard, M. L. Bayne, F. J. Crosby, and C. B. Muller, “Matching by race and gender in mentoring relationships: Keeping our eyes on the prize,” J. Soc. Issues, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 622–643, 2011.
[5]
K. J. Haley, T. D. Hudson, and A. J. Jaeger, “Career Coherence, Agency, and the Postdoctoral Scholar,” in The Postdoc Landscape: The Invisible Scholars, Elsevier Inc., 2018, pp. 121–142.
[6]
T. D. Hudson, K. J. Haley, A. J. Jaeger, A. Mitchall, A. Dinin, and S. B. Dunstan, “Becoming a legitimate scientist: Science identity of postdocs in STEM fields,” Rev. High. Educ., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 607–639, 2018.
[7]
M. Nerad, “It takes a global village to develop the next generation of PhDs and postdoctoral fellows,” Acta Acad., vol. Supplement, no. 2, pp. 198–216, 2011.
[8]
J. M. Faupel-Badger, K. Raue, D. E. Nelson, and S. Tsakraklides, “Alumni perspectives on career preparation during a postdoctoral training program: A qualitative study,” CBE Life Sci. Educ., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2015.
[9]
R. G. Ross, L. Greco-Sanders, and M. Laudenslager, “An Institutional Postdoctoral Research Training Program: Increasing Productivity of Postdoctoral Trainees,” Acad. Psychiatry, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 207–212, 2016.
[10]
L. Nowell, G. Ovie, N. Kenny, and M. Jacobsen, “Postdoctoral scholars' perspectives about professional learning and development: a concurrent mixed-methods study,” Palgrave Commun., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2020.
[11]
L. Nowell, G. Ovie, C. Berenson, N. Kenny, and K. A. Hayden, “Professional Learning and Development of Postdoctoral Scholars: A Systematic Review of the Literature,” Educ. Res. Int., vol. 7, no. 224, pp. 1–7, 2018.
[12]
A. K. Scaffidi and J. E. Berman, “A positive postdoctoral experience is related to quality supervision and career mentoring, collaborations, networking and a nurturing research environment,” High. Educ., vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 685–698, Dec. 2011.
[13]
A. Yadav, “Taking the next step: supporting postdocs to develop an independent path in academia,” vol. 1, pp. 1–12, 2019.
[14]
A. Yadav et al., “The Forgotten Scholar: Underrepresented Minority Postdoc Experiences in STEM Fields,” Educ. Stud. - AESA, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 160–185, 2020.
[15]
D. Chakraverty, “The impostor phenomenon among black doctoral and postdoctoral scholars in STEM,” Int. J. Dr. Stud., vol. 15, pp. 433–460, 2020.
[16]
R. L. Layton et al., “Career planning courses increase career readiness of graduate and postdoctoral trainees,” F1000Research, vol. 9, pp. 1–24, 2020.
[17]
N. L. Vanderford, T. M. Evans, L. T. Weiss, L. Bira, and J. Beltran-Gastelum, “Use and effectiveness of the individual development plan among postdoctoral researchers: Findings from a cross-sectional study,” F1 000Research, vol. 7, pp. 1–26, 2018.
[18]
A. A. Eaton, J. F. Saunders, R. K. Jacobson, and K. West, “How Gender and Race Stereotypes Impact the Advancement of Scholars in STEM: Professors' Biased Evaluations of Physics and Biology Post-Doctoral Candidates,” Sex Roles, pp. 1–15, 2019.
[19]
L. Vygotsky, Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1962.
[20]
A. Ardichvili, “Learning and Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Communities of Practice: Motivators, Barriers, and Enablers,” Adv. Dev. Hum. Resour., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 541–554, 2008.
[21]
Z. Zhao and A. R. Carberry, “Developing postdoctoral scholar and graduate student mentorship ability,” in 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2018, pp. 1–7.
[22]
J. Roy, “Engineering by the Numbers,” 2019.
[23]
H. F. Hsieh and S. E. Shannon, “Three approaches to qualitative content analysis,” Qual. Health Res., vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 1277–1288, 2005.
[24]
J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE Publications. Inc., 2016.
[25]
B. Rybarczyk, L. Lerea, P. K. Lund, D. Whittington, and L. Dykstra, “Postdoctoral Training Aligned with the Academic Professoriate,” Bioscience, vol. 61, no. 9, pp. 699–705, 2011.
[26]
B. J. Rybarczyk, L. Lerea, D. Whittington, and L. Dykstra, “Analysis of postdoctoral training outcomes that broaden participation in science careers,” CBE Life Sci. Educ., vol. 15, no. 3, 2016.
[27]
A. J. Jaeger and A. J. Dinin, The Postdoc Landscape: The Invisible Scholars. London: Elsevier: Academic Press, 2017.
[28]
I. Van Der Weijden, C. Teelken, and M. De Boer, “Career satisfaction of postdoctoral researchers in relation to their expectations for the future,” High. Educ., vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 25–40, 2016.
[29]
R. Ysseldyk et al., “A leak in the academic pipeline: Identity and health among postdoctoral women,” Front. Psychol., vol. 10, no. JUN, pp. 1–17, 2019.
[30]
D. Chakraverty, “The impostor phenomenon among postdoctoral trainees in stem: A us-based mixed-methods study,” Int. J. Dr. Stud., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 329–352, 2020.
[31]
S. J. Ceci, W. M. Williams, and S. M. Barnett, “Women's underrepresentation in science: sociocultural and biological considerations.,” Psychol. Bull., vol. 135, no. 2, pp. 218–61, Mar. 2009.
[32]
W. Williams and S. Ceci, “When scientists choose motherhood,” Am. Sci., 2012, Accessed: Nov.22, 2013. [Online]. Available: http://www.humec.cornell.edu/hdlupload/WilliamsAmScientist-3-2012-2.pdf.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Exploring Women’s Experiences of Transition into Computing Careers from Non-Computing BackgroundsProceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 210.1145/3568812.3603460(55-58)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2023
  • (2023)Characterizing Women's Alternative Pathways to a Computing Career Using Content AnalysisProceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3545945.3569798(158-164)Online publication date: 2-Mar-2023

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Guide Proceedings
2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)
Oct 2021
2473 pages

Publisher

IEEE Press

Publication History

Published: 13 October 2021

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 25 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Exploring Women’s Experiences of Transition into Computing Careers from Non-Computing BackgroundsProceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 210.1145/3568812.3603460(55-58)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2023
  • (2023)Characterizing Women's Alternative Pathways to a Computing Career Using Content AnalysisProceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3545945.3569798(158-164)Online publication date: 2-Mar-2023

View Options

View options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media