Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1109/IV47402.2020.9304609guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
research-article

CSG: Critical Scenario Generation from Real Traffic Accidents

Published: 19 October 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Autonomous driving (AD) is getting closer to our life, but the severe traffic accidents of autonomous vehicle (AV) happened in the past several years warn us that the safety of AVs is still a big challenge for the AD industry. Before volume production, the automotive industry and regulators must ensure the AV can deal with dangerous scenarios. Although road test is the most common method to test the performance and safety of an AV, it has some manifest disadvantages, e.g., highly risky and unrepeatable, low efficiency and lack of useful critical scenarios. Critical-scenario-based simulation can effectively address these problems and become an important complement to road test. In this paper, we present a novel approach to extract critical scenarios from real traffic accident videos and re-generate them in a simulator. We also introduce our integrated toolkit for scenario extraction and scenario test. With the toolkit, we can build a critical scenario library quickly and use it as a benchmark for AV safety assessment, among other purposes. On top of this, we further introduce our safety assessment criteria and scoring method.

References

[1]
NVIDIA, NVIDIA drive constellation: virtual reality autonomous vehicle simulator (2017).
[2]
Shital Shah, Debadeepta Dey, Chris Lovett, and Ashish Kapoor. Airsim:High-fidelity visual and physical simulation for autonomous vehicles. CoRR, abs/1705.05065, 2017.
[3]
Alexey Dosovitskiy, German Ros, Felipe Codevilla, Antonio Lopez, and Vladlen Koltun. CARLA: An open urban driving simulator. In Proceedings of the 1st Annual Conference on Robot Learning, pages lC16, 2017.
[4]
Queiroz Rodrigo, Berger Thorsten, and Czarnecki Krzysztof. (2019). GeoScenario: An Open DSL for Autonomous Driving Scenario Representation. 287–294.
[7]
Vincenzo Punzo, Maria Teresa Borzacchiello, and Biagio Ciuffo. On the assessment of vehicle trajectory data accuracy and application to the next generation simulation (NGSIM) program data. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 19(6):1243 C 1262, 2011.
[8]
Li W, Pan C W, Zhang Ret al., AADS: Augmented autonomous driving simulation using data-driven algorithms[J]. Science Robotics, 2019, 4(28).
[9]
Xu Xiaoyan, Wang Xuesong, Wu Xiangbin. Calibration and Evaluation of Responsibility-Sensitive Safety Model on Autonomous Car- Following Maneuvers Using Naturalistic Driving Study Data. 99th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting.
[10]
K. He, G. Gkioxari, P. Dollr, R. Girshick, Mask r-cnn. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2980C2988 (2017).
[11]
Krzysztof Czarnecki. Operational world model ontology for automated driving systemsCpart 1: Road structure. Technical report, Waterloo Intelligent Systems Engineering Lab (WISE) Report, 2018.
[12]
Till Menzel, Gerrit Bagschik, and Markus Maurer. Scenarios for development, test and validation of automated vehicles. In 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, IV 2018, Changshu, Suzhou, China, June 26–30, 2018, pages 1821C1827, 2018.
[13]
W. G. Najm, John D. Smith, and Mikio Yanagisawa. Pre-Crash Scenario Typology for Crash Avoidance Research. Technical report, U.S. Department of Transportation, NHTSA, April2007.
[14]
Tong D S, AJINKYA B, HERMAN V.Simulation-based Testing Framework for Autonomous Driving Development. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics (ICM). New York:IEEE, 2019: 576–583.
[15]
Heikkila, J., and O. Silven. A Four-step Camera Calibration Procedure with Implicit Image Correction. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 1997.
[16]
Zhu, M., X. Wang, A. Tarko, and S. Fang. Modeling Car-Following Behavior on Urban Expressways in Shanghai: A Naturalistic Driving Study. 2018.
[19]
Robot Operating System (ROS). https://www.ros.org/.
[20]
Shalev-Shwartz, S., S. Shammah, and A. Shashua. On a Formal Model of Safe and Scalable Self-Driving Cars. 2017, pp. lC37.
[21]
Shashua, A., S. Shalev-Shwartz, and S. Shammah. Implementing the RSS Model on NHTSA Pre-Crash Scenarios. https://www.mobileye.com/responsibility-sensitive-safety/rss_on_nhtsa.pdf. Accessed Jul.30, 2019.
[22]
Darweesh Hatem, Takeuchi Eijiro, Takeda Kazuya, Ninomiya Yoshiki, Sujiwo Adi, Morales Y., Akai Naoki, Tomizawa Tetsuo, Kato Shinpei. (2017). Open Source Integrated Planner for Autonomous Navigation in Highly Dynamic Environments. Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics. 29. 668–684.
[24]
Erdogan, Ahmetcan et al., “Parametrized end-to-end scenario generation architecture for autonomous vehicles.” 2018 6th International Conference on Control Engineering & Information Technology (CEIT). IEEE, 2018.
[25]
N. Kalra, S. M. Paddock. Driving to safety: How many miles of driving would it take to demonstrate autonomous vehicle reliability?Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 94, 182C193 (2016).
[26]
A. C. Madrigal, Inside Waymo's Secret World for Training Self- Driving Cars. the Altantis (2017).
[27]
Althoff, Matthias, and Sebastian Lutz. “Automatic generation of safety-critical test scenarios for collision avoidance of road vehicles.” 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). IEEE, 2018.
[31]
Klischat, Moritz, and Matthias Althoff. “Generating critical test scenarios for automated vehicles with evolutionary algorithms.” 2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). IEEE, 2019.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Generating Executable Test Scenarios from Autonomous Vehicle Disengagements using Natural Language ProcessingProceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing Systems10.1145/3643915.3644098(98-104)Online publication date: 15-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Industry Practices for Challenging Autonomous Driving Systems with Critical ScenariosACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology10.1145/364033433:4(1-35)Online publication date: 11-Jan-2024
  • (2023)A Survey on Automated Driving System Testing: Landscapes and TrendsACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology10.1145/357964232:5(1-62)Online publication date: 24-Jul-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. CSG: Critical Scenario Generation from Real Traffic Accidents
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image Guide Proceedings
        2020 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)
        Oct 2020
        1558 pages

        Publisher

        IEEE Press

        Publication History

        Published: 19 October 2020

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
        Reflects downloads up to 30 Aug 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2024)Generating Executable Test Scenarios from Autonomous Vehicle Disengagements using Natural Language ProcessingProceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing Systems10.1145/3643915.3644098(98-104)Online publication date: 15-Apr-2024
        • (2024)Industry Practices for Challenging Autonomous Driving Systems with Critical ScenariosACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology10.1145/364033433:4(1-35)Online publication date: 11-Jan-2024
        • (2023)A Survey on Automated Driving System Testing: Landscapes and TrendsACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology10.1145/357964232:5(1-62)Online publication date: 24-Jul-2023
        • (2022)ADEPT: A Testing Platform for Simulated Autonomous DrivingProceedings of the 37th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering10.1145/3551349.3559528(1-4)Online publication date: 10-Oct-2022
        • (2022)Automatic Evaluation of Automatically Derived Semantic Scenario Instance Descriptions2022 IEEE 25th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC)10.1109/ITSC55140.2022.9922013(1565-1571)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2022

        View Options

        View options

        Get Access

        Login options

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media