Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Formation Tracking in Sparse Airborne Networks

Published: 01 September 2018 Publication History

Abstract

A swarm of unmanned air vehicles (UAVs) may form a dynamic 3-D network whose topology changes frequently. Tracking the geometric formation of the network is a critical problem. Recent advantage of wireless ranging technologies (e.g., ultrawideband) enables inter-UAV distance measurement up to hundreds meters with errors in centimeter level. This makes it possible to track the network topology by the partially measured distance matrix among the UAVs, which is known as the <italic>formation tracking</italic> problem. But the measured distances are generally sparse and noisy, and the topology of UAV network is changing continuously. These cause the formation tracking highly challenging. Existing methods are generally fragile to the measurement noises and network sparsity. This paper exploits a fact that well-connected subcomponents, whose local structures can be calculated reliably, exist widely because the unevenness of node distribution in sparse networks. Therefore, a weighted component stitching (WCS) method to find the reliable components and stitch their local structures with weights is proposed for calculating the formation of the network accurately. In particular, we propose efficient two-center four-vertex-connected star-graph (2-4-star) detection and merging algorithms to extract the reliable global rigid components. A WCS algorithm and a weighted component-based Kalman filter algorithm with complexity both <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$O(n^{3})$ </tex-math></inline-formula> are proposed for robust formation tracking in <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$n$ </tex-math></inline-formula> vertex UAV networks. Extensive experiments were conducted, showing that the proposed methods can improve the formation tracking accuracy 21&#x0025;&#x2013;48&#x0025; over existing state-of-the-art methods, especially in sparse, noisy UAV networks under different parameter settings.

References

[1]
S. Sandet al., “Swarm exploration and navigation on mars,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Localization GNSS (ICL-GNSS), Jun. 2013, pp. 1–6.
[2]
N. Mahdoui, E. Natalizio, and V. Fremont, “Multi-UAVs network communication study for distributed visual simultaneous localization and mapping,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Comput., Netw. Commun. (ICNC), Feb. 2016, pp. 1–5.
[3]
M. A. Guney and M. Unel, “Formation control of a group of micro aerial vehicles (MAVs),” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Syst., Man, Cybern., Oct. 2013, pp. 929–934.
[4]
L. Barnes, R. Garcia, M. Fields, and K. Valavanis, “Swarm formation control utilizing ground and aerial unmanned systems,” in Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robots Syst., Sep. 2008, p. 4205.
[5]
X. Dong, B. Yu, Z. Shi, and Y. Zhong, “Time-varying formation control for unmanned aerial vehicles: Theories and applications,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 340–348, Jan. 2015.
[6]
G. Michieletto, A. Cenedese, and A. Franchi, “Bearing rigidity theory in SE(3),” in Proc. IEEE 55th Conf. Decis. Control (CDC), Dec. 2016, pp. 5950–5955.
[7]
Z. Wang, C. Yang, X. Dong, Q. Li, and Z. Ren, “Time-varying formation control for mobile robots: Algorithms and experiments,” in Proc. 43rd Annu. Conf. IEEE Ind. Electron. Soc. (IECON), Oct./Nov. 2017, pp. 7239–7244.
[8]
L. Gupta, R. Jain, and G. Vaszkun, “Survey of important issues in UAV communication networks,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1123–1152, 2nd Quart., 2016.
[9]
J. Seo, Y. Kim, S. Kim, and A. Tsourdos, “Collision avoidance strategies for unmanned aerial vehicles in formation flight,” IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 2718–2734, Dec. 2017.
[10]
J. L. Ny, A. Ribeiro, and G. J. Pappas, “Adaptive communication-constrained deployment of unmanned vehicle systems,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 923–934, Jun. 2012.
[11]
Q. Wu, Y. Zeng, and R. Zhang, “Joint trajectory and communication design for multi-UAV enabled wireless networks,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 2109–2121, Mar. 2018.
[12]
J. Kwon and S. Hailes, “Scheduling UAVs to bridge communications in delay-tolerant networks using real-time scheduling analysis techniques,” in Proc. IEEE/SICE Int. Symp. Syst. Integr. (SII), Dec. 2014, pp. 363–369.
[13]
Y. Zeng, X. Xu, and R. Zhang, “Trajectory design for completion time minimization in UAV-enabled multicasting,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 2233–2246, Apr. 2018.
[14]
M. Logan, T. Vranas, M. Motter, Q. Shams, and D. Pollock, “Technology challenges in small UAV development,” in Proc. Infotech@Aerospace, 2005, pp. 1–5.
[15]
J. Wan, L. Zhong, and F. Zhang, “Cooperative localization of multi-UAVs via dynamic nonparametric belief propagation under GPS signal loss condition,” Int. J. Distrib. Sensor Netw., vol. 10, no. 2, p. 562380, 2014.
[16]
A. Benini, A. Mancini, and S. Longhi, “An IMU/UWB/vision-based extended Kalman filter for mini-UAV localization in indoor environment using 802.15.4a wireless sensor network,” J. Intell. Robot. Syst., vol. 70, pp. 461–476, May 2013.
[17]
Y. Ma, N. Selby, and F. Adib, “Minding the billions: Ultra-wideband localization for deployed RFID tags,” in Proc. 23rd Annu. Int. Conf. Mobile Comput. Netw., New York, NY, USA, 2017, pp. 248–260.
[18]
K. Guoet al., “Ultra-wideband-based localization for quadcopter navigation,” Unmanned Syst., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 23–34, 2016.
[19]
S. J. Gortler, A. Healy, and D. P. Thurston, “Characterizing generic global rigidity,” Amer. J. Math., vol. 132, no. 4, pp. 897–939, 2007.
[20]
M. Cucuringu, “Graph realization and low-rank matrix completion,” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Appl. Math., Princeton Univ., Princeton, NJ, USA, 2012.
[21]
L. Zhang, L. Liu, C. Gotsman, and S. J. Gortler, “An as-rigid-as-possible approach to sensor network localization,” ACM Trans. Sens. Netw., vol. 6, no. 4, p. 35, 2010.
[22]
H. G. de Marina, F. J. Pereda, J. M. Giron-Sierra, and F. Espinosa, “UAV attitude estimation using unscented Kalman filter and TRIAD,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 59, no. 11, pp. 4465–4474, Nov. 2012.
[23]
B. Tian, L. Liu, H. Lu, Z. Zuo, Q. Zong, and Y. Zhang, “Multivariable finite time attitude control for quadrotor UAV: Theory and experimentation,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 2567–2577, Mar. 2018.
[24]
X. Dong, Formation Control of Swarm Systems. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2016, pp. 53–103.
[25]
V. M. Monajjemi, J. Wawerla, R. Vaughan, and G. Mori, “HRI in the sky: Creating and commanding teams of UAVs with a vision-mediated gestural interface,” in Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robots Syst., Nov. 2013, pp. 617–623.
[26]
B. Zhu, L. Xie, and D. Han, “Recent developments in control and optimization of swarm systems: A brief survey,” in Proc. 12th IEEE Int. Conf. Control Automat. (ICCA), Jun. 2016, pp. 19–24.
[27]
F. Schiano and P. R. Giordano, “Bearing rigidity maintenance for formations of quadrotor UAVs,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Automat. (ICRA), May/Jun. 2017, pp. 1467–1474.
[28]
J. Tiemann and C. Wietfeld, “Scalable and precise multi-UAV indoor navigation using TDOA-based UWB localization,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Indoor Positioning Indoor Navigat. (IPIN), Sep. 2017, pp. 1–7.
[29]
F. J. Perez-Grau, F. Caballero, L. Merino, and A. Viguria, “Multi-modal mapping and localization of unmanned aerial robots based on ultra-wideband and RGB-D sensing,” in Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robots Syst. (IROS), Sep. 2017, pp. 3495–3502.
[30]
Y. Wang, L. Song, and S. S. Iyengar, “An efficient technique for locating multiple narrow-band ultrasound targets in chorus mode,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 2343–2356, Nov. 2015.
[31]
X. Ji and H. Zha, “Sensor positioning in wireless ad-hoc sensor networks using multidimensional scaling,” in Proc. 23rd Annu. Joint Conf. IEEE Comput. Commun. Soc. INFOCOM, vol. 4, Nov. 2004, pp. 2652–2661.
[32]
S. Korkmaz and A.-J. van der Veen, “Robust localization in sensor networkswith iterative majorization techniques,” in Proc. IEEE ICASSP, Apr. 2009, pp. 2049–2052.
[33]
A. M.-C. So and Y. Ye, “Theory of semidefinite programming for Sensor Network Localization,” Math. Program., vol. 109, nos. 2–3, pp. 367–384, 2006.
[34]
T. Sun, Y. Wang, D. Li, W. Chen, and Z. Gu, “Robust component-based network location with noisy range measurements,” in Proc. 27th Int. Conf. Comput. Commun. Netw., Hangzhou, China, 2018, pp. 1–9.
[35]
M. Cucuringu, Y. Lipman, and A. Singer, “Sensor network localization by eigenvector synchronization over the Euclidean group,” ACM Trans. Sensor Netw., vol. 8, no. 3, p. 19, 2012.
[36]
C. Luo, S. I. McClean, G. Parr, L. Teacy, and R. De Nardi, “UAV position estimation and collision avoidance using the extended Kalman filter,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 2749–2762, Jul. 2013.
[37]
M. S. Arulampalam, S. Maskell, N. Gordon, and T. Clapp, “A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian tracking,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 174–188, Feb. 2002.
[38]
J. Pattillo, A. Veremyev, S. Butenko, and V. Boginski, “On the maximum quasi-clique problem,” Discrete Appl. Math., vol. 161, nos. 1–2, pp. 244–257, 01 2013.
[39]
B. Jackson and A. Nixon, “Stress matrices and global rigidity of frameworks on surfaces,” Discrete Comput. Geometry, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 586–609, 2015.
[40]
J. M. F. Ten Berge, “J.C. Gower and G.B. Dijksterhuis.Procrustes problems. New York: Oxford University Press,” Psychometrika, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 799–801, 2005.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A Vehicle-Mounted Radar-Vision System for Precisely Positioning Clustering UAVsIEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications10.1109/JSAC.2024.341461042:10(2688-2703)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
  • (2023)InferLoc: Hypothesis-Based Joint Edge Inference and Localization in Sparse Sensor NetworksACM Transactions on Sensor Networks10.1145/360847720:1(1-28)Online publication date: 12-Jul-2023
  • (2023)GPART: Partitioning Maximal Redundant Rigid and Maximal Global Rigid Components in Generic Distance GraphsACM Transactions on Sensor Networks10.1145/359466819:4(1-26)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Formation Tracking in Sparse Airborne Networks
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
        IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications  Volume 36, Issue 9
        Sept. 2018
        250 pages

        Publisher

        IEEE Press

        Publication History

        Published: 01 September 2018

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
        Reflects downloads up to 09 Nov 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2024)A Vehicle-Mounted Radar-Vision System for Precisely Positioning Clustering UAVsIEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications10.1109/JSAC.2024.341461042:10(2688-2703)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
        • (2023)InferLoc: Hypothesis-Based Joint Edge Inference and Localization in Sparse Sensor NetworksACM Transactions on Sensor Networks10.1145/360847720:1(1-28)Online publication date: 12-Jul-2023
        • (2023)GPART: Partitioning Maximal Redundant Rigid and Maximal Global Rigid Components in Generic Distance GraphsACM Transactions on Sensor Networks10.1145/359466819:4(1-26)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2023
        • (2023)Communication Efficient, Distributed Relative State Estimation in UAV NetworksIEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications10.1109/JSAC.2023.324270841:4(1151-1166)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2023
        • (2022)On Node Localizability Identification in Barycentric Linear LocalizationACM Transactions on Sensor Networks10.1145/354714319:1(1-26)Online publication date: 8-Dec-2022
        • (2021)Performance Analysis of Routing Protocols in UAV Ad Hoc Networks2021 International Conference on Mechanical, Aerospace and Automotive Engineering10.1145/3518781.3519205(57-63)Online publication date: 3-Dec-2021
        • (2020)A Survey of Filtering based Active Localization MethodsProceedings of the 2020 4th International Conference on Big Data and Internet of Things10.1145/3421537.3421541(69-73)Online publication date: 22-Aug-2020
        • (2020)iGridEdgeDrone: Hybrid Mobility Aware Intelligent Load Forecasting by Edge Enabled Internet of Drone Things for Smart Grid NetworksInternational Journal of Parallel Programming10.1007/s10766-020-00675-x49:3(285-325)Online publication date: 24-Aug-2020
        • (2019)LifeTagProceedings of the 2019 8th International Conference on Networks, Communication and Computing10.1145/3375998.3376043(57-64)Online publication date: 13-Dec-2019
        • (2019)A Survey of Hybrid Deep Learning Methods for Traffic Flow PredictionProceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Advances in Image Processing10.1145/3373419.3373429(133-138)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2019
        • Show More Cited By

        View Options

        View options

        Get Access

        Login options

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media