Healthy Skepticism
Authors: 
John Leslie King, Hal Berghel, Phillip Glen Armour, Robert N. CharetteAuthors Info & Claims
John Leslie King, Hal Berghel, Phillip Glen Armour, Robert N. CharetteAuthors Info & ClaimsAbstract
Healthy skepticism improves project success by confronting project problems with candor, but is easy to stifle when participants fear being considered “Luddites.” Healthy skepticism is valuable and necessary but cannot survive when all skepticism is destroyed.
Index Terms
- Healthy Skepticism
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Skepticism revisited
Thought experiments involving The Matrix, brains-in-vats, or Cartesian demons have traditionally thought to describe skeptical possibilities. Chalmers has denied this, claiming that the simulations involved are real enough to at least sometimes defeat ...
Skepticism relations for comparing argumentation semantics
The issue of formalizing skepticism relations between argumentation semantics has been considered only recently in the literature. In this paper we provide a twofold contribution to this kind of analysis. First, starting from the traditional concepts of ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
0018-9162 © 2024 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See https://www.ieee.org/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
Publisher
IEEE Computer Society Press
Washington, DC, United States
Publication History
Published: 15 October 2024
Qualifiers
- Discussion
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 0Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025