Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1109/SFCS.2005.68guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

Sink Equilibria and Convergence

Published: 23 October 2005 Publication History

Abstract

We introduce the concept of a sink equilibrium. A sink equilibrium is a strongly connected component with no outgoing arcs in the strategy profile graph associated with a game. The strategy profile graph has a vertex set induced by the set of pure strategy profiles; its arc set corresponds to transitions between strategy profiles that occur with nonzero probability. (Here our focus will just be on the special case in which the strategy profile graph is actually a best response graph; that is, its arc set corresponds exactly to best response moves that result from myopic or greedy behaviour.) We argue that there is a natural convergence process to sink equilibria in games where agents use pure strategies. This leads to an alternative measure of the social cost of a lack of coordination, the price of sinking, which measures the worst case ratio between the value of a sink equilibrium and the value of the socially optimal solution. We define the value of a sink equilibrium to be the expected social value of the steady state distribution induced by a random walk on that sink. We illustrate the value of this measure in three ways. Firstly, we show that it may more accurately reflects the inefficiency of uncoordinated solutions in competitive games when the use of pure strategies is the norm. In particular, we give an example (a valid-utility game) in which the game converges to solutions which are a factor

References

[1]
B. Awerbuch and Y. Azar and A. Epstein, "The price of routing unsplittable flow", STOC , 2005.
[2]
A. Fabrikant and C. Papadimitriou and K. Talwar, "On the complexity of pure equilitria", STOC , 2004.
[3]
L. Fliescher, M. Goemans, V. Mirrokni and M. Sviridenko, "Almost tight approximation algorithms for maximising general assignment problems", submitted, 2005.
[4]
D. Fotakis and S. Kontogiannis and P. Spirakis, "Selfish unsplittable flow", ICALP , 2004.
[5]
M. Goemans, L. Li, V. Minokni, and M. Thottan, "Market sharing games applied to content distribution in ad-hoc networks", MOBIHOC , 2004.
[6]
M. Kandori, G. Mailath and R. Rob, "Learning, mutuation, and long-run equilibria in games", Econometrica , 61 , pp. 29-56, 1993.
[7]
E. Kohlberg and J. Mertems, 'On the strategic stability of equilibria", Econometrica , 54 (5), pp. 1003-1037, 1986.
[8]
E. Koutsoupias and C. Papadimitriou, "Worst-case equilibria", STACS , 1999.
[9]
V. Mirrokni and A. Vetta, "Convergence issues in competitive games", RANDOM-APPROX , 2004.
[10]
C. Papadimitriou, "Algorithms, games and the internet", STOC , 2001.
[11]
C. Papadimitriou and A. Schaffer and M. Yannakakis, "On the strategic stability of equilibria On the complexity of local search", STOC 1990.
[12]
T. Roughgarden and E. Tardos, "How bad is selfish routing?", J. ACM , 49(2) , pp. 236-259, 2002.
[13]
A. Schaffer and M. Yannakakis, "Simple local search problems that are hard to solve", SIAM Journal on Computing , 20(1) , pp. 56-87, 1991.
[14]
A. Vetta, "Nash equilibria in competitive societies, with applications to facility location, traffic routing and auctions", FOCS , 2002.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Guide Proceedings
FOCS '05: Proceedings of the 46th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
October 2005
645 pages
ISBN:0769524680

Publisher

IEEE Computer Society

United States

Publication History

Published: 23 October 2005

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 03 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Swim till You Sink: Computing the Limit of a GameAlgorithmic Game Theory10.1007/978-3-031-71033-9_12(205-222)Online publication date: 3-Sep-2024
  • (2023)Evaluation and learning in two-player symmetric games via best and better responsesInformation Sciences: an International Journal10.1016/j.ins.2023.119459647:COnline publication date: 17-Oct-2023
  • (2022)Pure Nash Equilibria in Resource Graph GamesJournal of Artificial Intelligence Research10.1613/jair.1.1266872(185-213)Online publication date: 4-Jan-2022
  • (2022)Blockchain Nash Dynamics and the Pursuit of ComplianceProceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies10.1145/3558535.3559781(281-293)Online publication date: 19-Sep-2022
  • (2022)Decentralization Analysis of Pooling Behavior in Cardano Proof of StakeProceedings of the Third ACM International Conference on AI in Finance10.1145/3533271.3561787(18-26)Online publication date: 2-Nov-2022
  • (2021)Collective influence maximization for multiple competing products with an awareness-to-influence modelProceedings of the VLDB Endowment10.14778/3450980.345098114:7(1124-1136)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2021
  • (2020)Existence and Efficiency of Equilibria for Cost-Sharing in Generalized Weighted Congestion GamesACM Transactions on Economics and Computation10.1145/33914348:2(1-28)Online publication date: 13-May-2020
  • (2019)Game dynamics as the meaning of a gameACM SIGecom Exchanges10.1145/3331041.333104816:2(53-63)Online publication date: 7-May-2019
  • (2018)A better-response strategy for self-interested planning agentsApplied Intelligence10.1007/s10489-017-1046-548:4(1020-1040)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2018
  • (2017)Best-response dynamics in combinatorial auctions with item biddingProceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms10.5555/3039686.3039719(521-533)Online publication date: 16-Jan-2017
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media