Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

An $O(\log \log m)$ Prophet Inequality for Subadditive Combinatorial Auctions

Published: 19 May 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Prophet inequalities compare the expected performance of an online algorithm for a stochastic optimization problem to the expected optimal solution in hindsight. They are a major alternative to classic worst-case competitive analysis, of particular importance in the design and analysis of simple (posted-price) incentive compatible mechanisms with provable approximation guarantees. A central open problem in this area concerns subadditive combinatorial auctions. Here $n$ agents with subadditive valuation functions compete for the assignment of $m$ items. The goal is to find an allocation of the items that maximizes the total value of the assignment. The question is whether there exists a prophet inequality for this problem that significantly beats the best known approximation factor of $O(\log m)$. We make major progress on this question by providing an $O(\log \log m)$ prophet inequality. Our proof goes through a novel primal-dual approach. It is also constructive, resulting in an online policy that takes the form of static and anonymous item prices that can be computed in polynomial time given appropriate query access to the valuations. As an application of our approach, we construct a simple and incentive compatible mechanism based on posted prices that achieves an $O(\log \log m)$ approximation to the optimal revenue for subadditive valuations under an item-independence assumption.

References

[1]
S. Assadi, T. Kesselheim, and S. Singla, Improved truthful mechanisms for subadditive combinatorial auctions: Breaking the logarithmic barrier, in SODA 2021, ACM, New York, SIAM, Philadephia, 2021, pp. 653–661, https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611976465.40.
[2]
S. Assadi and S. Singla, Improved truthful mechanisms for combinatorial auctions with submodular bidders, in FOCS 2019, IEEE, Washington, DC, 2019, pp. 233–248.
[3]
M. Babaioff, N. Immorlica, B. Lucier, and S. M. Weinberg, A simple and approximately optimal mechanism for an additive buyer, in FOCS 2014, IEEE, Washington, DC, 2014, pp. 21–30.
[4]
K. Bhawalkar and T. Roughgarden, Welfare guarantees for combinatorial auctions with item bidding, in SODA 2011, ACM, New York, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2011, pp. 700–709, https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611973082.55.
[5]
Y. Cai, N. R. Devanur, and S. M. Weinberg, A duality based unified approach to Bayesian mechanism design, in STOC 2016, ACM, New York, 2016, pp. 926–939.
[6]
Y. Cai and M. Zhao, Simple mechanisms for subadditive buyers via duality, in STOC 2017, ACM, New York, 2017, pp. 170–183.
[7]
S. Chawla, J. D. Hartline, and R. Kleinberg, Algorithmic pricing via virtual valuations, in EC 2007, ACM, New York, 2007, pp. 243–251.
[8]
S. Chawla, J. D. Hartline, D. L. Malec, and B. Sivan, Multi-parameter mechanism design and sequential posted pricing, in STOC 2010, ACM, New York, 2010, pp. 311–320.
[9]
S. Chawla, D. L. Malec, and B. Sivan, The power of randomness in Bayesian optimal mechanism design, in EC 2010, ACM, New York, 2010, pp. 149–158.
[10]
S. Chawla and J. B. Miller, Mechanism design for subadditive agents via an ex ante relaxation, in EC 2016, ACM, New York, 2016, pp. 579–596.
[11]
S. Chawla, J. B. Miller, and Y. Teng, Pricing for online resource allocation: Intervals and paths, in SODA 2019, ACM, New York, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2019, pp. 1962–1981, https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611975482.119.
[12]
G. Christodoulou, A. Kovács, and M. Schapira, Bayesian combinatorial auctions, J. ACM, 63 (2016), pp. 1–19.
[13]
S. Dobzinski, Two randomized mechanisms for combinatorial auctions, in APPROX-RANDOM 2007, Springer, New York, 2007, pp. 89–103.
[14]
S. Dobzinski, Breaking the logarithmic barrier for truthful combinatorial auctions with submodular bidders, in STOC 2016, ACM, New York, 2016, pp. 940–948.
[15]
P. Dütting, M. Feldman, T. Kesselheim, and B. Lucier, Prophet inequalities made easy: Stochastic optimization by pricing nonstochastic inputs, SIAM J. Comput., 49 (2020), pp. 540–582, https://doi.org/10.1137/20M1323850.
[16]
P. Dütting and T. Kesselheim, Best-response dynamics in combinatorial auctions with item bidding, in SODA 2017, ACM, New York, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2017, pp. 521–533, https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611974782.33.
[17]
P. Dütting and R. Kleinberg, Polymatroid prophet inequalities, in ESA 2015, Springer, New York, 2015, pp. 437–449.
[18]
S. Ehsani, M. Hajiaghayi, T. Kesselheim, and S. Singla, Prophet secretary for combinatorial auctions and matroids, in SODA 2018, ACM, New York, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2018, pp. 700–714, https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611975031.46.
[19]
U. Feige, On maximizing welfare when utility functions are subadditive, SIAM J. Comput., 39 (2009), pp. 122–142, https://doi.org/10.1137/070680977.
[20]
M. Feldman, H. Fu, N. Gravin, and B. Lucier, Simultaneous auctions are (almost) efficient, in STOC 2013, ACM, New York, 2013, pp. 201–210.
[21]
M. Feldman, N. Gravin, and B. Lucier, Combinatorial auctions via posted prices, in SODA 2015, ACM, New York, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2015, pp. 123–135, https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611973730.10.
[22]
M. Feldman, O. Svensson, and R. Zenklusen, Online contention resolution schemes, in SODA 2016, ACM, New York, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2016, pp. 1014–1033, https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611974331.ch72.
[23]
M. Hardt, B. Recht, and Y. Singer, Train faster, generalize better: Stability of stochastic gradient descent, in ICML 2016, JMLR, 2016, pp. 1225–1234.
[24]
S. Hart and N. Nisan, Approximate revenue maximization with multiple items, J. Econom. Theory, 172 (2017), pp. 313–347.
[25]
R. Kleinberg and S. M. Weinberg, Matroid prophet inequalities, in STOC 2012, ACM, New York, 2012, pp. 123–136.
[26]
U. Krengel and L. Sucheston, Semiamarts and finite values, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 83 (1977), pp. 745–747.
[27]
U. Krengel and L. Sucheston, On semiamarts, amarts, and processes with finite value, in Probability on Banach Spaces, Adv. Probab. Related Topics 4, Dekker, New York, 1978, pp. 197–266.
[28]
X. Li and A. C.-C. Yao, On revenue maximization for selling multiple independently distributed items, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110 (2013), pp. 11232–11237.
[29]
T. Roughgarden, Intrinsic robustness of the price of anarchy, J. ACM, 62 (2015), 32.
[30]
A. Rubinstein, Beyond matroids: Secretary problem and prophet inequality with general constraints, in STOC 2016, ACM, New York, 2016, pp. 324–332.
[31]
A. Rubinstein and S. Singla, Combinatorial prophet inequalities, in SODA 2017, ACM, New York, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2017, pp. 1671–1687, https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611974782.110.
[32]
A. Rubinstein and S. M. Weinberg, Simple mechanisms for a subadditive buyer and applications to revenue monotonicity, ACM Trans. Econ. Comput., 6 (2018), 19.
[33]
E. Samuel-Cahn, Comparison of threshold stop rules and maximum for independent nonnegative random variables, Ann. Probab., 12 (1984), pp. 1213–1216.
[34]
V. Syrgkanis and É. Tardos, Composable and efficient mechanisms, in STOC 2013, ACM, New York, 2013, pp. 211–220.
[35]
V. V. Vazirani, Approximation Algorithms, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001.
[36]
A. C.-C. Yao, An n-to-\textup1 bidder reduction for multi-item auctions and its applications, in SODA 2015, ACM, New York, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2015, pp. 92–109, https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611973730.8.
[37]
H. Zhang, Improved prophet inequalities for combinatorial welfare maximization with (approximately) subadditive agents, in ESA 2020, Springer, New York, 2020, 82.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image SIAM Journal on Computing
SIAM Journal on Computing  Volume 53, Issue 6
DOI:10.1137/smjcat.53.6
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics

United States

Publication History

Published: 19 May 2022

Author Tags

  1. prophet inequality
  2. posted prices
  3. combinatorial auction
  4. mechanism design

Author Tags

  1. 68Q25
  2. 68W27
  3. 60G40

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 0
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media