Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1011767.1011802acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespodcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

How fast can a distributed atomic read be?

Published: 25 July 2004 Publication History

Abstract

This paper addresses the problem of designing an efficient implementation of a basic atomic read-write data structure over an asynchronous message-passing system. In particular, we consider time-efficient implementations of this abstraction in the case of a single writer, multiple readers (also called a SWMR atomic register) and S servers: the writer, the readers, and t out of the S servers may fail by crashing. Previous implementations tolerate the failure of any minority of servers (i.e., t < S/2) and require one communication round-trip for every write, and two round-trips for every read.We investigate the possibility of fast implementations, namely, implementations that complete both reads and writes in one round-trip. We show that, interestingly, the existence of a fast implementation depends on the maximum number of readers considered. More precisely, we show that a fast implementation is possible if and only if the number of readers is less that S<over>t-2. We also show that a fast implementation is impossible in a multiple writers setting when t ≥ 1.Our results draw sharp lines between the time-complexity of regular and atomic register implementations, as well as between single-writer and multi-writer implementations. The results lead also to revisit, in a message-passing context, the folklore theorem that "atomic reads must write".

References

[1]
H. Attiya, A. Bar-Noy, and D. Dolev. Sharing memory robustly in message-passing systems. Journal of the ACM, 42(1):124--142, January 1995.
[2]
H. Attiya and J. Welch. Distributed Computing. Fundamentals, Simulations, and Advanced Topics. McGraw-Hill, 1998.
[3]
R. Fan and N. Lynch. Efficient replication of large data objects. In Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC-17), Sorrento, Italy, October 2003.
[4]
M. Herlihy. Wait-free synchronization. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 13(1):124--149, January 1991.
[5]
M. Herlihy and J. Wing. Linearizability: a correctness condition for concurrent objects. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 12(3):463--492, July 1990.
[6]
L. Lamport. On interprocess communication -- parts I-II. Distributed Computing, 1(2):77--101, May 1986.
[7]
N. Lynch and A. Shvartsman. Robust emulation of shared memory using dynamic quorum-acknowledged broadcasts. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual International Symposium on Fault-Tolerant Computing (FTCS'97), Seattle, Washington, June 1997. IEEE.
[8]
N. Lynch and A. Shvartsman. RAMBO: A reconfigurable atomic memory service for dynamic networks. In Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC-16), Toulouse, France, October 2002.
[9]
N. A. Lynch. Distributed Algorithms. Morgan Kaufmann, 1996.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)SWARM: Replicating Shared Disaggregated-Memory Data in No TimeProceedings of the ACM SIGOPS 30th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles10.1145/3694715.3695945(24-45)Online publication date: 4-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Ares II: Tracing the Flaws of a (Storage) God2024 43rd International Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems (SRDS)10.1109/SRDS64841.2024.00027(187-197)Online publication date: 30-Sep-2024
  • (2023)Distributed Multi-writer Multi-reader Atomic Register with Optimistically Fast Read and WriteProceedings of the 35th ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures10.1145/3558481.3591086(479-488)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
PODC '04: Proceedings of the twenty-third annual ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing
July 2004
422 pages
ISBN:1581138024
DOI:10.1145/1011767
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 25 July 2004

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. atomic registers
  2. shared-memory emulation
  3. time-complexity

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

PODC04
PODC04: Principles of Distributed Computing 2004
July 25 - 28, 2004
Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 740 of 2,477 submissions, 30%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)15
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
Reflects downloads up to 14 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)SWARM: Replicating Shared Disaggregated-Memory Data in No TimeProceedings of the ACM SIGOPS 30th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles10.1145/3694715.3695945(24-45)Online publication date: 4-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Ares II: Tracing the Flaws of a (Storage) God2024 43rd International Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems (SRDS)10.1109/SRDS64841.2024.00027(187-197)Online publication date: 30-Sep-2024
  • (2023)Distributed Multi-writer Multi-reader Atomic Register with Optimistically Fast Read and WriteProceedings of the 35th ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures10.1145/3558481.3591086(479-488)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2023
  • (2022)Exploring the use of Strongly Consistent Distributed Shared Memory in 3D NVEsProceedings of the 2022 Workshop on Advanced tools, programming languages, and PLatforms for Implementing and Evaluating algorithms for Distributed systems10.1145/3524053.3542748(47-55)Online publication date: 25-Jul-2022
  • (2022)Ares: Adaptive, Reconfigurable, Erasure coded, Atomic StorageACM Transactions on Storage10.1145/351061318:4(1-39)Online publication date: 12-Nov-2022
  • (2022)Implementing Three Exchange Read Operations for Distributed Atomic StorageJournal of Parallel and Distributed Computing10.1016/j.jpdc.2022.01.024Online publication date: Feb-2022
  • (2022)Invited Paper: Towards Practical Atomic Distributed Shared Memory: An Experimental EvaluationStabilization, Safety, and Security of Distributed Systems10.1007/978-3-031-21017-4_3(35-50)Online publication date: 9-Nov-2022
  • (2021)Fragmented Objects: Boosting Concurrency of Shared Large ObjectsStructural Information and Communication Complexity10.1007/978-3-030-79527-6_7(106-126)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2021
  • (2021)Robust and Strongly Consistent Distributed Storage SystemsResearch Challenges in Information Science10.1007/978-3-030-75018-3_51(670-679)Online publication date: 8-May-2021
  • (2020)GryffProceedings of the 17th Usenix Conference on Networked Systems Design and Implementation10.5555/3388242.3388286(591-618)Online publication date: 25-Feb-2020
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media