Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1076034.1076044acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

A study of factors affecting the utility of implicit relevance feedback

Published: 15 August 2005 Publication History

Abstract

Implicit relevance feedback (IRF) is the process by which a search system unobtrusively gathers evidence on searcher interests from their interaction with the system. IRF is a new method of gathering information on user interest and, if IRF is to be used in operational IR systems, it is important to establish when it performs well and when it performs poorly. In this paper we investigate how the use and effectiveness of IRF is affected by three factors: search task complexity, the search experience of the user and the stage in the search. Our findings suggest that all three of these factors contribute to the utility of IRF.

References

[1]
Bell, D.J. and Ruthven, I. (2004). Searchers' assessments of task complexity for web searching. Proceedings of the 26th European Conference on Information Retrieval, 57--71.
[2]
Borlund, P. (2000). Experimental components for the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. Journal of Documentation. 56(1): 71--90.
[3]
Brajnik, G., Mizzaro, S., Tasso, C., and Venuti, F. (2002). Strategic help for user interfaces for information retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 53(5): 343--358.
[4]
Busha, C.H. and Harter, S.P., (1980). Research methods in librarianship: Techniques and interpretation. Library and information science series. New York: Academic Press.
[5]
Campbell, I. and Van Rijsbergen, C.J. (1996). The ostensive model of developing information needs. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science, 251--268.
[6]
Harman, D., (1992). Relevance feedback and other query modification techniques. In Information retrieval: Data structures and algorithms. New York: Prentice-Hall.
[7]
Kelly, D. and Teevan, J. (2003). Implicit feedback for inferring user preference. SIGIR Forum. 37(2): 18--28.
[8]
Koenemann, J. and Belkin, N.J. (1996). A case for interaction: A study of interactive information retrieval behavior and effectiveness. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 205--212.
[9]
Meddis, R., (1984). Statistics using ranks: A unified approach. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 303--308.
[10]
Morita, M. and Shinoda, Y. (1994). Information filtering based on user behavior analysis and best match text retrieval. Proceedings of the 17th Annual ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 272--281.
[11]
Salton, G. and Buckley, C. (1990). Improving retrieval performance by relevance feedback. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 41(4): 288--297.
[12]
Siegel, S. and Castellan, N.J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences. 2nd ed. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
[13]
White, R.W. (2004). Implicit feedback for interactive information retrieval. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
[14]
White, R.W., Jose, J.M. and Ruthven, I. (2005). An implicit feedback approach for interactive information retrieval, Information Processing and Management, in press.
[15]
White, R.W., Jose, J.M., Ruthven, I. and Van Rijsbergen, C.J. (2004). A simulated study of implicit feedback models. Proceedings of the 26th European Conference on Information Retrieval, 311--326.
[16]
Zellweger, P.T., Regli, S.H., Mackinlay, J.D., and Chang, B.-W. (2000). The impact of fluid documents on reading and browsing: An observational study. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 249--256.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Exploring the Impact of Verbal-Imagery Cognitive Style on Web Search Behaviour and Mental WorkloadProceedings of the 2024 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval10.1145/3627508.3638313(303-316)Online publication date: 10-Mar-2024
  • (2023)The Infinite Index: Information Retrieval on Generative Text-To-Image ModelsProceedings of the 2023 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval10.1145/3576840.3578327(172-186)Online publication date: 19-Mar-2023
  • (2020)Designing Multistage Search Systems to Support the Information Seeking ProcessUnderstanding and Improving Information Search10.1007/978-3-030-38825-6_7(113-137)Online publication date: 30-May-2020
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. A study of factors affecting the utility of implicit relevance feedback

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGIR '05: Proceedings of the 28th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
    August 2005
    708 pages
    ISBN:1595930345
    DOI:10.1145/1076034
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 15 August 2005

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. implicit relevance feedback
    2. relevance feedback

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Conference

    SIGIR05
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 792 of 3,983 submissions, 20%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 27 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Exploring the Impact of Verbal-Imagery Cognitive Style on Web Search Behaviour and Mental WorkloadProceedings of the 2024 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval10.1145/3627508.3638313(303-316)Online publication date: 10-Mar-2024
    • (2023)The Infinite Index: Information Retrieval on Generative Text-To-Image ModelsProceedings of the 2023 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval10.1145/3576840.3578327(172-186)Online publication date: 19-Mar-2023
    • (2020)Designing Multistage Search Systems to Support the Information Seeking ProcessUnderstanding and Improving Information Search10.1007/978-3-030-38825-6_7(113-137)Online publication date: 30-May-2020
    • (2020)Personalization in text information retrievalJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/asi.2423471:3(349-369)Online publication date: 28-Jan-2020
    • (2019)Explicating "Implicit Interaction"Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3290605.3300647(1-16)Online publication date: 2-May-2019
    • (2018)The role of emotional aspects in the information retrieval from the webOnline Information Review10.1108/OIR-04-2016-012142:4(520-534)Online publication date: 30-Jul-2018
    • (2018)Recommending Based on Implicit FeedbackSocial Information Access10.1007/978-3-319-90092-6_14(510-569)Online publication date: 3-May-2018
    • (2018)Relevance Feedback for Text RetrievalEncyclopedia of Database Systems10.1007/978-1-4614-8265-9_949(3160-3161)Online publication date: 7-Dec-2018
    • (2017)A Distribution Separation Method Using Irrelevance Feedback Data for Information RetrievalACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/29946088:3(1-26)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2017
    • (2016)The impacts of time constraint on users' search strategy during search processProceedings of the 79th ASIS&T Annual Meeting: Creating Knowledge, Enhancing Lives through Information & Technology10.5555/3017447.3017498(1-9)Online publication date: 14-Oct-2016
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media