Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1097064.1097078acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Finding corresponding objects when integrating several geo-spatial datasets

Published: 04 November 2005 Publication History

Abstract

When integrating geo-spatial datasets, a join algorithm is used for finding sets of corresponding objects (i.e., objects that represent the same real-world entity). Algorithms for joining two datasets were studied in the past. This paper investigates integration of three datasets and proposes methods that can be easily generalized to any number of datasets. Two approaches that use only locations of objects are presented and compared. In one approach, a join algorithm for two datasets is applied sequentially. In the second approach, all the integrated datasets are processed simultaneously. For the two approaches, join algorithms are given and their performances, in terms of recall and precision, are compared. The algorithms are designed to perform well even when locations are imprecise and each dataset represents only some of the real-world entities. Results of extensive experiments show that one of the algorithms has the best (or close to the best) performances under all circumstances. This algorithm has a much better performance than applying sequentially the one-sided nearest-neighbor join.

References

[1]
C. Beeri, Y. Kanza, E. Safra, and Y. Sagiv. Object fusion in geographic information systems. In Proc. of the 13th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Toronto (Ontario, Canada), 2004.]]
[2]
O. Boucelma, M. Essid, and Z. Lacroix. A WFS-based mediation system for GIS interoperability. In Proc. of the 10th ACM International Symposium on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, McLean, (Virginia, US), 2002.]]
[3]
T. Bruns and M. Egenhofer. Similarity of spatial scenes. In Proc. of the 7th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, Delft (Netherlands), 1996.]]
[4]
M. A. Cobb, M. J. Chung, H. Foley, F. E. Petry, and K. B. Show. A rule-based approach for con ation of attribute vector data. GioInformatica, 2(1):7--33, 1998.]]
[5]
T. Devogele, C. Parent, and S. Spaccapietra. On spatial database integration. International Journal of Geographic Information Systems, 12(4), 1998.]]
[6]
Y. Doytsher and S. Filin. The detection of of corresponding objects in a linear-based map con ation. Surveying and Land Information Systems, 60(2):117--128, 2000.]]
[7]
Y. Doytsher, S. Filin, and E. Ezra. Transformation of datasets in a linear-based map con ation framework. Surveying and Land Information Systems, 61(3):159--169, 2001.]]
[8]
F. T. Fonseca and M. J. Egenhofer. Ontology-driven geographic information systems. In Proc. of the 7th ACM International Symposium on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, Kansas City (Missouri, US), 1999.]]
[9]
F. T. Fonseca, M. J. Egenhofer, and P. Agouris. Using ontologies for integrated geographic information systems. Transactions in GIS, 6(3), 2002.]]
[10]
R. Laurini, K. Yetongnon, and D. Benslimane. Gis interoperability, from problems to solutions. In Encyclopedia of of Life Support Systems (EOLSS). Eolss Publishers, 2002.]]
[11]
H. Mayer. Automatic object extraction from aerial imagery - a survey focusing on buildings. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 74(2), 1999.]]
[12]
E. M. Mikhail. Observations and Least Squares. University Press of America, 1976.]]
[13]
M. Minami. Using ArcMap. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc., 2000.]]
[14]
C. Parent and S. Spaccapietra. Database integration: The key to data interoperability. In Advances in Object-Oriented Data Modeling. MIT Press, 2000.]]
[15]
B. Rosen and A. Saalfeld. Match criteria for automatic alignment. In Proc. of 7th International Symposium on Computer-Assisted Cartography (Auto-Carto 7), 1985.]]
[16]
A. Saalfeld. Con ation-automated map compilation. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 2(3):217--228, 1988.]]
[17]
A. Samal, S. Seth, and K. Cueto. A feature based approach to con ation of geospatial sources. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 18(00):1--31, 2004.]]
[18]
R. Sinkhorn. A relationship between arbitrary positive matrices and doubly stochastic matrices. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 35(2):876--879, 1964.]]
[19]
R. Sinkhorn. Diagonal equivalence to matrices with perscribed row and column sums. The American Mathematical Monthly, 74(4):402--405, 1967.]]
[20]
H. Uitermark, P. V. Oosterom, N. Mars, and M. Molenaar. Ontology-based geographic data set integration. In Proc. of Workshop on Spatio-Temporal Database Management, Edinburgh (Scotland), 1999.]]
[21]
G. Wiederhold. Mediators in the architecture of future information systems. Computer, 25(3):38--49, 1992.]]
[22]
G. Wiederhold. Mediation to deal with heterogeneous data sources. In Proc. of 2nd International Conference on Introperating Geographic Information Systems, Zurich (Swizerland), 1999.]]

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)A System for Aligning Geographical Entities from Large Heterogeneous SourcesISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information10.3390/ijgi1102009611:2(96)Online publication date: 28-Jan-2022
  • (2022)Positive and Negative Association Rules Algorithm Based on Improved Interest Measure2022 IEEE 5th Advanced Information Management, Communicates, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IMCEC)10.1109/IMCEC55388.2022.10019871(745-750)Online publication date: 16-Dec-2022
  • (2021)Research on multi-source POI data fusion based on ontology and clustering algorithmsApplied Intelligence10.1007/s10489-021-02561-6Online publication date: 28-Jul-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
GIS '05: Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM international workshop on Geographic information systems
November 2005
306 pages
ISBN:1595931465
DOI:10.1145/1097064
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 04 November 2005

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. corresponding objects
  2. geospatial datasets
  3. integration
  4. location-based join
  5. spatial join

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

CIKM05
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 220 of 1,116 submissions, 20%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 09 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)A System for Aligning Geographical Entities from Large Heterogeneous SourcesISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information10.3390/ijgi1102009611:2(96)Online publication date: 28-Jan-2022
  • (2022)Positive and Negative Association Rules Algorithm Based on Improved Interest Measure2022 IEEE 5th Advanced Information Management, Communicates, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IMCEC)10.1109/IMCEC55388.2022.10019871(745-750)Online publication date: 16-Dec-2022
  • (2021)Research on multi-source POI data fusion based on ontology and clustering algorithmsApplied Intelligence10.1007/s10489-021-02561-6Online publication date: 28-Jul-2021
  • (2021)A novel similarity measure for spatial entity resolution based on data granularity model: Managing inconsistencies in place descriptionsApplied Intelligence10.1007/s10489-020-01959-yOnline publication date: 31-Jan-2021
  • (2020)A points of interest matching method using a multivariate weighting function with gradient descent optimizationTransactions in GIS10.1111/tgis.1269025:1(359-381)Online publication date: 5-Oct-2020
  • (2020)An iterative approach based on contextual information for matching multi‐scale polygonal object datasetsTransactions in GIS10.1111/tgis.1262524:4(1047-1072)Online publication date: 11-Jun-2020
  • (2019)Point of Interest Matching between Different Geospatial DatasetsISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information10.3390/ijgi81004358:10(435)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2019
  • (2019)An IR-based approach towards automated integration of geo-spatial datasets in map-based software systemsProceedings of the 2019 27th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering10.1145/3338906.3340454(946-954)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2019
  • (2019)Follow the road: historical GIS for evaluating the development of routes in the Negev region during the twentieth centuryCartography and Geographic Information Science10.1080/15230406.2019.157717646:6(532-546)Online publication date: 26-Feb-2019
  • (2018)Combined geo-social searchGeoinformatica10.5555/3238836.323886122:3(615-660)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2018
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media