Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1146909.1147138acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Exploring trade-offs in buffer requirements and throughput constraints for synchronous dataflow graphs

Published: 24 July 2006 Publication History

Abstract

Multimedia applications usually have throughput constraints. An implementation must meet these constraints, while it minimizes resource usage and energy consumption. The compute intensive kernels of these applications are often specified as Synchronous Dataflow Graphs. Communication between nodes in these graphs requires storage space which influences throughput. We present exact techniques to chart the Pareto space of throughput and storage trade-offs, which can be used to determine the minimal storage space needed to execute a graph under a given throughput constraint. The feasibility of the approach is demonstrated with a number of examples.

References

[1]
M. Adé et al. Data minimisation for synchronous data flow graphs emulated on dsp-fpga targets. In DAC'97, Proc. (1997), ACM, p. 64--69.]]
[2]
K. Altisen et al. A methodology for the construction of scheduled systems. In Int. Symp. on Formal Techniques in Real-Time and Fault-Tolerant Systems, Proc. (2000), Springer-Verlag, p. 106--120.]]
[3]
T. Amnell et al. Times: a tool for schedulability analysis and code generation of real-time systems. In FORMATS'03, number 2791 in LNCS (2004), Springer-Verlag, p. 60--72.]]
[4]
S. Bhattacharyya et al. Software Synthesis from Dataflow Graphs. Kluwer, 1996.]]
[5]
S. Bhattacharyya et al. Synthesis of embedded software from synchronous dataflow specifications. Journal on VLSI Signal Process. Syst. 21, 2 (1999), p. 151--166.]]
[6]
J. Buck. Scheduling Dynamic Dataflow Graphs with Bounded Memory using the Token Flow Model. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 1993.]]
[7]
M. Geilen, T. Basten, and S. Stuijk. Minimising buffer requirements of synchronous dataflow graphs with model-checking. In DAC'05, Proc. (2005), ACM, p. 819--824.]]
[8]
A. Ghamarian, M. Geilen, S. Stuijk, T. Basten, A. Moonen, M. Bekooij, B. Theelen, and M. Mousavi. Throughput analysis of synchronous data flow graphs. In ACSD'06, Proc. (2006), IEEE.]]
[9]
R. Govindarajan et al. Minimizing buffer requirements under rate-optimal schedule in regular dataflow networks. Journal of VLSI Signal Processing 31, 3 (2002), p. 207--229.]]
[10]
C.-T. Hwang et al. A formal approach to the scheduling problem in high-level synthesis. IEEE Trans. on Computer-Aided Design 10, 4 (1991), p. 464--475.]]
[11]
E. Lee and D. Messerschmitt. Static scheduling of synchronous data flow programs for digital signal processing. IEEE Trans. on Comp. 36, 1 (1987), p. 24--35.]]
[12]
P. Murthy and S. Bhattacharyy. Shared memory implementations of synchronous dataflow specifications. In DATE'00, Proc. (March 2000), IEEE, p. 404--410.]]
[13]
Q. Ning and G. Gao. A novel framework of register allocation for software pipelining. In Symp. on Principles of Programming Languages, Proc. (1993), ACM, p. 29--42.]]
[14]
H. Oh and S. Ha. Efficient code synthesis from extended dataflow graphs. In DAC'02, Proc. (2002), IEEE, p. 275--280.]]
[15]
P. Poplavko, T. Basten, M. Bekooij, J. van Meerbergen, and B. Mesman. Task-level timing models for guaranteed performance in multiprocessor networks-on-chip. In Compilers, Architecture and Synthesis for Embedded Systems, CASES'03, Proc. (2003), ACM, p. 63--72.]]
[16]
S. Ritz et al. Scheduling for optimum data memory compaction in block diagram oriented software synthesis. In Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Proc. (1995), IEEE, p. 2651--2654.]]
[17]
S. Shukla and R. Gupta. A model checking approach to evaluating system level dynamic power management policies for embedded systems. In High-Level Design Validation and Test, Proc. (2001), IEEE, p. 53--57.]]
[18]
S. Sriram and S. Bhattacharyya. Embedded Multi-processors Scheduling and Synchronization. Marcel Dekker, 2000.]]
[19]
S. Stuijk, M. Geilen, and T. Basten. Exploring trade-offs in buffer requirements and throughput constraints for synchronous dataflow graphs. Tech. Report, TU Eindhoven. http://www.es.ele.tue.nl/esreports/esr-2006-01.pdf]]
[20]
S. Stuijk, M. Geilen, and T. Basten. SDF3: SDF for free. In ACSD'06, Proc. (2006), IEEE. http://www.es.ele.tue.nl/sdf3]]

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Exploring Multi-Reader Buffers and Channel Placement During Dataflow Network Mapping to Heterogeneous Many-Core SystemsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.337507912(39748-39769)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2023)Streaming Task Graph Scheduling for Dataflow ArchitecturesProceedings of the 32nd International Symposium on High-Performance Parallel and Distributed Computing10.1145/3588195.3592999(225-237)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2023
  • (2022)K-Periodic Scheduling for Throughput-Buffering Trade-Off Exploration of CSDFACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems10.1145/355976022:1(1-28)Online publication date: 29-Oct-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Exploring trade-offs in buffer requirements and throughput constraints for synchronous dataflow graphs

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    DAC '06: Proceedings of the 43rd annual Design Automation Conference
    July 2006
    1166 pages
    ISBN:1595933816
    DOI:10.1145/1146909
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 24 July 2006

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. buffering
    2. optimization
    3. synchronous dataflow
    4. throughput

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Conference

    DAC06
    Sponsor:
    DAC06: The 43rd Annual Design Automation Conference 2006
    July 24 - 28, 2006
    CA, San Francisco, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,770 of 5,499 submissions, 32%

    Upcoming Conference

    DAC '25
    62nd ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference
    June 22 - 26, 2025
    San Francisco , CA , USA

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)19
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
    Reflects downloads up to 06 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Exploring Multi-Reader Buffers and Channel Placement During Dataflow Network Mapping to Heterogeneous Many-Core SystemsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.337507912(39748-39769)Online publication date: 2024
    • (2023)Streaming Task Graph Scheduling for Dataflow ArchitecturesProceedings of the 32nd International Symposium on High-Performance Parallel and Distributed Computing10.1145/3588195.3592999(225-237)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2023
    • (2022)K-Periodic Scheduling for Throughput-Buffering Trade-Off Exploration of CSDFACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems10.1145/355976022:1(1-28)Online publication date: 29-Oct-2022
    • (2022)DFSynthesizer: Dataflow-based Synthesis of Spiking Neural Networks to Neuromorphic HardwareACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems10.1145/347915621:3(1-35)Online publication date: 28-May-2022
    • (2022)ChordMap: Automated Mapping of Streaming Applications Onto CGRAIEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems10.1109/TCAD.2021.305831341:2(306-319)Online publication date: Feb-2022
    • (2022)Real-Time Scheduling of Machine Learning Operations on Heterogeneous Neuromorphic SoC2022 20th ACM-IEEE International Conference on Formal Methods and Models for System Design (MEMOCODE)10.1109/MEMOCODE57689.2022.9954596(1-12)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2022
    • (2022)A survey of main dataflow MoCCs for CPS design and verification2022 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Embedded Multicore/Many-core Systems-on-Chip (MCSoC)10.1109/MCSoC57363.2022.00010(1-9)Online publication date: Dec-2022
    • (2022)Strictly Periodic Scheduling of Cyclo-Static Dataflow ModelsEmbedded Computer Systems: Architectures, Modeling, and Simulation10.1007/978-3-031-04580-6_15(229-241)Online publication date: 27-Apr-2022
    • (2021)Code-size-aware Scheduling of Synchronous Dataflow Graphs on Multicore SystemsACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems10.1145/344003420:3(1-24)Online publication date: 27-Mar-2021
    • (2021)A Design Flow for Mapping Spiking Neural Networks to Many-Core Neuromorphic Hardware2021 IEEE/ACM International Conference On Computer Aided Design (ICCAD)10.1109/ICCAD51958.2021.9643500(1-9)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2021
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media