Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1147261.1147277acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespdcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Whose participation? whose knowledge?: exploring PD in Tanzania-Zanzibar and Sweden

Published: 01 August 2006 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper we discuss two Participatory Design (PD) projects, one in Tanzania-Zanzibar and the other one in Sweden. In both countries the design process was done through the analysis of work practices involving both designers and users. The discussion focuses on a number of factors such as location, time and scene. We also ask how different projects can be that it is still possible to talk about PD as an overall participation and design approach. If PD is not a singular, definite, closed and fixed approach on the explicit layers, so how do these projects relate to each other when focusing on methods embracing the ambiguities of participation? The paper ends with a discussion of differences and similarities considering participation in the projects.

References

[1]
Beck, E P for Political: Participation is Not Enough. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 14, 1, (2002), 77--92.
[2]
Bjerknes, G., Bratteteig, T. User Participation and Democracy, A Discussion of Scandinavian Research on System Development. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 1, 7, (1995), 73--98.
[3]
Brandt, E., Messeter, J. Facilitating Collaboration through Design Games. In Proceedings of Participatory Design Conference (PDC), Toronto, New York City, USA. ACM Press, 2004, 121--131.
[4]
Bratteteig, T. Making Change. Dealing with relations between design and use. Dr. Philos dissertation, Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, 2004.
[5]
Bratteteig, T., Stolterman, E. Design in groups--and all that jazz. In Kyng, M, Mathiassen, L. (eds). Computers and Design in Context. MIT Press, Cambrigde, Mass., London, 1997, 289--316.
[6]
Braa, J., Hedberg, C. The Struggle for District-Based Health Information Systems in South Africa. The Information Society 18, 2, (2002), 113--127.
[7]
Bødker, K., Kensing, F. and Simonsen, J. Participatory IT Design. Designing for Business and Workplace Realities. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England, 2004.
[8]
Bødker, S. A for Alternatives. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 15, 1 (2003), 87--89.
[9]
Ehn, P, Scandinavian Design: on Participation and Skill. In Schuler, D., Namioka, A. (eds.) Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1993, 41--77.
[10]
Elovaara, P. Angels in Unstable Sociomaterial Relations: Stories of Information Technology. Karlskrona, Blekinge Institute of Technology, 2004.
[11]
Gaver, B., Beaver, J. et al (2003) Ambiguity as a Resource for Design. In Proc. CHI 2003, ACM Press (2003), 223--240.
[12]
Göranzon, B. The practical Intellect: Computers and Skills. Springer Verlag, London, Berlin, cop. 1993 Carlssons, Stockhom, 1996.
[13]
Hansson, P-A. Folkhemmet, medborgarhemmet {People's home, citizens' home}. In Hansson, P-A, Demokrati: tal och uppsatser {Democrary: speeches and essays}, pp. 19--32. Tiden, Stockholm, 1935.
[14]
Haraway, D. J. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. Routledge, New York, 1991.
[15]
hooks, b Feminism is for Everybody: passionate politics. South End Press, Cambridge MA, 2000.
[16]
Karasti, H. Gendered Expertise and Participation in Systems Design. In Mörtberg, C., Elovaara, P. and Lundgren, A. (eds) How to make a difference?: Information Technology, Transnational Democracy and Gender. Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, 2003, 29--49.
[17]
Kimaro, H. C., Titlestad, O. H. Challenges of User Participation in a Design of Computer Based System: The Possibility of Participatory Customisation in Low Income Countries. In IFIP WG 9.4 Working Conference. Enhancing Human Resource Development through ICT, May 26--28 2005, Nicol Hilton Hotel, Abuja, Nigeria.
[18]
Law, J After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. Routledge, London, New York, 2004.
[19]
Loi, D, Voderberg, M, Manrique, P, Marwah, S;, Liney B. "Live like I do" -- a Field Experience Using Cultural Probes. In Proceedings of Participatory Design Conference (PDC), Toronto, New York City, USA. ACM Press, 2004, 121--131.
[20]
Markussen, R. Politics of Intervention: Feminist Reflections on the Scandinavian Tradition. AI & Society, 1996, 10, pp. 127--141.
[21]
Molander, B. Kunskap i handling {Knowledge in Action}. Daidalos, Göteborg, 1996
[22]
Mörtberg, C. Medborgare i en digital tid - aktörer eller konsumenter? {A Citizen in a Digital Era: Actors or Consumers?}. Oslo: Nordisk institutt for kvinne- og kjønnsforskning. NIKK Småskrifter nr. 9, 2004.
[23]
Mörtberg, C., Stuedahl, D. Silences and Sensibilities -- increasing participation in IT design. In Proceedings of The Fourth Decennial Aarhus Conference, Denmark (ACM)(2005), 141--144
[24]
Puri, S., Byrne, E., Nhampossa, J. L. and Quraishi Z. B. Contextuality of Participation in IS Design: a Developing Country Perspective. In Proceedings of Participatory Design Conference PDC) Toronto, New York City, USA. ACM Press, 2000, 42 -- 52.
[25]
Rydhagen, B. Feminist sanitary engineering as a participatory alternative in South Africa and Sweden. Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, 2002
[26]
Regeringens proposition 1999/2000:125 Ett informationssamhälle för alla {Government Bill 1999/2000:125 An Information Society for All}, http://www.regeringen.se {2006-01-15}.
[27]
Sahay, S., Avgerou, C. Introducing the Special Issue on Information and Communication Technologies in Developing Countries. The Information Society 18, 2, (2002), 73--76.
[28]
Shapiro, D. Participatory Design: the will to succeed. In Bertelsen et al. (eds.) Between Sense and Sensibility Critical Computing Aarhus 2005 Proceedings ACM, pp 29--38, 2005.
[29]
Star, S. L. Misplaced Concretism and Concrete Situations: Feminism, Method and Information Technology. Gender-Nature-Culture Feminist Research Network, Working paper 11, Odense University, Odense, 1994
[30]
Star, S. I., Strauss, A. Layers of Silence, Arenas of Voice: The Ecology of Visible and Invisible Work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 8, (1999), 9--30.
[31]
Suchman, L. Located Accountabilities in Technology Production. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 14, 2, (2002), 91--105.
[32]
Suchman, L., Trigg, R.: Understanding Practice: Video as a Medium for Reflection and Design, In Greenbaum, J., Kyng, M. Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Lawrence Earlbaum Hillsdale, 1991.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Health Management Information and Evidence in Primary Health Care in TanzaniaPrimary Health Care in Tanzania through a Health Systems Lens10.1079/9781800623330.0006(124-154)Online publication date: 8-Sep-2023
  • (2023)Breaking New Ground: Stories from the WildTorn Many Ways10.1007/978-3-031-31642-5_10(139-152)Online publication date: 10-Oct-2023
  • (2018)Participatory Design in Emerging Civic Engagement Initiatives in the New Public SectorACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/315242025:1(1-26)Online publication date: 30-Jan-2018
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Whose participation? whose knowledge?: exploring PD in Tanzania-Zanzibar and Sweden

    Recommendations

    Reviews

    Barrett Hazeltine

    In participatory design (PD), users are involved in the design of a project. Two information technology (IT) projects are described in this paper: one is a hospital information system in Zanzibar, and the other is the improvement of e-government in Sweden. Both projects consist of joint analysis of work practices by users and designers. A full description is given of how the designers attempted to gain the trust of the users and learn their perspective. As expected, the projects differed in many ways besides location: accessibility of participants, reasons for participation, IT knowledge and culture of users, availability of electricity, and import tariffs. The key question is how to maintain the core purpose of PD-to encourage participation in the face of different experiences and knowledge. The research seems to indicate no universal rules exist. The strength of PD is in its capacity to be transformed by the situation at hand. One objective of the study was to find methods to support cooperation between designers and users, while keeping their positions separate. Again, effective techniques seem to depend on the local setting; what works in Sweden may not work in Zanzibar, but the objectives and philosophy of PD should be constant. Both improving the effectiveness of participatory design and allowing for cultural differences in a design are important issues. This paper has some illuminating points, but offers no strong guidelines on what to do. Online Computing Reviews Service

    Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

    Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    PDC '06: Proceedings of the ninth conference on Participatory design: Expanding boundaries in design - Volume 1
    August 2006
    149 pages
    ISBN:159593460X
    DOI:10.1145/1147261
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    • CPSR: Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 August 2006

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Sweden
    2. Tanzania-Zanzibar
    3. ambiguity
    4. differences
    5. methods
    6. participation
    7. work practices

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Conference

    PDC'06
    Sponsor:
    • CPSR
    PDC'06: Expanding Boundaries in Design
    August 1 - 5, 2006
    Trento, Italy

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 49 of 289 submissions, 17%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)13
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 01 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Health Management Information and Evidence in Primary Health Care in TanzaniaPrimary Health Care in Tanzania through a Health Systems Lens10.1079/9781800623330.0006(124-154)Online publication date: 8-Sep-2023
    • (2023)Breaking New Ground: Stories from the WildTorn Many Ways10.1007/978-3-031-31642-5_10(139-152)Online publication date: 10-Oct-2023
    • (2018)Participatory Design in Emerging Civic Engagement Initiatives in the New Public SectorACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/315242025:1(1-26)Online publication date: 30-Jan-2018
    • (2018)Insights, Solutions and Empowerment: a framework for evaluating participatory designCoDesign10.1080/15710882.2018.154064117:1(1-21)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2018
    • (2018)Feminist Technoscience as a Resource for Working with Science Practices, a Critical Approach, and Gender Equality in Swedish Higher IT EducationsThis Changes Everything – ICT and Climate Change: What Can We Do?10.1007/978-3-319-99605-9_16(221-231)Online publication date: 26-Aug-2018
    • (2018)Participatory Design Approach to Internet of Things: Co-designing a Smart Shower for and with People with DisabilitiesUniversal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Virtual, Augmented, and Intelligent Environments10.1007/978-3-319-92052-8_19(246-261)Online publication date: 6-Jun-2018
    • (2017)Informed Systems for Participatory Organizations : Contributions from International ResearchersDilemmas 2015 Papers from the 18th annual International Conference Dilemmas for Human Services: Organizing, Designing and Managing10.15626/dirc.2015.09Online publication date: 29-Mar-2017
    • (2017)Designing an ICT self-management service: suggestions from persons with type 2 diabetesHealth and Technology10.1007/s12553-016-0176-97:2-3(197-206)Online publication date: 11-Jan-2017
    • (2017)Creativity and design to articulate difference in the conflicted city: collective intelligence in Bogota’s grassroots organisationsAI & SOCIETY10.1007/s00146-017-0716-533:1(147-158)Online publication date: 5-Apr-2017
    • (2016)Migration of a sharing platform from Copenhagen to AarhusProceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Interactive Exhibitions, Workshops - Volume 210.1145/2948076.2948098(107-108)Online publication date: 15-Aug-2016
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media