Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1254882.1254886acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmetricsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

QoS policies and architecture for cache/memory in CMP platforms

Published: 12 June 2007 Publication History

Abstract

As we enter the era of CMP platforms with multiple threads/cores on the die, the diversity of the simultaneous workloads running on them is expected to increase. The rapid deployment of virtualization as a means to consolidate workloads on to a single platform is a prime example of this trend. In such scenarios, the quality of service (QoS) that each individual workload gets from the platform can widely vary depending on the behavior of the simultaneously running workloads. While the number of cores assigned to each workload can be controlled, there is no hardware or software support in today's platforms to control allocation of platform resources such as cache space and memory bandwidth to individual workloads. In this paper, we propose a QoS-enabled memory architecture for CMP platforms that addresses this problem. The QoS-enabled memory architecture enables more cache resources (i.e. space) and memory resources (i.e. bandwidth) for high priority applications based on guidance from the operating environment. The architecture also allows dynamic resource reassignment during run-time to further optimize the performance of the high priority application with minimal degradation to low priority. To achieve these goals, we will describe the hardware/software support required in the platform as well as the operating environment (O/S and virtual machine monitor). Our evaluation framework consists of detailed platform simulation models and a QoS-enabled version of Linux. Based on evaluation experiments, we show the effectiveness of a QoS-enabled architecture and summarize key findings/trade-offs.

References

[1]
Azul Systems. Azul Compute Appliance. http://www.azulsystems.com/products/cpools_cappliance.html
[2]
P. Barham, et al. Xen and the Art of Virtualization. In Proc. of the ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles (SOSP), Oct 2003.
[3]
D. Chandra, F. Guo, S. Kim, and Y. Solihin. Predicting inter-thread cache contention on a chip multiprocessor architecture", In Proc. of 11th International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA), Feb 2005.
[4]
T. Deshane, D. Dimatos, et al. Performance Isolation of a Misbehaving Virtual Machine with Xen, VMware and Solaris Containers. http://people.clarkson.edu/~jnm/publications/isolationOfMisbehavingVMs.pdf.
[5]
L. Hsu, S. Reinhardt, R. Iyer and S. Makineni. Communist, Utilitarian, and Capitalist Policies on CMPs: Caches as a Shared Resource. In Proc. of 15th International Conference on Parallel Architectures and Compilation Techniques (PACT), Sept 2006.
[6]
R. P. Goldberg. Survey of virtual machine research. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 1974.
[7]
Intel Corporation. Intel Dual-Core Processors-The First Multi-core Revolution. http://www.intel.com/technology/computing/dual-core/.
[8]
R. Iyer. On Modeling and Analyzing Cache Performance using CASPER. In Proc. of 11th International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer & Telecom Systems, Oct 2003.
[9]
R. Iyer. CQoS: A Framework for Enabling QoS in Shared Caches of CMP Platforms. In Proc. of 18th Annual International Conference on Supercomputing (ICS'04), July 2004.
[10]
S. Kim, D. Chandra, and Y. Solihin. Fair Cache Sharing and Partitioning in a Chip Multiprocessor Architecture. In Proc. of 13th Int'l Conf. on Parallel Arch. & Complication Techniques(PACT), Sept 2004.
[11]
P. Kongetira, K. Aingaran, and K. Olukotun. Niagara: A 32-Way Multithreaded Sparc Processor.In Proc. of Annual International Symposium on Microarchitecture(MICRO), Mar 2005.
[12]
K. Krewell. Best Servers of 2004: Multicore is Norm. Microprocessor Report, www.mpronline.com, Jan 2005.
[13]
R. Kumar, D. M. Tullsen, N. P. Jouppi, P. Ranganathan. Heterogeneous Chip Multiprocessors. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 2005.
[14]
J. Laudon. Performance/Watt: The New Server Focus. In 1st Workshop on Design, Architecture and Simulation of CMP (dasCMP), Nov 2005.
[15]
K. Lee, T. Lin and C. Jen. An Efficient Quality-Aware Memory Controller for Multimedia Platform SoC. IEEE Trans. On Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, May 2005.
[16]
C. Natarajan, B. Christenson, and F. Briggs. Performance Impact of Memory Controller Features in Multiprocessor Server Environment. In 3rd Workshop on Memory Performance Issues, 2004.
[17]
Kyle J. Nesbit, et al. Fair Queuing Memory Systems. In Proc. of Annual International Symposium on Microarchitecture (MICRO), June 2006.
[18]
K. Olukotun, B. A. Nayfeh, et. al. The case for a single-chip multiprocessor. In Proc. of the 7th International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS), Oct 1996.
[19]
M. K. Qureshi and Y. N. Patt. Utility-Based Cache Partitioning: A Low-Overhead, High-Performance, Runtime Mechanism to Partition Shared Caches In Proc. of Annual Int'l Symposium on Microarchitecture (MICRO), June 2006.
[20]
N. Rafique, W. T. Lim and M. Thottethodi. Architectural Support for Operating System-Driven CMP Cache Management. In Proc. of the 15th International Conference on Parallel Architectures and Compilation Technology (PACT 2006), Sept 2006.
[21]
P. Ranganathan and N. Jouppi. Enterprise IT Trends and Implications on Architecture Research. In Proc. of the 11th International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA), Feb 2005.
[22]
S. Rixner, W. J. Dally, U. J. Kapasi, et al. Memory access scheduling. In Proc. of the International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA), June 2000.
[23]
M. Rosenblum and T. Garfinkel. Virtual Machine Monitors: Current Technology and Future Trends. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 2005.
[24]
L. Sha, R. Rajkumar and J. P. Lehoczky. Priority Inheritance Protocols: An Approach to Real-Time Synchronization. IEEE Transactions on Computers, Sept 1990.
[25]
SPECint, http://www.spec.org/cpu2000/SPECint
[26]
SPECjbb2005, http://www.spec.org/jbb2005
[27]
H. S. Stone, J. Turek, and J. L. Wolf. Optimal partitioning of cache memory. IEEE Transactions on Computers, Sept 1992.
[28]
G. Suh, S. Devadas, and L. Rudolph. A New Memory Monitoring Scheme for Memory-Aware Scheduling and Partitioning. In Proc. of International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA), Feb 2002.
[29]
"Test TCP (TTCP) Benchmarking Tool", http://www.pcausa.com
[30]
"TPC-C Design Document", http://www.tpc.org/tpcc/
[31]
R. Uhlig, et al., "Intel Virtualization Technology," IEEE Transactions on Computers, 2005.
[32]
R. Uhlig, R. Fishtein, et. al. SoftSDV: A Presilicon Software Development Environment for the IA-64 Architecture. Intel Technology Journal. (http://www.intel.com/technology/itjf)
[33]
T. Y. Yeh and G. Reinman. Fast and Fair: Data-stream Quality of Service. In Proc. of International Conference of Compilers, Architecture and System For Embedded Systems (CASES), July 2004.
[34]
L. Zhao, J. Moses, R. Iyer, et al. Architectural Evaluation of Large-Scale CMP Platforms using ManySim. In Intel's Design & Test Technology Conference (DTTC), Aug 2006.
[35]
H. Zhang. Service Disciplines for Guaranteed Performance Service in Packet-switching Networks. In Proc. of IEEE, Oct. 1995.
[36]
Z. Zhu and Z. Zhang. A Performance Comparison of DRAM Memory System Optimizations for SMT Processors. In Proc, of the 11th International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA), Feb 2005.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)SDRP: Safe, Efficient, and SLO-Aware Workload Consolidation Through Secure and Dynamic Resource PartitioningIEEE Transactions on Services Computing10.1109/TSC.2020.302455215:4(1868-1882)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2022
  • (2021)Advances in Microprocessor Cache Architectures Over the Last 25 YearsIEEE Micro10.1109/MM.2021.311490341:6(78-88)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2021
  • (2021)Leaky Buddies: Cross-Component Covert Channels on Integrated CPU-GPU Systems2021 ACM/IEEE 48th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA)10.1109/ISCA52012.2021.00080(972-984)Online publication date: Jun-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. QoS policies and architecture for cache/memory in CMP platforms

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGMETRICS '07: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGMETRICS international conference on Measurement and modeling of computer systems
    June 2007
    398 pages
    ISBN:9781595936394
    DOI:10.1145/1254882
    • cover image ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review
      ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review  Volume 35, Issue 1
      SIGMETRICS '07 Conference Proceedings
      June 2007
      382 pages
      ISSN:0163-5999
      DOI:10.1145/1269899
      Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 12 June 2007

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. CMP
    2. QoS
    3. cache/memory
    4. performance
    5. quality of service
    6. resource sharing priniciples
    7. service level agreements

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Conference

    SIGMETRICS07

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 459 of 2,691 submissions, 17%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)27
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
    Reflects downloads up to 11 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2022)SDRP: Safe, Efficient, and SLO-Aware Workload Consolidation Through Secure and Dynamic Resource PartitioningIEEE Transactions on Services Computing10.1109/TSC.2020.302455215:4(1868-1882)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2022
    • (2021)Advances in Microprocessor Cache Architectures Over the Last 25 YearsIEEE Micro10.1109/MM.2021.311490341:6(78-88)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2021
    • (2021)Leaky Buddies: Cross-Component Covert Channels on Integrated CPU-GPU Systems2021 ACM/IEEE 48th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA)10.1109/ISCA52012.2021.00080(972-984)Online publication date: Jun-2021
    • (2020)RLDRM: Closed Loop Dynamic Cache Allocation with Deep Reinforcement Learning for Network Function Virtualization2020 6th IEEE Conference on Network Softwarization (NetSoft)10.1109/NetSoft48620.2020.9165471(335-343)Online publication date: Jun-2020
    • (2019)DICERProceedings of the 48th International Conference on Parallel Processing10.1145/3337821.3337891(1-10)Online publication date: 5-Aug-2019
    • (2019)CoPartProceedings of the Fourteenth EuroSys Conference 201910.1145/3302424.3303963(1-16)Online publication date: 25-Mar-2019
    • (2019)TA-LRWIEEE Transactions on Computers10.1109/TC.2018.287543968:3(455-470)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2019
    • (2019)Enforcing Last-level Cache Partitioning through Memory Virtual ChannelsProceedings of the International Conference on Parallel Architectures and Compilation Techniques10.1109/PACT.2019.00016(97-109)Online publication date: 23-Sep-2019
    • (2019)Combining Prefetch Control and Cache Partitioning to Improve Multicore Performance2019 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS)10.1109/IPDPS.2019.00103(953-962)Online publication date: May-2019
    • (2019)Enhancing Server Efficiency in the Face of Killer Microseconds2019 IEEE International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA)10.1109/HPCA.2019.00037(185-198)Online publication date: Feb-2019
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media