Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1282380.1282396acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free access

Can internet video-on-demand be profitable?

Published: 27 August 2007 Publication History

Abstract

Video-on-demand in the Internet has become an immensely popular service in recent years. But due to its high bandwidth requirements and popularity, it is also a costly service to provide. We consider the design and potential benefits of peer-assisted video-on-demand, in which participating peers assist the server in delivering VoD content. The assistance is done in such a way that it provides the same user quality experience as pure client-server distribution. We focus on the single-video approach, whereby a peer only redistributes a video that it is currently watching.
Using a nine-month trace from a client-server VoD deployment for MSN Video, we assess what the 95 percentile server bandwidth costs would have been if a peer-assisted employment had been instead used. We show that peer-assistance can dramatically reduce server bandwidth costs, particularly if peers prefetch content when there is spare upload capacity in the system. We consider the impact of peer-assisted VoD on the cross-traffic among ISPs. Although this traffic is significant, if care is taken to localize the P2P traffic within the ISPs, we can eliminate the ISP cross traffic while still achieving important reductions in server bandwidth. We also develop a simple analytical model which captures many of the critical features of peer-assisted VoD, including its operational modes.

References

[1]
L. Gomes, "Will All of Us Get Our 15 Minutes On a YouTube Video?"Wall Street Journal, Aug. 30, 2006.
[2]
"Windows Media Services SDK Client Combination Logs,"http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms741431.aspx.
[3]
B. Cheng, X. Liu, Z. Zhang, and H. Jin, "A Measurement Study of a Peer-to-Peer Video-on-Demand System,"IPTPS, Bellevue, WA, Feb. 2007.
[4]
C. Huang, J. Li, and K. W. Ross, "Peer-Assisted VoD: Making Internet Video Distribution Cheap,"IPTPS, Bellevue, WA, Feb. 2007.
[5]
W. B. Norton, "The Evolution of the U.S. Internet Peering System,"whitepaper, Equinix Inc., 2003.
[6]
W. B. Norton, "Internet Service Providers and Peering,"white paper, Equinix Inc., 2001.
[7]
CAIDA. CoralReef suite. http://www.caida.org/tools/measurement/coralreef.
[8]
CAIDA. AS Relationships Data. Research Project. http://www.caida.org/data/active/as-relationships.
[9]
L. Gao, "On Inferring Automonous System Relationships in the Internet,"IEEE/ACM Trans. on Networking, 9(6), Dec. 2001.
[10]
X. Dimitropoulos, D. Krioukov, M. Fomenkov, B. Huffaker, Y. Hyun, kc claffy, and G. Riley, "AS Relationships: Inference and Validation,"ACM SIGCOMM CCR, 37(1), 2007.
[11]
B. Cohen, "Incentives to Build Robustness in BitTorrent,"Workshop on Economics of P2P Systems, 2003.
[12]
A. Legout, G. Urvoy-Keller, and P. Michiardi. "Rarest First and Choke Algorithms Are Enough,"ACM IMC, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Oct. 2006.
[13]
A. Bharambe, C. Herley, and V. Padmanabhan, "Analyzing and Improving a BitTorrent Network's Performance Mechanisms,"IEEE INFOCOM, Barcelona, Spain, 2006.
[14]
D. Qiu, and R. Srikant, "Modeling and Performance Analysis of BitTorrent-like Peer-to-Peer Networks,"ACM SIGCOMM, Portland, Sep. 2004.
[15]
K. Sripanidkulchai, A. Ganjam, B. Maggs, and H. Zhang, "The Feasibility of Supporting Large-Scale Live Streaming Applications with Dynamic Application End-Points,"ACM SIGCOMM, Portland, Sep. 2004.
[16]
D. Xu, S. Kulkarni, C. Rosenberg, H.-K. Chai, "Analysis of a CDN-P2P Hybrid Architecture for Cost-Effective Streaming Distribution, "ACM/Springer Multimedia Systems Journal, 11(4), 2006.
[17]
Y. C. Tu, J. Sun, M. Hefeeda, and S. Prabhakar, "An Analytical Study of Peer-to-Peer Media Streaming Systems,"ACM TOMCCAP, 1(4), 2005.
[18]
Y. Guo, S. Mathur, K. Ramaswamy, S. Yuy, and B. Patel, "PONDER: Providing Commercial-Quality Video-on-Demand Service Using Peer-to-Peer Network,"submitted.
[19]
A. Al Hamra, E. W. Biersack, and G. Urvoy-Keller, "A Pull-based Approach for a VoD Service in P2P Networks,"IEEE HSNMC, Toulouse, France, Jul. 2004.
[20]
Y. Cui, B. Li, and K. Nahrstedt, "oStream: A synchronous Streaming Multicast in Application-Layer Overlay Networks,"IEEE JSAC, 22(1), 2004.
[21]
J. Li, Y. Cui, and B. Chang, "PeerStreaming: Design and Implementation of an On-Demand Distributed Streaming System with DRM Capabilities,"Multimedia Systems Journal, 2007.
[22]
S. Annapureddy, C. Gkantsidis, P. R. Rodriguez, and L.Massoulie, "Providing Video-on-Demand Using Peer-to-Peer Networks,"Microsoft Research Technical Report, MSR-TR-2005-147, Oct. 2005.

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)An Incentive Compatible Mechanism for Replica Placement in Peer-Assisted Content DistributionInternational Journal of Software Science and Computational Intelligence10.4018/IJSSCI.202001010412:1(47-67)Online publication date: Jan-2020
  • (2019)AutoTune: Game-Based Adaptive Bitrate Streaming in Cloud-Based Hybrid VoD SystemsIEEE Transactions on Services Computing10.1109/TSC.2016.260508212:4(519-533)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2019
  • (2019)Joint Content Distribution and Traffic Engineering of Adaptive Videos in Telco-CDNsIEEE INFOCOM 2019 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications10.1109/INFOCOM.2019.8737635(1342-1350)Online publication date: Apr-2019
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGCOMM '07: Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications
August 2007
432 pages
ISBN:9781595937131
DOI:10.1145/1282380
  • cover image ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
    ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review  Volume 37, Issue 4
    October 2007
    420 pages
    ISSN:0146-4833
    DOI:10.1145/1282427
    Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 27 August 2007

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. ISP-friendly
  2. peer-to-peer
  3. video-on-demand

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

SIGCOMM07
Sponsor:
SIGCOMM07: ACM SIGCOMM 2007 Conference
August 27 - 31, 2007
Kyoto, Japan

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 462 of 3,389 submissions, 14%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)168
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)24
Reflects downloads up to 07 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)An Incentive Compatible Mechanism for Replica Placement in Peer-Assisted Content DistributionInternational Journal of Software Science and Computational Intelligence10.4018/IJSSCI.202001010412:1(47-67)Online publication date: Jan-2020
  • (2019)AutoTune: Game-Based Adaptive Bitrate Streaming in Cloud-Based Hybrid VoD SystemsIEEE Transactions on Services Computing10.1109/TSC.2016.260508212:4(519-533)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2019
  • (2019)Joint Content Distribution and Traffic Engineering of Adaptive Videos in Telco-CDNsIEEE INFOCOM 2019 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications10.1109/INFOCOM.2019.8737635(1342-1350)Online publication date: Apr-2019
  • (2018)A Survey on Flash Translation Layer for NAND Flash MemoryIndian Journal of Science and Technology10.17485/ijst/2018/v11i23/12564111:23(1-7)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2018
  • (2018)Toward Efficient Short-Video Sharing in the YouTube Social NetworkACM Transactions on Internet Technology10.1145/313756918:3(1-25)Online publication date: 6-Mar-2018
  • (2018)Access Types Effect on Internet Video Services and Its Implications on CDN CachingIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology10.1109/TCSVT.2017.265248728:5(1183-1196)Online publication date: May-2018
  • (2018)A Two-Step Server Selection in Hybrid CDN-P2P Mesh-based for Video-on-Demand Streaming2018 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC)10.1109/ICTC.2018.8539453(499-504)Online publication date: Oct-2018
  • (2018)Content Placement for Video-on-Demand Services Over Cellular NetworksWireless Personal Communications: An International Journal10.1007/s11277-017-4879-798:1(467-486)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2018
  • (2017)Geocacher's co-creation to sharing their own playful treasure hunt video experiences around the worldInternational Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations10.5555/3141312.314131317:2-3(105-125)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2017
  • (2017)CloudFogIEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems10.1109/TPDS.2016.256342828:2(431-445)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2017
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media