Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1355238.1355266acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescprConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The role of technology and authentic task contexts in promoting inclusive learning for disabled and non-disabled college students

Published: 03 April 2008 Publication History

Abstract

Although most online courses offered by institutions of higher learning are accessible to both the disabled and non-disabled student population, little empirical research is available on how inclusive the online courses are. Fulfilling mandated accessibility requirements may not always connote inclusivity. As such, educational institutions may unwittingly foster separate educational tracks for disabled Vs non-disabled students; while simultaneously paying mere lip service to the notion of "making reasonable accommodations" for their disabled student population as required by law. In this research project, we intend to use our current understanding of how humans learn in technology enabled environments and findings in cognitive neuroscience, to develop and assess the effectiveness of online course materials that will be made inclusively accessible to both disabled and non-disabled students. Our initial focus is on Science, Technology Engineering and Math (STEM) online courses offered to college level blind and deaf as well as sighted/hearing students.

References

[1]
American Disability Act (ADA) of 1990; Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) of 1975 - as amended in 1997 & 2004.
[2]
BADDELEY, A. D. (2002). Is Working Memory Still Working? European Psychologist, Vol. 7 (2), 85--97.
[3]
BADDELEY, A. D. (1999). Human Memory. Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA.
[4]
BAVELIER, D. & NEVILLE, H. J. (2002). Cross-Modal Plasticity: Where and How? Nature Reviews, Neuroscience, (3), 443--452.
[5]
BAVELIER, D., DYEL, M. W. G. & HAUSER, P. C. (2006). Do deaf individuals see better? TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 10 (11): 512--518.
[6]
BELCH, H. A. (ED.). (2000). Serving Students with Disabilities. New Directions for Student Services, (91). Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
[7]
CARROLL, J. M. {ED.} (2002). Human Computer Interaction in the New Millennium. MA: Boston, Addison Wesley and ACM Press, New York, NY.
[8]
CLARK, R., NGUYEN, F., AND SWELLER, J. (2006). Efficiency in Learning: Evidence-Based Guidelines to Manage Cognitive Load. Pfeiffer, San Francisco, CA.
[9]
GUPTA, S. & BOSTROM, R. P. (2006). End-user training methods: what we know, need to know. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGMIS CPR Conference On Computer Personnel Research: Forty Four Years of Computer Personnel Research: Achievements, Challenges and the Future. Claremont, California, RYAN, T. & KAISER, K. (Eds). The Association of Computing Machinery USA, 172--182.
[10]
HANNAN, C. K. (2006). Review of Research: Neuroscience and the Impact of Brain Plasticity on Braille Reading. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 100(7), 397--413.
[11]
MAYER, R. E. (2001) Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
[12]
NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
[13]
O'NEIL, H. F.{Ed.} (2003). What Works in Distance Learning. ONR KMT What Works in Distance Learning Office of Naval Research Award Number N00014-02-1--0179.
[14]
POWER-DEFUR, L. A. & ORELOVE, F. P. (1997). Inclusive Education: Practical Implementation of the Least Restrictive Environment. Boston: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
[15]
ROBERTS, J. C. (2004). Visualization Equivalence for Multisensory Perception. In Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Conference on Information Visualization, CHEN, J. X. & BOWEN LOFTIN, R. L. {Eds.}, IEEE CS and the AIP, London, UK, 61--65.
[16]
ROENNBERG, J. (1995). Perceptual compensation in the deaf and blind: Myth or reality? In R. A. DIXON AND L. BAECKMAN (Eds.), Compensating for Psychological Deficits and Declines: Managing Losses and Promoting Gains, NJ: Hillsdale, Lawrence Erlbaum Associations, Inc., New Jersey, NJ, 251--274.
[17]
SHIMOJO, S. & SHAMS, L. (2001). Sensory modalities are not separate modalities: plasticity and interactions. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11, 505--509.
[18]
SPENCE, C. & DRIVER, J. (1996). Audiovisual links in endogenous covert spatial attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1005--30.
[19]
SWELLER, J., VAN MERRIENBOER, J., & PAAS, F. (1998). "Cognitive architecture and instructional design." Educational Psychology Review 10: 251--296.
[20]
TROIANO, P. F. (2003). College Students and Learning Disability: Elements of Self-Style. Journal of College Student Development, 44(3) 404--419

Cited By

View all
  • (2013)Computer PersonnelProceedings of the 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences10.1109/HICSS.2013.141(4105-4114)Online publication date: 7-Jan-2013
  • (2012)Observations regarding the history of the study of computer personnelProceedings of the 50th annual conference on Computers and People Research10.1145/2214091.2214140(189-198)Online publication date: 31-May-2012

Index Terms

  1. The role of technology and authentic task contexts in promoting inclusive learning for disabled and non-disabled college students

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGMIS CPR '08: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMIS CPR conference on Computer personnel doctoral consortium and research
        April 2008
        195 pages
        ISBN:9781605580692
        DOI:10.1145/1355238
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Sponsors

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 03 April 2008

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. assessment
        2. authentic task contexts
        3. guided learning
        4. learning processes
        5. multimedia technology
        6. universal design for learning

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article

        Conference

        SIGMIS-CPR '08
        Sponsor:

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate 300 of 480 submissions, 63%

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
        Reflects downloads up to 28 Jan 2025

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2013)Computer PersonnelProceedings of the 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences10.1109/HICSS.2013.141(4105-4114)Online publication date: 7-Jan-2013
        • (2012)Observations regarding the history of the study of computer personnelProceedings of the 50th annual conference on Computers and People Research10.1145/2214091.2214140(189-198)Online publication date: 31-May-2012

        View Options

        Login options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Figures

        Tables

        Media

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media